<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Comments by James Ward</title>
    <description>Most recent public comments by James Ward</description>
    <link>https://nowcomment.com/users/28244</link>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://nowcomment.com/users/28244/comments"/>
    <item>
      <title>Then a) if federal government can not force something upon local governments, how can key issues be resolved and b) doesn't that rid the federal government of authority?</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/70144?scroll_to=666752</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/70144?scroll_to=666752</guid>
      <description>to be continued</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 13:10:20 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>blank</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/70144?scroll_to=666732</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/70144?scroll_to=666732</guid>
      <description>In the first article, the author is arguing that local governments have direct authority over their residents, and is responsible for granting them more rights or protections. The second article argues that the Constitution gives laws enacted by Congress supreme authority, and it is up to local governments to enforce those laws and not counter them with by establishing their own rights.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 12:56:15 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
