Comments by Andrew White Most recent public comments by Andrew White https://nowcomment.com/users/19919 Engagement https://nowcomment.com/documents/56402?scroll_to=626470 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56402?scroll_to=626470 A reviewer must have a large comprehension of a topic, which will lead to enthusiasm. Enthusiasm of engagement is a desire for understanding and thought, but should be careful not to emptily praise the topic, this should be done in a cautious way and in an attractive manner since readers do want to be educated and entertained. Tue, 29 Nov 2016 18:42:06 -0500 Writing shorter https://nowcomment.com/documents/56401?scroll_to=626467 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56401?scroll_to=626467 Writing briefer means the writer has to be more cohesive with fewer words. The manner of picking the right words is challenging but ultimately rewarding. This is imperative when writing a review. Tue, 29 Nov 2016 18:35:59 -0500 There is risk https://nowcomment.com/documents/56401?scroll_to=626466 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56401?scroll_to=626466 Pool states that tradition requests that the reviewer come off as authoritative. When you are reviewing you are obligated to pick a stance and stick with it. This is the backbone of the review and ultimately why people will read it. But there is a risk in seeming condescending. Tue, 29 Nov 2016 18:33:04 -0500 Times will never be on their side. https://nowcomment.com/documents/56401?scroll_to=626465 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56401?scroll_to=626465 Time will never be on the reviewer's side because of deadlines. The reviewer might be reading numerous books between a short time spans. That little amount of time does not permit for a concise breakdown of the material up for evaluation. This is important when giving reviews because a reviewer’s first impression may change over time. Wed, 30 Nov 2016 06:58:10 -0500 There is an implication https://nowcomment.com/documents/56410?scroll_to=626464 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56410?scroll_to=626464 There is an implication that Madison’s biography must not disregard the act of being a slave owner. The reviewer has offered his viewpoint that this book offers insight on Madison's slave ownership where as others have failed to do so or haven’t acknowledged it at all. Wed, 30 Nov 2016 06:57:20 -0500 By treating it as a thing apart, the reviewer is implying that these biographers have pigeonholed https://nowcomment.com/documents/56410?scroll_to=626463 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56410?scroll_to=626463 By treating it as a thing apart, the reviewer is implying that these biographers have pigeonholed Madison's slave ownership instead of giving attention to other facets of his life. They are seemingly affording him him carte blanche by minimizing the substance of owning slaves. Wed, 30 Nov 2016 06:56:27 -0500 The matchup is charged due in part to the outcome of the review. A writer may get rave reviews for one piece, and negative comments following the next one. Its about the thrill of the gamble. https://nowcomment.com/documents/56400?scroll_to=611145 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56400?scroll_to=611145 Wed, 02 Nov 2016 21:18:52 -0400 Reviewing can be difficult. Your opinion may ultimately sway a reader to make a decision based on the pro's and con's of the reviewer. The process should be painstaking https://nowcomment.com/documents/56359?scroll_to=611102 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56359?scroll_to=611102 Wed, 02 Nov 2016 19:11:10 -0400 According to Pool, anyone can be a reviewer. Though this may cheapen or lessen the quality of the review because there are little to no credentials for the field. The occupation itself is ambiguous because everyone has an opinion. https://nowcomment.com/documents/56359?scroll_to=611100 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56359?scroll_to=611100 Wed, 02 Nov 2016 19:09:07 -0400 Reviewing can be difficult due to time constraints and the length of whats being reviewed. In other words, time is of the essence. https://nowcomment.com/documents/56359?scroll_to=611097 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56359?scroll_to=611097 Fri, 09 Dec 2016 15:11:33 -0500 Timing places more power behind facts as to best present them to the reader. Its all about structure. https://nowcomment.com/documents/56408?scroll_to=589874 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56408?scroll_to=589874 Sun, 09 Oct 2016 07:35:01 -0400 The functions of the literary allusions used here are merely to place more emphasis on the character, as to create a mood for the reader to best digest the story. https://nowcomment.com/documents/56408?scroll_to=589873 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56408?scroll_to=589873 Sun, 09 Oct 2016 07:34:34 -0400 The paragraph gives a dose of credibility to Assia’s femme fatale history, shedding