NowComment
2-Pane Combined
Comments:
Full Summaries Sorted

EDU 807 Master - Week 2 - Triple E Framework - Summer 2018 - Group 2


0 General Document comments
0 Sentence and Paragraph comments
0 Image and Video comments


Triple E Framework

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 1 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 1, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

About the Triple E Framework

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 2 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 2, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Created by Dr. Liz Kolb, University of Michigan

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 3 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 3, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

http://www.tripleeframework.com/​

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 4 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 4, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Picture

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 5 (Image 1) 0
No whole image conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Whole Image 0
No whole image conversations. Start one.

What is the Triple E?

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 6 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 6, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

The Triple E Framework attempts to define what it should look like, sound like and feel like to integrate technology tools into teaching in order to meet and exceed learning goals.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 7 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 7, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

The framework is based on three levels, Engagement in learning goals, Enhancementof learning goals, and Extension of learning goals.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 8 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 8, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

While these terms are often used interchangeably, they are distinct and different.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 9 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 9, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

The Triple E Framework defines each term and show examples of what makes each one unique and measurable.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 10 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 10, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

The Triple E Framework is based on a considerable amount of research about what works and does not work when it comes to technology in learning.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 11 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 11, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

In particular it emphasizes...

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 12 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 12, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

  • Pragmatism: Active, social, creative, and authentic learning (Dewey, 1897)
  • New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 13 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 13, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  • Focus on the learning goals (Linnenbrink &Pintrich, 2003)
  • New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 14 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 14, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  • The importance of time-on-task active engagement (Wartella, 2015)
  • New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 15 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 15, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  • The quality of technology use rather than quantity (Wenglinsky, 2006; Wenglinsky, 2008)
  • New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 16 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 16, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  • Technology itself does not lead to positive effects in student learning but can be an ‘intellectual and social amplifier’ which can help make good schools better but also can increase problems at less successful schools when not implemented strategically. (Warschauer, 2006)
  • New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 17 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 17, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 17, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  • The type of use--avoiding "drill and practice" which can have negative effects on learning outcomes and integrating more real world problem-solving and creating (Vaala et al., 2015)
  • New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 18 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 18, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  • Helping students connect existing knowledge with new knowledge (Wartella, 2015)
  • New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 19 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 19, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  • Co-use of technology devices and software (Darling-Hammond et al., 2014)
  • New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 20 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 20, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  • Social aspect of learning through technology tools (Vaala et al., 2015; Guernsey, 2012)
  • New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 21 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 21, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  • Value-added strategies such as promoting student self-reflection, self-assessment, and self-explanation (Means et al. 2009)
  • New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 22 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 22, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 22, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Read more about the research and links here

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 23 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 23, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

The Triple E Framework was developed in 2011 by Professor Liz Kolb at the University of Michigan, School of Education. The Triple E was created to fill a gap that has been pervasive in educational technologies---How to effectively integrate technology tools in K-12 learning so they have a positive impact on student achievement and learning outcomes.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 24 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 24, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 24, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

WHY Triple E? The research on technology and learning over the past decade is fairly clear, technology should be integrated based on what we already know about good teaching and pedagogical practices. Dating back to the late 19th century, the foundation of current teaching practices is based on the work of pragmatism. Pragmatists like John Dewey (1897) pushed for learning to be embedded in the student's authentic everyday lives, socially constructed knowledge, active/hands-on learning and full of choice. Since the early 1990s Research has found that educational technology with a "drill and practice" approach often has no effects on learning or cognition. Yet, most technology tools created for education are still drill and practice and in the lower-order of Blooms Taxonomy.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 25 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 25, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 25, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 25, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 25, Sentence 4 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 25, Sentence 5 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 25, Sentence 6 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Despite media often claiming a new piece of technology as a way to "revolutionize" learning, that is almost never the case. The Triple E framework takes this fallacy of technology as the magic bullet learning into account, and allows teachers to become critical consumers of making mindful choices around technology tools in their teaching. It is a simple framework, based on research, that helps educators create lessons that allow students to use technology to meet and add value to learning goals as active, social, creative learners, in authentic ways.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 26 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 26, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 26, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 26, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

