Comments by Mr. Kishan Singh Most recent public comments by Mr. Kishan Singh https://nowcomment.com/users/11233 Although from NYC, a bit eurocentric, and prefers a more orderly setting over a chaotic NYC. https://nowcomment.com/documents/25283?scroll_to=302680 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25283?scroll_to=302680 Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:46:12 -0500 Fast paced. Getting directly to the point. https://nowcomment.com/documents/25283?scroll_to=302679 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25283?scroll_to=302679 Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:46:12 -0500 A lot of these couples are not historic. FDR ruled at a time when there were major world shaping events (USA:very important world player). Incomparable. https://nowcomment.com/documents/25273?scroll_to=302678 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25273?scroll_to=302678 Tue, 16 Dec 2014 00:29:35 -0500 It is not extraordinary that any one can put on an act, and McCartney was world famous. Even the person studying him might not have access to his most intimate thoughts. https://nowcomment.com/documents/25272?scroll_to=302677 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25272?scroll_to=302677 Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:46:12 -0500 McCartney has already established fame in most parts of the world. Therefore having an unbiased biography would be refreshing to him n his fans. https://nowcomment.com/documents/25272?scroll_to=302676 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25272?scroll_to=302676 Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:46:12 -0500 She is of an upper class family. It is confirmed in the next paragraph. https://nowcomment.com/documents/25280?scroll_to=302675 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25280?scroll_to=302675 Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:46:12 -0500 That is true. But remembering something that minor, seems extraordinary. https://nowcomment.com/documents/25280?scroll_to=302674 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25280?scroll_to=302674 Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:46:11 -0500 They were the innovators. https://nowcomment.com/documents/25205?scroll_to=302673 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25205?scroll_to=302673 Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:46:11 -0500 Lost generation in this sense refers to the notable writers, who were forgotten after the wars, who were key in devising some of the literary techniques that we use today, however, many writers do not credit then. https://nowcomment.com/documents/25205?scroll_to=302672 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25205?scroll_to=302672 Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:46:11 -0500 She was confident, even while addressing and defending issues many disagreed with. https://nowcomment.com/documents/25204?scroll_to=302671 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25204?scroll_to=302671 Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:46:11 -0500 Establishes that she was a key voice of women, that addressed many issues in politics. https://nowcomment.com/documents/25204?scroll_to=302670 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25204?scroll_to=302670 Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:46:11 -0500 Interpretations are based on assumptions. exploring different avenues might sometimes lead to assumptions, however careful deliberation of versatile patterns with emphasis on personal details should be done. https://nowcomment.com/documents/25200?scroll_to=302669 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25200?scroll_to=302669 Mon, 15 Dec 2014 23:49:19 -0500 Basically, her poetry and life has changed drastically for major life events. https://nowcomment.com/documents/25199?scroll_to=302668 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25199?scroll_to=302668 Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:46:11 -0500 sagacious maybe. https://nowcomment.com/documents/25199?scroll_to=302667 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25199?scroll_to=302667 Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:46:11 -0500 Braun admiration (probably obsession) for Hitler, was not unlike any German women to their leader or spouse, and courageous as it may seem, she was just doing what she was taught as a kid. https://nowcomment.com/documents/25276?scroll_to=302666 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25276?scroll_to=302666 Mon, 15 Dec 2014 23:34:52 -0500 Male dominance was ideal in these times, and not uncommon in many parts of the world. https://nowcomment.com/documents/25276?scroll_to=302665 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25276?scroll_to=302665 Mon, 15 Dec 2014 23:30:17 -0500 The description certainly let us know of his condition and he himself knew that his hour is near, but he was still hopeful. https://nowcomment.com/documents/25276?scroll_to=302664 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25276?scroll_to=302664 Mon, 15 Dec 2014 23:27:53 -0500 Intriguing. Führer would certainly get the readers' attention,the date would tell us that its the last hours of her leader and husband. https://nowcomment.com/documents/25276?scroll_to=302663 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25276?scroll_to=302663 Mon, 15 Dec 2014 23:25:15 -0500 Psychologically, he gives the readers what they know, except his version of it. https://nowcomment.com/documents/25275?scroll_to=302662 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25275?scroll_to=302662 