Most recent public comments by Ahmed Al Ali https://nowcomment.com/users/138539 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3207650 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3207650 I feel that this is a very complex situation that's very hard to come to a compromise. This has been going on for so many years though I don't feel all the bloodshed is necessary. I feel at some point they will hopefully figure out a way to end the war Tue, 19 Dec 2023 21:31:08 +0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360765?scroll_to=3199862 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360765?scroll_to=3199862 As much as I have come to respect the work of this writer I have to say that this phrase of "self-defense" has become very dangerous to protest for the Palestinian or the pro-Palestinian people. The Israeli media has become very good at twisting the protests of the Palestinian people into becoming anti-Jewish protests. So, Israel has the right to self-defense and after the attacks of October 7th, it has become harder to protest because of the words and interpretations of western supporters. Mon, 04 Dec 2023 21:22:42 +0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360765?scroll_to=3199832 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360765?scroll_to=3199832 This is a very interesting point that he brought up which is the realization how important religion is in other parts of the world. Not because foreign countries and governments force religion onto people but because the United States simply does not hold values with their religion outside of the Christian majority. Mon, 04 Dec 2023 21:15:32 +0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360765?scroll_to=3199107 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360765?scroll_to=3199107 When the interview first started I was very surprised that a writer who obliviously and for good reason prioritizes the African American social issues. So, for him to have the will to go and visit Palestine and on top of that finds ways to support by understanding that this issue has occurred in his own community is very impressive to see. This was a great introduction to him and his work. Fri, 01 Dec 2023 23:30:09 +0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360697?scroll_to=3198070 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360697?scroll_to=3198070 The use of the word Islamic Nazism is a very desperate call for pity and empathy. Nazis had a very clear and direct goal to kill all Jews and it becomes easy to use an idea so simple in order to apply it to anyone has has a Jew as an enemy. Thu, 30 Nov 2023 21:52:37 +0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360697?scroll_to=3198065 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360697?scroll_to=3198065 This point is incorrect because the American Government supplies Israel with a very large amount of weapons and ships. The US government has been extremely pro-Israel for the entirety of its existence. I do understand she is making the point of the people not in government being Pro Palestine in their protest in colleges, however none of it is anti Jewish. Thu, 30 Nov 2023 21:50:39 +0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360697?scroll_to=3198042 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360697?scroll_to=3198042 I think that this point she is making here is very misleading by saying that a phrase that stands for a safe and free Palestinian land means the extermination of all Jews. Which is very smart from an Israeli propaganda perspective because they accomplish one very important thing and that is making the entire agenda for a free Palestine become an agenda of extreme anti sematism which is exactly what the Israeli government wants in order to defeat Palestine physically and through the media. Thu, 30 Nov 2023 21:44:22 +0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3193192 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3193192 Maram, you're seeking sources that maintain objectivity and allow you to form your own opinion without being swayed by a particular agenda. As someone who values the impartiality of the information you receive, it's essential to approach your search for unbiased sources with a critical eye. One way to ensure the reliability of a source is to look for educational institutions, such as universities or research labs, where the primary goal is the advancement of knowledge rather than the promotion of a specific viewpoint. Additionally, you might consider international organizations, such as the United Nations or the World Health Organization, which, while not entirely devoid of perspective, often offer data and reports that are less influenced by individual national or commercial interests. Your quest for unbiased information might also lead you to explore various media outlets that have a reputation for rigorous journalism standards. Remember to cross-reference facts and data across different platforms to corroborate information. In this way, you're not relying on a single source, which may inadvertently harbor biases, but rather, on a constellation of information that can give you a more well-rounded view. Remember to question the question you're asking: what are sources that are biased? Understanding bias is not always about labelling a source as wholly one-sided but learning to detect the subtle nuances and perspectives that might color the presentation of information, even in the most reputable outlets. As you re-examine the text you have in mind, Maram, consider how it addresses the complexity of bias. Does it offer guidance on identifying slanted information by examining language, ownership of the source, and the presence of fact-checking? Acknowledge that complete objectivity may be an ideal, and part of becoming well-informed is learning how to navigate through different degrees of partiality. In your journey to learn more and educate yourself, a re-read of the text with these aspects in mind might reveal additional layers on how to discern and mitigate the effects of bias in the information you consume. Keep