How Triple E is Different than other Tech Integration Models
Some educators tend to be haphazard with technology tools, often trying new hardware or software because it's shiny or new, dismissing older technologies with an assumption that older=poor technology use. Today, few educators would argue that technology is a TOOL to help students reach learning goals. So how do educators measure a tools ability to help students reach learning goals? There are a number of frameworks that teachers use for integrating technology (SAMR, ADDIE, TIMS, TPACK), while all of them have benefits, none directly focus on how technology helps students achieve learning goals. Most frameworks focus on how technology substitutes for traditional tools or if the technology use is creative, but not if the tools were able to enhance or extend the learning goals. As the U.S. has become focused on standards (CCSS, NEXTGEN...etc) and standardizing learning, making sure that students are using their time to meet learning goals is even more vital when integrating technology. This is where the Triple E Framework can fill this void.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 27 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 27, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 27, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 27, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 27, Sentence 4 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 27, Sentence 5 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 27, Sentence 6 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 27, Sentence 7 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 27, Sentence 8 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Triple E Level 1: Engaged Learning

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 28 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 28, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Engagement is a minimum standard of technology integration.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 29 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 29, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Often by putting a piece of technology in front of the students or in their hands, they become interested or "engaged" in the activity.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 30 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 30, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

However, we can look a little more deeply at engagement by considering if the technology is not just capturing the interest of the student, but if it is actually engaging them actively in the content (not just the bells and whistles of the software).

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 31 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 31, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

It is important to look for "time on task" engagement.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 32 0
profile_photo
May 11
Corinne McCabe Corinne McCabe (May 11 2018 11:10AM) : Assumption about students more

This part of the framework assumes engagement and compliance are synonymous. It also implies that students need to work with others to be actively engaged.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 32, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

In addition, engagement should include social or co-use of the technology tool rather than isolated learning with a tool.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 33 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 33, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Students should be working together through the tool (eg...synchronous collaboration) or with the tool (eg...in pairs or groups with a device).

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 34 0
profile_photo
May 13
Michael White Michael White (May 13 2018 9:47PM) : In the corporate environment we encourage students to work in groups using computers technology more

The learning environment in a training classroom if for eight hours with 1-100 other adults. The conditions, devices, learning, and instructor must be engaging to produce engagement. Working in groups to keep the focus on a game or scavenger hunt is an example of using this engagement framework to the benefit of the student learner. We have to focus on the student with a learner-centered strategy which includes total engagement.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 34, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Below are three questions to ask when measuring for engagement in learning goals through a technology tool.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 35 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 35, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

The technology tool helps students engage in the learning goals

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 36 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 36, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

  1. Does the technology allow students to focus on the task of the assignment or activity with less distraction?
  2. New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 37 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 37, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  3. Does the technology motivate students to start the learning process?
  4. New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 38 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 38, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  5. Does the technology cause a shift in the behavior of the students, where they move from passive to active social learners (co-use)?
  6. New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 39 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 39, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Research to Support Active Engagement

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 40 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 40, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

​Engagement in technology-enhanced lessons does not necessarily correlating with achievement.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 41 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 41, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

  • Studies on engagement uncovered that while students may be physically present and appear to be actively involved in using the technology tools, in reality they might still be cognitively disengaged from the learning goals (Linnenbrink &Piintrich, 2003).
  • New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 42 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 42, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Create an environment of active time-on-task learning (learn more about time-on-task engagement)

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 43 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 43, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

  • The tool should help focus student’s attention on the learning goals and the task at hand and not distract from it (Wartella, 2015).
  • New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 44 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 44, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  • Active learning is when students are actively focused on the learning goals and not just “busy” doing what looks like learning. “active learning occurs when children are “minds-on”—that is, engaged in thinking, reflecting, and effortful mental activity…swiping, tapping, and physically engaging with an app is not the same as “minds-on” activity. “ Ellen Wartella (2015)
  • New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 45 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 45, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 45, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Creating an environment of co-use (social)

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 46 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 46, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

  • A recent report by the Joan Ganz Cooney Center (Vassy et al., 2015) emphasized the importance of social in learning with technology devices for children.
  • New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 47 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 47, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  • Researchers have promoted the ability to connect with others through media or while using media together as key ways children deepen their learning (e.g., Hirsh-Pasek et al., 2015; Guernsey,2012; Takeuchi & Stevens, 2011).
  • New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 48 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 48, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  • “joint media engagement, and socially interactive learning more generally, offer young children an environment that can help them learn through the Vygotskian notion of scaffolding, or extending children’s learning beyond what they would learn left on their own.” Ellen Wartella (2015)
  • New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 49 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 49, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 49, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Engagement Checklist

