Most recent public comments by Dreanna Lovelace https://nowcomment.com/users/138507 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360765?scroll_to=3198740 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360765?scroll_to=3198740 Thu, 30 Nov 2023 15:14:26 -0700 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360765?scroll_to=3198736 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360765?scroll_to=3198736 Thu, 30 Nov 2023 15:11:19 -0700 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360765?scroll_to=3198729 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360765?scroll_to=3198729 Thu, 30 Nov 2023 15:01:17 -0700 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360697?scroll_to=3198722 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360697?scroll_to=3198722 She is bringing up the past of what they tried to do before as it and is holding it against the people who live there now and is clearly painting Jewish people as if they can do no wrong. Thu, 30 Nov 2023 14:43:17 -0700 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360697?scroll_to=3198566 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360697?scroll_to=3198566 Thu, 30 Nov 2023 11:53:49 -0700 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360697?scroll_to=3198556 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360697?scroll_to=3198556 The words "Nazism" and "Lurking" gives off the feel as if they have been waiting forever to do this and that they have give hints that it was going to happen even though with the current events, it shows that it was slightly at random. She is generalizing it too because she makes it seem as though it was everyone planning on it when even some of the people of Hamas are confused. Thu, 30 Nov 2023 11:51:24 -0700 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192352 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192352 Your experiences in both the First and Second Intifada have undoubtedly provided you with a unique perspective on the behaviors and responses you can expect from the military during times of curfew. You're wondering if the military will automatically resort to violence when encountering civilians after curfew, or whether they might first attempt to intimidate or scare people away without immediate use of force. Reflecting on your vivid recollection of how "everybody would go — we called it skag — between two buildings," you've personally navigated the tense dynamics of military presence and the instinctual response of seeking refuge. The strategies of the military, however, can vary depending on numerous factors like the rules of engagement they follow, the immediate perceived threat, and the broader political context. You should consider revisiting situations in the past curfews where the military encountered groups of people. What was the outcome? Military conduct can range from a show of force intended to disperse groups and enforce the curfew, to more aggressive tactics if they feel threatened or if there is an escalation. Your direct experiences in Gaza give you a valuable lens through which to assess this. Think back to directives issued by the military during past curfews—were there clear instructions or warnings given to the civilian population on what would happen if the curfew was broken? How did the community understand and react to these directives? It's sometimes the case that a military might use loudspeakers, flyovers, or other non-lethal means to encourage compliance before things escalate. You've taken shelter during these moments of tension, and that action itself has likely given you insights into the behavioral patterns of both the military and civilians. Has there been a consistent approach from the military, or has it varied? In understanding military responses, context is always significant. Re-examining the memories that stand out to you from the Intifadas could provide clues about the military's possible actions in similar future situations. As someone who has lived the reality of curfews in Gaza, your assessment of whether the military will resort to immediate violence or start with less confrontational tactics is informed by a history that has taught you patterns to watch for. It might be useful for you to converse with others who shared those experiences and compare their reactions and interpretations with your own — their stories might provide additional insights and perhaps historical patterns that are less clear when we're too close to our own experiences. Tue, 21 Nov 2023 13:10:31 -0700 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192350 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192350 I' asking this cause I want to know if they would resort to violence automatically or will they just try to scare them away. Tue, 21 Nov 2023 13:10:31 -0700 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192263 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192263 The blockade that you're referring to has been a significant aspect of life for residents and those with ties to Gaza. Your inquiry about whether they check IDs and paperwork or indiscriminately block people is indicative of your personal experiences and the challenges you have faced in trying to return. The text you're examining, though not explicitly stated here, might delve into the procedural aspects of the blockade or the policies that govern who is allowed entry and exit. When looking at the text, you should consider how it resonates with your understanding and experiences regarding the blockade. Does the text mention specific criteria or protocols that authorities use to allow or deny access to Gaza, such as checking IDs and paperwork? Your personal connection to this issue, having tried to return since 2003, can guide you in identifying parts of the text that speak to these policies. To make this connection even stronger, think back to the details provided in the checkpoints or border crossings in the text. Reflect on how these details compare to what you know or have experienced. Are there narratives or testimonies within the text that mirror your own attempts to enter the region? You might want to reread the text with your specific question in mind: how do authorities handle the passage of individuals with historical and familial ties to Gaza like yourself? Look for instances in the text where the procedures are outlined or where personal anecdotes provide insight into the process. In revisiting the text, remember your core question: is the blockade a blanket prevention, or are there systematic checks like IDs and paperwork as you suspect? Also, contemplate on the broader implications the text may suggest about freedom of movement, human rights, and the emotional toll on people who share your experience—those who have a history of living in Gaza but now find themselves on the outside looking in, due to political and security complexities. While the blockade's existence is clear, remind yourself to search the text for the nuanced aspects of its implementation. There might be more connections you can make, shedding light not only on the logistical but also the human side of this geopolitical issue that has directly affected your life. Tue, 21 Nov 2023 11:48:33 -0700 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192257 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192257 I'm