Funds of Knowledge for Teaching: Using a Qualitative Approach to Connect Homes and Classrooms
Author(s): Luis C. Moll, Cathy Amanti, Deborah Neff and Norma Gonzalez
Source: Theory Into Practice, 2, Qualitative Issues in Educational Research (Spring, 1992), pp. 132-141
Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1476399 Accessed: 16-08-2017 17:47 UTC
For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms
Taylor & Francis, Ltd. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
Theory Into Practice
This content downloaded from 141.209.151.208 on Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:47:57 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Luis C. Moll
Cathy Amanti
Deborah Neff
Norma Gonzalez
Funds of Knowledge for Teaching: Using a Qualitative Approach
to Connect Homes and Classrooms
This approach is par-
education and anthropology that is studying ticularly important in dealing with students whose household and classroom practices within households are usually viewed as being "poor,"
working-class, Mexican communities in Tucson,
The primary purpose of this work is to
develop innovations in teaching that draw upon
the knowledge and skills found in local house-
Our claim is that by capitalizing on
household and other community resources, we can organize classroom instruction that far ex-ceeds in quality the rote-like instruction these
children commonly encounter in schools (see,
e.g., Moll & Greenberg, 1990; see also Moll & Dfaz, 1987).
To accomplish this goal, we have developed
a research approach that is based on under-standing households (and classrooms) qualita-
We utilize a combination of ethnographic
observations, open-ended interviewing strate-
gies, life histories, and case studies that, when
combined analytically, can portray accurately the
complex functions of households within their
Qualitative research
not only economically but in terms of the quality of experiences for the child.
Our research design attempts to coordinate
three interrelated activities: the ethnographic analysis of household dynamics, the examina-
tion of classroom practices, and the development These
study groups, collaborative ventures between teachers and researchers, are settings within
which we discuss our developing understanding
These study
groups also function as "mediating structures"
for developing novel classroom practices that
involve strategic connections between these two
entities (see Moll et al., 1990).
In this article we discuss recent develop-
ments in establishing these "strategic connec-
tions" that take the form of joint household re- search between classroom teachers and uni-
versity based researchers, and the subsequent
development of ethnographically informed offers a range of methodological alternatives that
We first present a summa- can fathom the array of cultural and intellectual
resources available to students and teachers ry of our household studies and the findings that form the bases of our pedagogical work.
We then present an example of recent research
Luis C. Moll is associate professor of education at
the University of Arizona; Cathy Amanti is a sixth between a classroom teacher and an anthropol- grade bilingual teacher (on leave) and a doctoral ogist, highlighting details of their visit to a student in anthropology at the University of Arizona; household, and the teacher's development of
and Deborah Neff and Norma Gonzalez are anthro- an instructional activity based on their observa-
We conclude with some comments on the
thropology, University of Arizona. work presented.
Theory Into Practice, Volume XXXI, Number 2, Spring 1992
This content downloaded from 141.209.151.208 on Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:47:57 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Some Basic Findings |
|
Table 1 |
|
As noted, central to our project is the quali- |
A Sample of Household Funds of Knowledge |
|
|
This approach in- |
Agriculture |
Material & Scientific |
|
volves, for one, understanding the history of the |
|
||
border region between Mexico and the United |
and Mining |
Knowledge |
|
States and other aspects of the sociopolitical |
Ranching and farming |
Construction |
|
and economic context of the households (see, |
|
||
Horse riding skills |
Carpentry |
|
|
e.g., Velez-lbanez, in press; see also Heyman, |
|
||
Animal management |
Roofing |
|
|
It also involves analyz- |
|
||
Soil and irrigation |
Masonry |
|
|
ing the social history of the households, their |
|
||
systems |
Painting |
|
|
origins and development, and most prominently |
|
||
Crop planting |
Design and archi- |
|
|
for our purposes, the labor history of the families, |
Hunting, tracking, |
tecture |
|
which reveals the accumulated bodies of |
dressing |
|
|
knowledge of the households (see Velez-lbfaez |
|
|
|
& Greenberg, 1989). |
Mining |
Repair |
|
With our sample,1 this knowledge is broad |
Airplane |
|
|
|
Timbering |
|
|
and diverse, as depicted in abbreviated formMinerals |
Automobile |
|
|
Notice that household knowledge Blasting may |
Tractor |
|
|
