<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Comments by Allen Strk</title>
    <description>Most recent public comments by Allen Strk</description>
    <link>https://nowcomment.com/users/18760</link>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://nowcomment.com/users/18760/comments"/>
    <item>
      <title>Great point </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/46240?scroll_to=522012</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/46240?scroll_to=522012</guid>
      <description>He needed to take consideration into what readers want to read as well. It's a tricky situation, where you need to judge what information needs to be revealed. That could possibly define Michael's reputation. </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 06:44:54 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fair point</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/46240?scroll_to=522011</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/46240?scroll_to=522011</guid>
      <description>A tape recorder does provide a credible source of information. It helps both parties, which can't be discounted either. </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 06:42:59 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lifestyle</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/44058?scroll_to=522010</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/44058?scroll_to=522010</guid>
      <description>Would a free lifestyle be a better phrase? She doesn't seem to have much discipline, when it comes to her life. </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 06:35:54 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>McGinnis-MacDonald</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/44650?scroll_to=521776</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/44650?scroll_to=521776</guid>
      <description>McGinnis is trying to build a relationship with McDonald. By staying on MacDonald's side, that could help him gain confidential information. MacDonald wants to state his case and give McGinnis give something to talk about in a positive light. </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 06:59:42 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Michael the Apostate </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/46236?scroll_to=521763</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/46236?scroll_to=521763</guid>
      <description>The reference is based on someone who vacates their judgement. Friction emerges from this moment on what content will be included in the biography. </description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2016 23:32:23 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Authorized biographies </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/46236?scroll_to=521761</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/46236?scroll_to=521761</guid>
      <description>The issue pertains to giving a person command over what information can be told in the respective story. That increases the possibility of key factual information being untold. The writer will need to gain permission on certain aspects of a subject. It will also increase the possibility of leaving the reader gasping for more content. </description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2016 23:23:37 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Journalist first </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/46236?scroll_to=521760</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/46236?scroll_to=521760</guid>
      <description>A journalist mindset is maintaining principles towards getting the story and not being swayed in any direction. They don't put their self over the story either.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2016 23:16:01 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reporter's two drafts</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/44121?scroll_to=518843</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/44121?scroll_to=518843</guid>
      <description>The drafts are flawed based on classifying journalism from a reporting perspective, while discounting its creative possibilities. The newspaper's shortcomings are evident from their inability to share all of the information. That leaves a sense of wanting more, as the story doesn't possess the same personal connection without the full story.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2016 07:56:53 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reporter's call out</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/44121?scroll_to=518840</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/44121?scroll_to=518840</guid>
      <description>The reporter is frustrated by the editor's expectations. He doesn't want to comply with the editor's restrictions. By losing his creative flexibility, the reporter is unfiltered with his desire to get drunk. That coincides with him wanting the editor to pay for his drink. Based on his work ethic and obliging with the editor's strict demands, he feels worthy of asking him to buy a drink. Unsatisfying pay is another reason behind calling the editor a bastard.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 13:37:00 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Not putting all cards on the table </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/44649?scroll_to=518788</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/44649?scroll_to=518788</guid>
      <description>It's a risky approach based on possibly losing power within the subject. You can also lose trust as well by exposing yourself. This approach is best when your prepared and confident about coming out unscathed. Your counterpart may also be offended by the aggressiveness of placing all your cards on the table. </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 18:11:26 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Wambaugh</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/44649?scroll_to=518780</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/44649?scroll_to=518780</guid>
      <description>Wambaugh's fearlessness is evident from his willingness to tell the story. His perspective needs to be clear from expressing the story in this manner. It's possible that he wants to gain the trust of the journalist, but its not exactly clear. </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2016 07:46:38 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reporter</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/44057?scroll_to=514353</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/44057?scroll_to=514353</guid>
      <description>The reporter wants details to the story based on becoming so emotionally involved within the story.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:30:30 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ethical implications </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/44057?scroll_to=514341</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/44057?scroll_to=514341</guid>
      <description>By stressing about accuracy, this indicates an objective mindset when doing your job as a journalist. The editor stresses neutrality that produces some type of emotion or reaction out of the reader. </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:29:34 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Journalists </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/44058?scroll_to=514319</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/44058?scroll_to=514319</guid>
