NowComment
2-Pane Combined
Comments:
Full Summaries Sorted

Skim reading is the new normal

0 General Document comments
0 Sentence and Paragraph comments
0 Image and Video comments


Skim reading is the new normal. The effect on society is profound

New Conversation
Paragraph 1 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 1, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 1, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

New Conversation
Paragraph 2 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 2, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

When the reading brain skims texts, we don’t have time to grasp complexity, to understand another’s feelings or to perceive beauty. We need a new literacy for the digital age

New Conversation
Paragraph 3 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 3, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 3, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

New Conversation
Paragraph 4 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 4, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 5 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 5, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Shares

New Conversation
Paragraph 6 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 6, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

77,548
New Conversation
Paragraph 7 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 7, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Comments

New Conversation
Paragraph 8 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 8, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

1,364

New Conversation
Paragraph 9 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 9, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

reading
New Conversation
Paragraph 10 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Whole Image 0
No whole image conversations. Start one.

‘We need to cultivate a new kind of brain: a “bi-literate’ reading brain’ Illustration: Sebastien Thibault
New Conversation
Paragraph 11 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 11, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Look around on your next plane trip. The iPad is the new pacifier for babies and toddlers. Younger school-aged children read stories on smartphones; older boys don’t read at all, but hunch over video games. Parents and other passengers read on Kindles or skim a flotilla of email and news feeds. Unbeknownst to most of us, an invisible, game-changing transformation links everyone in this picture: the neuronal circuit that underlies the brain’s ability to read is subtly, rapidly changing - a change with implications for everyone from the pre-reading toddler to the expert adult.

New Conversation
Paragraph 12 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 12, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 12, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 12, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 12, Sentence 4 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 12, Sentence 5 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

As work in neurosciences indicates, the acquisition of literacy necessitated a new circuit in our species’ brain more than 6,000 years ago. That circuit evolved from a very simple mechanism for decoding basic information, like the number of goats in one’s herd, to the present, highly elaborated reading brain. My research depicts how the present reading brain enables the development of some of our most important intellectual and affective processes: internalized knowledge, analogical reasoning, and inference; perspective-taking and empathy; critical analysis and the generation of insight. Research surfacing in many parts of the world now cautions that each of these essential “deep reading” processes may be under threat as we move into digital-based modes of reading.

New Conversation
Paragraph 13 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 13, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 13, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 13, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 13, Sentence 4 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

mobile
New Conversation
Paragraph 14 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Whole Image 0
No whole image conversations. Start one.

New Conversation
Paragraph 15 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 15, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

New Conversation
Paragraph 16 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 16, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Pinterest

New Conversation
Paragraph 17 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 17, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

There’s an old rule in neuroscience that does not alter with age: use it or lose it Photograph: Sjale/Getty Images/iStockphoto
New Conversation
Paragraph 18 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 18, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

This is not a simple, binary issue of print vs digital reading and technological innovation. As MIT scholar Sherry Turkle has written, we do not err as a society when we innovate, but when we ignore what we disrupt or diminish while innovating. In this hinge moment between print and digital cultures, society needs to confront what is diminishing in the expert reading circuit, what our children and older students are not developing, and what we can do about it.

New Conversation
Paragraph 19 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 19, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 19, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 19, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

We know from research that the reading circuit is not given to human beings through a genetic blueprint like vision or language; it needs an environment to develop. Further, it will adapt to that environment’s requirements – from different writing systems to the characteristics of whatever medium is used. If the dominant medium advantages processes that are fast, multi-task oriented and well-suited for large volumes of information, like the current digital medium, so will the reading circuit. As UCLA psychologist Patricia Greenfield writes, the result is that less attention and time will be allocated to slower, time-demanding deep reading processes, like inference, critical analysis and empathy, all of which are indispensable to learning at any age.