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 50 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 50, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

  1. Does the technology allow students to focus on the task of the assignment or activity with less distraction? Students are focused on the task because the software is helping them create the code that represents their content learning goals (characterization, setting, plot..etc). There are no games or rewards at the end of using the software that distract from the process of learning.
  2. New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 51 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 51, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 51, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 51, Sentence 3 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  3. Does the technology motivate students to start the learning process? Students are interested to connect their code to their complex novel. They are not just "swiping through" their iPad, rather they are carefully planning a code that is representative of their goal so they can see the physical results in the programmable ball that moves.
  4. New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 52 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 52, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 52, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 52, Sentence 3 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  5. Does the technology cause a shift in the behavior of the students, where they move from passive to active social learners (co-use)?Students are working in groups co-using the devices (rather than 1 device per child). Collaboration and constructing knowledge together.
  6. New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 53 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 53, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 53, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Picture

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 54 (Image 2) 0
No whole image conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Whole Image 0
No whole image conversations. Start one.

Triple E Level 2: Enhanced Learning

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 55 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 55, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Technology can create opportunities for students to move beyond engagement in content, where the technology may simply be replacing a traditional method of instruction, but it is not actually doing anything different than the traditional method was doing.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 56 0
profile_photo
May 13
Michael White Michael White (May 13 2018 9:54PM) : The active ingredient in this scenario is the teacher or instructor focusing on the lesson being delivered. more

The active ingredient in this scenario is the teacher or instructor focusing on the lesson and how we can make the learning more purposeful. We dont want to lose the lesson objective, but we do want to deliver it in a way that it will be sustained and not become cold storage in a week or two. When the same lesson that the student would normally read to themselves becomes a teachback lesson or full room participation in a game like format, you have flipped the learning. Put the learning in the students hands as much as possible and be the best facilitator for guidance and direction. They will retain the learning with more positive enthusiasm.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 56, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

We call this the "value-added" aspect of technology.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 57 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 57, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Value-added enhancement of learning through technology is when the tool is somehow aiding, assisting, scaffolding learning in a way that could not easily be done with traditional methods.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 58 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 58, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

This is the level where learning can become personalized and more relatable to the learner.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 59 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 59, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

This is when technology is really starting to change how learning occurs to make it more meaningful to the learner.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 60 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 60, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Below are three questions that should be asked when measuring for enhancement of learning through technology tools.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 61 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 61, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

  1. Does the technology tool aid students in developing or demonstrating a more sophisticated understanding of the content? (creates opportunities for creation/production over consumption)
  2. New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 62 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 62, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  3. Does the technology create scaffolds to make it easier to understand concepts or ideas?
  4. New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 63 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 63, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  5. Does the technology create paths for students to demonstrate their understanding of the learning goals in a way that they could not do with traditional tools?
  6. New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 64 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 64, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Research to Support Enhanced Learning

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 65 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 65, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Application Use Should Avoid "Drill and Practice"

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 66 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 66, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

  • "Drill and practice" software has not been successful in showing positive achievements for student learning outcomes (Wenglinsky, 1998).
  • New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 67 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 67, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Encourage use of technology to help students explore, create and problem-solve

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 68 0
profile_photo
May 11
Corinne McCabe Corinne McCabe (May 11 2018 11:15AM) : Assumption about teaching more

While I agree with this statement, it does assume that those integrating the technology have a solid understanding of strong pedagogy which is not always the case. Too often, we have teachers just taking what they’ve always done and making it digital. This is where I feel professional development is often failing our teachers. The PD often focuses on new tools, rather than on how to use those tools to enhance teaching and learning within the context of strong instructional practices.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 68, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

  • Digital technology use for creating and exploring rather than Drill and Practice, have been found to positively effect student achievement while drill and practice has had negative effects on student achievement scores (National Association of Educational Progress, NAEP via Wenglinsky, 2006).
  • New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 69 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 69, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  • Supporting or scaffolding technology that creates opportunities for children deepen their learning through social use (e.g., Hirsh-Pasek et al., 2015; Guernsey,2012; Takeuchi & Stevens, 2011).
  • New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 70 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 70, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  • Value-added strategies such as promoting student self-reflection, self-assessment, and self-explanation through technology can enhance learning outcomes (Means et al. 2009).
  • New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 71 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 71, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 71, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Encourage Quality over Quantity

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 72 0
profile_photo
May 11
Corinne McCabe Corinne McCabe (May 11 2018 11:17AM) : Question for 1:1 school districts or learning environments more

In my district, we do “Tech Walk-throughs” to collect data on technology use. My concern is that this sends the message that if you’re not using technology, it is bad.

