<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Comments by Glory Tobiason</title>
    <description>Most recent public comments by Glory Tobiason</description>
    <link>https://nowcomment.com/users/14195</link>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://nowcomment.com/users/14195/comments"/>
    <item>
      <title>Interesting, Bob.  I wonder if this works, too: SC are the &quot;what&quot; (i.e., what will teachers see / hear from students?) and LGs are the &quot;why&quot; (i.e., why is that particular student performance worth analyzing and interpreting?&quot;).</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/34294?scroll_to=339973</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/34294?scroll_to=339973</guid>
      <description></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2015 15:37:48 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I'm wondering what &quot;Clarify Intended Learning&quot; might look like for younger students.  I mean, what if the intended learning is somewhat complex or refers to concepts that a 1st or 2nd grader might not be familiar with?</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/34294?scroll_to=339972</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/34294?scroll_to=339972</guid>
      <description></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2015 00:08:52 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
