Public Documents can be seen and commented on by everyone (most NowComment documents are private, invitation-only).
2
|
While highlighting the potential negative impacts is important, the comment could be more impactful by suggesting possible solutions or strategies for managing mobile phone use and promoting healthier relationships.
https://geometrydashworld.online
This entire paragraph is Deborah talking about how there are two sides to the story, but the paragraph before it really set’s it up by ending with “But by the time I got the message and called her back, she’d changed her mind.”
How do you think? Is it important to turn to reliable and verified sources of information? I am especially interested in this question when it comes to official documents or other important details. Do you think this helps avoid mistakes, misunderstandings or misinterpretation of information?
Further elaboration on the implementation and potential challenges of the proposed model would enhance the paper’s impact.
https://trafficjam3d.com
Through the use of a simile, the author establishes a comparison between the cells of Henrieta, and the size of the earth. Thus this creates a sense of understanding for the reader, in which the comparison serves to establish the large impact Henrietta’s cells had on the world of science-helping cure many diseases, while benefiting the lives of many.
I like this sentence because it gives context from the perspective of the prisoners. It is concise and direct, but gets the point across that the prisoners, assuming they are being sincere, feel bad about their actions and that is why they volunteered. The author makes a very interesting choice, however, to describe their response using a simile, saying they replied, “like a refrain,” which, despite what they are saying, makes readers question their sincerity. This simple wording forces us to question what their actual motives are in this situation or if they are truly guilty.
These long, complex sentences portray a scientific appeal. They push an idea of scientific understanding, added to with the professional language utilized throughout the paragraph.
The author Gey’s dedication to his work through describing the process in which he captured some of his cells. Before a possibly life saving operation Gey focused on samples of his tumor trying to make them just like Henrietta’s.
Here, the author uses a complex sentence to emphasize the importance and severity of taking the risk. The author combines two sentences that otherwise stand alone.
This parallel structure emphasizes the growth of the published articles over the last 15 years. It gives a sense of urgency and reinforces the gravity of the situation.
This is the sentence where this chapter changes from focusing on Deborah and decides to focus on Joe. Specifically how Joe became a murderer.
Skloot uses speculation in this paragraph to emphasize the fear that Henrietta’s daughter in law felt when she heard that doctors all over were in possession of Henrietta’s cells. She realized that this knowledge is likely to affect Henrietta’s children and grandchildren, who currently didn’t even know the research was happening.
This sentence structure is compound-complex, which adds a lot of fluidity to this part of the chapter. It also changes the reading flow a lot because it is a bit easier to read because instead of having a lot of sentences with information and having it be choppy, there is just one sentence that has all the information that is needed.
The opening line sets the tone by emphasizing that true solitude requires a retreat from both physical and mental company. Reading and writing, even alone, can still involve engagement with the world.
https://houseofhazards.com
I liked how the author used the semi colon here to switch between different characters here. He used it to describe two different people, and where one of them went to church. It would have been hard to do this using normal sentance structure
In the first sentence, Skloot made use of dashes to add additional information and details of different kinds of cells scientists had grown. The additional details also gives a better insight on how scientists utilized tissue samples from their family, patients, and themselves. Skloot prolonged the second sentence by adding colon and semicolons to illustrate examples and demonstrate how the cells contribute to some historic discoveries.
Not only is this a complex sentence it highlights the irony of the lacks’ “pretty much supported the pharmaceutical industry” while still suffering from a bad heart, high blood pressure, etc.
The author intentionally included Stanley Gartler’s qualifications and his wide spread of influence to 700 other scientists to speak to the reader’s sense of credibility to what is being claimed by the geneticist.
The author is illustrating what it was like for her to write this very book, sharing her own experience as well as what it was like for her and Deborah.
The character Cliff is happy at the idea that white slave owners are buried under their black slaves. After hundreds of thousands suffered and argued the social hierarch. Because of the differences between their skin color. It is the opposite of what was expected to happen. It makes no difference in the after-life. He says: “they spending eternity in the same place”
This paragraph emphasizes how effective HeLa cells are, as well as how they get to the point of affecting things around them.
Even though the insertion of the phrase “seemingly out of nowhere” was abrupt, it actually contributed to more effective communication on how what Cliff is about to say may be surprising and off-putting. Outside of this context, the fact that this phrase has been inserted like that makes the phrase look like it came seemingly out of nowhere from a seemingly ordinary sentence. So it’s a phrase that says “seemingly out of nowhere” that appeared seemingly out of nowhere. This sentence makes the author’s display of information more immersive making the reader feel off-put just like Skloot felt off-put during this moment in conversation.
