NowComment
2-Pane Combined
Comments:
Full Summaries Sorted

Is animal testing necessary to advance medical research?

Author: New Internationalist.org

https://newint.org/sections/argument/2011/06/01/animal-testing-medical-research-laurie-pycroft-pro-test

0 General Document comments
0 Sentence and Paragraph comments
0 Image and Video comments


Laurie

New Conversation
Paragraph 1 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 1, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Biomedical research is a dif cult process, to say the least. The human body is the most

New Conversation
Paragraph 2 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 2, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 2, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

complex machine yet encountered, consisting of trillions of cells, each containing billions of

New Conversation
Paragraph 3 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 3, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

molecules, many of which are composed of tens of thousands of atoms. These molecular machines perform their designated tasks with incredible precision, working within

New Conversation
Paragraph 4 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 4, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 4, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

a stunningly interdependent environment, from the level of molecules communicating with each other over minute distances right

New Conversation
Paragraph 5 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 5, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

up to entire organ systems interacting with one another. Biomedical researchers need tools capable of mimicking this level of

New Conversation
Paragraph 6 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 6, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 6, Sentence 2 0
profile_photo
Jan 15
Megan McCoy (Jan 15 2020 10:54AM) : counterargument more

There is nothing that comes close to the complexity of the human body besides animals, so they re needed to test on.

complexity. The past century or so has seen an explosion in the availability of investigative

New Conversation
Paragraph 7 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 7, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 7, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

tools – cell cultures, non-invasive imaging, computer models – these are all powerful techniques in humanity’s arsenal in the war against disease and ignorance, but none of them fully replicates the intricacy of a living organism.

New Conversation
Paragraph 8 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 8, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Without the ability to use animals in
their research, scientists’ efforts would be massively hampered, not only in the direct development of new treatments, but also in
the fundamental research which underpins all biomedical knowledge. For example, it was Alan Lloyd Hodgkin and Andrew Huxley’s work on the nerves of squid that elucidated the basis of nervous transmission; and it was John C Eccles’ work on cats’ spinal cords that rst incontrovertibly demonstrated the nature of the synapse, earning him a share of the 1963 Nobel in Physiology, along with Hodgkin and Huxley. Without their work on animals, we would know far less about the workings of our own nervous systems and how to treat them.

New Conversation
Paragraph 9 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 9, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 9, Sentence 2 0
profile_photo
Jan 15
Megan McCoy (Jan 15 2020 10:55AM) : counterargument more

It’s for the medical advancements to save humans, which are the ultimate priority. Testing on animals is absolutely necessary to see human benefits in the medical field.

New Conversation
Paragraph 9, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 9, Sentence 4 0
profile_photo
Jan 15
Megan McCoy (Jan 15 2020 10:55AM) : counterargument example more

example of the counterargument

New Conversation
Paragraph 9, Sentence 5 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Helen

New Conversation
Paragraph 10 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 10, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Absolutely! The human body – indeed most living systems – is extremely complex. This complexity and intricacy is precisely why animals

New Conversation
Paragraph 11 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 11, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 11, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 11, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

are not good models for human medicine. Humans differ from other animals

New Conversation
Paragraph 12 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 12, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 12, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

anatomically, genetically and metabolically, meaning data derived from animals cannot be extrapolated to humans with suf cient accuracy.

New Conversation
Paragraph 13 0
profile_photo
Jan 15
Megan McCoy (Jan 15 2020 10:56AM) : counter to the counter more

Argues that animals complexity does not come close to that of humans, and therefore animals would not be sufficient for testing.