Does anyone else have to collect data on tech usage? If so, what type of data collection tool do you use?

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 72, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

  • Studies are finding that the quality of work done with computers is much more important to determining student achievement than the quantity of time spent with devices (Wenglinsky, 2006).
  • New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 73 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 73, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Enhancement Checklist

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 74 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 74, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

  1. Does the technology tool aid students in developing or demonstrating a more sophisticated understanding of the content? (creates opportunities for creation/production over consumption) By students using technology to research their road trip (using authentic websites to reserve hotels, pay for meals, gas...etc), they are able to assess their understanding of rates, proportions, percents in mathematics with authentic data that connects to the real world (rather than a worksheet). They are using their higher order thinking cognitive skills of analysis, creativity and evaluation.
  2. New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 75 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 75, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 75, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  3. Does the technology create scaffolds to make it easier to understand concepts or ideas? The students were able to use technology to better see and experience the connections between math, geography, and social studies in everyday life. They are no longer isolated workbooks or class activities.
  4. New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 76 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 76, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 76, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 76, Sentence 3 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  5. Does the technology create paths for students to demonstrate their understanding of the learning goals in a way that they could not do with traditional tools? There was a lot of choice available because the students could select where to go, what websites and digital resources to use to help aid in their development of the trip. Creation, critical thinking, and construction were all important skills that were enhanced with the aid of technology tools.
  6. New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 77 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 77, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 77, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 77, Sentence 3 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Picture

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 78 (Image 3) 0
No whole image conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Whole Image 0
No whole image conversations. Start one.

Triple E Level 3: Extended Learning

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 79 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 79, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Educators are always looking for ways to connect student learning to the authentic world.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 80 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 80, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

If technology can somehow aid or enhance the ability to create these real-world connections, than learning is being extended outside of the classroom walls and into student's everyday lives.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 81 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 81, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

In addition, another piece of extension are non-content related skills (often called "soft skills").

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 82 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 82, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

In the digital age, educators are often looking to help their students to start developing grit and P21 skills, that many employers are asking for.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 83 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 83, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

In order to measure if technology tools are extending learning goals, the following questions can be used for analysis.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 84 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 84, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

  1. Does the technology create opportunities for students to learn outside of their typical school day?
  2. New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 85 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 85, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  3. Does the technology create a bridge between school learning and everyday life experiences?
  4. New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 86 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 86, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  5. Does the technology allow students to build skills, that they can use in their everyday lives?
  6. New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 87 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 87, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Research that Supports Extension

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 88 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 88, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Avoiding technology that only provides individual isolated content knowledge

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 89 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 89, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

  • Studies have found that reinforcing knowledge or giving isolated content knowledge did not lead to student achievement gains. For example secondary students using technology for content-specific tasks (such as reading or evaluating primary documents in history class) had no correlation on student achievement, but students using computers for more generic academic tasks in school had positive correlation to student achievement. (Wenglinsky, 2006)
  • New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 90 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 90, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 90, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 90, Sentence 3 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Connecting the student's CURRENT real world with school learning

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 91 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 91, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

  • "Education is not a preparation for life; education is life itself." (Dewey, 1897)
  • New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 92 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 92, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 92, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  • Researchers believe that technology tools need to encourage meaningful learning, where the technology is extending the learning from student’s preexisting knowledge and helping them create new knowledge (Wartella, 2015).
  • New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 93 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 93, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Extension Checklist

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 94 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 94, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

  1. Does the technology create opportunities for students to learn outside of their typical school day? Students are able to connect with other students to compare and contrast their own lives with those of students in Massachusetts. They are collaborating in real time and choosing tools to help them better connect with their individual pen pals (such as Google Translator or Google Documents)
  2. New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 95 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 95, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 95, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 95, Sentence 3 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  3. Does the technology create a bridge between school learning and everyday life experiences? Students learn to use to technology to connect with other people that are different from them, learn from them and share what they know.
  4. New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 96 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 96, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 96, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  5. Does the technology allow students to build skills, that they can use in their everyday lives? Students are learning to use digital tools to build positive digital footprints and make new friends.
  6. New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 97 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 97, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
    Paragraph 97, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Picture

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 98 (Image 4) 0
No whole image conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Whole Image 0
No whole image conversations. Start one.