New Conversation
Paragraph 20 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 20, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 20, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 20, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 20, Sentence 4 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

The negative effects of screen reading can appear as early as fourth and fifth grade

New Conversation
Paragraph 21 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 21, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Increasing reports from educators and from researchers in psychology and the humanities bear this out. English literature scholar and teacher Mark Edmundson describes how many college students actively avoid the classic literature of the 19thand 20th centuries because they no longer have the patience to read longer, denser, more difficult texts. We should be less concerned with students’ “cognitive impatience,” however, than by what may underlie it: the potential inability of large numbers of students to read with a level of critical analysis sufficient to comprehend the complexity of thought and argument found in more demanding texts, whether in literature and science in college, or in wills, contracts and the deliberately confusing public referendum questions citizens encounter in the voting booth.

New Conversation
Paragraph 22 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 22, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 22, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 22, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Multiple studies show that digital screen use may be causing a variety of troubling downstream effects on reading comprehension in older high school and college students. In Stavanger, Norway, psychologist Anne Mangen and her colleagues studied how high school students comprehend the same material in different mediums. Mangen’s group asked subjects questions about a short story whose plot had universal student appeal (a lust-filled, love story); half of the students read Jenny, Mon Amour on a Kindle, the other half in paperback. Results indicated that students who read on print were superior in their comprehension to screen-reading peers, particularly in their ability to sequence detail and reconstruct the plot in chronological order.

New Conversation
Paragraph 26 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 26, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 26, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 26, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 26, Sentence 4 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Ziming Liu from San Jose State University has conducted a series of studies which indicate that the “new norm” in reading is skimming, with word-spotting and browsing through the text. Many readers now use an F or Z pattern when reading in which they sample the first line and then word-spot through the rest of the text. When the reading brain skims like this, it reduces time allocated to deep reading processes. In other words, we don’t have time to grasp complexity, to understand another’s feelings, to perceive beauty, and to create thoughts of the reader’s own.

New Conversation
Paragraph 27 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 27, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 27, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 27, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 27, Sentence 4 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

reading
New Conversation
Paragraph 28 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Whole Image 0
No whole image conversations. Start one.

New Conversation
Paragraph 29 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 29, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

New Conversation
Paragraph 30 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 30, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Pinterest

New Conversation
Paragraph 31 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 31, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

‘Multiple studies show that digital screen use may be causing a variety of troubling downstream effects on reading.’ Photograph: Westend61/Getty Images/Westend61
New Conversation
Paragraph 32 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 32, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 32, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Karin Littau and Andrew Piper have noted another dimension: physicality. Piper, Littau and Anne Mangen’s group emphasize that the sense of touch in print reading adds an important redundancy to information – a kind of “geometry” to words, and a spatial “thereness” for text. As Piper notes, human beings need a knowledge of where they are in time and space that allows them to return to things and learn from re-examination – what he calls the “technology of recurrence”. The importance of recurrence for both young and older readers involves the ability to go back, to check and evaluate one’s understanding of a text. The question, then, is what happens to comprehension when our youth skim on a screen whose lack of spatial thereness discourages “looking back.”

New Conversation
Paragraph 33 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 33, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 33, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 33, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 33, Sentence 4 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 33, Sentence 5 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

US media researchers Lisa Guernsey and Michael Levine, American University’s linguist Naomi Baron, and cognitive scientist Tami Katzir from Haifa University have examined the effects of different information mediums, particularly on the young. Katzir’s research has found that the negative effects of screen reading can appear as early as fourth and fifth grade - with implications not only for comprehension, but also on the growth of empathy.

New Conversation
Paragraph 34 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 34, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 34, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

We need to cultivate a new kind of brain

New Conversation
Paragraph 35 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 35, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

The possibility that critical analysis, empathy and other deep reading processes could become the unintended “collateral damage” of our digital culture is not a simple binary issue about print vs digital reading. It is about how we all have begun to read on any medium and how that changes not only what we read, but also the purposes for why we read. Nor is it only about the young. The subtle atrophy of critical analysis and empathy affects us all. It affects our ability to navigate a constant bombardment of information. It incentivizes a retreat to the most familiar silos of unchecked information, which require and receive no analysis, leaving us susceptible to false information and demagoguery.