      <description>Journalists are looking to gather data for their respective story. They have to decide what information is valuable, while eliminating unnecessary gossip. </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:28:54 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Not news</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/44058?scroll_to=514313</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/44058?scroll_to=514313</guid>
      <description>If reporters know about her actions, it can't be classified as news. Her open lifestyle is well documented. Why would they bother reporting on something that wouldn't generate much of a reaction?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:28:09 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reporter's non reaction.</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/44058?scroll_to=514306</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/44058?scroll_to=514306</guid>
      <description>The reporter has other matters on his mind. That was evident by sitting immobile. Usually a joke will lead to some type of physical reaction. That never occurred with him. When it comes to smoke and voices, it reveals the lack of hilarity. The smoke showcases hollowness within the room. He may feel light-headed from the alcohol and cigarette smoke.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:26:59 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Spare</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/44058?scroll_to=514290</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/44058?scroll_to=514290</guid>
      <description>A spare companion appears to be what the statement means. It was a very awkward joke about living an open-minded lifestyle </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 06:35:54 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The relationship needs to be understood</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/44058?scroll_to=514287</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/44058?scroll_to=514287</guid>
      <description>The reporter's stance needs to be distinguished. Realize the entire context of each story, along with removing all emotional feelings towards covering it.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:24:18 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Relationship to the story </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/44058?scroll_to=514265</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/44058?scroll_to=514265</guid>
      <description>The reporter is trying to distance himself from any personal relations. Finding more information about the story is the main objective. He couldn't get emotionally attached. as a true professional reporter.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:23:14 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Buildup description </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/44058?scroll_to=514253</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/44058?scroll_to=514253</guid>
      <description>The buildup is based on putting together all of the data before submitting the story. This is an important part to the process. </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:22:11 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Increased tension </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/46240?scroll_to=511406</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/46240?scroll_to=511406</guid>
      <description>A tape recorder shows no faith between the interviewer and interviewee. They will choose their words wisely knowing what can be documented. That being said, a recorder is useful to track the entire conversation and makes transcribing far easier. You need to make a decision on what you value more. Are you dependent of a recorder or more willing to let the other person speak in an unfiltered manner that you can comprehend?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 06:42:59 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Romantic details.</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/46240?scroll_to=511405</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/46240?scroll_to=511405</guid>
      <description>The cliche is based on discovery details that hold strong merit to a story. Readers obviously want to be interested or informed by any story. Realizing substantial information of why something occurred is most important from this cliche. </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 07:58:55 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Michael's denial </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/46240?scroll_to=511404</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/46240?scroll_to=511404</guid>
      <description>The truth can be a dirty discovery that will haunt someone forever. It also could change someone's career from wanting to be allies with everyone to criticizing the wrong person and damaging your career. From reading the paragraph, the biographer is carefully making decisions on what to write. </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 06:44:54 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reasoning for not sharing the same bed. </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/46240?scroll_to=511403</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/46240?scroll_to=511403</guid>
      <description>Sharing a bed can symbolize a personal action, where two people are close to each other and possibly ruin candid information. They made the right decision to avoid making any potential mistake through an intimate setting, despite Michael joking about the situation. </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 07:56:08 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reporter's investment</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/44057?scroll_to=504844</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/44057?scroll_to=504844</guid>
      <description>The different mindsets between editor and reporter couldn't be more evident. Editor is solely focused on finding information and composing it within a professional manner. Reporter has to interact with people, along with listening to their thoughts. That can lead them towards being emotionally invested. The editor can't understand his thought process, while the reporter remains attached. </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:30:31 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Editor vs. Reporter</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/44057?scroll_to=504836</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/44057?scroll_to=504836</guid>
      <description>It's not enough because you need to garner outside information from what they saw on experience. There is simply more substance that is needed than just witnessing something first hand. The editor wants a more structured viewpoint that will gravitate to the reader by focusing on the central idea. Solely relying on observations doesn't do a story enough justice. </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2016 08:16:29 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hero worshipping to biography</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/46237?scroll_to=504821</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/46237?scroll_to=504821</guid>