include information about farming and animal Equipment operation |
House maintenance |
|
|
management, associated with households' rural |
|
|
|
|
and maintenance |
|
|
origins, or knowledge about construction and |
|
|
|
building, related to urban occupations, as well |
|
|
|
|
Economics |
Medicine |
|
as knowledge about many other matters, such |
|
|
|
|
Business |
Contemporary medicine |
|
as trade, business, and finance on both sides of |
|
||
|
Market values |
Drugs |
|
the border (see, e.g., Moll & Greenberg, 1990). |
First aid procedures |
|
|
|
Appraising |
|
|
We use the term "funds of knowledge" to refer |
Anatomy |
|
|
|
Renting and selling |
|
|
to these historically accumulated and culturally |
Midwifery |
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
developed bodies of knowledge and skills es- |
|
|
|
|
Labor laws |
|
|
sential for household or individual functioning |
Folk medicine |
|
|
|
Building codes |
|
|
and well-being (Greenberg, 1989; Tapia, 1991; |
|
|
|
Velez-lbfaez, 1988). |
Consumer knowledge Herbal knowledge |
|
|
Accounting |
Folk cures |
|
|
|
|
||
Our approach also involves studying how |
Folk veterinary cures |
|
|
household members use their funds of knowl- |
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
edge in dealing with changing, and often diffi- |
|
|
We |
Household Management Religion |
|
|
|
|
are particularly interested in how families develop Budgets social networks that interconnect them with their Childcare
social environments (most importantly with oth Cooking -
er households), and how these social relation Appliance - repairs
ships facilitate the development and exchange of resources, including knowledge, skills, and
Catechism
Baptisms
Bible studies
Moral knowledge
and ethics
labor, that enhance the households' ability to ships with the same person or with various per-
survive or thrive (see, e.g., Moll & Greenberg, The person from whom the child learns
1990; Velez-lbanez & Greenberg,1989; see also carpentry, for example, may also be the uncle
Keefe & Padilla, 1987). with whom the child's family regularly celebrates
Two aspects of these household arrange-birthdays or organizes barbecues, as well as
ments merit emphasis here, especially becausethe person with whom the child's father goes
they contrast so sharply with typical classroomfishing on weekends.
One is that these networks are flexi- Thus, the "teacher" in these home based
ble, adaptive, and active, and may involve mul- contexts of learning will know the child as a tiple persons from outside the homes; in our "whole" person, not merely as a "student," tak- terms, they are "thick" and "multi-stranded," ing into account or having knowledge about the
meaning that one may have multiple relation multiple - spheres of activity within which the child
Volume XXXI, Number 2 133
This content downloaded from 141.209.151.208 on Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:47:57 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
In comparison, the typical teach-
er-student relationship seems "thin" and "single-
stranded," as the teacher "knows" the students
only from their performance within rather limited
classroom contexts.
motivated by the children's interests and ques-tions; in contrast to classrooms, knowledge is
obtained by the children, not imposed by the This totality of experiences, the cultural structuring of the households, whether related
Additionally, in contrast to the households to work or play, whether they take place individ- and their social networks, the classrooms seemually, with peers, or under the supervision of
encapsulated, if not isolated, from the social adults, helps constitute the funds of knowledge When children bring to school (Moll & Greenberg,
funds of knowledge are not readily available 1990).
within households, relationships with individuals
outside the households are activated to meet |
Funds of Knowledge for Teaching |
In class- |
Our analysis of funds of knowledge repre- |
rooms, however, teachers rarely draw on the sents a positive (and, we argue, realistic) view resources of the "funds of knowledge" of the ofhouseholds as containing ample cultural and
child's world outside the context of the class- |
cognitive resources with great, potential utility for |
room. |
classroom instruction (see Moll & Greenberg, |
This view of house-
As Velez-lbanez holds,we should mention, contrasts sharply with (1988) has observed, reciprocity represents prevailing an and accepted perceptions of working-
"attempt to establish a social relationship class on an families as somehow disorganized social- Whether symmetrical or asymlyand-deficient intellectually; perceptions that
metrical, the exchange expresses and symbolarewell-accepted and rarely challenged in the izes human social interdependence" (p. field 142) of . education and elsewhere (however, see
That is, reciprocal practices establish serious McDermott, 1987; Moll & Diaz, 1987; Taylor & obligations based on the assumption of "con -
Dorsey Gaines, 1988; see also Velez-lbanez, in fianza" (mutual trust), which is reestablished or
press).
