Chapter 12 Sexual Morality Discussions
Start a new conversation
It has come to my attention that there are laws concerning the welfare and protection of every Filipino, that each one must have a dignified self and must not be exploited sexually. Legalizing this would make all individuals regardless of sexuality, gender, or age vulnerable to sexual crimes. This would further cause the reinforcement of human trafficking wherein a society of rich people will take advantage of those less fortunate who are forced to sell their bodies in exchange for their survival. It is total inequality. Only a good education with good people leading the government will be able to solve such a problem concerning prostitution.
I think that the legalization of something does not necessarily depend only on the moral aspects of the issue. Given that prostitution also has its economic considerations for those practicing it, there are a lot of factors to be considered. I personally respect prostitution so long as there is a consensual agreement and both parties are of a decent age to participate. However, given the status quo of morality in the Philippines, where virginity and chastity is held one among the country’s most important value, there would be great value conflict among Filipinos if prostitution was to be legalized. Given that legalization of prostitution have no evident claims yet of decreasing sexual crimes and abuse. I do not think that legalization of this would be that beneficial. It does not yet outweigh the benefits of the negative consequences it may cause. All in all I do not agree for the legalization of prostitution in the Philippines.
Because I also believe that individuals get into prostitution because of their socio-economic status. Also, when we critically think about it, prostitution might have negative effect on one’s body such as getting AIDS or HIV.
I have watched numerous cases wherein the own parents of a child encourages them to prostitute themselves just to earn money for the family despite of the child being against it. As filipinos who are family-oriented citizens, legalizing such work would lead to more forced application towards the job.
Its moral component extends more than in terms of consent and age-appropriateness. Although it is better in such a way that it could reduce unhealthy sexual trades and unreported rape cases, policies regulating the system, and minimizing other illegal businesses, it will eventually be prone to corruption in many aspects. Prostitution and sex trafficking is involved in variety of other social issues, therefore it will not entirely be addressed until deep-rooted issues are.
ARIZO- No, since prostitution may lead to a variety of moral and social issues in society. First, it encourages sex trafficking, increases child prostitution or abuse, and raises the risk of HIV and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Given the high risk implications of prostitution, I believe it is detrimental to the country.
This is a paradoxical issue, but, in the context of the Philippines, prostitution should be not legalized because it creates conflict with the cultural values and norms. Additionally, the government is not ready nor capable of providing safe and structured workplace for the nature of this work.
In moral dimensions, aside from value conflict, this could violate the spiritual and material faculty of the individual. It could also be the root of more moral issues to face. Lastly, in view of consequentialism, it will harbor more negative effects in the long run rather than the short-lived economic effects.
People might consider the legalization of prostitution as an economic advantage but the country or the state should focus on matters that will solve our economic issues by creating more job opportunities. Furthermore, prostitution is immoral for it may violate the self-worth/ self-esteem of the prostitute and the personal discipline of the lusty man. One should justify how prostitution benefits both individuals not just in the economic prosperity or growth of the country before legalizing it.
I personally think that they are abusing their body to the reason that they are financially unstable and that is the best solution for it. There are also lots of health risks.
First of all even though some people may think this is okay than stealing. However there is still a lot of consequences that could happen to the person who is doing and considering this as their jobs.
Though it will help the economy of the country, it tends to neglect the well-being of the possible workers since we are not sure about the motive why they chose that work. Legalizing it will just let them stuck in that work since it will be viewed as socially acceptable. So no, I do not agree. I think there are others ways to prevent sex trafficking without legalizing another social issue.
In my perspective, prostitution is not the main issue rather the reason why people do it, but for the safety of both party and the protection of minors since there are a lot of reports where children are being abused for sexual contents, we must have a law that sets guidelines about prostitutions.
Prostitutions violates the sanctity of sex. Prostitution is another form pre marital sex that has a lot of underlying consequences specially to one’s health and well being.
I really do think it should be legalized, in fact, the “job” itself should not be normalized as well. Women/men who do prostitution should realize their value, uphold their welfare rights, and should be given instead jobs that will help them and their families without having the need to give up their value as a human person.
I think this should not be legalized as this has negative effects on health specifically STDs. Moreover, as the common reason of those who are working as prostitutes are their financial instability, I think government must give them better opportunities for them to quit this kind of job.
It would be better to NOT legalize prostitution. We need and should DEMAND accountability to our government to CREATE and GENERATE better job and work opportunities for these individuals involved. In that way, we are really focusing and directly acting to resolve the existing issues as to why people results to this kind of work such as prostitution; mainly this is because of poverty and limited opportunities.