      <description>When it comes to hero worshipping, it usually means nothing but praise for that person. That precludes them from writing a true biography. Revering someone deeply will leave you narrow minded rather than open minded. </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 07:57:32 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Friendship with journalism</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/46237?scroll_to=504804</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/46237?scroll_to=504804</guid>
      <description>When it comes to true journalism, all emotional ties are to be removed. That's the biggest reason why friendship is incompatible with journalism. Friendship inspires bias, which leads to insufficient work. </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2016 07:54:34 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gossip </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/46237?scroll_to=504800</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/46237?scroll_to=504800</guid>
      <description>It's rare that gossip has any positive or substantial influence on anything, let alone a biography. You never know when gossip is valid. It features a significant amount of questionable information that likely has emotional ties. A biography can't feature content that isn't valid. Gossip can reveal some types of truth. It's not a consistent source for information, which doesn't make it likely justified. </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 07:55:37 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Types of biographies </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/46238?scroll_to=504599</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/46238?scroll_to=504599</guid>
      <description>Michael was open about being turned off by authorized biographies. He didn't like the structure of it. When personal matters start to emerge, Michael changes his stance to accommodate Barbara's demands. </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 20:58:39 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Romantic biography </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/46238?scroll_to=504597</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/46238?scroll_to=504597</guid>
      <description>Any biography express some time of emotion or affection. It can relate to a wonderful positive story or dark gloomy ending that is used within the literary imagination context. With this biography, the couple continuously deals with family conflict and past events as analogies. The obscene truth plays a major role in determining the romance, where all emotions are divulged. </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:15:15 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Putting in the shit </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/46238?scroll_to=504596</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/46238?scroll_to=504596</guid>
      <description>The meaning pertains to uncensored content. It ranges from revealing dirty truths to possibly offending readers. This is essential for a biography to be even more appealing. While you want to preserve some information, that shouldn't remove yourself from being honest. Putting in the shit is a difficult situation, where you can't please everyone. It's still an important element that can't be ignored about someone's life. </description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2016 06:39:52 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Salacious biography </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/46238?scroll_to=504592</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/46238?scroll_to=504592</guid>
      <description>A type of biography that consists of unfiltered content, which is viewed as controversial. It will likely command plenty of interest. The raunchy stories can be found on tabloids and front page headlines. People are always eager to read raw stories without showing much compassion. </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:13:06 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Biography to painting</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/46239?scroll_to=504589</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/46239?scroll_to=504589</guid>
      <description>When creating a biography, you are telling a realistic story that some could possibly resonate with, depending on the demographic. A biographer is like a painter by being in sole possession of their work. You are in control rather than being constrained by certain boundaries. </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:12:11 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Differences</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/46239?scroll_to=504588</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/46239?scroll_to=504588</guid>
      <description>It appears that you reveal more content for readers to understand and digest compared to Michael's view. Most people would obviously prefer reading a more open-minded approach rather than being attentive. Michael's perspective is secluded, as only some can resonate with him. </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:11:10 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Amour-propre</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/46239?scroll_to=504587</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/46239?scroll_to=504587</guid>
      <description>The term relates to self worth. How you envision yourself as a person compared to everyone's else opinion. Journalists don't consider that in their pieces, as facts and quality information are the most important components to their work. </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:09:58 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Meaning </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/46239?scroll_to=504585</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/46239?scroll_to=504585</guid>
      <description>It was a calculated risk that the journalist was confident that some readers would understand his viewpoint. He knew it was going to create conflict, but the story had to be written. </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:08:50 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Material </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/46239?scroll_to=504576</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/46239?scroll_to=504576</guid>
      <description>Treating people as material allows you to be unbiased and removes any emotional or biased ties towards composing a story. This is a difficult transition for many journalists, who can get attached to a particular story or moment. </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:08:16 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Invader</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/46239?scroll_to=504574</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/46239?scroll_to=504574</guid>