confirmed with each exchange, and leads to the But how can teachers make use of these
Each
We hav exchange with relatives, friends, and neighbors
been experimenting with the aforementione entails not only many practical activities (every-
arrangements that involve developing after thing from home and automobile repair to ani-
school settings where we meet with teachers t mal care and music) but constantly provides
analyze their classrooms, discuss household contexts in which learning can occur-contexts,
observations, and develop innovations in th for example, where children have ample oppor-
These after-school setting tunities to participate in activities with people
they trust (Moll & Greenberg, 1990). represent social contexts for informing, assist ing, and supporting the teachers' work; setting
A related observation, as well, is that chil-
in our terms, for teachers and researchers to dren in the households are not passive by-
exchange funds of knowledge (for details, se standers, as they seem in the classrooms, but
Moll et al.,1990).2 active participants in a broad range of activities
In analyzing our efforts, however, we real- mediated by these social relationships (see La
ized that we had relied on the researchers to
In some cases, their participa-
present their findings to the teachers and to f tion is central to the household's functioning, as
ure out the relevance of that information for
Although we were careful about ou
production of the home, or use their knowledge
of English to mediate the household's commudesires- not to impose but to collaborate wit nications with outside institutions, such as theteachers, this collaboration did not extend to
In other the cases In our work with
they are active in household chores, such teachers, as at least as far as household data were
repairing appliances or caring for younger concerned,sib- we relied on a "transmission" mod-
lings. el: We presented the information, teachers re-
Our analysis suggests that within these ceived it, without actively involving them-
contexts, much of the teaching and learning is selves in the development or production of
134 Theory Into Practice
This content downloaded from 141.209.151.208 on Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:47:57 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
This content downloaded from 141.209.151.208 on Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:47:57 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
But how could it be otherwise? We
Was it feasible to ask teachers to become field have fears and assumptions, and perhaps misun-
What would they get out of it? I for one did not know exactly what to
Could they develop similar insights to those de expect - when I first went into the Lopez home with veloped by the anthropologists in our research I had heard talk of dysfunctional homes, lack
of discipline, lack of support systems and so forth, Could they, for
but remained skeptical of these negative character-example, with little experience, understand the
Having done fieldwork before, I was accus- subtleties of ethnographic observations? tomed to this kind of uncertainty.
In what follows we present a case example
Encyclopedias on corner bookshelves provided a
natural entree into topics of family history and social networks of exchange, literacy, and the parents' pride
in their child's achievements.
DN: Eventually, we returned to the questionnaire, moving on to discuss the family's labor history.
CA: As we progressed asking questions about
family background and labor history, I began to re
DN: At first, going into the Lopez home, I felt a lax, although I was concerned with whether I wa little nervous too, because it was my experience to getting enough material that would be useful later i
Actually I never totall interacting with the families before gaining the kind disengaged from my role as a teacher and when
of entree we were hoping to gain in this first intersuch- things as cross-border trade came up, I thought
I didn't realize then that Cathy, as Carlos's this would be a great topic to use in my classroom
teacher, had a natural entree into the home, and |
and I tried to figure out how I could capture thi |
|
|
I resource for teaching. |
|
||
She was their son's |
|
|
|
teacher, and so we were treated with a tremendous |
Seeing Beyond Stereotypes |
|
|
I was amazed at |
|
||
how easily and quickly Cathy gained rapport with |
An important aspect of the teachers' partic- |
|
|
Mrs. Lopez, and how much the Lopezes opened up ipation in the household research became th |
|
||
to us. |
more sophisticated understanding they devel |
|
|
The anthropologist noticed that the teacher
There is much teachers do not know about their held a special status with the family that could
help establish the trust necessary for the ex students - or families that could be immediately After making sure thathelpful in the classroom, as the following com-the family understood the purpose of the visit, ments illustrate.
