<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Comments by Masaki Dickerson</title>
    <description>Most recent public comments by Masaki Dickerson</description>
    <link>https://nowcomment.com/users/138495</link>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://nowcomment.com/users/138495/comments"/>
    <item>
      <title>tension</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/360765?scroll_to=3199022</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/360765?scroll_to=3199022</guid>
      <description>This is true because currently this situation is filled with high tension, and even countries who are not directly involved need to be careful with what they say. The US is in a position where they need to publically side with their main ally in that part of the world, so it would make sense if this is the reason Biden downplayed (I am not justifying it). </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2023 23:32:28 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Religion </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/360765?scroll_to=3199017</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/360765?scroll_to=3199017</guid>
      <description>Religion is a very personal thing that people hold close to them because of personal experiences and such, and the fact that Israel is able to use this as a tool against certain groups of people is very sickening and sad. </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2023 23:48:53 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>complexity</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/360765?scroll_to=3198974</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/360765?scroll_to=3198974</guid>
      <description>he makes a fair point when talking about how complex this matter is made out to be by media. It does in fact go far back in history, however if one puts some time into the research I think they will find that it is not as intimidatingly complex as the media makes it out to be. I think in a way people are exposed on how much they are willing to research a social topic, when they use this reason to avoid talking about this. 
    I will say however I think that this is used as a way to avoid showing one's views, mainly because no matter what you say today, because so many people have gotten involved, it is bound to receive some form of backlash from someone. </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2023 22:57:16 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>what do Universities matter?</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/360697?scroll_to=3198964</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/360697?scroll_to=3198964</guid>
      <description>while it is true that Jews' experiance of anti-semitism throughout history is prevalent, I fail to understand why she speaks so passionately on Western Universities views, when politicaly majority of Western countries are in support of Israel. Israel has so many countries on it's side that it doesn't make sense why Universities mean so much in this. </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2023 22:47:38 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Terms</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/360697?scroll_to=3198926</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/360697?scroll_to=3198926</guid>
      <description>the terms she chooses to use in this speech are words that stick out and catch the audience's attention, these terms can also be heard and get the audience excited.  she is taking advantage of the situation and is using good vocabulary to get listeners on her side. </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2023 22:22:01 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>&quot;Islamic Nazism&quot;</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/360697?scroll_to=3198565</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/360697?scroll_to=3198565</guid>
      <description>she labels the people of Palestine &quot;Islamic Nazis&quot; which demonstrates how many people see this situation right now.  They fail to distinguish the fight between two political powers and citizens of those nations.  Nazism is a political ideology, and creating the term &quot;Islamic Nazism&quot;  places a whole group of people into one category with a political ideology. </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2023 13:53:48 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How does the immigration process of Gaza after 2003 compare to what Jewish immigrants had to go through during WW2. </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192844</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192844</guid>
      <description>Understanding the immigration process of Gaza after 2003 through your lens, you who have lived the harrowing tale of a Jewish immigrant escaping Europe during World War II, is undoubtedly a profound and personal endeavor. The process you remember, steeped in fear and uncertainty, must resonate deeply when considering the experiences of those navigating the rigors of moving to Gaza in the more contemporary context. The quote you provided speaks volumes about the psychological toll and the sense of humiliation encountered&#8212;not unlike the tales of the past where Jewish immigrants were met with hostility and derogation.

Reflecting on your account, &quot;You're not treated normally. It&#8217;s not like going through the TSA and getting your security checks,&quot; draws a stark comparison between routine security measures and the dehumanization that can occur during such intense immigration processes. The fear you felt, the way your parents cautioned you, &quot;Don&#8217;t move that way,&quot; is a poignant reminder that echoes in the stories of Gazan immigrants, who may also have to instruct their children on how to navigate the scrutiny and suspicion of an exhaustive security apparatus.

When you speak about arriving in Gaza and feeling like you're home within 20 minutes despite the grueling process, it's reminiscent of the relief that must have been felt by those who finally reached a safe haven after fleeing Europe during WW2. This connection might prompt you to consider how the culmination of the journey to Gaza is a stark contrast to the exhausting ordeal that precedes it, and perhaps encourage you to revisit the text, considering the similarities and differences in emotions and experiences of arriving at a long-awaited destination.

As you delve back into the text, might you see other parallels or discrepancies between the passage to safety and freedom in your history as compared to the Gazan immigrants? Consider the context of your escape; how does the geopolitical landscape and international response to the Gazan immigration process compare to that of the Jewish immigrants during WW2?

