Comments by Wendy Lamont Most recent public comments by Wendy Lamont https://nowcomment.com/users/80138 How about the content-specific use of ed tech in schools? Maybe the gradual introduction of technologies, beginning with buy-in, could be a more helpful way to approach meaningful and effective integration? https://nowcomment.com/documents/200877?scroll_to=1880063 https://nowcomment.com/documents/200877?scroll_to=1880063 Fri, 15 May 2020 16:47:04 -0400 My concern on this paragraph. How does this effect family communication regarding school? I remember when my kids were in K-12 this replaced most meetings, conferences, etc. https://nowcomment.com/documents/200877?scroll_to=1880058 https://nowcomment.com/documents/200877?scroll_to=1880058 I think that families feel disconnected, frustrated, and lost. The system is completely broken because of learning management systems, and unfortunately, there is no going back at this point. What is everyone's experience? Thu, 14 May 2020 14:21:45 -0400 Our faculty trainers pushed lots of new tech with our new LMS systems. We need much mentoring and training with the system as Canvas was implemented and integrated along with BrightSpace. https://nowcomment.com/documents/200877?scroll_to=1880035 https://nowcomment.com/documents/200877?scroll_to=1880035 We worked with the faculty community and institution to successful provide this for students. The point is? We need coaches we need better communication-working together. Thu, 14 May 2020 14:19:11 -0400 Not sure I agree on being disinterested and dispassionate regarding the claims about specific technologies. While it’s extremely important to be critical, I think bringing a mind for the possibilities that a technology could offer (and discerning it's https://nowcomment.com/documents/200877?scroll_to=1879993 https://nowcomment.com/documents/200877?scroll_to=1879993 abilities – or lack of abilities) could contribute to its more relevant and meaningful adoption. Thu, 14 May 2020 14:13:47 -0400 I had to read SAMR model. I learned while reviewing this method, that meaningful uses of technology in teaching and move away from simply using “tech for tech's sake”. Interesting! https://nowcomment.com/documents/200877?scroll_to=1879973 https://nowcomment.com/documents/200877?scroll_to=1879973 Thu, 14 May 2020 14:11:16 -0400 Interesting comment. The tool doesn't always impact learning-with your experience. I'd like to focus on Teacher’ and students’ communication channels and methods. This has improved. https://nowcomment.com/documents/200877?scroll_to=1879968 https://nowcomment.com/documents/200877?scroll_to=1879968 Fri, 15 May 2020 16:42:58 -0400 As I read Selwyn’s article on the last page, I had many questions with the following statement: “Instead, digital technology should be something that you engage with on your own terms, to achieve your own goals and to address your own needs”. https://nowcomment.com/documents/200877?scroll_to=1872398 https://nowcomment.com/documents/200877?scroll_to=1872398 So when it comes to higher education and continuous improvement plans, this statement really contradicts the collective process we attempt to go through when implementing new initiatives, strategies, or practices. Not sure I can get on board with this type of philosophy where educators just get to do things because it addresses an individual need. Thu, 14 May 2020 12:05:40 -0400 Selwyn's comments and suggestions border on common-sense for anyone that has worked with educational technology for the last several years. Just as he states we can no longer be 'wooed' by new tech but instead really need to be critical. https://nowcomment.com/documents/200877?scroll_to=1872397 https://nowcomment.com/documents/200877?scroll_to=1872397 Sun, 10 May 2020 23:43:52 -0400 I agree with Selwyn's statements concerning a distinct lack of ed tech that addresses issues of social justice or equity, rather it’s focused on, as he says, the growing “individualization” of learners. https://nowcomment.com/documents/200877?scroll_to=1872394 https://nowcomment.com/documents/200877?scroll_to=1872394 Sun, 10 May 2020 23:40:48 -0400 Selwyn challenges this indicating that change must be determined not on the prevalence of technology but whether or not that tool will actually support the learning environment in a positive way. https://nowcomment.com/documents/200877?scroll_to=1872376 https://nowcomment.com/documents/200877?scroll_to=1872376 Sun, 10 May 2020 23:24:48 -0400 Selwyn's video assumptions that really resonated with me was that educators, students, & administrators assume that due to the current state of technology & the ubiquitous nature of technology today we have to change the way that education looks/function https://nowcomment.com/documents/200877?scroll_to=1872374 https://nowcomment.com/documents/200877?scroll_to=1872374 Sun, 10 May 2020 23:42:29 -0400 Selwyn’s primary assumptions lie within monetization of educational technology among stakeholders, and others. I agree with his statements concerning a distinct lack of ed tech that addresses issues of social justice or equity. https://nowcomment.com/documents/200877?scroll_to=1872373 https://nowcomment.com/documents/200877?scroll_to=1872373 Wed, 13 May 2020 14:33:10 -0400 Negligible impact? I wonder what she is thinking now with the COVID 19 mess? I bet teachers wish the schools would of been a bit more prepared now. Maybe they will realize the value of using tech in classes now? https://nowcomment.com/documents/200877?scroll_to=1871804 https://nowcomment.com/documents/200877?scroll_to=1871804 Sun, 10 May 2020 20:24:26 -0400