Mon, 15 Dec 2014 23:19:32 -0500 Somewhat theatrics, elephantine meaning extremely famous, but yet not as effective as he had hoped. https://nowcomment.com/documents/25275?scroll_to=302661 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25275?scroll_to=302661 Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:46:10 -0500 At 84, even though I don't know who Norman Mailer is, I would presume that being of that age, he has been a novelist who had covered a lot of major world events in his lifetime to transcribe, therefore a key novelist, and as the title says, a top one. https://nowcomment.com/documents/25275?scroll_to=302660 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25275?scroll_to=302660 Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:46:10 -0500 I feel Assia was resentful of Sylvia, for being the actual 'stunt double' of Sylvia's poems, therefore directly or indirectly influencing her. https://nowcomment.com/documents/25198?scroll_to=302659 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25198?scroll_to=302659 Mon, 15 Dec 2014 23:05:31 -0500 I think "convince" would have worked. https://nowcomment.com/documents/25186?scroll_to=302658 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25186?scroll_to=302658 More like trying to win over, and develop some sort of trust. Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:46:10 -0500 Does the quotation really exclude social, cultural, and psychological factors, or does it make them secondary. https://nowcomment.com/documents/25186?scroll_to=302657 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25186?scroll_to=302657 No. Social,cultural and psychological factors are not made secondary. Because these factors are key in modern literature, it does not mean that they are overlooked or overshadowed in some of the greatest works of the past. Literature spanning back to the renaissance period and even before have a certain 'je ne sais quoi' that inculcate these factors circumlocutorily. Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:46:10 -0500 Yes, Mrs. Pankhurst made mistakes, but those mistakes are explainable in terms of her ultimate goals. https://nowcomment.com/documents/25274?scroll_to=297373 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25274?scroll_to=297373 I wouldn't consider her mistakes to be mistakes, but more of gaining experiences that would later prove to be very valuable in her endeavors. She followed a more practical approach, not those based on the culture of her society, but ones that she knew would better suit her goals, breaking traditional barriers in the process. Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:46:09 -0500 Women do not vote as a bloc. Not all women supported votes for Women. https://nowcomment.com/documents/25274?scroll_to=267618 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25274?scroll_to=267618 True. However, voting as a bloc is common in today's society, and in the United States around the same time Mrs. Pankhurst conducted this uprising, therefore, why not in England. Many women were already members of a party that they were "forced" to be a apart of, or inherited, therefore from the time Emmeline founded the WSPU in 1903 to when the Liberals won the election but lost their overall majority in Feb. 1910, then securing the same amount of seats as the Conservative party, even-though the labour voted for the liberals in a second election in Oct. 1910, suffragette Emily Davison is killed by the king's horse in 1913, to Feb. 1918 when women over the age of 30, providing they meet certain qualifications, were given the right to vote, to May, 1928 where all women over 21 had the right to vote, these events should have given women more rights to vote for whoever they deem fit, without the influence of the male society or their parents. Not forgetting the population imbalance between men-women after the first world war, where there were more women than men in the country, giving women an edge; Stanley Baldwin must have acted on this, thus , seeing himself securing a second and third term as Prime Minister. Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:45:43 -0500 Why Stanley Baldwin in particular? Why Pankhurst, a radical, became involved with Conservatives? https://nowcomment.com/documents/25274?scroll_to=265328 https://nowcomment.com/documents/25274?scroll_to=265328 Taking nothing away from women's right to vote (and events leading up to women's suffrage), might women's right to vote be an indirect consequence of the Earl's scheme to secure another term as Prime Minister; since supporting Mrs. Pankhurst, he would, naturally, gain the support of all women in the nation and even the empire at that time. Why Baldwin in particular; he was fortunate to be in office at the end of WWII, and because of the roles women played in the war, and because of the changes the nation was undergoing, and because of his political background, he seemed the right person at the time. Therefore, in 1930, he was the perfect candidate to give a speech at this unveiling, because of the role he,also, played in women suffrage. Pankhurst, became involved in this undertaking because she was introduced, by her parents, into the world of women suffrage at the age of 8, and even-though she was brought up prepared to be a wife and mother, she attended a prestigious University in Paris; married an activist for women suffrage who supported her work as an activist for women; and after she was refused membership to the Independent Labor Party, she was driven to get involved in this undertaking. Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:45:43 -0500