the teacher started the interview, and was sur-
prised by how forthcoming the mother was with
Cathy, the teacher, also realized
of the multicultural experiences their son, Carlos, that she was starting to blend her role as a
It wasn't just a super-teacher with her new role as researcher; as she ficial experience for him.
gathered new information about the family, their CA: Half of the children in my classroom are
history and activities, she started making con- international travelers and yet this experience is not
recognized or valued because they are Mexican
Anglo children may spend a summer in France and we make a big deal about Carlos spends summers in Mag-dalena, Mexico, yet he's probably rarely been asked to share his experiences with anyone.
His visits to Mexico have been more than 1- or
He His family's cross-border activities extend back genera- His fa-ther began coming to the U.S. during his summer
thing was to get the family history so we would have vacations, when he worked as a migrant worker in
a baseline for discussing literacy, parenting, attitudes He eventually decided to stay here per-
towards school, and funds of knowledge.
The issue of balancing use of the questionnaire
and letting it go to probe on emergent issues was
That's why it was helpful
For example,
during one later interview, I was prepared to accept a short answer from a parent and go on to the next question, but at Deborah's urging, I probed further
and ended up with good information on religious de- When he is there he plays with his
votion as a fund of knowledge, something that I would They are allowed to wander freely around
have missed. They like to play hide-and-seek
136 Theory Into Practice
This content downloaded from 141.209.151.208 on Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:47:57 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
and sometimes they are taken places by older rela- |
We had little idea of what Carlos's life |
They like to visit a pharmacy that one of his |
was really like outside of the classroom, and what |
aunts owns and one of his older cousins is married |
he knew about the world. |
to someone who works on three ranches. |
CA: I couldn't have done this work without the |
Onceanthropological perspective and methodology I
One thing he likes to do when Ethnography is different from
he visits a ranch is play with bow and arrow. other He It's open-end- says his cousin's husband will give him and hised, you go in with an open mind-not prejudging-
cousins a thousand pesos if they find the arrows being ." totally receptive to everything you hear and
Carlos also reports playing cards when he visits I didn't want to know only if the parents read
Magdalena and that he has gone fishing near Santastories to their children or how many books they
I wasn't tallying the hours of TV the children
DN:lt is precisely through information of these I feel that I learned much more than kinds of social activities that we identify funds ofthat with a greater breadth of knowledge because I
knowledge that can be used in the classroom to was not narrow in my focus.
help improve his academic development. DN: Carlos is embedded in a home and world,
CA: Furthermore, because of these experienc continuous - with his family's history and in a culture es, Carlos and many of my other students showthat is at times discontinuous from that found in
great deal of interest in economic issues, because How to take advantage of these resources in This experience of going into the home,
in immigration law, but also in laws in general; theytaking off your lens for a moment, trying to step would ask me why there are so many laws here that outside your assumptions to see Carlos on his own These children have had terms, in his own turf, is one way to do this.
the background experiences to explore in-depth is- We learned a lot during these three interviews sues that tie in with a sixth grade curriculum, suchthat fractured stereotypes that we had heard others as the study of other countries, different forms say of Carlos's parents not
government, economic systems, and so on. |
only care, but have a very strong philosophy of child- |
Carlos himself is involved in what we could call |
rearing that is supportive of education, including |
They have goals of a university Not only does he sell candy from Mexico but, ac- education for their children, instill strong values of
His mother of pride and a strong sense of identity-in addition
says Carlos got the idea to sell candy from other to the more practical knowledge in which their chil- |
|
children. |
These values are not |
We didn't uncover this only through questioning |
All of the households we visit- |
but from being there when one child came over to |
ed possess similar values and funds of knowledge |
He was really proud that can be tapped for use in the classrooms.
