Most recent public comments by Mija Jimenez Perez https://nowcomment.com/users/18733 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43790?scroll_to=505055 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43790?scroll_to=505055 I believe that she didn't partake in the Nazi party. In terms of her making great films, Hitler seemded to have been the popular topic of discussion at that time. Fri, 01 Apr 2016 08:06:47 -0400 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43763?scroll_to=494940 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43763?scroll_to=494940 I agree with Kim Brands. The documentary is only showing how powerful and admired Hitler was by the German citizens, the film maker was not going to show personal details of Hitler. Sat, 12 Mar 2016 07:34:22 -0500 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43762?scroll_to=488002 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43762?scroll_to=488002 I feel that the truth-value of documentaries the evidence that is obtained to prove that such and such situation actually took place. Wed, 02 Nov 2016 12:23:44 -0400 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43758?scroll_to=487465 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43758?scroll_to=487465 The film conveys an unfamiliar culture of Nanook and his family without much emotions as opposed to what is seen in the photo gallery which conveyed the real struggles that they went through. Thu, 03 Mar 2016 20:31:03 -0500 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43742?scroll_to=487452 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43742?scroll_to=487452 Films are more real whether in studio or on location. It just depends on the level of skills of the production team. Thu, 03 Mar 2016 20:20:58 -0500 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43742?scroll_to=487448 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43742?scroll_to=487448 I think this is the same as "seeing is believing". In regards to film "seeing is believing" maybe a problem because a the director of a documentary film is going to include what he/she feels should be included. Wed, 30 Mar 2016 06:46:07 -0400 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43742?scroll_to=487440 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43742?scroll_to=487440 I believe that materialist reasons maybe an individual doing something for something in return. Materialists usually only care about the acquisition of things. Thu, 03 Mar 2016 20:08:47 -0500 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43736?scroll_to=457153 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43736?scroll_to=457153 The Lumière brothers discovered the way to capture actions and émotions on film. Thu, 19 May 2016 18:08:22 -0400 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43736?scroll_to=457149 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43736?scroll_to=457149 I was honestly not bored while watching the film, but thé facture that it was a film from i'm guessing the 1800s, that the film was jumpy so i couldn't totally focus. I was into thé film because it was thé start of innovation regarding film making. Thu, 19 May 2016 17:22:49 -0400 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43736?scroll_to=457129 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43736?scroll_to=457129 Documentaries are presented with evidence to correlate to the visual aspect of the film. The documentary can be distorted when the film maker leaves out details that maybe important. Fri, 05 Feb 2016 08:15:20 -0500 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43736?scroll_to=457119 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43736?scroll_to=457119 Whether dishonest or not dishonest really depends on the film maker and the purpose of the documentary. If it's is a biographical documentary then it has to be factual or else thé credibility will questioned. Fri, 05 Feb 2016 08:02:56 -0500 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43736?scroll_to=457106 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43736?scroll_to=457106 Montage is subjective to convey different meanings. Montage can show a sequence of the character's reaction to a certain action. Another exemple of montage would images of a person or an object's progression and a final exemple of montage would be to speed through a certain évent that is too difficult to cover in one shot Fri, 05 Feb 2016 07:51:26 -0500