<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Comments by Kurt Sudbrink</title>
    <description>Most recent public comments by Kurt Sudbrink</description>
    <link>https://nowcomment.com/users/107559</link>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://nowcomment.com/users/107559/comments"/>
    <item>
      <title>The author appears to recognize the complexity of the of this writing and so makes a point to draw us into the the debate by highlighting the &quot;we&quot; used by Feilds.</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/276337?scroll_to=2486629</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/276337?scroll_to=2486629</guid>
      <description>This felt purposeful and meant to bring me deeper into the conversation. It is is a good tool to keep readers motivated to read on even if they are getting tired.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2021 21:12:21 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I like this. I can imagine a conversation.</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/276337?scroll_to=2486628</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/276337?scroll_to=2486628</guid>
      <description>Sometimes when reading I get wrapped up in the emotion and argument of the author. I can lose a critical eye. By identifying opinion words and labelling them as such I can understand that the author is trying to convince me of this and I should be conscious of that fact.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2021 21:19:08 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