New Conversation
Paragraph 36 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 36, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 36, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 36, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 36, Sentence 4 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 36, Sentence 5 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 36, Sentence 6 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

There’s an old rule in neuroscience that does not alter with age: use it or lose it. It is a very hopeful principle when applied to critical thought in the reading brain because it implies choice. The story of the changing reading brain is hardly finished. We possess both the science and the technology to identify and redress the changes in how we read before they become entrenched. If we work to understand exactly what we will lose, alongside the extraordinary new capacities that the digital world has brought us, there is as much reason for excitement as caution.

New Conversation
Paragraph 40 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 40, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 40, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 40, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 40, Sentence 4 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 40, Sentence 5 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

We need to cultivate a new kind of brain: a “bi-literate” reading brain capable of the deepest forms of thought in either digital or traditional mediums. A great deal hangs on it: the ability of citizens in a vibrant democracy to try on other perspectives and discern truth; the capacity of our children and grandchildren to appreciate and create beauty; and the ability in ourselves to go beyond our present glut of information to reach the knowledge and wisdom necessary to sustain a good society.

New Conversation
Paragraph 41 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 41, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 41, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

  • Maryanne Wolf is the Director of the Center for Dyslexia, Diverse Learners, and Social Justice in the Graduate School of Education and Information Studies at UCLA

    Skim reading is the new normal. The effect on society is profound

    New Conversation
    Paragraph 43 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 43, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 43, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 44 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 44, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

    When the reading brain skims texts, we don’t have time to grasp complexity, to understand another’s feelings or to perceive beauty. We need a new literacy for the digital age

    New Conversation
    Paragraph 45 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 45, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 45, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

    New Conversation
    Paragraph 46 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 46, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 47 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 47, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

    Shares

    New Conversation
    Paragraph 48 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 48, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

    77,548
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 49 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 49, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

    Comments

    New Conversation
    Paragraph 50 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 50, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    1,364
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 51 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 51, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

    reading
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 52 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Whole Image 0
    No whole image conversations. Start one.

    ‘We need to cultivate a new kind of brain: a “bi-literate’ reading brain’ Illustration: Sebastien Thibault
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 53 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 53, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

    Look around on your next plane trip. The iPad is the new pacifier for babies and toddlers. Younger school-aged children read stories on smartphones; older boys don’t read at all, but hunch over video games. Parents and other passengers read on Kindles or skim a flotilla of email and news feeds. Unbeknownst to most of us, an invisible, game-changing transformation links everyone in this picture: the neuronal circuit that underlies the brain’s ability to read is subtly, rapidly changing - a change with implications for everyone from the pre-reading toddler to the expert adult.

    New Conversation
    Paragraph 54 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 54, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 54, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 54, Sentence 3 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 54, Sentence 4 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 54, Sentence 5 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

    As work in neurosciences indicates, the acquisition of literacy necessitated a new circuit in our species’ brain more than 6,000 years ago. That circuit evolved from a very simple mechanism for decoding basic information, like the number of goats in one’s herd, to the present, highly elaborated reading brain. My research depicts how the present reading brain enables the development of some of our most important intellectual and affective processes: internalized knowledge, analogical reasoning, and inference; perspective-taking and empathy; critical analysis and the generation of insight. Research surfacing in many parts of the world now cautions that each of these essential “deep reading” processes may be under threat as we move into digital-based modes of reading.

    New Conversation
    Paragraph 55 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 55, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 55, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 55, Sentence 3 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 55, Sentence 4 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

    mobile
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 56 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Whole Image 0
    No whole image conversations. Start one.

