<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Comments by teacher Tracey Williams</title>
    <description>Most recent public comments by teacher Tracey Williams</description>
    <link>https://nowcomment.com/users/14015</link>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://nowcomment.com/users/14015/comments"/>
    <item>
      <title>Will it ever be accepted?</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/33803?scroll_to=335783</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/33803?scroll_to=335783</guid>
      <description>This is truly an interesting idea, but I'm not sure I could be convinced of its ability to be successful as a fully implemented assessment tool.  I do believe that it would help students because of the immediate feedback even though it is not a live teacher.  Some feedback is better than none.  On the other hand I could never see this being implemented as an actual grader for something like a state mandated test. How could they possibly keep the error ratio down to an acceptable number, for that matter is there an acceptable number? </description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2015 19:06:05 -0300</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