      <description>Michael views the journalist as a companion rather than someone that can cause an issue. A common bond is met, which is accommodated by Michael's welcoming personality. </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:07:20 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Editor's patience with reporter</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/43909?scroll_to=480980</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/43909?scroll_to=480980</guid>
      <description>The editor feels sympathetic based on his past experience. A creative mindset is something that he can appreciate from his work ethic. Despite his old preferences, the editor wants him to evolve from his past. Applying the structure of a newspaper story is what needs to be done for the reporter's development. He is trying to do this in a calming molding manner rather than constantly hampering on his deficiencies. </description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2016 10:17:56 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Editors's interest</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/43909?scroll_to=480978</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/43909?scroll_to=480978</guid>
      <description>Editors of newspapers want journalists to be persistent and original with their work. Covering the biggest headlines by breaking news and getting insightful quotes from the most important individuals of a story appears to be essential for them. A combination of catchy headlines, noteworthy quotes, and factual information would be the biggest elements for an editor. </description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2016 10:16:31 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>No room for literature </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/43909?scroll_to=480976</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/43909?scroll_to=480976</guid>
      <description>A newspaper is known for instant news that contains either facts, statistics, and quotes. They want to report on certain stories that produces a reaction. Literature is known for giving us imagery and perspectives that newspaper editors don't have much interest in. There aren't many newspapers that allow a story to go more than one page. </description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2016 10:15:25 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Living breath of the news. </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/43907?scroll_to=480800</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/43907?scroll_to=480800</guid>
      <description>The editor wants to see fresher content. Repetitive information with the same structure and reminiscent headlines of other top reporters aren't going to cut it. With this fresher content, more information will be displayed with facts and deeper details from a particular story. Instead of focusing on the tabloids, it's time to be unique and bring out the entirety of an event. </description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2016 10:09:59 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Second sentence</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/43907?scroll_to=480799</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/43907?scroll_to=480799</guid>
      <description>The sentence expresses the reporter's willingness to  be ambitious as a reporter. Although reporting news is his profession, he shows compassion for people by becoming directly involved in a potential homicide. </description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2016 10:09:26 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Envisioning the reporter</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/43907?scroll_to=480745</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/43907?scroll_to=480745</guid>
      <description>The reporter seems to be well educated and ambitious, despite not meeting the editor's expectations in regards to news stories. The potential is there, yet the editor wants a more direct and informative content. Those are two elements that can help readers gravitate towards his work. </description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:06:12 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Expectations </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/46232?scroll_to=480742</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/46232?scroll_to=480742</guid>
      <description>Michael Foot's expectations about his biography focuses about his glowing achievements and effort towards becoming successful. The clash comes from the biographer desiring full context about Foot's life. Focusing on his accolades and charming personality isn't acceptable for the biographer. A biography needs a full story that will follow in somewhat chronological order, along with an actual flow rather than a list of moments. </description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:04:48 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Buffering</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/46232?scroll_to=480739</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/46232?scroll_to=480739</guid>
      <description>When someone buffers something, it usually pertains to hiding information about your life or some type of story. Michael was trying to focus primarily on his bright moments rather than hamper on his failures. </description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:03:51 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Biography suffer</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/46235?scroll_to=479749</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/46235?scroll_to=479749</guid>
      <description>Mr.Foot's refusal to reveal information about his friends will be detrimental. The truth will be hidden, while he will likely find himself limited in terms of content. Repetitiveness could become a major issue that will leave readers annoyed. </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 23:22:29 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Antidotes</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/46235?scroll_to=479735</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/46235?scroll_to=479735</guid>
      <description>A journalist's literary imagination can serve as an antidote by a creative and legitimized combination. Biographies will present more facts that allows people to be more educated compared to an autobiography. These facts can be presented in a appealing way through quotes and statistics. </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 23:15:36 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Autobiographers </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/46235?scroll_to=479719</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/46235?scroll_to=479719</guid>
      <description>When autobiographers write about their life, they usually feel some type of pressure to make an impression. They need something to gravitate readers involved becoming invested in their life. This can lead to stories becoming convoluted and fabricated. Controversy usually sells, which makes over dramatizing stories beneficial. </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 23:05:01 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reporters in movies </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/43908?scroll_to=474554</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/43908?scroll_to=474554</guid>
