Comments by Zelene Pineda Suchilt Most recent public comments by Zelene Pineda Suchilt https://nowcomment.com/users/11222 he's a new yorker but admires british formality https://nowcomment.com/documents/25283?scroll_to=292535 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25283?scroll_to=292535 Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:46:07 -0500 the exact date and recounting of the days activities. https://nowcomment.com/documents/25283?scroll_to=292534 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25283?scroll_to=292534 Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:46:07 -0500 Mixed https://nowcomment.com/documents/25276?scroll_to=275223 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25276?scroll_to=275223 The subject matter is great, yet not enough evidence. SHe must place things in context of history. The intimate nature of eva's relationship with Hitler forgives the intimate nature of the biographer's references. At the end of the day people will read it for the subject and not necessarily for the writing or history. There is a saturation of hitler and WWII literature. Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:45:50 -0500 She makes claims out of sheer assumption https://nowcomment.com/documents/25276?scroll_to=275209 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25276?scroll_to=275209 no facts to back it up, except through her family history. Her mother was a contemporary of Eva Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:45:50 -0500 we would have stopped reading https://nowcomment.com/documents/25276?scroll_to=275205 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25276?scroll_to=275205 The subject is so fascinating and rare, that it's worthy of a review, but a critics mind is a terrible thing to waste Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:45:50 -0500 A life well lived https://nowcomment.com/documents/25275?scroll_to=271223 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25275?scroll_to=271223 So many writers spend much of their lives inside a room. Mailer wanted to be well known during his lifetime and make history by having an exciting and engaging life. Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:45:48 -0500 It's up for debate https://nowcomment.com/documents/25275?scroll_to=271222 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25275?scroll_to=271222 The Last Romantic is a competitive title, many would protest to Mailer being the reigning "Last..." Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:45:47 -0500 Hemingway reads feminist though https://nowcomment.com/documents/25275?scroll_to=271220 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25275?scroll_to=271220 Hemingway's gift was the way he brought out the dignity in his characters and in his voice. Despite his being an athletic and masculine voice, it is also an honest and vulnerable voice. The women in his stories are dignified, brave and adult. a finesse not all writers possess. Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:45:47 -0500 great title. war and neurotics https://nowcomment.com/documents/25275?scroll_to=271219 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25275?scroll_to=271219 Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:45:47 -0500 The Elephant in the Room https://nowcomment.com/documents/25275?scroll_to=271218 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25275?scroll_to=271218 the question made me think of this phrase. He also tried to run away from his BK Jewish origins while at the same time placing himself in his work conspicuously trying to place himself in the ranks of masculine literary figures like Hemingway. Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:45:47 -0500 It let's you know where and what he died of, and what were his most notable accomplishments as a writer. he was a Pulitzer winner, one if not the highest honors a writer can receive in his lifetime,aside from a Nobel peace prize https://nowcomment.com/documents/25275?scroll_to=271200 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25275?scroll_to=271200 Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:45:47 -0500 She wasn't a socialist https://nowcomment.com/documents/25274?scroll_to=267348 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25274?scroll_to=267348 Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:45:43 -0500 The writer's main reference to Pankhurst's life and cause https://nowcomment.com/documents/25274?scroll_to=266676 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25274?scroll_to=266676 The other sources or biographies are skewed to Pankhurst life and cause as a "Conservative Revolutionary" Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:45:43 -0500 Nothing new under the sun https://nowcomment.com/documents/25274?scroll_to=266638 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25274?scroll_to=266638 Lest we not forget that at one point people believed the world was flat. Modern revisions into the pasts are important. Beaumont generalizes contemporary feminists and feminists during the Great War as having blanketed views. Ultimately, feminism is the answer to the question "are women human?" and the activists therein the feminist identity work towards the economic and political equality of the sexes. Feminism can also be interpreted as the struggle against the oppression of women and some feminist align themselves against all forms of oppression, not just against women and across generations. What distorts the past are people's current agendas. Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:45:43 -0500 Radical https://nowcomment.com/documents/25274?scroll_to=266629 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25274?scroll_to=266629 Maintaining a safe space for women where they could discuss and plan, free of the male gaze or male privelege, to attain the ultimate goal which was democratic participation of women by voting Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:45:42 -0500 She was more interested in the democratic principles of equality and participation that over throwing the government https://nowcomment.com/documents/25274?scroll_to=266622 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25274?scroll_to=266622 She was pragmatist and political animal. She was more interested in making the government function and adhere to the democratic principles of equality instead of overthrowing it, or necessarily going against it. A "dynamic" means engagement not necessarily opposition or reaction. Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:45:42 -0500 She wants to reinforce "democracy" by any means necessary https://nowcomment.com/documents/25274?scroll_to=266585 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25274?scroll_to=266585 Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:45:42 -0500 It messes up the narrative https://nowcomment.com/documents/25274?scroll_to=266582 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25274?scroll_to=266582 To appeal to the masses, the movement must be constructed as a clear narrative. Good guy vs Bad guy: Pick a side. When paradox exist, as they always do, the writers of history try to smooth things out to adhere to the narrative. Biographical profiles are not always narrative, they are useful to "humanize" history and to highlight individuals as they were, paradox and all. Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:45:42 -0500 TO establish and reinforce her femininity https://nowcomment.com/documents/25274?scroll_to=266576 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25274?scroll_to=266576 It was important for both authors to bust the myth that suffragettes were "unwomanly". Also both highlight her foundation of conservative theory and other misconceptions about their subject. Both aim to place her as a "patriotic feminist" Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:45:41 -0500 Pankhurst was an anti communist during a time where the Bolshevik Revolution was looming and socialism was the popular ideology in leftist and "radical" circles. https://nowcomment.com/documents/25274?scroll_to=266550 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25274?scroll_to=266550 Pankhurst was an anti communist during a time where the Bolshevik Revolution was looming and socialism was the popular ideology in leftist and "radical" circles.For the sake of leftist "radical" history during that time period, the omission of Ms. Pankhurst's involvement in the suffrage movement is convenient to the socialist agenda at the time. Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:45:41 -0500