<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Comments by Christina Whitt</title>
    <description>Most recent public comments by Christina Whitt</description>
    <link>https://nowcomment.com/users/23954</link>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://nowcomment.com/users/23954/comments"/>
    <item>
      <title>inuring </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/62808?scroll_to=608161</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/62808?scroll_to=608161</guid>
      <description>Toughen, condition, as in he was conditioning his body to hardship. He was preparing himself.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2016 08:32:35 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Wants to find passage near the pole, and find the secret of the magnet.</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/62808?scroll_to=608160</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/62808?scroll_to=608160</guid>
      <description>To me, he seems to be really determined to achieve his dream, no matter what.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2016 08:25:56 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Conjectures </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/62808?scroll_to=608159</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/62808?scroll_to=608159</guid>
      <description>concluding something without complete information. </description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2016 08:22:33 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ardent</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/62808?scroll_to=608158</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/62808?scroll_to=608158</guid>
      <description>enthusiastic or passionate. (Sounds like the word &quot;fervent!&quot;)</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2016 08:21:01 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Diffusing</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/62808?scroll_to=608157</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/62808?scroll_to=608157</guid>
      <description>To spread over a wide area. In this case, he is marveling at the sun's beauty, and notices how its light spreads over the horizon.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2016 08:13:02 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fervent</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/62808?scroll_to=608156</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/62808?scroll_to=608156</guid>
      <description>Fervent means passionate. It sounds like the more he travels, the excited he is becoming excited about the possibilities of his daydreams becoming true. </description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2016 08:10:09 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Robert Walton</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/62808?scroll_to=608155</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/62808?scroll_to=608155</guid>
      <description>Robert Walton is a main character, a ship captain, writing a letter to his sister, Margaret. He is planning to go on a long journey in hopes of fulfilling his dream of finding a passage to the North Pole.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 17:55:54 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I agree with you, that he pushed how having a Pardoner is wrong.</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/60379?scroll_to=576288</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/60379?scroll_to=576288</guid>
      <description>But that was also his criticism with the church, that it was corrupt itself. After all, the Pardoners represented the church!</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2016 06:13:06 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What criticism do you think Chaucer is making of the Pardoner, or the church, by telling this story?</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/60379?scroll_to=576287</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/60379?scroll_to=576287</guid>
      <description>Chaucer is criticizing the church for making people literally pay for their sins to be forgiven, which God never said. He said that if you repent and turn of your ways, He would forgive your sins. He never said that you had to pay for it.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2016 06:09:19 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What &quot;sin&quot; ultimately killed the three men?</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/60379?scroll_to=576286</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/60379?scroll_to=576286</guid>
      <description>It was greed! Greed is the most &quot;poisonous&quot; sin of all. It makes people do things that they would not normally do, but might not even regret.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2016 06:01:52 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Paragraph 34, sentence 4</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/60379?scroll_to=576285</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/60379?scroll_to=576285</guid>
      <description>These three men ended up being Death itself, because they caused the death of each other!</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2016 05:58:57 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Paragraph 28</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/60379?scroll_to=576284</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/60379?scroll_to=576284</guid>
      <description>Verbal irony
He says, &quot;by my word,&quot; but how good could his word be, when he just betrayed the other friend!</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2016 05:54:24 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Paragraph 23</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/60379?scroll_to=576283</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/60379?scroll_to=576283</guid>
      <description>The men gave up looking for Death, and instead chose to succomb to greed. At this point, they do not see the connection.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2016 05:48:55 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Paragraph 19, sentence 3</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/60379?scroll_to=576282</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/60379?scroll_to=576282</guid>
      <description>Who, or what, do you think the old man represents? 
