Most recent public comments by Bobbi Thompson https://nowcomment.com/users/138604 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360765?scroll_to=3198939 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360765?scroll_to=3198939 Personal reasons and propaganda clouds the ability to understand this in people's minds. The loss of innocent lives is never ok, yet people find a way to justify it on either side in effort of supporting whichever nation their loyalty is to . Thu, 30 Nov 2023 19:37:53 -0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360765?scroll_to=3198934 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360765?scroll_to=3198934 As a country, we have supposedly learned from the history of jim crow and slavery, only to support the perpetrators of the modern-day recreation of it in the gaza strip. Thu, 30 Nov 2023 19:32:00 -0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360765?scroll_to=3198927 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360765?scroll_to=3198927 I find it weird that he had trouble finding a place that would allow him to hold this event and reach out to people about this issue. It seems that people who do anything other than support israel's "right to defend themselves" face obstacles and repercussions in order to, and in consequence of speaking out. Take this for example as well as how officials are treated when they express support for palestinians. Thu, 30 Nov 2023 19:24:16 -0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360697?scroll_to=3198913 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360697?scroll_to=3198913 What I believe she is referring to as "grooming" is the media portraying the suffering of the people living in the gaza strip, as well as the spread of knowledge on what is happening. Why is she inferring that educating people on the tragedies of people in different places is "grooming", yet her one-sided and harsh speech isn't? She seems to misconstrue opinions and events using her words in order to prove her point. I think it's crazy to say that the underdog is committing a genocide, and even crazier to say that the west is "celebrating" it. This speech is the definition of propaganda. Thu, 30 Nov 2023 19:05:40 -0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360697?scroll_to=3198886 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360697?scroll_to=3198886 The lack of neutrality and abundance of dogmatic nature in her speech reminds you of who is giving it constantly while you are listening to it. This is very obviously an actress, and not someone who's job it is to enlighten the public. In my opinion, her speech is one that shouldn't be advertised to the masses. Her use of words and phrases such as "evil", "Nazism" and "we will defeat you" in reference to Palestine show how radical her views on them and her wishes for this war are. It's not even about what she's saying, as everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but her delivery is a bit belligerent. Thu, 30 Nov 2023 18:43:06 -0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360697?scroll_to=3198884 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360697?scroll_to=3198884 I believe that the setting of the conference tailors her language and how comfortable and/or obligated she feels to make seemingly extreme comments. This venue would sensibly draw a crowd of people who are going to agree with what she says. She could have used this as an opportunity to passionately express her partisan beliefs and feel justified to, I would say, exaggerate the information and opinions she sought to speak on. Thu, 30 Nov 2023 18:28:43 -0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3192834 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3192834 I can't speak for the relief that 4 hours of ceasefire brings to Palestinians constantly under attack. I can, though, speak for the miniscule efforts of leaders such as Biden to intervene. I agree that Biden's call is only to save face and is not in the best interest of the people dying in this conflict. The hypocrisy in calling for ceasefire, for any amount of time, while supplying weapons to Israel for the violence exposes the lack of real care for victims of this. Tue, 21 Nov 2023 19:39:57 -0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3192822 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3192822 Peace is all that can be wished for by palestinians who are trapped in a prison of destruction and death. I don't know if peace will ever be as much of a priority to the israeli nation, as from what I have seen, they are not subjected to amounts close to the cruelty and restriction. This is unsurprising as Israel has all the power in this situation, in numbers, control, and technology. Given their status, it is up to them to bring "peace". Tue, 21 Nov 2023 19:27:08 -0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3192802 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3192802 I agree, the conflict dates back thousands of years. They have had much time to resolve these conflicts but fuel is continuously added to the fire. This proves the complexity of the conflict, as they have been conflicting over things such as territory, independence, and beliefs practically since the nations pf Palestine and Israel were established. Tue, 21 Nov 2023 19:17:47 -0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192790 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192790 As you delve into the complexities of the "hawiya" system that you were responsible for setting up, you're touching upon sensitive historical and political distinctions that impact the daily lives of Palestinians. When you inquire why 1948 Palestinians are given more freedom in the travel system compared to other Palestinians, you are indeed recognizing an essential element related to the aftermath of the Nakba in 1948, where countless Palestinians were displaced from their homes. These historical events have had long-lasting repercussions on the identity, rights, and mobility of Palestinians. You might remember setting up the "hawiya" system with particular attention to these distinctions. The implications of this system suggest that 1948 Palestinians, being citizens of Israel, are subject to a different set of regulations in terms of freedom of movement, reflecting a complex interaction of law, identity, and history. Reflecting on the text, it's worth revisiting the question you've posed: "Why are 1948 Palestinians given more freedom in the travel system of 'hawiya' than other Palestinians?" Your direct experience with these systems gives you a unique insight