<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Comments by Math teacher Susan Protzman</title>
    <description>Most recent public comments by Math teacher Susan Protzman</description>
    <link>https://nowcomment.com/users/14125</link>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://nowcomment.com/users/14125/comments"/>
    <item>
      <title>I have a difficult time seeing exactly how this would be implemented in math content, although I guess you could automate some basic calculations, but not sure about others.

However, for writing, I think this is fabulous.</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/33800?scroll_to=337860</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/33800?scroll_to=337860</guid>
      <description>One question arises though, as teachers instruct on writing in different manners, the 'grader' (I suppose) would grade the same way, each time.  So, is there a way that the teacher can alter some of the 'grading' or is there a 'rubric' so to speak, against which the teacher instructs.  

I say this only when I see frustrated students, as they learn to write from teacher 'A', then the following year teacher 'B' is focusing on other elements of the writing, and they feel they are starting all over again.  With this kind of tool, it seems that its 'one direction' or 'method'.  </description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2015 21:16:34 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
