<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Comments by Brit Richardson</title>
    <description>Most recent public comments by Brit Richardson</description>
    <link>https://nowcomment.com/users/15622</link>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://nowcomment.com/users/15622/comments"/>
    <item>
      <title>Brittney Richardson:
Is this something states should be able to decide for themselves, by making and interpreting state law?</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/37888?scroll_to=365054</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/37888?scroll_to=365054</guid>
      <description>It is not the states' duties to interpret matters that may create or be in conflict with the U.S Constitution.  Matters of this nature should be strictly left to the Supreme Court, for the mere fact that this matter extends far beyond state law. If there is &quot;no question that the state law falls when It conflicts constitutionally protected rights,&quot; then the issue of same-sex marriage should never even reach the desks of state legislatures.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 23:27:44 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
