<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Comments by Prof. Ruth Ferree</title>
    <description>Most recent public comments by Prof. Ruth Ferree</description>
    <link>https://nowcomment.com/users/917</link>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://nowcomment.com/users/917/comments"/>
    <item>
      <title>Bare Minimum</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/3113?scroll_to=8094</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/3113?scroll_to=8094</guid>
      <description>Rubrics make me a little nervous if only because they act like check points. I would be worried that a student might read the rubric and just get the minimum done without really thinking through of thinking deeply about the assignment. I think that in most situations they are helpful, but I always want there to be a row about &quot;effort&quot; or &quot;evidence of deep thinking&quot;-- but is that too subjective?

Cameron</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 23:09:16 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>TIME TO ABSORB...</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/3113?scroll_to=8089</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/3113?scroll_to=8089</guid>
      <description>...new ideas seem to be the the key to assessing the learning.

VERNON!!!</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 23:09:16 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why is the day after better?</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/3113?scroll_to=8085</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/3113?scroll_to=8085</guid>
      <description>Wouldn't immediately be more effective?

I suppose if you take it the day after you are able to ascertain whether it truly was learned or not

VERNON!!!!</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 23:09:16 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mastery Learning</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/3113?scroll_to=8083</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/3113?scroll_to=8083</guid>
      <description>I have always been intrigued by mastery learning. The system seems odd to me since it allows students not to prepare and not have any consequences. This research, however, seems to suggest that it is helpful to students. --Cameron</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 23:09:16 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>grade inflation?</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/3113?scroll_to=7128</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/3113?scroll_to=7128</guid>
      <description>How does this fit with concerns about grade inflation? </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 23:09:16 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>value not weight</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/3113?scroll_to=7126</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/3113?scroll_to=7126</guid>
      <description>This tip is almost misleading! I agree that just a number is not helpful. There is a limit to how much a person can absorb at a time, however. </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 23:09:16 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