Here But the workshops and fieldwork experience are
There's the extensive reflection
This experience later turned out to be the seed for the learning module I devel-
and writing up stage, the record of the experience,
from which we read segments a few minutes ago.
oped for the project, which I will share with you in a This reflection process is not to be underempha- |
|
|
few minutes. |
sized, for it is not just what people say that matters, |
|
|
|
|
The two presenters then discuss how the |
but the subtext, and our observations and interpre- |
|
specific qualitative methods of study influenced |
tations; for example, the way Mrs. L6pez's eyes lit |
|
up when she showed us the trophy her son had won |
|
|
not only the nature of the information collected |
in the science fair, Mr. Lopez's pride in his philoso- |
|
from the family, yielding data about their experi- |
And then there is |
|
ences and funds of knowledge, but provided |
the translation of this material into viable lessons for |
|
them with a more sophisticated understanding |
the classroom. |
|
of the student, his family, and their social world. |
The presenters pointed out that it is the |
|
This more elaborate understanding helped the |
|
|
teacher, not the anthropologist, who is ultimate- |
|
|
teacher transform this information into a useful |
|
|
instructional activity. |
ly the bridge between the students' world, theirs |
|
DN: It is so important to learn how culture is |
and their family's funds of knowledge, and the |
|
expressed in students' lives, how students live their |
However, teachers need |
|
They can form part of study Only a part of that child is present in the groups, social networks, that will provide the
Volume XXXI, Number 2 137
This content downloaded from 141.209.151.208 on Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:47:57 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
needed assistance and support in analyzing in-
formation and in elaborating instructional prac-
tices.
Experimenting with Practice
The presentation concluded with a descrip-tion by Cathy, the teacher, of the development
of a theme study, or learning module, as we
called them, based on information gathered from
Notice the emphasis on the in-quiry process, on the students becoming active learners, and on strategically using their social
contacts outside the classroom to access new
of the chart-a fourth column, something new for me-to record new questions students had, to help
them see that learning is ongoing, that it does not
We then
surveyed and graphed favorite candies of the class.
With the assistance of the teacher, the stu-dents pursued their interests by focusing their
inquiry on a narrower topic and by specifying a
As is common in research,
the class relied on all their resources, including
Notice, however, that this was not a
typical parent visit to correct or sort papers; the
knowledge for the development of their studies purpose . of the parent's visit was to contribute
Here is her summary: intellectually to the students' academic activity.
This parent, in effect, became a cognitive re-
CA: After we had completed our field work and
source for the students and teacher in this written field notes for all our interviews, it truly was
left up to us, the teachers, to decide how we classroom were (see also Moll & Greenberg, 1990). going to use the knowledge we had gained about
We spent 2 days with
dents chose one of the questions they'd generated consultants and everyone else who had been work-
They chose, "What ingredients are used ing on the project and brainstormed and bounced
I framed the pursuit of
the answer using the version of the scientific meth-
ers from my school and together we developed a
After writing their question on learning module with a rather unusual theme-can-
You've already heard that Deborah and I wit-
answer their question; then they hypothesized what nessed Carlos selling Mexican candy to a neighbor.
ingredients they'd find on the candy labels they
The fifth grade teacher I worked with also uncovered
brought in the next day.
He interviewed a parent who is an ex-
In a truly collabo-
list of ingredients in the candy samples they'd brought rative effort, we outlined a week's worth of activities
in, they graphed the frequency of occurrence of the
Then I had them divide the
To focus students' thinking on the theme, I had
I recorded
found in the Mexican candy samples and one of their ideas on a large piece of white paper on the
We Next, I had them come up with a definition for
We were all sur- This was not as easy as you might
prised to see that fewer ingredients are used in They'd mentioned gum and sunflower seeds
Mexican candies and that they don't use artificial while brainstorming, which I wasn't sure should be
But I didn't tell them this
because I wanted them to use their analytical skills The next day one of the parents of my students,
Mrs. Rodriguez, came in to teach us how to make Actually, they
This turned out to got stuck deciding if salty things like picalim6n and
Before she came in that
morning, the students divided up to make advertis-
ing posters and labels for the candy because we
were going to sell what we made at the school talent
When Mrs. Rodriguez arrived, she became
For those not familiar with this method, we While the candy was cooking, she talked
to the class for over an hour and taught all of us not
only how to make different kinds of candy but also
In the next column, we recorded what they such things as the difference in U.S. and Mexican The third column, the "L" column, isfood consumption and production, nutritional value
to be used at the end of the unit to record what the My respect and awe of Mrs. After working with Rodriguez grew by leaps and bounds that morning.
the project consultant, I added another W at the end Finally, the students packaged and priced their candy.
