Very well conducted literature review. First of all it’s properly structured and has professional language. Every fact is backed up with a reference which demonstrates well conducted research and makes it trustworthy. Most importantly it has some critical analysis and the author explains every statement and data very clearly. This shows the author’s understanding of the subject and the fact that the author is ready for the further investigation.

The given paper represents a good example of how the research paper should be structured.

Firstly, the information is fully and consistently referenced in each section, thus making the paper seem credible.

Secondly, the literature review includes a through and critical evaluation of the previous papers and theoretical approach. This helps the reader to understand clearly what is going to be explored in the given paper, as well as the author’s contribution to the field of study.

Finally, it is important to mention that the method and results of the research are clearly presented and explained. As a result, the analysis part clearly presents the link between the previous parts and makes the paper look properly structured, consistent and easy to follow.

Additionally, it is worth mentioning that the author acknowledges the fact that there are some limitations. This highlights that despite the contribution the authors made with their research, the study field still requires further investigations to be made. This is an important issue, as it shows that the researchers made a through review of the literature, which helped them to identify the knowledge gap, as well as present areas for development.

Firstly, the proper literature review is missing. The author seems to share his general knowledge on the subject they chose, rather than explaining and evaluating on previous researches and theories that should be linked to their paper. As a result, the paper loses its credibility.

Secondly, the structure of the paper is not fully consistent either. The findings are not fully referenced to the presented data and, thus, it is hard to draw the link between the sections.

Finally, it is worth mentioning that the results are vaguely presented. That is, the statements lack clear explanation and evidence. More so some of the examples used are very broad and lack explanation about their relevance.

First of all, gives this literature review “why marketing analytics hasn`t lived up to its promise” us a good deal of information, but the problem is that the paper lacks sources, that make it difficult to evaluate the credibility of the sources that have been used.

I would also say that the paper feels more of a summary to me and that the author has taken different sets of notes and put them together into a compound text. Furthermore, I think the paper is written mainly by the authors point of view.

I learnt that blacks being evil and white being saved is a thread. That segregations is a national problem that has been happening for hundred of years. That the negro are always at the bottom and that is the way of life in he U.S.

They both show the struggles to be black in one person perspective. They are different because they took place in different times and had different experience with the whites also James Baldwin look more educated than Bigger.

The main topic of this video is how black are seen and how their experience in the eyes of James Baldwin