    New Conversation
    Paragraph 57 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 57, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 57, Sentence 4 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 57, Sentence 6 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

    There’s an old rule in neuroscience that does not alter with age: use it or lose it Photograph: Sjale/Getty Images/iStockphoto
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 58 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 58, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

    This is not a simple, binary issue of print vs digital reading and technological innovation. As MIT scholar Sherry Turkle has written, we do not err as a society when we innovate, but when we ignore what we disrupt or diminish while innovating. In this hinge moment between print and digital cultures, society needs to confront what is diminishing in the expert reading circuit, what our children and older students are not developing, and what we can do about it.

    New Conversation
    Paragraph 59 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 59, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 59, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 59, Sentence 3 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

    We know from research that the reading circuit is not given to human beings through a genetic blueprint like vision or language; it needs an environment to develop. Further, it will adapt to that environment’s requirements – from different writing systems to the characteristics of whatever medium is used. If the dominant medium advantages processes that are fast, multi-task oriented and well-suited for large volumes of information, like the current digital medium, so will the reading circuit. As UCLA psychologist Patricia Greenfield writes, the result is that less attention and time will be allocated to slower, time-demanding deep reading processes, like inference, critical analysis and empathy, all of which are indispensable to learning at any age.

    New Conversation
    Paragraph 60 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 60, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 60, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 60, Sentence 3 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 60, Sentence 4 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

    The negative effects of screen reading can appear as early as fourth and fifth grade

    New Conversation
    Paragraph 61 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 61, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

    Increasing reports from educators and from researchers in psychology and the humanities bear this out. English literature scholar and teacher Mark Edmundson describes how many college students actively avoid the classic literature of the 19thand 20th centuries because they no longer have the patience to read longer, denser, more difficult texts. We should be less concerned with students’ “cognitive impatience,” however, than by what may underlie it: the potential inability of large numbers of students to read with a level of critical analysis sufficient to comprehend the complexity of thought and argument found in more demanding texts, whether in literature and science in college, or in wills, contracts and the deliberately confusing public referendum questions citizens encounter in the voting booth.

    New Conversation
    Paragraph 62 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 62, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 62, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 62, Sentence 3 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

    Multiple studies show that digital screen use may be causing a variety of troubling downstream effects on reading comprehension in older high school and college students. In Stavanger, Norway, psychologist Anne Mangen and her colleagues studied how high school students comprehend the same material in different mediums. Mangen’s group asked subjects questions about a short story whose plot had universal student appeal (a lust-filled, love story); half of the students read Jenny, Mon Amour on a Kindle, the other half in paperback. Results indicated that students who read on print were superior in their comprehension to screen-reading peers, particularly in their ability to sequence detail and reconstruct the plot in chronological order.

    New Conversation
    Paragraph 66 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 66, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 66, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 66, Sentence 3 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 66, Sentence 4 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

    Ziming Liu from San Jose State University has conducted a series of studies which indicate that the “new norm” in reading is skimming, with word-spotting and browsing through the text. Many readers now use an F or Z pattern when reading in which they sample the first line and then word-spot through the rest of the text. When the reading brain skims like this, it reduces time allocated to deep reading processes. In other words, we don’t have time to grasp complexity, to understand another’s feelings, to perceive beauty, and to create thoughts of the reader’s own.

    New Conversation
    Paragraph 67 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 67, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 67, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 67, Sentence 3 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 67, Sentence 4 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

    reading
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 68 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Whole Image 0
    No whole image conversations. Start one.

