Most recent public comments by Nyiem Coleman https://nowcomment.com/users/138494 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360765?scroll_to=3198877 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360765?scroll_to=3198877 This is very true both groups hold their people and their beliefs close to them and they should make a truce so they can continue living and improving. Thu, 30 Nov 2023 20:00:00 -0600 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360765?scroll_to=3198876 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360765?scroll_to=3198876 This statement is interesting because there can be different perspectives. One thinks a Ph.D. is needed because an expert can give insight or additional information. The other perspective is that such things are not that trivial and can be recognized by what they know. Thu, 30 Nov 2023 19:56:50 -0600 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360765?scroll_to=3198867 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360765?scroll_to=3198867 It shows how it is the same in the middle east compared to the US and its past. Thu, 30 Nov 2023 19:44:49 -0600 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360697?scroll_to=3198574 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360697?scroll_to=3198574 This line makes me believe that they are ignorant of what is the truth and what Israel has done and continues to do. She also uses genocide like Hamas(Palestinians) are in any shape or form powerful enough to do such a thing as genocide Thu, 30 Nov 2023 12:56:03 -0600 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360697?scroll_to=3198546 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360697?scroll_to=3198546 This is an extreme accusation like Hamas wants to call for genocide against the Jews. This is not related. Thu, 30 Nov 2023 12:50:00 -0600 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360697?scroll_to=3198519 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360697?scroll_to=3198519 The words that she uses in her speech such as lurking are extreme. She labels them without know the full situation between Hamas and Isreal and try to make it seem like Isreal is getting attaked. Fri, 01 Dec 2023 13:29:14 -0600 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192694 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192694 As an Israeli soldier, you have a unique perspective on the tactics used in conflict situations, and you’re asking about an incident involving the arrest of males over 18 years old within a village. The situation you describe hints at an underlying tension between security measures and their impact on local populations, which is a very complex issue. In examining the text and considering your connection to it, remember your question, "What were the tactics of arresting any male who was more than 18 years old?" It's clear that you're considering both the strategic and ethical dimensions of such military actions. In this context, tactics could have involved a range of methods, commonly including setting up checkpoints, performing house-to-house searches, or announcing curfews to maintain control during the operation. Given your experience, you might see parallels between what's described in the text and your own knowledge of military protocols. Are these tactics used as a broader measure of imposing control or could they be more targeted responses based on intelligence? Also, consider the possible rationale behind these tactics: Are they purely for security, or could they have other implications? You may want to reflect again on the phrase, "oppress Palestinians," and think about how complex the situation is. As someone who's served, you understand that actions taken by soldiers are usually part of larger military strategies and political directives. Could there be layers of intention behind the described arrests? This could range from maintaining security to deterring potential threats, or, as you've suggested, exercising control over the population. In looking back at the text, I encourage you to ask yourself about the feelings and consequences these tactics might generate among the local population. How does this align with your own experiences and the values you saw being upheld or challenged during your service? Please think about your question in light of both the tactical necessity you might be familiar with and the human impact that you know these operations can have. Are there additional insights from your military experience that could shed light on the narrative you're questioning? The answers you seek, reflecting both your role and the text, may reveal more about the nature of conflict and the fine balance between security and the rights of individuals in these challenging environments. Tue, 21 Nov 2023 20:29:52 -0600 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192693 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192693 I am wondering this because was it a way to oppress Palestinians. Tue, 21 Nov 2023 20:29:52 -0600 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192685 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192685 Considering your position as an American government official, your reading of the text you've mentioned poses an intriguing perspective on international relations, particularly the dynamic between Israel and Hamas. The statement, "We believe that the history will correct itself," suggests an underlying belief in a self-regulating historical process that resolves conflict over time without external intervention. In your context, this notion might resonate with ideas of national sovereignty and the principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of other states. However, as an official, you would also be acutely aware that in practice, international conflicts such as the one between Israel and Hamas often have broader implications that extend beyond their immediate geographic and political contexts, potentially impacting regional stability, global security, and humanitarian conditions. Looking at the text through the lens of your experience, you might ask yourself if history has indeed shown the capacity to "correct itself" without external assistance or if inaction can lead to exacerbation of violence and human suffering, contrary to the desired outcome of self-correction. As a government official, you're likely familiar with the complex layers of diplomacy, foreign policy, and the balancing act between intervention and respecting autonomy. Reflecting back on the text, consider the instances in history where international engagement has positively or negatively influenced outcomes of conflicts. Does the text account for the intricacy of such situations? You're right to recognize that often, an unaddressed conflict can result in nothing but a "massacre," a term that brings to the forefront the human cost of war. Contemplate the responsibilities that you, as a part of the American government, might hold — both moral and practical — in preventing such outcomes. Does the stance of leaving conflicts to resolve themselves align with the values and interests of your nation and its role on the world stage? Perhaps revisiting the text with these questions in mind could offer you additional insights. How might the lessons learned from past interventions or the lack thereof guide your understanding of this principle of historical self-correction? Consider further if there are subtler forms of involvement or influence that can be employed to encourage peaceful resolutions without overt intervention. In essence, does the text offer a simplistic view of a very complex issue, and could there be a middle path that recognizes the nuances of international relations? These are considerations that someone in your position might reflect on deeply when interpreting such statements about the course of history and the role of different actors in shaping it. Tue, 21 Nov 2023 20:16:28 -0600 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192682 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192682 I'm wondering this because with the on going war. The only thing to come out of it is a massacre. Tue, 21 Nov 2023 20:16:28 -0600 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192675 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192675 I understand your question concerns the unique historical events of 1948 when your family, like many Palestinians, was pushed into the Gaza Strip. Recognizing your personal connection to this period, it's clear you're looking for a deeper understanding of the rationale behind the displacement of Palestinians, particularly when other groups in the region were not subjected to the same treatment. In discussing the events of 1948, it's important to examine the complex tapestry of nationalism, colonial legacies, and the geopolitical interests of the time. The creation of Israel was accompanied by major demographic changes, shaped by Zionist ideology, which prioritized the establishment of a Jewish homeland. This entailed establishing a majority Jewish population in specific territories, especially those earmarked by the United Nations for the Jewish State according to the 1947 Partition Plan. Reflecting on your question, "Why did they only push back Palestinians and not any other groups?" brings us to the heart of the conflict – a clash between the Zionist movement’s goals and the indigenous Palestinian presence. Such displacements often have strategic objectives, such as land consolidation, resource control, and altering demographic balances to cement political claims and ensure a stable base for the new state's continuity. Considering what Israel supposedly gained from this, you might ponder how demographic shifts could solidify the nascent state's identity and sovereignty. Controlling the land and reducing the presence of a potentially hostile population that might challenge the legitimacy or alter the character of the state could have been seen as instrumental for the young state's survival and future stability. The push towards Gaza could be viewed as part of this broader strategy. Reflect on the text once more, with your familial background shaping this inquiry, and consider the significance of the territorial and demographic priorities of Israeli policymakers at the time. The implications for your family and many other Palestinians were, undoubtedly, profound and lasting. Your connection to these events provides a deeply personal lens through which to examine historical narratives. As you continue to explore this topic, think about the interplay of power, politics, and identity, and how these forces culminated in the specific experiences of Palestinians in 1948. Perhaps, by revisiting the text with these reflections in mind, you might uncover further insights into the motivations behind such a targeted displacement and its enduring repercussions. Tue, 21 Nov 2023 20:09:06 -0600 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192673 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192673 I'm asking this question because there were other groups, and I'm wondering what Israel gained from this. Tue, 21 Nov 2023 20:09:06 -0600 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3191071 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3191071 I agree, but this makes the Hamas government make a selfish decision because this cost a lot of lives, which is still continuing. Even for freedom, the stakes were extremely high. Mon, 20 Nov 2023 19:14:24 -0600 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3191066 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3191066 I agree. A strong percentage of the deaths of Palestinians were women and children. It is crazy thinking about it but Israel doesn't seem to lead up until full control no matter the lives. Mon, 20 Nov 2023 19:09:14 -0600 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3191045 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3191045 Many outlets including the news spread information, and it is hard to know what is the truth without bias. I believe individual research should be done to get both sides the bring them together to the current problem. Mon, 20 Nov 2023 18:58:32 -0600 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3191033 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3191033 I dont think that until there are hefty deals and agreements made there will be no ceasefire. Israel will not stop their attack until full submission from Hamas. Hamas government won't stop either to protect themselves and what they want. Mon, 20 Nov 2023 18:52:28 -0600 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3191021 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3191021 Their history is very complicated, but if you enable this mindset it makes what is happening between Israel and Hamas reasonable. Though it was a road some people took because they thought it was their way to freedom. Mon, 20 Nov 2023 18:47:21 -0600 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188418 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188418 This can make the US involved even further trying to save its relations or trying to protect itself from potential war. Thu, 16 Nov 2023 20:56:34 -0600 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188413 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188413 If this is the case it could start an all-out war between the countries making the conditions worse for countries like Gaza receiving heavy fire. Thu, 16 Nov 2023 20:54:03 -0600 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188411 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188411 I agree with this because even if Palestinians wanted their independence not all of them would agree with the method taken. Especially knowing the consequences. Thu, 16 Nov 2023 20:50:50 -0600 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188403 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188403 Leaders saw the horror from the many videos, photos, and reports given about the issue making them want to support Thu, 16 Nov 2023 20:43:25 -0600 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188385 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188385 I would feel the same anger being kicked out of my home, but the plan of attack was not entirely thought through. Especially when dealing with a country that controls the imports to yours. Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:23:38 -0600 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188383 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188383 They did this not knowing the heavy repercussions they would face eventually. They sought to resist settler colonialism but ended it a worse case. Thu, 16 Nov 2023 20:09:36 -0600 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188379 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188379 It is such a massacre that other nations have called a humanitarian cease-fire to help them recover. Thu, 16 Nov 2023 20:05:28 -0600 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188374 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188374 The people in Gaza day by day are getting trapped by Isreal and getting killed because of this like shootings, environment destruction, and the lack of resources. Thu, 16 Nov 2023 20:02:06 -0600 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188369 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188369 This is a very intense and destructive war. It mostly affects the innocent that live there and by slowing the process, it could be time for negotiation. Thu, 16 Nov 2023 19:55:13 -0600 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188349 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188349 My thoughts on this are that Palestinians and others living there won't be able to survive and be able to access help. They are being cutoff Thu, 16 Nov 2023 19:50:15 -0600 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188328 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188328 What is the use of hostages in this situation when they are already at war Thu, 16 Nov 2023 19:41:26 -0600 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188323 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188323 This was a destructive volley killing hundreds from the start. Thu, 16 Nov 2023 19:35:57 -0600