<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Comments by Fr.  Timothy Laboe</title>
    <description>Most recent public comments by Fr.  Timothy Laboe</description>
    <link>https://nowcomment.com/users/79782</link>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://nowcomment.com/users/79782/comments"/>
    <item>
      <title>Role playing</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/140998?scroll_to=1863508</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/140998?scroll_to=1863508</guid>
      <description>As to roles, I think in theology courses I would have students take roles of different schools of thought or different sides of an issue from which to argue a disputed point.

I think an ideal size for a group discussion would be around 5 or 6 (assuming everyone participates).</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2020 14:45:57 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Importance of Instructor</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/140998?scroll_to=1863501</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/140998?scroll_to=1863501</guid>
      <description>The success of the discussions rely heavily on the work of the instructor because of his/her role as facilitator.  Without good questions and good rubrics, discussions won't go far.  </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2020 14:40:12 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Clarity and Charity</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/140998?scroll_to=1863495</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/140998?scroll_to=1863495</guid>
      <description>If it wasn't already a part of the course in the initial communication from the instructor, I would include 
 1.  The student clearly communicated his/her ideas without errors (spelling, grammar, syntax, etc.) and in complete sentences.

2.  The student's response demonstrates depth in understanding the issues and respect for others whose opinions differ.   </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2020 14:36:20 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Support</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/140998?scroll_to=1863438</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/140998?scroll_to=1863438</guid>
      <description>If it leads to students actually backing up their claims with supporting evidence, then I would agree that it would be a great benefit.  My questions are: 1) how often does that occur; and 2) how accountable are they if they post erroneous or unsubstantiated claims? </description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2020 16:37:34 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Writing skills</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/140998?scroll_to=1863433</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/140998?scroll_to=1863433</guid>
      <description>Frequent online discussions can help students improve writing skills, but instructors must grade them for spelling and grammar along with content.  Without negative consequences for poor writing, students won't necessarily improve. 
 </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2020 18:52:41 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