asking this question because I wanna know if they checked ids and paper work or are they just blocking any and everyone. Tue, 21 Nov 2023 11:48:33 -0700 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192226 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192226 You might be grappling with this question because of the different perspectives and experiences that are symbolized within the text. Soldiers, much like yourself, often operate under strict protocols and rules of engagement which can be hard for civilians to understand. Your question raises the issue of the use of force and how it is perceived by those on the receiving end compared to those who have to make split-second decisions in the field. The text suggests a complexity within these night-time encounters that echoes your awareness of military operations and your own experiences as an Israeli soldier. When the soldiers in the story are shooting, they might not necessarily aim to kill but perhaps to deter or control a situation — a concept that in your military training is likely addressed as 'crowd control' or 'warning shots'. It's something you might have been trained in or encountered during your service. It's important to consider the rules of engagement you know so well, and how they dictate a soldier's actions in such scenarios. Reflecting on your own experiences, the phrase "shooting at us" can have a broad range of meanings; from shots fired directly with intent to harm, to warning shots intended to enforce a curfew, safeguard a restricted zone, or to prevent people from entering a potentially dangerous area. As you know, intentions and actions in these high-stress situations aren't always understood by civilians, which could lead to the perception that all shooting has lethal intent. Given your background, you may want to reread the passage asking yourself: what other reasons might soldiers have for opening fire if not to kill? Think about the rules that you operate under and how they are designed to balance the mission with the moral obligation to preserve life whenever possible. This reflection could offer more insights into the text and help bridge the gap between the lived experience of the civilians in the story and the operational reality you're familiar with. Contemplate on how this perspective might influence your understanding of the text. It's probable that with each reread, considering your own nuanced experiences, new layers of understanding will unfold. This complex interaction between soldiers and civilians is more than a simple narrative and delving deeper into it could reveal more parallels with your own life than initially apparent. Tue, 21 Nov 2023 11:40:00 -0700 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3190940 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3190940 Mon, 20 Nov 2023 16:26:40 -0700 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3190930 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3190930 Mon, 20 Nov 2023 16:17:02 -0700 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3190924 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3190924 Mon, 20 Nov 2023 16:11:52 -0700 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3190916 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3190916 Mon, 20 Nov 2023 16:04:29 -0700 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3190910 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3190910 Mon, 20 Nov 2023 15:56:42 -0700 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188158 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188158 Thu, 16 Nov 2023 16:05:26 -0700 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188155 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188155 I believe that since other countries are starting to get involved more now, the problem is for sure going to turn into something much worse. Tue, 21 Nov 2023 16:05:16 -0700 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188153 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188153 To me, the President of Turkey's response is pretty logical. He is not trying to blame anyone, he is avoiding the area, and he realizes that what Israel is doing is brutal. He is letting people say what they want about the matter and is saying his own without getting on the bad side of other countries. Thu, 07 Dec 2023 19:01:31 -0700 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188152 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188152 I believe that the leaders are going about this in a wrong way. Being able to defend their country is important but full on attacking and purposely going out of their way to cause irreversible harm is not reasonable. Leaders are giving weapons to a country that has already inflicted enough damage to cause more damage. Thu, 16 Nov 2023 15:49:53 -0700 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188151 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188151 It was very bold for the Palestinian military leader to speak out about the problem, but thats not gonna change Israel's mind on the matter. Yes, taking accountability for their actions and admitting that they were wrong for the first attack, but it is too late now. Thu, 16 Nov 2023 15:43:03 -0700 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188149 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188149 Mon, 20 Nov 2023 08:03:23 -0700 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188148 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188148 Israel is continuing to attack Gaza and the death toll of the people goes up buy the hundreds everyday.Children are dying the most since their bodies are not strong enough to handle this. Even though they are trying to leave for their safety, with everything happening, its just as dangerous. Thu, 16 Nov 2023 15:33:32 -0700 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188147 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188147 Thu, 16 Nov 2023 15:27:58 -0700 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188146 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188146 Thu, 16 Nov 2023 15:18:47 -0700 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188145 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188145 Even though what happened in Israel was bad, their response was horrible. From what I've seen, they are acting out of rage instead of reasoning. Yes, fighting back is understandable, the fact that it had to take other country to tell you to wait until you can try and get the hostages back is just wrong. Thu, 16 Nov 2023 15:15:05 -0700 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188144 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188144 On October 7th, Israel was attacked with several rockets in their cities by Hamas. They went into their army bases, border communities, and an outdoor festival. These attacks made it the single most deadliest day in history. Thu, 16 Nov 2023 15:01:25 -0700 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188143 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188143 The attacks on Israel were already bad and were able to kill many of the people, but taking people as hostages takes the situation to another level. Taking civilians that are innocent and just as negotiable objects can have just as much of an effect. Mon, 11 Dec 2023 08:32:24 -0700