into how historical events such as the Nakba and legal frameworks based on these events have contributed to shaping the present reality. Indeed, if you underscore the connection between the Nakba and the current state of travel freedoms, you might see that the events of 1948 have served to create distinct categories of Palestinian identities, influencing how travel permissions and civil rights are allocated. Remember, the Nakba was not just an isolated historical event but a catalyst that introduced a series of legal and cultural demarcations within the Palestinian population. Rereading the relevant policies and historical accounts could help you further unpack the reasons behind such divergent travel freedoms. Consider taking another look at how the hawiya system reflects the broader geopolitical landscape and historical context. Explore how the legislation and administration you helped to shape might exemplify larger patterns of mobility, citizenship, and rights that continue to affect Palestinian communities. By revisiting this question with the knowledge of your involvement in setting up these systems, you may find deeper insights into the nuanced effects of history on contemporary governance and personal liberties. Tue, 21 Nov 2023 19:08:31 -0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192785 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192785 I'm asking this because other than the Arab-Israeli war in 1948 I don't know of any reason that sets them apart, they are still palestinians. Or is this because of the 1948 nakba, where many palestinians where pushed out of their homes? Tue, 21 Nov 2023 19:08:31 -0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192723 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192723 As a psychologist who experienced the tumultuous times of the first intifada as a child, you might be acutely aware of how formative experiences in childhood can impact emotional processing and memory. When considering the question of whether growing up during such chaos desensitizes individuals, your conversation with your brother provides a fascinating insight. You've said, "There’s that incident that happened, and he remembers it, and we remember it vividly." Your use of the word "incident" and the memory associated with mangoes suggests a possible dissociation from the emotional gravity that these experiences could carry. It's not unusual for children, especially in situations of conflict, to remember events with specific sensory details—like the taste of mangoes—while the emotional responses might seem underplayed or almost absent. This could be a form of psychological protection. I urge you to revisit that conversation with your brother and see if, as a psychologist, you notice other instances where emotionally expressive terminology is absent. Reflect on what this might say about the way children who grew up in conflict zones process traumatic events. This is an invitation for you to dig deeper into your memories and the language used to describe them. Additionally, ponder the effects of desensitization in your professional practice. How might your childhood experiences have shaped your approach to clients who have experienced trauma? Consider rereading texts on childhood trauma and resilience to see if you make new connections to your personal history and professional knowledge. Remember, the question about desensitization isn't just about emotional expression but also about the coping mechanisms that children develop in response to their environment. Therein lies an opportunity to not only understand your personal journey but also to enrich your professional perspective with a unique sensitivity to the effects of growing up in such complex circumstances. Tue, 21 Nov 2023 18:44:18 -0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192715 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192715 I ask this because when recalling it, there is a lack of emotionally expressive terminology as well as the fact that it is referred to as an "incident" which fails to encapsulate the weight of the situation he is describing. Tue, 21 Nov 2023 18:44:18 -0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192305 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192305 As you've shared your unsettling experience of the security procedures at the Erez crossing, it's clear that the treatment you and your family received left a profound impact on you. The way you described the room, "all silver," with just a "table in the middle," sets a scene that many would find intimidating. It's disquieting, to say the least, to imagine being in such a sterile and alien environment. Your question about the necessity and appropriateness of the security measures touches on a deeper issue of dignity and respect in security protocols. Yes, security forces must ensure safety, but the manner in which they asked your mother to open a can of powdered milk seems to go beyond simple precaution. You've astutely noted that "there are many other ways to solve a problem" when suspicions arise, and it begs the question of whether the methods employed were indeed the least distressing ones available. Reflecting on the text, consider how this moment not only felt "really not good" as you mentioned, but also whether it was truly justifiable from a security standpoint, or if it leaned more towards an assertion of power. The fear you felt as a child seems to have emanated from more than just an unfamiliar environment. It's possible that the security personnel could have explained their actions more clearly, or taken steps to alleviate the worry that you and your family experienced. As you are piecing together your own understandings of that day now, try to reread the story of your crossing. Look again at the feelings you had then versus what you recognize them to mean now. Ask yourself if there are similarities between your experience and those of others, and consider why certain security measures are in place while also contemplating their human cost. It is in the questioning and understanding of our experiences that we often find common ground and the potential for change. Remember, your experience holds powerful insights into how security measures can and should be balanced with compassion and respect for human dignity. Tue, 21 Nov 2023 11:16:27 -0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192295 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360477?scroll_to=3192295 I ask this because there are many other ways to solve a problem arose by the suspicion of correlation between items so different such as food and explosives. This