this at the forefront as you continue to seek out reliable sources, and always apply your critical thinking skills to question even the most seemingly neutral information. And as you pointed out, education is key, maintaining a willingness to learn and adapt your understanding as you gather more insights. Wed, 22 Nov 2023 21:44:08 +0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3193191 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3193191 I ask this because I want to know what are sources that are biased. Wed, 22 Nov 2023 21:44:08 +0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3193189 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3193189 I asked this because I want us to know if we can lead into a better conversation of solutions and not greiving. Wed, 22 Nov 2023 21:36:17 +0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3193184 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3193184 As you, Maram Al-Dada, ask where Palestinians are supposed to go if Gaza is constantly being bombed, the anguish and frustration embedded in your question reverberate with the reality of many who find themselves in a seemingly endless cycle of conflict without safe havens. You're confronting one of the most distressing aspects of the situation in Gaza—the lack of secure and viable places of refuge amidst ongoing hostilities. Reflecting on your question, you might revisit historical and contemporary texts that tackle the topic of forced displacement. Within these texts, find the narratives that echo the question you posed—where are those dispossessed supposed to go when their homelands become sites of peril? You may identify with passages that describe the search for safety, the yearning for stability, and the international community's responses to such crises. Consider rereading sections that shed light on the international legal frameworks governing refugees and internally displaced persons. Do they offer an answer to your question? You might find yourself evaluating the adequacy of these provisions in the context of your question and whether they align with the lived experiences of Palestinians. Notice too how your question resonates with historical instances of displacement, and draw parallels to understand the continuum of such issues. Have there been resolutions that could be applied or lessons that can be drawn from these events to address your poignant question about the people of Gaza? Moreover, your question encapsulates a call to examine the broader sociopolitical forces at play. It may urge you to look beyond the immediate emergencies and delve into policy discussions, editorials, and opinion pieces that confront the political complexities and propose pathways forward. Lastly, you might reread stories of resilience within Palestinian communities, both in historical texts and contemporary reportage. In these accounts, search for the spirit of perseverance and the forms of solidarity that arise even in the direst of circumstances—how do these communities adapt, and what does this tell you about the human capacity to endure and hope for better times? So, as you contemplate where Palestinians are supposed to go, I invite you to engage with a diverse range of texts, seeking answers, insights, and perhaps, finding a reflection of your thoughts and experiences in the search for understanding and resolution. Wed, 22 Nov 2023 21:36:17 +0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3193183 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3193183 Where are Palestinians supposed to go if Gaza is constantly bombed ? Wed, 22 Nov 2023 21:36:17 +0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192479 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192479 Your musings on where justice begins and ends resonate deeply within the text, as you explore the complexity of justice in the context of the Palestinian struggle for sovereignty and peace. The question you pose, "Where does justice end and where does it start?" is not only profound but also intrinsically linked to your belief that "just justice will prevail" one day. As you contemplate the text further, consider how justice is portrayed. Is it seen as retribution, restoration, or perhaps a blend of many ideals? Reflect on how the authors discuss the various facets of justice. They might explore historical grievances, current conflicts, or envision a future where justice has a transformative role. Given your personal connection to and understanding of Palestine, you know that justice is multifaceted—it can mean the restoration of land, the acknowledgment of suffering, as well as the establishment of a lasting peace. Moreover, think about your pointed statement that "Justice can be the death of every enemy of Palestine to simply recovering a few miles of land for Gaza." How does the text address the notion of enemies and the attribution of justice in the context of gaining ground? Is there a suggestion that true justice encompasses more than territorial gains, and perhaps includes reconciliation and mutual recognition of humanity between parties in conflict? As you revisit the text, ask yourself: How do the authors' views align or diverge with your perspective on justice for Palestine? Is there an underlying philosophy discussed that resonates with your belief in justice ultimately prevailing? Your insight into the situation, informed by your personal experiences and beliefs, may unearth new layers of meaning in the text that speaks to the broader quest for justice. Remember, you believe that justice will prevail—one day. Does the text offer a roadmap or illuminate the principles that could contribute to making that belief a reality? Keep these thoughts in mind as you tie your reflections back to the enduring question you posed: "Where does justice end and where does it start?" Wed, 22 Nov 2023 07:45:54 +0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192475 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192475 Where does justice end and where does it start ? I ask this because Justice can be the death of every enemy of Palestine to simply