<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Comments by Leitha Delves</title>
    <description>Most recent public comments by Leitha Delves</description>
    <link>https://nowcomment.com/users/27113</link>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://nowcomment.com/users/27113/comments"/>
    <item>
      <title>Does &quot;classical&quot; always equal &quot;outdated&quot;?</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/67217?scroll_to=645134</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/67217?scroll_to=645134</guid>
      <description>I know I, for one, place more value on knowledge authenticated by experts, than on the popularity vote. I can't quite see why this should be wrong! :)</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2017 02:33:11 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why not- co-existence rather than transcendance?</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/67217?scroll_to=645133</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/67217?scroll_to=645133</guid>
      <description>I can't agree that scholarship has to shift away from its current form, towards their reconfigured notion of social scholarship. I think they need to co-exist, with traditional scholarship retaining its sub-purpose of demonstrating an ability to engage in applied research at a deep and rigorous level, and social scholarship being an optional add-on that has a completely different, and fairly intangible, purpose.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2017 02:33:11 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