light her reasoning behind wanting to steal Hughes away https://nowcomment.com/documents/56408?scroll_to=589872 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56408?scroll_to=589872 Sat, 03 Dec 2016 20:49:35 -0500 A femme fatale is a woman who is irresistibly attractive and posses a threat to those who fall for her. By painting Assia in this light, the reader is seeing how desirable and mysterious she is first hand, juxtaposed to Plath's "housewife". https://nowcomment.com/documents/56408?scroll_to=589871 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56408?scroll_to=589871 Sat, 08 Oct 2016 17:42:20 -0400 The word "world' instead of"marriage" is utilized to place more literary importance or attention onto the situation at hand. https://nowcomment.com/documents/56408?scroll_to=589870 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56408?scroll_to=589870 Sun, 09 Oct 2016 07:33:13 -0400 Agon is an ancient Greek term for a struggle or a contest. So much emphasis is placed on it because it references the circus-show that is Plath and Hughes marital issues. https://nowcomment.com/documents/56408?scroll_to=589869 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56408?scroll_to=589869 Sun, 09 Oct 2016 07:32:38 -0400 The most compelling works of literature tend to not always get reviewed. Works that are better known tend to get more attention because readers are attracted to a well-liked review. https://nowcomment.com/documents/56358?scroll_to=586232 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56358?scroll_to=586232 Wed, 12 Oct 2016 07:01:22 -0400 Review editors having an "awareness" of publications means that they comprehend how to categorize publications into the correct categories and understand types of material they often publish. https://nowcomment.com/documents/56358?scroll_to=586231 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56358?scroll_to=586231 Sun, 02 Oct 2016 20:37:45 -0400 Pool’s response pertains to the book page. It will be reviewed centered around the publications observations. So whoever the audience of that publication is, it will be reviewed. https://nowcomment.com/documents/56358?scroll_to=586230 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56358?scroll_to=586230 Mon, 03 Oct 2016 07:42:41 -0400 “Cultural guidance” implies that the reviewer is sifting through the culture, which is a reflection their present. Consumer advice tells you what you should or should not buy. This advice is a matter of fundamental value to the consumer https://nowcomment.com/documents/56357?scroll_to=586222 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56357?scroll_to=586222 Sun, 02 Oct 2016 18:16:16 -0400 The statement is difficult to say because there is no apparent time when book reviewing was regarded as beneficial. Pool states that since the inception of book reviewing, it has been grieved. Pool gives many examples dating from 1800 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56357?scroll_to=586221 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56357?scroll_to=586221 Mon, 03 Oct 2016 07:50:21 -0400 An unmediated historical document is an honest source. It has not been distorted or interfered with by a third party. It is concise. https://nowcomment.com/documents/56406?scroll_to=586220 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56406?scroll_to=586220 Mon, 03 Oct 2016 07:49:35 -0400 The interpretation of Anne Frank the author, rather than the target, provides a fresh viewpoint to an unacquainted facet of her life. Prose altered the reviewers awareness, to view the diary as a precisely thought out piece. https://nowcomment.com/documents/56406?scroll_to=586219 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56406?scroll_to=586219 Mon, 03 Oct 2016 07:49:06 -0400 The first sentence describes the preceding paragraph and sets up the point the writer is building in regards to why/how Francine Prose has a diverse view on the Anne Frank story. https://nowcomment.com/documents/56406?scroll_to=586217 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56406?scroll_to=586217 Sun, 02 Oct 2016 17:39:26 -0400 The author is curious if there is more perspective to be shared. It also seems to suggest that the topic has been excessively documented. https://nowcomment.com/documents/56406?scroll_to=586216 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56406?scroll_to=586216 Mon, 03 Oct 2016 07:47:46 -0400 Witty and dumb in this instance, are included to highlight the skills Monroe had as an actress. She was a buoyant individual, who didn't take herself too seriously, a stark contrast to her acting teacher Lee Strasberg. https://nowcomment.com/documents/56356?scroll_to=586215 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56356?scroll_to=586215 Sun, 02 Oct 2016 17:34:31 -0400 The review is Monroe's personal writings. The paragraph with a quote from the writer herself is suitable in its ability to sum up Monroe's mental state. https://nowcomment.com/documents/56356?scroll_to=586213 