This points out the media being over eager to get excited about something. Earlier it was said that the cells would make people immortal. Also the “immortal” chicken heart didn’t turn out to be the miracle it was thought to be. “Cell sex” would help scientists out greatly, helping them determine which traits get passed down. I like Skloot starting a sentence with “and.” Its abrupt and gets the reader interested.
Very punchy sentence that holds a lot of emotion. Starting the sentence with a conjunction makes the sentence more impactful in my opinion, but I can’t put my finger on why. When I read this I picture someone sitting away in silence, letting this struggle eat away at them.
The author using this quote, really puts an emphasis on how awful that information really was. Most people would feel disbelief at what was said and it would most certainly feel validating when being told that, the information was complete nonsense.
Skloot uses a lengthier sentence here which appeals to logos. The content inside the sentence is entirely factual and instead of dividing the sentence into smaller bits, Skloot summarizes key information into this sentence. It logically conveys a lot of information in the most efficient and concise way possible.
This sentence is rather interestingly crafted, and it works very well. It begins with saying whom explicitly requires to tell about procedures – doctors. It then uses a semicolon to run into how there was uncertainty if that also applied to researchers who were working with patients who were not their own..
But he withered quickly. The choice to use the word withered about Gey’s condition is a powerful decision. Wither is a word we commonly associate with nature and decomposition. This man was decomposing while he was alive. Frightening stuff.
This makes the situation very dramatic as we can’t tell what the police would do based off of the information provided to them.
The use of a semicolon in this sentence compares what Lawrence and Sonny were doing in their lives. She uses a semicolon to show how similar they are and how they were successful in their lives.
In the sentence, “In 1960, French researchers had discovered that when cells were infected with certain viruses in culture, they clumped together and sometimes fused.”, Skloot chooses to begin the sentence with the specific year of 1960 and provides the French nationality of the researchers, which adds historical context to the paragraph. This use of syntax establishes ethos by presenting the scientific discovery of cell fusion through credible historical evidence.
Write Paper Reviews lacked depth. The https://essayservices.review/reviews/writepaper-com-review seemed inconsistent, making it challenging to gauge service reliability. Expected more detailed evaluations for better decision-making. Room for improvement here.
Paragraph 13 shows a prime example of segregation, revealing how it impacted even basic things in her life, like healthcare. The fact that Henrietta’s blood sample was labeled “COLORED” shows the extreme racism of the time. This shows how racial bias influenced even routine practices. Henrietta’s experience in the hospital, where her body was exploited without regard for her well-being, exemplifies the systemic racism and medical exploitation. The heartbreaking outcome, where her cells died due to contamination, adds to the narrative, emphasizing the dehumanizing practices faced by black communities.
The Yemen civil war, escalating since March 2015, stems from a Saudi-led coalition’s intervention supporting the internationally recognized government against Houthi rebels aligned with former president Ali Abdullah Saleh. I am working on the research paper about the conflict, initially expected to be brief and as I read at https://edubirdie.com/examples/civil-war/ which resulted in significant humanitarian crises, with nearly 100,000 reported deaths, 250,000 people displaced this year alone, and 80% of the population requiring assistance. Despite attempts at power transition and peace talks, the situation remains dire, with geopolitical tensions involving the UK, Saudi-led coalition, and Iran contributing to the complexity of the conflict.
The description of Day appeals to Pathos because it helps us understand Day more and feel emotion toward him.
We see in many of the authors sentences, their choice of using dashed sentences of further detail or evidence. This adds depth to the work, and intrigues the reader to keep reading and further understand the points that the author is trying to portray
This supporting detail providing evidence of the immoral acts allows the reader to fully understand how some of these experiments were carried out without consent. This results in the study to be halted, as the reader can fully understand due to the given evidence
The use of these dashes makes the entirety of this paragraph one sentence. It introduces the ideas of the NIH’s requirements as well as the need to protect the rights of research subjects. Research and testing must be proposed and approved. The dashes add emphasis on the process for this new regulated research.
Skloot uses a dash here to soften the strength of her statement. This statement shows how when people die, their lives can be dug into, and their private information can be shared because they can’t give consent. The dash clarifies that even people with parts of them still alive could have their records dug into and published with no consequences (at least back then). This appeals to logos because the author is showing her knowledge of the legal system back then.
Throughout this chapter and even the whole book, citations are used frequently. These add expert opinions and testimonies which put our minds deeper into the story as if we are there. In this section it helps us feel as if we are in the interview with BBC about Henrietta Lacks.
Click on a comment's summary to see it in context