138 Theory Into Practice
This content downloaded from 141.209.151.208 on Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:47:57 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
The unit concludes, somewhat prematurely, as the teacher notes, with the students summa-
rizing and reflecting upon their work, and by
The
teacher, in turn, has become a "mediator," pro-viding strategic assistance that would facilitate
the students' inquiry and work.
CA: The last day of the unit, students wrote
Then they began to formulate new
Examples of their new questions are:
"What is candy like in Africa?" and "What candy do
As you can see, if we'd had
We did, however, cover
many areas of the curriculum in one short week-
math, science, health, consumer education, cross-cultural practices, advertising, and food production.
From the questions the students came up with
alone, we could have continued investigating using
innumerable research and critical thinking skills for a
If we had continued
this type of activity all year, by the end we would
have been an experienced research team and my
role would have been to act as facilitator helping the students answer their own questions.
interest to them, or important to the teacher, or for achieving curricular goals.
Our concept of funds of knowledge is inno-
vative, we believe, in its special relevance to
teaching, and contrasts with the more general
term "culture," or with the concept of a "culture-sensitive curriculum," and with the latter's reli-
Although the term "funds of knowledge" is not meant to replace the anthropological concept of culture,
it is more precise for our purposes because of
its emphasis on strategic knowledge and relat-
It is specific funds
of knowledge pertaining to the social, econom-ic, and productive activities of people in a local
region, not "culture" in its broader, anthropolog-
ical sense, that we seek to incorporate strategi-cally into classrooms.
Indispensable in this scenario are the re-
search tools-the theory, qualitative methods of study, and ways of analyzing and interpreting
These are what allow the teachers (and
others) to assume, authentically, the role of re-
searchers in household or classroom settings.
Conclusion |
They are also what help redefine the homes of |
|
the students as rich in funds of knowledge that |
|
|
|
|
|
We have presented a single aspect of a |
|
|
|
represent important resources for educational |
|
broader, multidimensional research project: |
|
|
|
change. |
|
teachers as co-researchers using qualitative |
|
|
|
We are currently starting the next phase of |
|
methods to study household knowledge, and |
|
|
|
study, involving teachers in five different schools |
|
drawing upon this knowledge to develop a par- |
|
|
|
serving both Mexican and Native-American stu- |
|
The insights gleaned from |
|
|
|
dents.5 The research design remains the same: |
|
approaching the homes ethnographically, and |
|
|
|
developing our understanding of households and |
|
adapting the method to the educational goals of |
|
|
|
classrooms and collaborating with teachers in |
|
the project, were a result of a genuine teacher- |
|
|
|
conducting the research and in developing aca- |
|
researcher (in this case, anthropologist) collab- |
|
|
We have learned that it is feasible and |
Now, |
|
however, we have teachers with research expe- |
|
|
useful to have teachers visit households for re- |
|
|
rience helping us organize the study groups, |
|
|
|
|
|
These are neither casual vis- |
|
|
|
developing further the methodology for doing |
|
its nor school-business visits, but visits in which |
|
|
the teachers assume the role of the learner, |
the home investigations, conceptualizing and |
|
implementing promising instructional activities, |
|
|
|
|
|
and in doing so, help establish a fundamentally In this new study we |
|
|
new, more symmetrical relationship with the |
|
|
parents of the students. |
plan to include principals, as co-researchers, and |
|
parents in the study groups, as an attempt to |
|
|
This relationship can become the basis for rethink our respective roles and develop our the exchange of knowledge about family or collective funds of knowledge about teaching
school matters, reducing the insularity of class-and learning.
rooms, and contributing to the academic con- One of the hallmarks of qualitative research
It can also become, as illus- is that strategies often evolve within the process
As teachers, administrators, and par-
teams among the students to study topics ofents become more aware of the linkages that
Volume XXXI, Number 2 139
This content downloaded from 141.209.151.208 on Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:47:57 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
can be created utilizing this methodology, and
become comfortable with the redefinition of roles
that it entails, new strategies of implementation
As the research unfolds, the
constitutive nature of the inquiry process be-
comes apparent, as teacher, researcher, par-
ent, child, and administrator jointly create and
negotiate the form and function of the explora-
tion.
success, especially the academic benefits to the
students, in order to improve our accountability to
the schools and communities in which we work.
