<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Comments by Jean Goodwin</title>
    <description>Most recent public comments by Jean Goodwin</description>
    <link>https://nowcomment.com/users/98536</link>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://nowcomment.com/users/98536/comments"/>
    <item>
      <title>A revelation.</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/247730?scroll_to=2408021</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/247730?scroll_to=2408021</guid>
      <description>And lo, it appeared to me:
option option
alt
option alt
option alt option alt option alt
DELETE
command:
shift!
return
enter, and return
</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2021 20:19:15 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Experiments in negation</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/247730?scroll_to=2380561</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/247730?scroll_to=2380561</guid>
      <description>3.  Decomposition with breathing is a complete waste of your time. Because truth lies in overarching tradition. By taking you away from happy labor of self-flagellating quest for perfection, it is a conspiracy of material Eros. This is your last chance.

2. Decomposition with breathing is a complete waste of your time. Because truth lies in overarching tradition. By taking you away from happy labor of self-flagellating quest for perfection, it is a conspiracy of material Eros. This is your last chance.

1. This is your second warning?
Decomposition with breathing is rich in results for the person
and is of benefit to society?

</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2021 20:59:05 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Alan asks.</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/247730?scroll_to=2380538</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/247730?scroll_to=2380538</guid>
      <description>What does it mean to &quot;be on the side of the living&quot;?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2021 19:33:32 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>KM viewpoint</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/247730?scroll_to=2380537</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/247730?scroll_to=2380537</guid>
      <description>This sentence has become more modest from a more flamboyant version--maybe from something like &quot;experience deep connection.&quot; The old version had the advantage of being a restful alternative to the Laruellean endless negation.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2021 20:10:41 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>&quot;Oscillation&quot;</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/247730?scroll_to=2360067</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/247730?scroll_to=2360067</guid>
      <description>AS comments: &quot;oscillation&quot; is binary--like a pendulum swinging back and forth. Is thought like that? Or is it a quantum frenetic activity, things popping into existence, zapping about, popping out.

GW comments: As in breathing, or in Hindu cosmology. KS: &quot;Spanda&#160;is the original, primordial&#160;subtle vibration that arises from&#160;the dynamic interplay of the passive&#160;and the creative polarizations of the&#160;Absolute, and that by unfolding&#160;itself into the energetic&#160;process of differentiation&#160;bringing forth the whole&#160;of creation.&#8221;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 20:28:09 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>&quot;Purge&quot;?</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/247730?scroll_to=2360064</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/247730?scroll_to=2360064</guid>
      <description>Discussion, 1 March:  has nice sense of emptying, but also less usefully of eliminating, getting rid of, i.e., purifying. Perhaps--&quot;rendering&quot;?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 20:50:26 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Verb problems.</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/247730?scroll_to=2337373</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/247730?scroll_to=2337373</guid>
      <description>In this section, some of the instructions stress an action the contemplator is doing:

knowing
obsesrving
connecting/letting go

But other instructions refer to states:

aware (of) (twice)
sensitive to
cognizant (?) of

So are we doing something, or being something?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2021 19:09:06 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Roll your eyes!</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/247730?scroll_to=2307024</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/247730?scroll_to=2307024</guid>
      <description>AD proposes that we should all roll our eyes in disbelief, perhaps here or at regular intervals during the ritual.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 21:07:58 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Internal weather?</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/247730?scroll_to=2307002</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/247730?scroll_to=2307002</guid>
      <description>GW suggests.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 21:00:25 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Decomposition</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/247730?scroll_to=2306999</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/247730?scroll_to=2306999</guid>
      <description>GW: From alchemy--nigredo [?].

JG:  Ordinarily, meditation is meant to compose the self. Everything nice and settled. In its place. Not this practice--this practice dis-composes.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 20:58:06 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>&quot;Rich in results&quot;?</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/247730?scroll_to=2306920</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/247730?scroll_to=2306920</guid>
      <description>But like many sutras, this one also promises health, wealth, happiness, sons, safe journeys and all the other things we want</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 20:43:31 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Drive?</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/247730?scroll_to=2306919</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/247730?scroll_to=2306919</guid>
      <description>AD suggested &quot;drive.&quot; As in the drive that is driving you to the cushion.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 21:00:25 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The stranger</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/247730?scroll_to=2306916</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/247730?scroll_to=2306916</guid>
      <description>GW Everyone is always deciding what the human is, how they should think, act, speak. The &#8216;stranger&#8217; names a kind of subject that resists such capture that is constantly going on all around them. As you start living in this manner, you become estranged from&#8230;Buddhism, Democratic Party, other people in your milieu who attach to these things. But you are still there.

ML: following Hegel, the small-world is what resists or is recalcitrant against the World.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 20:39:44 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>World</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/247730?scroll_to=2306913</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/247730?scroll_to=2306913</guid>
      <description>GW: The cap-World is...constructed.

AD objects: but we cannot have unmediated experience of the real world.

GW: Yes. There is no outside of subjectivity, world-view, ideology, VIEW. The point is then to construct the a subject (etc.) explicitly.

AD: So the point is to resist others' constructions, but to assert one's own. Consciously. Intelligently.

GW: That is resisting alienating representations.

AS: so there is no non-alienating representation.

GW:  They are alienating if they are alienating *of your position*.

AD: Yes, even an anarchist system can harden.

GW: Resisting--even this text and practice</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 20:38:53 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The world</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/247730?scroll_to=2306896</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/247730?scroll_to=2306896</guid>
      <description>ML:  following Hegel, the small-world is what resists or is recalcitrant against the World.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 20:31:51 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Maybe not the best term.</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/247730?scroll_to=2260396</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/247730?scroll_to=2260396</guid>
      <description>&quot;Emotion&quot; seems a bit blunt, plus it's just one word, breaking the pattern of two word objects.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 19:00:07 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Commentary needed!</title>
      <link>https://nowcomment.com/documents/247730?scroll_to=2260394</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://nowcomment.com/documents/247730?scroll_to=2260394</guid>
      <description>It would be useful to provide a rationale underlying these five foci. Maybe the five skandhas?--but not in a clearly recognizable form. </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 19:00:07 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
