<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Comments by Angelica Uribe</title>
    <description>Most recent public comments by Angelica Uribe</description>
    <link>https://nowcomment.com/users/15616</link>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://nowcomment.com/users/15616/comments"/>
    <item>
      <title>Understanding equal protection and  federalism with regards to states in concerns of same-sex marriage </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/37888?scroll_to=365296</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/37888?scroll_to=365296</guid>
      <description>As stated in the tenth paragraph, &quot;state's rights serve only one true purpose: fuller protection of individuals.&quot; This should give more freedom to each state to decide on the same-sex marriage topic and for the people in that state who are in favor and should follow through. It also beginning debated through the majority and minority groups they shoud then consider the full faith and credit clause. This provides a lesser tension between the national and state governments. But the main concern is how and when federalism is being taken advantage of. Federalism is a way of organizing the nation under two or more levels of government, but what if it's too much input to cause such dispute. Federalism is a unique system that should be fully understood to ensure each individuals protection and that of the nation.They need to focus more on the broader idea that it's just a marriage license that individuals, no matter who they decide to marry, should have equal rights as all citizens do in the United States.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 08:42:18 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