This sound crazy, and I hope I am not the only one who has thought about it this way, but perhaps he represents goodness! I know that this is a little confusing. He seems to know a lot about death, but then again, he admitted this. If we were to believe him, then he is actually a good person, who simply is painfully waiting for death to come. If this is true, then he would represent the only goodness here. After all, why are the three drunk people seeking Death? They want to kill him! That is murder, which is bad. This man simply wants to be dead, so he can be with his mother. He admittedly did not &quot;trespass in act or word.&quot;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2016 05:38:53 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Paragraph 18, sentence 3</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/60379?scroll_to=576281</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/60379?scroll_to=576281</guid>
      <description>This could be verbal irony, because he asks his dead mother to let him in, which she can neither hear him nor let him do. (I think verbal, because he is speaking those words to his mother.)</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2016 05:24:57 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Paragraph 14, sentence 3.</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/60379?scroll_to=576280</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/60379?scroll_to=576280</guid>
      <description>I believe this is verbal irony. After all, you cannot kill Death. Death is inevitable. I could be wrong, because in this situation, they think that they can, but that could make it dramatic irony!</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2016 05:18:03 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Situational irony</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/60379?scroll_to=576278</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/60379?scroll_to=576278</guid>
      <description>I think this is situational irony. First, Although these younger people, including younger men, women, and children have all died, he does not. Secondly, he wants to die, but cannot. Again, that sounds like situational irony. </description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2016 04:05:54 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>That is really funny!</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/60379?scroll_to=576277</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/60379?scroll_to=576277</guid>
      <description>I thought it was strange that a man &quot;blessed&quot; the drunks. I just didn't figure out what he meant!</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2016 03:58:37 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Paragraph 15</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/60379?scroll_to=576276</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/60379?scroll_to=576276</guid>
      <description>This is dramatic irony. Apparently they do not realize that they cannot kill Death. Death is already ... DEAD!</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2016 03:55:37 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Good eye!</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/60379?scroll_to=576275</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/60379?scroll_to=576275</guid>
      <description>I missed that one, but that's right!</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2016 03:53:01 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Paragraph 11, Sentence 1</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/60379?scroll_to=576272</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/60379?scroll_to=576272</guid>
      <description>This would have to be situational irony, because it says for the LOVE of Christ Who died for us, then tells us to forsake any oath. I would not forsake any oath, especially for the LOVE of Christ. </description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2016 03:37:42 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How mosaic plagiarism can happen, and how to avoid it</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/57214?scroll_to=564741</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/57214?scroll_to=564741</guid>
      <description>I apologize for putting my document in the wrong place! I decided to come back and delete it, and copy it over to the correct area!
     Mosaic plagiarism is taking a sentence and changing a few of the words. This might be done from different sources, and could be accidental. For instance, you might have forgotten to write down the source or thought it did not matter since it was only a few words. 

      Fortunately, there are ways to avoid plagiarizing. One way is to use an electronic application that checks your document for possible plagiarism. This is important, even if you are certain that you documented all of your work. Perhaps you read something and accidentally wrote it, with just different words. The best way to prevent plagiarism, however, is to cite all your sources, no matter how few words you copied. Make certain to paraphrase often, and put quotes around two or more words written together.
  That said, I did get confused about the differences between citing and references. I hope I can come to understand all these rules this year. It probably sounds more complicated than it is, but it is not something I would want to do, even by accident.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2016 20:06:00 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How mosaic plagiarism can happen, and how to avoid it</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/57214?scroll_to=562870</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/57214?scroll_to=562870</guid>
      <description>Mosaic plagiarism is taking a sentence and changing a few of the words. This might be done from different sources, and could be accidental. For instance, you might have forgotten to write down the source or thought it did not matter since it was only a few words. 

Fortunately, there are ways to avoid plagiarizing. One way is to use an electronic application that checks your document for possible plagiarism. This is important, even if you are certain that you documented all of your work. Perhaps you read something and accidentally wrote it, with just different words. The best way to prevent plagiarism, however, is to cite all your sources, no matter how few words you copied. Make certain to paraphrase often, and put quotes around two or more words written together.
  That said, I did get confused about the differences between citing and references. I hope I can come to understand all these rules this year. It probably sounds more complicated than it is, but it is not something I would want to do, even by accident.
EDIT - I tried to delete this after copying and pasting it to the correct area, but could not figure out how to delete this!</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2016 20:07:02 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