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56356?scroll_to=586213 Thu, 08 Dec 2016 20:44:23 -0500 Seemingly, most biographies place emphasis on her character as an actress. By the second sentence, it explains that her biographies were written about the facts of her life as well as her ascend to stardom. https://nowcomment.com/documents/56356?scroll_to=586212 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56356?scroll_to=586212 Mon, 03 Oct 2016 07:46:42 -0400 The first paragraph attempts to ascertain that Marilyn Monroe had many talents and unique assets. It forms that idea that Monroe was a modest person who was more than a beautiful actress. It mentions her shortcomings, but acclaims her artistic views https://nowcomment.com/documents/56356?scroll_to=586211 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56356?scroll_to=586211 Sun, 02 Oct 2016 17:26:17 -0400 The rudimentary components of a book review are an introduction of the material. It includes basic opinions on the characteristics of the book with examples, and a reiteration of what is important about it. https://nowcomment.com/documents/56355?scroll_to=586209 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56355?scroll_to=586209 Sun, 02 Oct 2016 17:18:47 -0400 The concluding paragraph simply ends the review in a straightforward way. It conveys that “reading Kaplan is a good start” and characterizes the book as being very simple and not challenging. https://nowcomment.com/documents/56355?scroll_to=586208 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56355?scroll_to=586208 Sun, 02 Oct 2016 17:16:10 -0400 "Rinsing out" simply means the author should precisely select the information they should and should not have included in their book. https://nowcomment.com/documents/56355?scroll_to=586207 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56355?scroll_to=586207 Sun, 02 Oct 2016 17:14:03 -0400 An epigraph is used to create the tone for the subsequent material. https://nowcomment.com/documents/56355?scroll_to=586206 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56355?scroll_to=586206 Sun, 02 Oct 2016 17:12:27 -0400 The word order is interesting. the sentences are able to convey a straightforward message without lengthly use of words. https://nowcomment.com/documents/56355?scroll_to=586205 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56355?scroll_to=586205 Mon, 03 Oct 2016 07:45:11 -0400 The first two sentences begin the theme of the review, the qualifications of the author, and their outlook on the writing. https://nowcomment.com/documents/56355?scroll_to=586201 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56355?scroll_to=586201 Sun, 02 Oct 2016 17:08:19 -0400 The first two sentences begin the theme of the review, the qualifications of the author, and their outlook on the writing. https://nowcomment.com/documents/56355?scroll_to=586200 https://nowcomment.com/documents/56355?scroll_to=586200 The first two sentences begin the theme of the review, the qualifications of the author, and their outlook on the writing. The initial sentence is an introduction to the review. Readers instantly know that the review will be about Frank Sinatra. Additionally, It shows that the biography is just one of several, The second sentence adds to the topic and structure of the biography as well as the actual review. Mon, 03 Oct 2016 07:44:31 -0400 Agenda https://nowcomment.com/documents/43790?scroll_to=507452 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43790?scroll_to=507452 I think that all she wanted to do was make boundless films about the world and Germany. I think in order to do so at that time; she had to associate herself with Hitler and his regime. They gave her the access she needed in order to do the work that she needed to do. I cant very well say if she was pleased with being allied with the party but it is obvious she did what she had to do in order to forge a legacy for herself and her work. Fri, 08 Apr 2016 08:00:13 -0400 World of Leni https://nowcomment.com/documents/43790?scroll_to=507443 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43790?scroll_to=507443 I think the film accurately portrays the complexities of her day to day dispositions. The film showed her being playful, as well as serious. She couldn't hide this because she wasn't the one directing or editing the film. Thu, 19 May 2016 19:39:40 -0400 Narrator https://nowcomment.com/documents/43791?scroll_to=507426 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43791?scroll_to=507426 Though in particular movies the narrator is used to influence the view of the audience, in this case I believe narration is used as a tool to illuminate the images and reenactments. I think Riefenstahl might state that the images and reenactments address the subject for themselves. I think a voiceover narrator is used to describe a specific perspective. Although the voiceover was narrating realities and pictures, descriptions can also fluently express views and