<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Comments by Janeth Mora</title>
    <description>Most recent public comments by Janeth Mora</description>
    <link>https://nowcomment.com/users/15629</link>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://nowcomment.com/users/15629/comments"/>
    <item>
      <title>Constitutional individual rights are held regardless of the what the majority believes, so Supreme Court must make the final decision.</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/37888?scroll_to=365207</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/37888?scroll_to=365207</guid>
      <description>As mentioned in the eighth paragraph, rights given to individuals by the Constitution are counter-majoritarian. Since the Constitution guarantees the freedom of religion and mentions the establishment clause, it is clear that there exists a separation of church and state. Although the majority of the population in some states are against gay-marriage perhaps because they believe it unethical, adopting a law prohibiting gay marriage violates the concept of separation of church and state. In addition to this, marriage is never explicitly mentioned or defined in the Constitution, so why did society accept opposite-sex marriage and not same-sex marriage? This is an argument that should not be an issue. How can we say everyone is free and equal, if we do not allow them to marry the people they love? Unfortunately, since this is an issue, the Supreme Court should make the final resolution, since this issue involves infringement of Constitutional individual rights.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 22:17:40 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