References
Laboratory settings and t
Journal of Teacher
Education, 36(6), 2-8.
Roots of the whole-languag
The Elementary School Journal, 92,
113-127.
Notes |
Funds of knowledge: |
|
Historical constitution, social distribution, and |
|
|
|
|
Our sample includes households of students in
the project teachers' classrooms, as well as students
from other classrooms, but in the same general gy, Santa Fe, NM.
In total, including previous projects, we |
|
|
have observed in approximately 100 homes. |
The emergence of the waged |
|
life course on the United States-Mexico border. |
|
|
For similar ideas regarding the development of American Ethologist, 17, 348-359.
teacher "labs" or activity settings, see, for example, Chicano ethnicity. Berliner (1985), Laboratory of Comparative Human Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
Cognition (1982), and Tharp and Gallimore (1988) La . An anthropological perspec-
The creation of study groups is also a common practice among whole-language teachers and re-
searchers (see Goodman, 1989).
Field notes are generally descriptive to provide Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press.
(1982). views, usually based on a questionnaire, focus on A model system for the study of learning diffi- topics of specific relevance to the project, such as The Quarterly Newsletter of the Labora-
the participation of children in a household activity. tory of Comparative Human Cognition, 4(3), 39-In the project described herein, all notes were pre- 66.
Tucson: and lap-top computers were made available to the The University of Arizona Press.
The explanation of minority
sisted the teachers in interviewing, and provided Anthropology and Educa- feedback on the consistency, completeness, and tion Quarterly, 18, 361-364.
Change as the goal of
Anthropology and Educa- lease time from teaching to conduct observations tion Quarterly, 18, 300-311.
Re Moll, - Creating zones
lease time, we should point out, is routinely granted of possibilities: Combining social contexts for
Vygotsky and ed-
Cambridge, U.K.: Cam-
menting the knowledge base of the students' homes. bridge University Press.
The presentation (August 5, 1991) was before Moll, L.C., Velez-lbanez, C., Greenberg, J., Whit-
approximately 200 principals and other administra-tors (including the new superintendent) of the local
school district.
One of our goals for 1992-1993 is to develop the
project in other regions of the country through simi-
For example, we are cur-
rently piloting an initial teacher-anthropologist com-
Community knowledge and classroom
300-87-0131).
Tucson: University of Arizona, College of Edu-
cation and Bureau of Applied Research in An-
thropology.
Cultural reproduction: Funds of
target schools and communities, including demogra- knowledge as survival strategies in the Mexican
phy, economy, migration, educational achievement Unpublished doctoral dis-
levels, and community resources, before developing sertation, University of Arizona, Tucson.
Growing up
We are also devel- |
Ports- |
oping assessment procedures to document project |
mouth, NH: Heinemann. |
140 Theory Into Practice |
|
This content downloaded from 141.209.151.208 on Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:47:57 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Rousing minds to |
Forma- |
|
|
life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social |
|
tion and transformation of funds of knowledge |
|
Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University |
|
among U.S. Mexican households in the context |
|
Press. |
|
Paper presented at the an- |
|
Networks of exchange |
|
||
nual meeting of the American Anthropological |
|
||
among Mexicans in the U.S. and Mexico: Local |
Association, Washington, DC. |
|
|
level mediating responses to national and inter- Velez-lbarez, C., Moll, L.C., Gonzalez, N., & Neff,
Urban Anthropology,
17(1), 27-51.
U.S. Mexicans in the
borderlands: Being poor without the underclass.
Los Angeles: Sage.
tip
This content downloaded from 141.209.151.208 on Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:47:57 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Logging in, please wait...
0 General Document comments
0 Sentence and Paragraph comments
0 Image and Video comments
General Document Comments 0