agendas. I think Riefenstahl being a administrator of propaganda would encourage this Fri, 20 May 2016 10:12:50 -0400 realism https://nowcomment.com/documents/43791?scroll_to=507412 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43791?scroll_to=507412 The concept of realism can vary. In this case, realism pertains to the believability of the film is question. In this circumstance, the individuals navigating in and out of the tunnels periodically whilst existing, displays their endurance in the face of adversity. Conversely in this case the fortitude of the British spirit. Though these trails may seem impractical to the audience, it was reality to these folk. Fri, 08 Apr 2016 07:47:19 -0400 The reality https://nowcomment.com/documents/43785?scroll_to=499278 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43785?scroll_to=499278 The reality of this film is that of conquest and power and the displays of those ideologies by Nazi Germany. The shots and angles glorify the impending triumph of the Hitler regime. The over all experience of valor and accolade fall right into the ideology of the Nazis and Hitler Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:27:49 -0400 Propaganda https://nowcomment.com/documents/43785?scroll_to=499272 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43785?scroll_to=499272 It can be considered propaganda simply because of those who were involved and what there agendas were. The underlying themes of power and triumph surrounded by Nazi Germany incorporated into the film were no coincidence and served a purpose. Glorification. Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:34:38 -0400 Olympia as art https://nowcomment.com/documents/43785?scroll_to=499255 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43785?scroll_to=499255 The Olympics is definitely a form of art. Sports in general are displays of defying feats orchestrated by the physical and mental will of the human body and psyche. The film shows the beauty of Olympia and its competitions with stunning angles and shots of the athlete performing. Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:35:17 -0400 The real face https://nowcomment.com/documents/43785?scroll_to=499252 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43785?scroll_to=499252 The real face of the Olympics was that of strength, power and accolade. By Hitler spear-heading the event, his is subliminally conveying his agenda. He was the reason all countrymen and races assembled and performed. Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:37:28 -0400 fascist aesthetic https://nowcomment.com/documents/43785?scroll_to=499250 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43785?scroll_to=499250 Basically, both the Olympics and fascism are earthly faiths that worship the human physique and pursue the conquest of the will. The Olympic slogan of ("faster, higher, stronger") is something that could have been fantasized by Hitler or Mussolini. Through the 1920s and 1930s, celebrations of the Olympiads and fascist conventions grew increasingly similar. Together they fit under the quasi-religious experience, with gradually sophisticated rites and rituals, and decorated with striking iconography. Even their salutes favored one another. Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:43:16 -0400 Fame and fortune https://nowcomment.com/documents/43785?scroll_to=499244 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43785?scroll_to=499244 Hitler is a master manipulator so any glorification of himself or his brand isn't surprising. He would take any opportunity to show off what he can accomplish. World domination was on his mind and what better way to get people to trust you than to be the main reason for was appears to be unification? Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:41:34 -0400 View of Hitler https://nowcomment.com/documents/43763?scroll_to=494767 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43763?scroll_to=494767 In present day, we obviously are privy to Hitlers path of evil. Albeit many years ago, Im sure people knew what was going on as well. The perspective of the film paints Hitler in a grandiose, leadership role, because thats what he was to some people, and probably to the director of this film. If you were aware of who he was, watching this movie, you'd probably think he was a positive person. Thu, 19 May 2016 23:21:56 -0400 Hitler is like a conductor https://nowcomment.com/documents/43763?scroll_to=494761 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43763?scroll_to=494761 The word "conduct" is especially fitting for Hitler because of the style of his speeches. In the sense that he is the focal point. He demands attention and his audience like a conductor to an orchestra. Fri, 11 Mar 2016 07:52:29 -0500 Can there be such a thing as an objective documentary? https://nowcomment.com/documents/43762?scroll_to=494750 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43762?scroll_to=494750 4.I don’t suppose