<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Comments by Katie Kline</title>
    <description>Most recent public comments by Katie Kline</description>
    <link>https://nowcomment.com/users/41674</link>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://nowcomment.com/users/41674/comments"/>
    <item>
      <title>This is very cool. </title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/105201?scroll_to=1038281</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/105201?scroll_to=1038281</guid>
      <description></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2020 09:57:09 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>XP4</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/104699?scroll_to=1037770</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/104699?scroll_to=1037770</guid>
      <description>I'm thinking about this. Should the maps contain both the initial writing to expand ideas about a place and also contain the more polished pieces which synthesize these perspectives (at least potentially)? </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2018 08:54:54 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>XP2</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/104699?scroll_to=1037769</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/104699?scroll_to=1037769</guid>
      <description>I think the point-of-view XP works well here. This XP has potential to move students beyond their own perspectives of a place to get a richer sense of that place. </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2018 08:51:48 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
