<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Comments by Christa Mullen</title>
    <description>Most recent public comments by Christa Mullen</description>
    <link>https://nowcomment.com/users/643</link>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://nowcomment.com/users/643/comments"/>
    <item>
      <title>How could such a thing not arouse concern?</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/1990?scroll_to=3257</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/1990?scroll_to=3257</guid>
      <description>One must wonder how it is possible that none of those groups of people were concerned. The public would have been the ones who could have died from receiving a surgery they didn&#8217;t need as well as the ones spending what could have been hundreds or thousands of dollars on a needless surgery. Plus, the medical establishment and the policymakers had an obligation to see to the safety of those individuals receiving surgeries.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 11:22:07 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why has no one bothered to make any new calculations?</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/1990?scroll_to=3256</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/1990?scroll_to=3256</guid>
      <description>I suppose having an actual estimation isn't exactly necessary, considering many people are aware of the overuse problem and considering that knowing that how many are affected will not change the fact that they are being negatively affected. However, I would be curious to know how the estimations would have changed since 1976 and why no one has bothered to keep track of them, or if they have, why they haven't made it public knowledge. </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 11:22:07 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why subject yourself to costly, annoying treatments that may not procure any benefits?</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/1990?scroll_to=3255</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/1990?scroll_to=3255</guid>
      <description>If it is highly possible that the patient will not reap any benefits from the treatments that would be costly - and most likely annoying considering there would supposedly be a lot of them -, why would the patient be willing to put himself or herself through those treatments?
Obviously, desperation is one reason, but could there be any others?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 11:22:07 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Where were the children's parents?</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/1990?scroll_to=3254</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/1990?scroll_to=3254</guid>
      <description>One must wonder why so many children's parents would allow their children to be subjected to a treatment that wasn't even necessary. </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 11:22:07 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