there is such a thing as objective documentary. The process of creating a documentary requires one to do their own do their own research and recite the events by themselves as opposed to consuming someone else’s facts and beliefs with an agenda. Personal opinion comes along with flaws such as prejudice and unfairness. Fri, 11 Mar 2016 08:03:08 -0500 What is the truth-value of documentary? https://nowcomment.com/documents/43762?scroll_to=494749 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43762?scroll_to=494749 3.Examples of truth-value in documentaries can be found in the film The Man With a Movie Camera. In this case the viewer watches a movie of a film in production. The viewer can then ponder about what they just saw as well as think about the creative process. The work that goes into a film is deeper than just what the shot looks like but actually the moments that lead up to the acquisition of the coveted scene and its requirements. Fri, 11 Mar 2016 08:02:16 -0500 How do films create their own reality? https://nowcomment.com/documents/43762?scroll_to=494748 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43762?scroll_to=494748 2. Films generate their own reality by the concealing and manipulation of images revealed. We see different methods of manipulation in the scenes used to capture incredible shots like the one in Man with a Movie Camera. Specifically referring to the scene when it appeared the camera man was in danger of getting hit by a train but in reality it was a manipulation of camera angles. Fri, 11 Mar 2016 08:01:11 -0500 In what sense do documentaries actually document? https://nowcomment.com/documents/43762?scroll_to=494746 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43762?scroll_to=494746 1.Documentaries document what the documentarian wants to be portrayed. For example, Nanook of the North showed us how the director wanted to show Nanook and his family as “gentle savages” and he did just that by manipulating camera angles. He had an agenda and it was reached through his cinematography and direction. Fri, 11 Mar 2016 08:00:11 -0500 Answers: Documentary Film March 5 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43762?scroll_to=487299 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43762?scroll_to=487299 1.Documentaries document what the documentarian wants to be portrayed. For example, Nanook of the North showed us how the director wanted to show Nanook and his family as "gentle savages" and he did just that by manipulating camera angles. He had an agenda and it was reached through his cinematography and direction. 2. Films generate their own reality by the concealing and manipulation of images revealed. We see different methods of manipulation in the scenes used to capture incredible shots like the one in Man with a Movie Camera. Specifically referring to the scene when it appeared the camera man was in danger of getting hit by a train but in reality it was a manipulation of camera angles. 3.Examples of truth-value in documentaries can be found in the film The Man With a Movie Camera. In this case the viewer watches a movie of a film in production. The viewer can then ponder about what they just saw as well as think about the creative process. The work that goes into a film is deeper than just what the shot looks like but actually the moments that lead up to the acquisition of the coveted scene and its requirements. 4.I don’t suppose there is such a thing as objective documentary. The process of creating a documentary requires one to do their own do their own research and recite the events by themselves as opposed to consuming someone else’s facts and beliefs with an agenda. Personal opinion comes along with flaws such as prejudice and unfairness. Fri, 04 Mar 2016 08:27:33 -0500 Subject of the people https://nowcomment.com/documents/43758?scroll_to=475007 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43758?scroll_to=475007 In retrospect, Flaherty's agenda is clear. He doesn't care about what is actually going on in Nanook and his family's daily life, instead his interests rest merely in making a touching film that hasn't been seen before. He wants to manipulate and fool his audience into thinking that an Eskimos life is all fun and games. Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:33:54 -0500 noble savage https://nowcomment.com/documents/43758?scroll_to=475006 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43758?scroll_to=475006 kind, thoughtful, playful, hardy, strategic, resourceful, carefree, intuitive. Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:29:37 -0500 Feeling sorry https://nowcomment.com/documents/43758?scroll_to=475005 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43758?scroll_to=475005 The way that the movie was shot, and what was included , does not grant sympathy from me. The film is somewhat of a delusion of a happy life of Nanook and his family. In reality , they go through various hardships and stuggle, natural of that of a family that inhabit such a harsh climate. Deception is the key here. The agenda is to make their life seem more trivial and care free than it is. Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:29:07 -0500 Moral lesson https://nowcomment.com/documents/43758?scroll_to=475004 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43758?scroll_to=475004 What I gathered from the film is that you can lose a sense of morality, for the sake of the art. For example, following Nanooks death, the movie could have taken a more honored approach to the film. It could have been a tribute to the life of Nanook but it seemed more like an exploitation of it. Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:26:03 -0500 technique https://nowcomment.com/documents/43742?scroll_to=471200 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43742?scroll_to=471200 This may imply that perception is everything and you cant always trust what you see. It is up to the viewer to do more research. Certain skills can be used to manipulate what is seen on screen and thats why you have to take it with a grain of salt. Sun, 14 Feb 2016 06:48:05 -0500 Realer film https://nowcomment.com/documents/43742?scroll_to=471199 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43742?scroll_to=471199 I think a film can be categorized as "real" if it is shot raw and sans hollywood like perfection. These "raw" films may resonate more heavily with people becaue it seems so real and encompasses real life scenery. Sun, 14 Feb 2016 06:46:36 -0500 getting around https://nowcomment.com/documents/43742?scroll_to=471198 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43742?scroll_to=471198 Getting around, or comprehension of the art. Often times films with a serious message doesnt get around quite like a film about super heros does, and thus falls on less of an audience due to lack of interest. Sun, 14 Feb 2016 06:45:27 -0500 Perception is reality https://nowcomment.com/documents/43742?scroll_to=471197 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43742?scroll_to=471197 I think often times, perception is reality, and seeing is believing. Its all sensory. Our eyes help see the the strongest evidence. And with this, caution must be exercised depending on the directors goal. Sun, 14 Feb 2016 06:43:00 -0500 Materialist Reasons https://nowcomment.com/documents/43742?scroll_to=471196 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43742?scroll_to=471196 I think that the notion of film leads us down the path of materialism in general. As society evolved, so did its desires. This is our affliction. Through film, we carry out our materialistic urges. We make films about stuff, and that have stuff in them. those are our reasons Sun, 14 Feb 2016 06:35:10 -0500 Camera techniques https://nowcomment.com/documents/43736?scroll_to=466978 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43736?scroll_to=466978 The Lumiere Brothers used what they knew as far angles and technique. As they began to experiment with camera placement, angle and lighting, progression is obviously taking place. Thu, 19 May 2016 18:04:40 -0400 I was bored https://nowcomment.com/documents/43736?scroll_to=466977 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43736?scroll_to=466977 I was bored because I am spoiled, as we all may be,considering the time of era we inhabit. We are so used to grandiose shots, frames that tantalize us like never before. Film has evolved no doubt but for that time, for those viewers, it was splendid. Wed, 10 Feb 2016 10:56:33 -0500 Timing https://nowcomment.com/documents/43736?scroll_to=466975 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43736?scroll_to=466975 Timing is crucial because that is the essence of film. We are capturing time, manipulating it for a purpose. Shots have to be exact, on time, or not, depending on what your goal is. Wed, 10 Feb 2016 10:54:21 -0500 Documentaries https://nowcomment.com/documents/43736?scroll_to=466963 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43736?scroll_to=466963 All documentaries have an agenda. They intend to document some aspect of reality, for the purposes of displaying knowledge or maintaining historical record. They may or may not be fact, I think thats up to the viewer to inquire. Wed, 10 Feb 2016 10:52:50 -0500 It is dishonest? https://nowcomment.com/documents/43736?scroll_to=466961 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43736?scroll_to=466961 I think that the idea is very divisive. It can be perceived as dishonest as well as it can be used as a technique to form bias to create an agenda Fri, 20 May 2016 10:04:54 -0400 Film technique (montage) https://nowcomment.com/documents/43736?scroll_to=466958 https://nowcomment.com/documents/43736?scroll_to=466958 A montage is a film editing technique in which a short series of shots are edited to save space. It can consist of the following techniques. Still pictures Sepia tone Slow-paced editing Orchestral music No dialogue Wed, 10 Feb 2016 10:50:54 -0500