recovering a few miles of land for Gaza Wed, 22 Nov 2023 07:45:54 +0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3190079 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3190079 Hamas and Israel must sign a peace treaty which is overseen by the UN. Mon, 20 Nov 2023 09:50:02 +0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3190075 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3190075 I do agree with this point but it is also important to understand it is many other countries that play a larger role than the USA. Countries that are deemed to have a Pro-Palestine standpoint are actually normalizing ties with Israel and even supplying the USA with oil. Mon, 20 Nov 2023 09:46:09 +0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3190072 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3190072 There are 2 points I can make to help you understand this part. 1. Just because you are weaker than your occupier does not mean you should not fight back. 2. The reason why Palestinians say they should not have attacked Israel is because Israel is losing to Hamas and they are targeting Hospitals and densely populated areas in order to instill fear hoping Hamas will stop. Mon, 20 Nov 2023 09:41:38 +0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3190071 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3190071 This is a very great summarization of this on-going conflict. Mon, 20 Nov 2023 09:35:35 +0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3190068 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3190068 I do agree with this statement however, It is important to understand the reason why Israelis call them terrorists. It is because they look for ways to villanize the Muslims because it is very easy to do so. Mon, 20 Nov 2023 09:32:30 +0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3187648 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3187648 Saudia Arabia supplies the United States with oil and the United States uses that oil to supply Israel and Saudia with weapons. Saudia Arabia has a recent history of creating relations with the enemies of their Muslim countries. I also believe that Mohammed Bin Salman does not want to support Palestine for fear of losing relations with the United States. Thu, 16 Nov 2023 23:05:57 +0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3187644 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3187644 The United States of course is in full support of the Israeli government as they have been supplying them with weapons and defense systems worth billions. The Israeli Minister of Defense himself is extremely anti-Palestinian and wants to remove every Palestinian from this land. He has made remarks by calling them "animals". It is no secret they have an extreme anti Palestinian agenda. Thu, 16 Nov 2023 23:03:15 +0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3187568 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3187568 Some Palestinian people condemn the attack because of the numbers. significantly more Palestinians have died in this struggle over the past 80 years than Israelis have. Mon, 20 Nov 2023 21:18:59 +0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3187564 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3187564 The Palestinians understand that the attack was wrong to target civilians but the Palestinians do understand that there was action that needed to be taken in order to resist the settler colonialism. Mon, 20 Nov 2023 21:17:14 +0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3187547 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3187547 There is also a blockade on Humanitarian aid. So hospital life is a slow death and infrastructure is gone as well. Fri, 08 Dec 2023 11:05:44 +0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3187541 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3187541 The situation in Gaza is a sheep fence for the Palestinian people. Israel has 2 claims 1 ignorant one and a false one. The first claim is that Hamas hides within the civilian population. I find that to be an excuse to paint the image that civilian death is collateral and there is not a conscious decision to bomb densely populated areas. The second claim is that the Palestinian people are safe in the south this is a false claim because Israel is still bombing the south of Gaza trapping the Palestinian citizens and not having a serious impact on Hamas. Sun, 31 Dec 2023 05:51:46 +0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3187348 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3187348 Adding on to my earlier comment, I do believe that Israelis have hatred for the Palestinian people which is no secret. A man who has access to weapons that can destroy entire countries calls the Palestinian people "Animals" you start to understand why the Pro-Palestinian people call this a genocide. In my eyes rightfully so. Thu, 16 Nov 2023 11:32:31 +0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3187344 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3187344 Israel has a justifiable response but not a justifiable action in the response. They target densely populated areas with mostly children. They cut electricity and aid which leaves thousands of people in hospitals without anesthesia or incubators making hospitals places where people slowly die and not heal. Thu, 16 Nov 2023 11:29:10 +0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3187330 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3187330 This is also where Hamas became extremely controversial. They are much harder to brand as a militant group now. However, Isreal's military has been doing the same thing for decades so it depends on simply how you view Muslims and Arabs. Thu, 16 Nov 2023 11:18:47 +0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3187326 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3187326 Hamas sent rockets into deep Israeli territory in retaliation for the settler colonialism that has been ongoing in Palestine. The attack was devastating and killed mostly civilians and teenagers. Thu, 16 Nov 2023 11:15:59 +0800