    New Conversation
    Paragraph 69 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 69, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 69, Sentence 4 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 69, Sentence 6 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

    ‘Multiple studies show that digital screen use may be causing a variety of troubling downstream effects on reading.’ Photograph: Westend61/Getty Images/Westend61
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 70 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 70, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 70, Sentence 3 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

    Karin Littau and Andrew Piper have noted another dimension: physicality. Piper, Littau and Anne Mangen’s group emphasize that the sense of touch in print reading adds an important redundancy to information – a kind of “geometry” to words, and a spatial “thereness” for text. As Piper notes, human beings need a knowledge of where they are in time and space that allows them to return to things and learn from re-examination – what he calls the “technology of recurrence”. The importance of recurrence for both young and older readers involves the ability to go back, to check and evaluate one’s understanding of a text. The question, then, is what happens to comprehension when our youth skim on a screen whose lack of spatial thereness discourages “looking back.”

    New Conversation
    Paragraph 71 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 71, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 71, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 71, Sentence 3 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 71, Sentence 4 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 71, Sentence 5 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

    US media researchers Lisa Guernsey and Michael Levine, American University’s linguist Naomi Baron, and cognitive scientist Tami Katzir from Haifa University have examined the effects of different information mediums, particularly on the young. Katzir’s research has found that the negative effects of screen reading can appear as early as fourth and fifth grade - with implications not only for comprehension, but also on the growth of empathy.

    New Conversation
    Paragraph 72 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 72, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 72, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

    We need to cultivate a new kind of brain

    New Conversation
    Paragraph 73 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 73, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

    The possibility that critical analysis, empathy and other deep reading processes could become the unintended “collateral damage” of our digital culture is not a simple binary issue about print vs digital reading. It is about how we all have begun to read on any medium and how that changes not only what we read, but also the purposes for why we read. Nor is it only about the young. The subtle atrophy of critical analysis and empathy affects us all. It affects our ability to navigate a constant bombardment of information. It incentivizes a retreat to the most familiar silos of unchecked information, which require and receive no analysis, leaving us susceptible to false information and demagoguery.

    New Conversation
    Paragraph 74 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 74, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 74, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 74, Sentence 3 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 74, Sentence 4 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 74, Sentence 5 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 74, Sentence 6 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

    There’s an old rule in neuroscience that does not alter with age: use it or lose it. It is a very hopeful principle when applied to critical thought in the reading brain because it implies choice. The story of the changing reading brain is hardly finished. We possess both the science and the technology to identify and redress the changes in how we read before they become entrenched. If we work to understand exactly what we will lose, alongside the extraordinary new capacities that the digital world has brought us, there is as much reason for excitement as caution.

    New Conversation
    Paragraph 78 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 78, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 78, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 78, Sentence 3 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 78, Sentence 4 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 78, Sentence 5 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

    We need to cultivate a new kind of brain: a “bi-literate” reading brain capable of the deepest forms of thought in either digital or traditional mediums. A great deal hangs on it: the ability of citizens in a vibrant democracy to try on other perspectives and discern truth; the capacity of our children and grandchildren to appreciate and create beauty; and the ability in ourselves to go beyond our present glut of information to reach the knowledge and wisdom necessary to sustain a good society.

    New Conversation
    Paragraph 79 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 79, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 79, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

    • Maryanne Wolf is the Director of the Center for Dyslexia, Diverse Learners, and Social Justice in the Graduate School of Education and Information Studies at UCLA
    • New Conversation
      Paragraph 80 0
      No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
      New Conversation
      Paragraph 80, Sentence 1 0
      No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  • New Conversation
    Paragraph 42 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 42, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.

DMU Timestamp: August 22, 2018 19:40

General Document Comments 0
Start a new Document-level conversation

Image
0 comments, 0 areas
add area
add comment
change display
Video
add comment

Quickstart: Commenting and Sharing

How to Comment
  • Click icons on the left to see existing comments.
  • Desktop/Laptop: double-click any text, highlight a section of an image, or add a comment while a video is playing to start a new conversation.
    Tablet/Phone: single click then click on the "Start One" link (look right or below).
  • Click "Reply" on a comment to join the conversation.
How to Share Documents
  1. "Upload" a new document.
  2. "Invite" others to it.

Logging in, please wait... Blue_on_grey_spinner