makes it seem like there is a motive of putting people in uncomfortable situations. Tue, 21 Nov 2023 11:16:27 -0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3190630 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3190630 I wouldn't think the conflict is because of religion because the major religions in both areas have co-existed for so long and I, personally, cannot think of reasons for Muslim and Jewish people to clash for their beliefs, seeing as the religions have such similar characteristics. Mon, 20 Nov 2023 15:24:05 -0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3190608 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3190608 It is important to bring up what is portrayed in the media because this is what has drawn a lot of people to be so passionate about this issue. Even people with no connection to Palestine or Israel become avid in their effort for spreading awareness when they come across scenes being brought to them by victims. It is even more important to highlight the prominence of children in the death count of people being bombed in the Gaza strip. Outsiders being able to sympathize with the death of children more than the people at fault is telling of the extents people in power will go to in order to prove a point. Mon, 20 Nov 2023 10:38:25 -0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3189253 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3189253 Our government is definitely complicit in Israel's oppression of Palestinians by supporting Israel in the manner they do. By supplying Israel with weapons, claiming "no confidence" in death figures of Palestinians and overall showing bias, we are involved in a way that does not benefit the Palestinians at all. Sat, 30 Dec 2023 14:11:23 -0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188422 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188422 Israel's control over gaza allows them to attack the region at the extent they do. This probes the question of how they would retaliate if other nations got involved. Israel would likely not be able to do half the things they did to Gaza, which circles back to the point of their excessive attacks being an abuse of power. Thu, 16 Nov 2023 19:03:42 -0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188417 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188417 There is chance for a broader conflict as efforts are having to be put in to stop other regions from engaging into the conflict as well. It is shown that other places are wanting to involve themselves, a broader conflict will be if or when they do. Thu, 16 Nov 2023 18:56:11 -0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188410 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188410 These statements receiving "sharp criticism" just shows a lack of equilibrium between morals and bias when it comes to this matter. What could you criticize about someone saying that the innocent public should not have to live in constant destruction for the actions of an organized group? Thu, 16 Nov 2023 18:50:41 -0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188405 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188405 The united states is threatening being on the wrong side of history in efforts of showing loyalty to Israel. There is an obvious bias, and though opinions on the situation may differ, subjectively looking at it would tell you not to supply weapons to further strengthen the country who is already having the upper hand . In my eyes, supplying weapons makes us contributors to what is going on in gaza. Sun, 19 Nov 2023 17:46:09 -0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188398 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188398 I was ignorant in thinking this was a new issue, but the truth is that this has been an ongoing issue for a while. With majority of the population having backgrounds of being forced out of Israel, it sets the stage for tension between palestinians and israel, though not justifying the acts of violence against either side. Thu, 07 Dec 2023 17:59:58 -0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188393 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188393 referring to Israels actions as exercising their "right to defend themselves" is manipulative and doesn't truly capture what they are doing. They are not doing things such as stationing troops in their cities to prevent further invasions and attacks from Hamas , they are infiltrating Palestinian cities, bombing their most densely populated areas and taking away their resources. Thu, 16 Nov 2023 18:26:39 -0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188377 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188377 Palestinians are being given deceiving advice by the Israeli government, instilling a false hope only for people to be met with the same destruction and gruesome scenes they wished to escape from. This direction fails to follow its motive as it is not keeping anyone safe. What is shown is a falsity of "consideration" for the innocent civilians, guiding them to a supposed safe-haven just to continue bombing them. Thu, 16 Nov 2023 18:14:54 -0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188367 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188367 Israel retaliated with destructiveness and used their advantage of advancement to launch attacks of bigger scales than Hamas could wish for. Along with their attacks, they have separated Gaza from the rest of the world and left them to be voiceless by taking away means of connection. Thu, 16 Nov 2023 17:53:40 -0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188092 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188092 Israel's response seems to be aiming for death through violence as well as physiological causes. The impression given is an attempt to "one up" on Palestine, not only attacking their people, but adding onto that by attacking their resources. It is an obvious abuse of power . Thu, 16 Nov 2023 11:49:33 -0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188071 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188071 A hamas attack marked "the single deadliest day in Israel history". Volleys of rockets struck multiple Israel cities and attackers infiltrated army bases and public areas, killing men, women, and children. Thu, 16 Nov 2023 11:39:32 -0800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188069 https://nowcomment.com/documents/360800?scroll_to=3188069 The military organization controlling the Gaza Strip launched an attack on Israel, causing 1400 fatalities in different areas. Thu, 16 Nov 2023 11:33:12 -0800