Perhaps, if more job opportunities are available to everyone, no one will resort to this. Currently, most would think that the legalization of prostitution is better in an economical context. However, in the long term, this will only cause more issues towards society and harmful consequences to all individuals involved.
I believe that prostitution has some serious effects in which women become victims of various sorts of bondage; situations from which they suffer and are abused but cannot escape. Sex workers are also victims of exploitation, coercion, and assault so I don’t think it should be legalize. Besides, it may increase human sex trafficking.
According to Beattie et al. (2020), the female sex workers mental health problems and vulnerabilities are widespread with risk factors involved, especially STD (Sexually Transmitted Disease) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). There is a need for social policies to be reformed in order to avoid the risk of violence, illegal drug use, etc (Elmes et al., 2022).
References:
Beattie, T. S., Smilenova, B., Krishnaratne, S., Mazzuca, A., Patel, V. (2020). Mental health problems among female sex workers in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS Medicine, 17(9), e1003297–. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003297
Elmes, J., Stuart, R., Grenfell, P., Walker, J., Hill, K., Hernandez, P., … & Platt, L. (2022). Effect of police enforcement and extreme social inequalities on violence and mental health among women who sell sex: findings from a cohort study in London, UK. Sexually transmitted infections, 98(5), 323-331.
I don’t think prostitution should be legalized, as it can lead to more problems such as human trafficking and abuse. Moreover, it devalues chastity. I think instead of legalizing it, the government should think of ways or open more job opportunities to avoid making prostitution their resort.
Legalizing prostitution in the Philippines will clash with the existing laws on violence against women and other values such as respect and dignity. Moreover, legalizing prostitution will serve as a “kapit sa patalim” work and not really deal with the root cause of the problem which is poverty
Prostitution normalizes the nature of work which also creates conflict on our values. This doesn’t also solve the root cause of the problem. Because why is there prostitution in the first place? One of causes is poverty. So by legalizing prostitution, might imply that there’s nothing we can do about poverty
A. I support same-sex marriage.
B. I don’t support same-sex marriage.
C. A civil union is better than same-sex marriage.
Pick one and defend it.
A. I support same-sex marriage. Personally, I’m gay so I know how hard it is to be gay in a very religious/conservative country and family. I do support the legalization of same-sex marriage. Honestly, what only establishes same-sex relationships as immoral are sacred texts. From a consequential point of view, same-sex relationship is even more beneficial now in society given that we are overpopulated. However, the conflict arises only between the churches and their beliefs on same-sex marriage. If Same-sex marriage were to be legalized, all institutions must cater to same-sex marriage even those against it. They may be put in jail if they do not. Tolerance in this scenario toward religious practices is then violated. But I think that if churches want to be inclusive of their members wanting to have same-sex marriage then they should at least try to tweak a bit of a change in their institution because honestly, same-sex marriage is only immoral in the eyes of their scriptures nothing else can be reasoned out other than just religious scriptures.
I support this as long as couples do not cause harm or disturbance to other people. As human beings, they also have the right to get married and build their own families.
As for now, this is my stand as our constitution says that marriage is a relationship exclusive only between a man and a woman. There are numerous factors that should be considered before implementing a law as its consequence may vary so we need a sufficient amount of time to make conclusions. Civil union, as I currently know, offers a compromise for same-sex couple. It also offers the recognition of same sex couples as married. So for now, in this age where discrimination is rampant, i believe a civil union would be the better choice for same sex couples to take.
Both the religion and the arguments for same sex are equally important and each hold different values. I think the best way to compromise is the civil union. This allows all benefits to be reaped by the homosexual couples of marriage, at the same time, this allows the Church to maintain its stance. The Vatican Church has a responsibility to uphold its doctrine and in October 2021, according to Pope Francis, as reported in the BBC, he claimed that same-sex couples should be able to have civil union. Objectively, this would be the proper societal compromise. But subjectively speaking, I would have supported same-sex marriage if the Church would allow it to be more progressive, because homosexuals should not be stigmatized and considered their orientation as a “sin”.
C. A civil union is better than same-sex marriage since civil union refers to legal, rather than religious, standards. As a result, when we use the term marriage, we are still discussing its legal meaning, legal structure, and the legal rights and duties that come with it. Civil unions are recognized in a few states and frequently provide the same rights as marriage. So, for the time being, civil union is ideal.
As stated in the chapter 2 religion and global ethic, some issue like marriages should be settled in non-secular manner specially if this contradicts the cultural norms. This non-secular way through civil union is the best way to meet halfway between the individual interest and the social interest.
