<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Comments by Jaime Jamison</title>
    <description>Most recent public comments by Jaime Jamison</description>
    <link>https://nowcomment.com/users/147354</link>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://nowcomment.com/users/147354/comments"/>
    <item>
      <title>Ecosystem of Learning vs. ERT</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/377143?scroll_to=3328501</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/377143?scroll_to=3328501</guid>
      <description>I have never taught online. Instead, I was an instructor who attempted to facilitate Emergency Remote Learning (ERT) for a lab-based course for two summers during the COVID pandy. The distinction between ERT and true online teaching is considerable. That is not to say that I took this responsibility lightly or grossly failed to plan the instruction, I simply lacked the time and tools to do it real justice, especially knowing what I know now in terms of the instructional design process. Also, as a side note, outside stressors including the health and safety of all individuals involved, greatly impacted the 30,000-foot perspective on the situation: is learning (under these circumstances) how to distinguish dependent vs. independent variables on a scatter plot, for example, even important when you&#8217;re a student who&#8217;s afraid to go to a family event for fear of getting sick?  Or, possibly even worse, not being able to visit a hospital-bound grandparent due to visitor restrictions?  Being in academia I obviously view education as invaluable; however, as a human I realize that you have nothing if you don&#8217;t have your health or the feeling of safety and stability.  Needless to say, the term &#8220;emergency&#8221; definitely fits the circumstances surrounding the COVID ERT epidemic.

On the contrary, building a successful &#8220;learning ecosystem&#8221; as described by Hodges, et. al. (2020) requires careful instructional design planning and development using a systematic model (pick one!); it&#8217;s NOT simply online content delivery. This learning ecosystem should intentionally incorporate the Nine Dimensions of Learning, choosing the best options within each dimension, for the greatest effectiveness. I appreciated the line stating, &#8220;careful planning for online learning includes not just identifying the content to cover but also carefully tending to how you&#8217;re going to support different types of interactions that are important in the learning process&#8221; (Hodges et.al., 2020). This, again, emphasizes that content delivery is NOT enough!  Addressing the fact that learning is both cognitive and social is a crucial element to planning instruction that supports the following interactions: student-student, student-content, and student-instructor.

I endorse the definition that [good] online education is a robust ecosystem that fully integrates and supports the cognitive and social aspects of learning, not just a hierarchical transmission of information from teacher to student.  It requires full and active participation from instructor and learners alike, which in actuality, is not very different from [good] traditional face-to-face education.  Good education, whether in person or online, requires abundant resources, careful planning, and participation.
</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2024 14:39:02 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
