Comments by Paul Chaber Most recent public comments by Paul Chaber https://nowcomment.com/users/28207 But there is also the issue that these immigrants are still considered "illegal". Aren't they still creating controversy from living in America without any proper documentation. https://nowcomment.com/documents/70074?scroll_to=666133 https://nowcomment.com/documents/70074?scroll_to=666133 Tue, 31 Jan 2017 08:25:05 -0500 It's also ironic that the federal government which tends to be against illegal immigration also, through the Supreme Court case, protects illegal immigration. https://nowcomment.com/documents/70074?scroll_to=666128 https://nowcomment.com/documents/70074?scroll_to=666128 Tue, 31 Jan 2017 08:23:32 -0500 "Local government have constitutional authority to grant residents more rights and protections." https://nowcomment.com/documents/70074?scroll_to=666126 https://nowcomment.com/documents/70074?scroll_to=666126 Vargas uses this evidence in order to support his argument that sanctuary cities need to remain under local law. According to the constitution, citizens under a local can get more rights and protections which is beneficial for illegal immigrants who can be in trouble from the federal government. Tue, 31 Jan 2017 08:21:40 -0500 Vargas claims that sanctuary cities need to stay under the protection of local and state government while Ting claims that sanctuary cities should follow the federal government and comply to immigration laws. https://nowcomment.com/documents/70074?scroll_to=666100 https://nowcomment.com/documents/70074?scroll_to=666100 Tue, 31 Jan 2017 08:11:15 -0500