I believe that LGBTQ people want to live normally like other straight couples, but as part of a Christian community, I am living with the values and teachings of the Bible. Furthermore, the marriage covenant was meant to represent the affection and connection between Christ and His church. So it would be impossible to separate the state and the church when discussing the legalization of same-sex marriage. As for now, I believe that a civil union would be a better choice for LGBTQ couples to live together legally.
I picked civil union because same-sex marriage contradicts what was written in the law and it cannot be changed easily.
I support same sex marriage because for me it does not really matter what gender your other half is going to be and who are we to judge other peoples choice to be happy.
The security and benefits between marriage and civil union are not the same. Though a same-sex couple is acknowledged by the law, this law varies from country to country that may confuse.
C. I support Civil Union. Personally, I identified myself as gay and coming from a family who are homophobic in nature and they are very religious. That’s why I go for Civil union because we should also respect other people’s beliefs, even though we are fighting for equality, we must respect their beliefs too and I think, since we are living together, we should come up with a solution where everyone could agree.
My reason for civil union is because marriage specially in church for same sex marriage is very debatable because of the scripture and our religious upholding. But, my primary reason here is because I believe they should have rights at least recognized by our law to protect and take care of their loved one’s on crucial time specially.
Although it is true that the state is separated from religion however, for my own personal view, in respect to other religions like the one I belong to, in respect to their values and perspective, I think civil union would be the best compromise for both parties.
A. I support same-sex marriage. I believe that it is now time that we open our arms to these individuals who chose to express themselves in their own way. We must not limit the choices for it is their rights as well. And lastly, for as long as these couples do not cause harm to themselves or to others, there is no question that needs to be raised to them.
I believe civil union is better than same sex marriage. As a Civil union is almost similar to marriage but more of legal, while marriage is more of religion. I also support civil union than marriage because I think same-sex marriage as of the moment may cause conflict on what is the current law and ofcourse on what is the stand of certain religion regarding marriage.
No culture or beliefs are exactly the same, but despite the evident differences in the society, we were able to co-exist because we also foster respect and tolerance towards one another. Thus, I believe among the three options, the civil union is the most appropriate choice as it acknowledges the union of same-sex couples and as well as, allow the religious community to maintain their scared beliefs. With this, both sides may come to an agreement through mutual concessions.
Same-sex marriage will offer LGBT relationships equal standing in society and under the law.
the word “marriage” must not be used since according to our law in the Philippines, EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 209
THE FAMILY CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Chapter 1 Art. 1 states “Marriage is a special contract of permanent union between a man and a woman entered into in accordance with law for the establishment of conjugal and family life.”. Since Philippines is a Catholic country, according to the Catholic Library (n.d.) in the Book X pertaining to the History of Marriage, “In the first place, history shows that wherever polygamy has been largely allowed the race has deteriorated. One man to one woman is the law of God and nature”.
References (links):
https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1987/07/06/executive-order-no-209-s-1987/
My answer roots from the values and culture that we have as a Filipino. The idea of marriage has always been from the religion. And if the goal of the same sex couples are rights and recognition, it will most likely better under Civil Union. Personally, I support same sex marriage. But if this would result to values conflict, I’m choosing the value that has always been in Filipino identity.
This option caters to both the pros and against same-sex marriage. LGBTQ+ couples argue that they should have the rights to be married because when a partner has an accident, the other partner cannot assume responsibility since legally, they aren’t bound. And those who do not agree with same-sex marriage says that we should respect the law that a man and woman should be married, and that marriage is sacred. Having civil union as an option can secure the rights of the LGBTQ+ couple since they are considered as a legal couple, and it doesn’t disrespect the sanctity of marriage, since technically, they aren’t church wedded.
I do think that sex education promotes awareness to all of those issues. However, given the context in the Philippines where most of these topics are taboo and hidden, teaching sex education would be very challenging. Implementation of the program itself would be a challenge. But just because it is hard doesn’t mean we should not consider it. Awareness is only the first process in solving an issue what comes after that depends on many other variables. We should not look at sex education as a scapegoat or a 3-in-1 solution to all the issues mentioned. I think that giving awareness itself is a good enough reason for it to be implemented but if people expect it to change the world and blame it if it didn’t, it’s bad reasoning.
Considering our cultural context, particularly Filipinos being conservatives, talking about sexual issues is not perceived as a normal discussion among individuals. Even in schools, there is no sex education implemented in the curriculum. This leaves a huge impact to individuals, especially students, in a way that they do not know how they should respond on a situation wherein sex, pornography, or gender transition is the issue.