The shared human desire for dignity and safety is universal and timeless, and yet, you have lived through a unique history that adds layers of understanding to contemporary immigration stories. See if, within the text, there are more detailed accounts of interactions between immigrants and officials that mirror the tension and relief you have described from your own experiences.

Like the waves of immigration that shift with the tides of history, the comparison you are drawing is an opportunity to explore the continuities and evolutions in the immigrant experience. The heart of your question lies in identifying common threads and understanding how the arc of history bends, evolves, and sometimes, painfully repeats itself.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 22:44:36 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What was the reason for making it so hard to access Gaza after 2003, and who was in the wrong?  (add evidence)</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192809</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192809</guid>
      <description>Understanding your perspective as a far-right leaning American politician, you likely have strong views on security and the importance of national sovereignty. With that in mind, when considering the situation described in the question&#8212;the difficulty of accessing Gaza after 2003 and the establishment of strict control at crossings like Erez&#8212;you might view these measures as necessary steps a sovereign nation like Israel could take to ensure its security.

Let's reflect on the context here. After 2003, following a surge in hostilities, especially the Second Intifada, Israel increased its security measures around Gaza. These moves, which included checkpoints and restricted movement, may resonate with your inclination to prioritize security concerns, especially considering the acts of terrorism that Israel was facing during this period.

When considering who was in the wrong, you might be inclined to look at this situation through a security-first lens. Your viewpoint likely leads you to understand Israel's perspective, seeing such restrictions as an act of self-defense rather than aggression. As the text notes, Erez Crossing is described as a &quot;military post,&quot; which emphasizes the security aspect.

Given your political standpoint, it's essential to keep in mind how sovereignty and security are paramount for nations dealing with terrorism. Your interpretation of the text likely reinforces the belief in a nation's right to defend itself and control its borders in response to perceived threats. It may be informative to reread the text and consider whether there are additional dimensions to the security measures that align with your values of national integrity and defense against external threats.

In summary, as you reflect on the question of access to Gaza post-2003, and on the actions taken by Israel, your perspective as a far-right leaning American politician might lead you to sympathize with the security challenges a nation faces and the difficult decisions that come with protecting its people. Keep the importance you place on security and sovereignty in mind as you revisit the text, and consider the broader implications it may have on your understanding of border control and national defense policies.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 22:22:59 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What did Israel politically gain from shooting Palestinians in 1948</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192228</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192228</guid>
      <description>Given your unique position as an Israeli politician who has been active since 1948, you have witnessed firsthand the complex and often painful history between Israelis and Palestinians. Your question about what Israel politically gained from the confrontations with Palestinians in 1948 is particularly poignant coming from someone who has lived through those events. The documentary you watched, referencing Ilan Pappe's findings, seems to touch upon the darker aspects of the conflict, including the incidents where Israeli forces engaged with Palestinians coming from the Gaza Strip.

The text you've mentioned speaks to a broader historical and strategic context that you, as a politician involved since the inception of the Israeli state, are deeply familiar with. The period of 1948 was marked by the War of Independence for Israel, and for Palestinians, it is remembered as the Nakba (Catastrophe). The political gains and losses of any military action taken by Israel at that time, including the ones described by Ilan Pappe, were and continue to be a subject of intense debate and reflection.

As you reflect on the question posed &#8211; what did Israel politically gain &#8211; it might be beneficial to consider the long-term implications these actions have had on regional security, international relations, and the socio-political landscape within Israel itself. It may lead you to ask further questions: did these actions create a temporary tactical advantage at the cost of a lasting peace? How have these early confrontations shaped Israel's subsequent policies towards the Palestinians?

Your perspective, given the decades of experience in Israeli politics, can offer a nuanced understanding that a documentary might not capture. It's imperative that, while considering the content of the documentary, you also weigh in the immediate and long-term political strategies that influenced the decisions made by Israeli leaders at the time. 

By revisiting the text of the documentary and Ilan Pappe's conclusions, you might find deeper insights that resonate with your own experiences, or you might discover points of contention that challenge the documentary's narrative. It's also important to consider the primary sources and to put Ilan Pappe's findings within the larger historical discourse.