      <description>Reporters are viewed as workhorses that play an essential role in setting up a dramatic story. They can be utilized as peacemakers to clear up an incident or forced into an uncomfortable situation by sharing unfortunate news. The rumpled portrayal comes from their rigorous lifestyle featuring mostly work and minimal pleasure. Untidy can be viewed in a similar manner by their disheveled look and constantly being on the move. Obtaining information about a specific story becomes their biggest priority over simple daily methods such as eating regular meals or dressing properly. </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 08:35:54 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Aquarium </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/43908?scroll_to=474548</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/43908?scroll_to=474548</guid>
      <description>There are many references during this paragraph, which relates to an aquarium like setting. &quot;Water at fish&quot; correlates with the reporter's situation. Also when you look at an aquarium's structure, it's very narrow without much breathing room. That is somewhat reminiscent of the reporter and editor, who can't seem to find a clear solution to deal with this difficult climate. It has started to take over their respective lives. </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 08:36:17 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dusty and Gloomy</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/43908?scroll_to=474544</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/43908?scroll_to=474544</guid>
      <description>These negative words suggest a period of time that lacks many joyful moments. Dusty can relate to journalism being stale, as writers are either writing repetitive headlines or focusing on the same story without any authenticity. Gloomy is a dark overview about any particular setting or story. As some mentioned above, The Great Depression likely played a pivotal role in this disappointing era of journalism. </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 08:32:20 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Journalism</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/43908?scroll_to=474541</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/43908?scroll_to=474541</guid>
      <description>The corpse-like description allows us to visualize a man without any exciting features. He is fatigued with a pale and mundane expression. It relates to his journalism by the lack of accomplishments in his respective career. His lackadaisical personality seems to be derailing everything surrounding his career.  </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 08:27:02 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Downfunneled light </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/43908?scroll_to=474538</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/43908?scroll_to=474538</guid>
      <description>The impact showcases a pivotal moment of highlighting an emotional scene. Imagery is used heavily with several adjectives and descriptive materials. The reporter appears to be defeated with a somber setting without feeling any semblance of optimism.  </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 19:14:31 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tension </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/46229?scroll_to=456649</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/46229?scroll_to=456649</guid>
      <description>Whenever anyone conducts a narration of someone's life, it can lead to conflict. There are certain moments that the person being interviewed doesn't want documented. The moments increase when it involves someone associated with politics. It's such a tightrope for them, as they are judged on every action or word. Michael Foot appears to be a genuine person, but he is very emotional and can spark outrage. A narration of someone's life will usually focus on their work ethic and how they earned accolades. Assessing Foot's character appears to be a touchy subject, especially with someone as intense as him. </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 14:25:28 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Process book </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/46229?scroll_to=456642</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/46229?scroll_to=456642</guid>
      <description>A book about process focuses on Foot's philosophies about campaigns and other issues surrounding the British parliament. This is about knowing who Foot is as a person and how he views certain topics from an audio perspective rather than relying on documents to give us an overview of his achievements and failures. By being smoothed over in a biographical narrative, writers can be overly biased towards either his crowning moments or darkest hours. It doesn't give us a full overview of Foot's legacy.  There is nothing more legitimate than audio interviews to showcase someone's ability. </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 14:23:08 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Phrasing </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/43903?scroll_to=456622</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/43903?scroll_to=456622</guid>
      <description>Thick heavy typesplattered can be compared to tabloid journalism. It will emphasize on jaw-dropping stories or incidents, gossip columns, and other trendy headlines. The sole purpose is to generate attention through four to six word catchy quotas. They also use some type of unique caption. </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 07:35:09 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reporter's setting</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/43903?scroll_to=456604</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/43903?scroll_to=456604</guid>
      <description>The author formulates an aura that can compare to a very competitive world. This competitiveness makes for high energy, where the reporter wants to get stories from pilots and know about their day-to-day life.  </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 21:27:37 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Style of use</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/43903?scroll_to=456573</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/43903?scroll_to=456573</guid>
      <description>Ejaculations is straight to the point. They gravitate to an audience that wants immediate answers. It attracts their attention, which can boost viewership to their respective website. They don't provide enough valuable information to educate readers on a certain issue or story.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 07:17:21 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dogwatch can be described as. </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/43903?scroll_to=456565</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/43903?scroll_to=456565</guid>
      <description>A dogwatch provides instant information about their local organizations and overall society. This involves news that is highly demanded with factual statements from public officials to confirm a story. </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 14:15:18 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