Picture

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 99 (Image 5) 0
No whole image conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Whole Image 0
No whole image conversations. Start one.

Karen McKinley an ELA curriculum specialist from Warren County Educational Service Center in Lebanon, Ohio shared this user friendly rubric that she designed based on the Triple E Framework.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 100 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 100, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

She gave permission for other educators to use and share the chart with teachers in their districts.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 101 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 101, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Thank you Karen!

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 102 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 102, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

DMU Timestamp: January 02, 2017 19:32

General Document Comments 0
New Thinking Partner Conversation Start a new Document-level conversation

profile_photo
Apr 28
Dr. Troy Hicks Dr. Troy Hicks (Apr 28 2018 2:39PM) : Reading Task for Triple E Framework more

For this week, please look for a segment in each text where you can reply to the following:

What does this framework for using technology in education assume about teachers and teaching?

What does this framework for using technology in education assume about students and learning?

Please offer at least one comment related to the assumptions about teaching, as well as at least one comment on each document related to the assumptions about learning (2 initial comments). Then, please reply to at least two different classmates on one of their comments (2 responses).

profile_photo
May 9
Mr. John Golden Mr. John Golden (May 09 2018 7:28PM) : For teachers and teaching, the Triple e-Framework assumes that teachers have a comprehensive tool at their disposal of which integrates technology and instruction for student achievement and learning outcomes. more

The Triple e-Framework, furthermore, enables teachers to design myriad of lessons using technology and instruction that motivate students to learn and solve complex problems. Finally, it enables teachers to use technology knowledge, pedagogy knowledge and content knowledge to, ultimately, foster student achievement and learning outcomes.

profile_photo
May 13
Michael White Michael White (May 13 2018 10:05PM) : Blend the learning, no pun intended. more

Sometimes as facilitators we have to quickly think outside the box John. Although we do not have all the technology tools at our disposal, we need to be vigilant in our opportunities to think quick and deliver flawlessly. Having the TPCK at the ready, we should always as teachers and instructors have a contingency plan ready to initiate experiential or flipped learning when the class calls for it. We have to anticipate when to use the triple E, if not always. I deal with adults and this is a daily assignment for me. Like the great Kenny rogers said, “I have to know when to hold a lesson firm and when to fold it and start plan b”.

profile_photo
May 9
Mr. John Golden Mr. John Golden (May 09 2018 7:33PM) : For students and learning, the Triple e-Framework assumes that students move from passive learning to active learning. It enhances, engages, and extends the student’s use of critical thinking and higher order thinking skills. [Edited] more

Moreover, the Triple e-Framework builds on TPACK, but it puts learning before technology. In other words, learning first and then technology.

profile_photo
May 12
Corinne McCabe Corinne McCabe (May 12 2018 5:34PM) : Learning first, technology second more

I love that you said, “In other words, learning first and then technology.” In fact Dr. Kolb wrote a book entitled, “Learning First, Technology Second” in which she stresses the importance of quality over quantity. Kolb (2017) stated, “The instructional choices that teachers make when integrating technology will determine how deeply students are embedded in the learning process and their long-term retention of the content goals in the experience” (p. 49). Working in the government sector, are you able to apply pieces of this framework in your setting?

profile_photo
May 13
Michael White Michael White (May 13 2018 10:10PM) : Blend the learning more

Triple E has to be a balanced effort. Not sure how it is in the government sector or K-12, but we all more than likely share the same space in learning and daily engagement. This tool adds to the current tools we have and will only make us better as instructors and teachers. I hope we can learn and use technology together to create a better work environment for all.

Image
0 comments, 0 areas
add area
add comment
change display
Video
add comment

Quickstart: Commenting and Sharing

How to Comment
  • Click icons on the left to see existing comments.
  • Desktop/Laptop: double-click any text, highlight a section of an image, or add a comment while a video is playing to start a new conversation.
    Tablet/Phone: single click then click on the "Start One" link (look right or below).
  • Click "Reply" on a comment to join the conversation.
How to Share Documents
  1. "Upload" a new document.
  2. "Invite" others to it.

Logging in, please wait... Blue_on_grey_spinner