Sex education should be implemented as it can help solving issues such as the issues stated above. However, in the Filipino context wherein most of its citizens are conservative, I believe that Chastity education would be the better approach to take in facing such issues. Sex education helps individuals to be knowledgeable about sex and its implications, while chastity education targets the values of the person and helps them value their partners more as well.
In line with this, the curriculum should be able to meet a standard that would allow people to have informed consent rather than the education indoctrinating and inculcating their personal agendas. Since this is a long-term solution that must be carefully implemented, it could only be effective given that standards are met in such a way that competent instructors are to deliver this, modules are inclusive, and the whole approach is involved with respect, appropriateness, and empiricism.
Yes, since in today’s environment, teens needs accurate knowledge and resources in order to learn, help, and protect themselves. They can learn how to have healthy relationships, make educated sex decisions, think critically about the world, be a good ally to people who are marginalized, and accept themselves for who they are through appropriate sex education.
Sexual issues are both social, biological, religious and moral issue. Hence, same sex education which main revolves around biological issue should not be enough. Especially in PH context where we value chastity. Chastity education and Body Consent education should be reinforced.
Because sex education is an awareness to matters that mostly taboo in the Philippines. It can be a way for teenagers to get aware to the changes happening to themselves and also a way to stop those taboo topics that are really happening in the society.
Sex education in the Philippines is highly needed specially for those students are engaging on premarital sex just because they are curious about things.
The sex education program could be a good tool to educate youngsters on the implication of engaging with sexual intercourse or other forms of sexual activities. It could help lessen the issues of unwanted pregnancy which is the main contributor to overpopulation. However, we should consider the age that should be targeted in this program. And we should also think that this may not be a solution for solving sexuality issues, but the good thing is that through this education, students primarily will learn to become more responsible.
I think that more than “abstinence” or discouragement, we need to empower them to critically think and make informed choices. Discouraging may already be a parenting strategy but these issues still happen, therefore it is not enough. So Sex Education is crucial.
I think sex education is an appropriate approach because it will help our generation to become aware and we can really guide them when they get to experience it, by educating them we are equipping them to make good decisions.
Prevention is better than cure. Sex Education is vividly and explicitly introduce to children without the supervision and guide of their parents or guardians. It’s better to teach them why it’s not yet the time to do it rather than telling them there are plenty of ways to prevent being pregnant or making someone pregnant.
Since we cannot change nor deny that this generation is indeed very curious and very exposed on social media which is the source of information regarding sex and all of its components, I think sex education should be implemented so that the students will be grounded, be accountable, and most of all have the chance to decide for themselves whether or not should they take that path.
Sex education is indeed a relevant and important program that must be implemented to our curriculum. However, I do acknowledge the challenges within the acceptance of most people, especially that we are a conservative country and I think that would be a huge challenge that educators will face. Also, i think that we must reinforce and intensify the value of chastity amongst our students THEN after, we can introduce these concepts to them.
We must aim to be progressive appropriately, i think that’s the only way for us to achieve the better understanding of sex education and its content.
Yes, I believe that sex education is an appropriate approach but it may improve by the value chastity. As I also believe that chastity must learned and valued by every learner for the sex education program to be more effective.
With the rising cases of abortion, unwanted pregnancies, and overpopulation within the country it is evidently a requisite to raise awareness and educate Filipinos, most especially the youth that are curious and explorative in nature about matters related to gender transitions, unwanted and non-consensual sex, teen pregnancy, pornography, and sexting in order to prevent further irreversible consequences.
Sex education program can definitely help in dealing with such issues especially in preventing sexual abuse to children, sexual violence, and sexual exploitation. Thus, I believe sex education can be crucial equally important as providing Chastity Education.
Yes, as the Philippines is a very conservative country and was not really that open with such discussions. However, I think there is a need to strengthen sex education as people don’t really take it seriously disregarding its importance to address such issues.
Because it brings awareness, clarity and diligence to the students.
Chastity Education, may no be labeled as such, has always been the kind of education we have regarding sexual topics. Or maybe, I still lacked knowledge about it. But from the lens of Sex Ed, it will provide awareness and knowledge so the students could better judge what path to take. It doesn’t also literally promote sex like what I think most people think, but it may also be in a way that they could promote abstinence as the right thing to do.
I always believe that education can go a long way. It can affect lives of the students that we share this knowledge with. I believe that sex education programs, partnered with chastity education, can cure the curious minds of the teenagers and prevent them from trying out the matters that were mentioned
Start a new conversation
icons on the left to see existing comments.
0 archived comments