Ultimately, the answer to the question about Israel's political gains from actions in 1948 can be multifaceted and complex. Your unique vantage point as someone who has been in the realm of Israeli politics since its beginning is invaluable to understanding that tumultuous period. Reflecting on both the documentary's claims and your own memories and knowledge could not only help answer that question but also contribute to the ongoing conversation about peace and reconciliation in the region.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 13:40:33 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hostage Situation </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3191485</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3191485</guid>
      <description>I think that one possibility is to gain more attention, in taking hostages you also get more people involved and with that comes more attention to what you are doing.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 00:53:08 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Response </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3191484</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3191484</guid>
      <description>this is true, both governments are in the wrong. This conflict really shows how much the regular people suffer when two political powers have disagreements. And while the cause may not be entirely governments fighting each other (people fighting for their land) this specific incident shows what can happen when civilians are the victims. </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 00:49:46 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hamas Attack</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3191483</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3191483</guid>
      <description>I agree that the civilians should not be victims from either country.  Cenk Uygur said that in some ways Hamas is pulling the cause back with what they are doing. This whole situation really proves that violence does indeed speak the loudest. </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 00:45:07 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Iron Dome</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3191468</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3191468</guid>
      <description>this is true, especially considering the tremendous amount of money invested into it by not only Israel, but also the US, why now of all times did it not work? It's possible it could have been intentional. </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 00:36:59 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fair point</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3191466</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3191466</guid>
      <description>This is true. We see many people acting like this is a relatively new thing, when in reality this has been going on for hundreds of years. </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 00:30:52 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Broader Conflict </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3189047</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3189047</guid>
      <description>Going back to my claim on world war, I still stand by that. Just like Europe, this area of the world is condensed of many different countries, and I feel that with conflict like this, it is bound to spill beyond the borders.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 13:58:18 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Broader Conflict? </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3189030</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3189030</guid>
      <description>The situation has become so tense that no matter what you say, or don't say, you are bound to have people shame you. The situation is so broad and so many are affected in some way, and when so many different people have different opinions it's bound to lead to conflict. </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2023 10:37:04 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Leaders' Response </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3189025</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3189025</guid>
      <description>the conflict has grown so large, controversial and violent that we see many leaders from all over now getting involved.  Although some may have been involved before, it has gotten to a point where countries can't turn a blind eye. </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 13:49:34 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Leaders Have Reacted</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3189019</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3189019</guid>
      <description>when you look at the countries who support Israel, and those that avoid condemning Hamas, the geography and past of these countries really seem to play a role. Leaders do not respond based on sympathy and what is morally right, but what politically benefits them. </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 13:43:15 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Palestinians Response</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3189014</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3189014</guid>
      <description>although not all Palestinians agree with the actions or code of Hamas, Hamas is definitely an example of Palestinians who are retaliating Israels actions.  </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 13:38:21 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Palestinians Response to the Attack</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3189010</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3189010</guid>
      <description>80% of Gaza's population are refugees, who have been displaced.  This shows how much the past is affecting right now. The people have been victims for years,and Hamas shows the response to this abuse. </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 13:35:17 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>situation in Gaza </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188557</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188557</guid>
      <description>Israel had already restricted the amount of resources allowed into Gaza, such as: food, water and medical equipment, it's interesting how long it is taking for Israel to let the resources waiting at the Egyptian border in.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2023 23:59:55 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>situation in Gaza </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188539</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188539</guid>
      <description>This is true, it talks about the people who say leaving is not an option, but it does not talk about the innocent people fleeing and being attacked by Israel in places they were told were safe, essentially being lead into a trap. </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2023 23:45:51 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How has Israel responded</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188529</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188529</guid>
      <description>As much as I think Hamas' end goal was to trigger Israel, I think that Israel saw this as an opportunity to launch a full scale attack on an area that has been a burden to them for years at this point. They are able to use the acts of Hamas to get away with actions close to if not war crimes. </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2023 23:41:13 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How has Israel responded?</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188522</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188522</guid>
      <description>In today's world, having the national internet services going down can greatly affect the country. The world we live in today is highly reliant on internet, and when a country's main source of output (statistics and info on the state of the country) it leaves the country in a severe state.  </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2023 23:36:08 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What's next? </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188497</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188497</guid>
      <description>I feel that at this point the most likely thing to happen is possibly another world war. This conflict has gone on for so many years now and even if politically an agreement is able to be met, thousands of people from both Israel and Palestine have been traumatized, and with that comes angered people. I feel that the cycle will continue, even if there is a victor in this theoretical war I am talking about history will likely repeat itself and someone will be left hurt. No matter what happens I feel that they are too far into this violent conflict to recover in our lifetime. </description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2023 10:12:46 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>reaction</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188478</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188478</guid>
      <description>I feel that it's possible Hamas initially had this attack to trigger Israel's response. The Western media was not covering this situation nearly as much as they are now, and that is mainly due to Israel's brutal response. I feel that (if true) Hamas was successful in getting the world's attention to that part of the world, opening up millions of eyes to what is happening there. </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2023 17:05:36 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