New Conversation
Paragraph 13, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

I’d love to hear a proposal for methods to realistically replace animal models that ‘eliminate the risk of species di erences’, but currently none exist, and developing them is still well within the realm of science ction – Laurie

New Conversation
Paragraph 14 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 14, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Understandably, when a drug or other medical treatment is developed, it must be tested in an entire living system. Using another species is using the wrong system. Considering the differences that occur on the metabolic,

New Conversation
Paragraph 15 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 15, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 15, Sentence 2 0
profile_photo
Jan 15
Megan McCoy (Jan 15 2020 10:56AM) : counter to counter more

Using the wrong system

New Conversation
Paragraph 15, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

LAURIE PYCROFT is one of the founders of Pro-Test, a British group that supported continuing animal testing in scientific research. Pro-Test wound up its operations in February 2011, but a related organization, Speaking of Research, is active in the US.

New Conversation
Paragraph 16 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 16, Sentence 1 0
profile_photo
Jan 15
Megan McCoy (Jan 15 2020 10:57AM) : credibility more

Founders of a group that supported continuing animal testing in scientific research.

New Conversation
Paragraph 16, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

pro-test.org.uk

New Conversation
Paragraph 17 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 17, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Pro-Test march in Oxford, UK.

New Conversation
Paragraph 18 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 18, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

NO

New Conversation
Paragraph 19 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 19, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

genetic and molecular levels, when applied to an entire biological system those intricate differences become exponential. Pre-clinical testing needs to be conducted in such a way that eliminates the risk of species differences

New Conversation
Paragraph 20 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 20, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 20, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

The human body is extremely complex. This is why animals are not good models for human medicine. Humans di er from other animals anatomically, genetically and metabolically – Helen

New Conversation
Paragraph 21 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 21, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 21, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 21, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

and is instead directly applicable to humans. Medical advances should be weighed

New Conversation
Paragraph 22 0
profile_photo
Jan 15
Megan McCoy (Jan 15 2020 10:58AM) : argument more

We cannot inly think about ourselves and the benefits to our own species here!

New Conversation
Paragraph 22, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 22, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

up against the delays and tragedies caused
by reliance on animal experiments – the thalidomide disaster whereby tens of thousands

New Conversation
Paragraph 23 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 23, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 23, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

of children were born with severe deformities not predicted in animal tests, to name one of the most famous, but there are many others. While some discoveries have been attributed to animal use, it does not necessarily mean that they could not have been made through other means. Dr John McArdle said: ‘Historically, vivisection has been much

New Conversation
Paragraph 24 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 24, Sentence 1 0
profile_photo
Jan 15
Megan McCoy (Jan 15 2020 10:59AM) : mentioned downfalls more

We are not testing on things with our exact genetics, so therefore there have been examples of unpredicted medical tragedies that came from testing on animals first.

New Conversation
Paragraph 24, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 24, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

like a slot machine. If researchers pull
the experimentation lever often enough, eventually some bene ts will result by pure chance.’ Such logic does not constitute good science. Good science, relevant and, importantly, ef cient science is what we must strive for.

New Conversation
Paragraph 25 0
profile_photo
Jan 15
Megan McCoy (Jan 15 2020 10:59AM) : it is a game of chance more

Animals are not the same as humans, so they are guessing that the tests on animals will be the same as humans, which is often not the case.

New Conversation
Paragraph 25, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 25, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 25, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 25, Sentence 4 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 25, Sentence 5 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Laurie

New Conversation
Paragraph 26 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 26, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

It’s undeniable that there are signi cant variations between species, but part
of research is taking these differences
into account and selecting appropriate model organisms to replicate the system
one is testing. Fortunately, researchers
have devised many routes of minimizing inter-species variation, such as the use of transgenic animals – genetically altered to replicate human physiology more closely. This has additional bene ts, including shorter generation-span, allowing scientists to perform experiments which simply would not be possible using humans (even ignoring ethical concerns).

New Conversation
Paragraph 27 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 27, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 27, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 27, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 27, Sentence 4 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 27, Sentence 5 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 27, Sentence 6 0
profile_photo
Jan 15
Megan McCoy (Jan 15 2020 11:01AM) : ethicality more

Scientists are altering animals genetics to then test on them, which is greatly altering the ethicality of not only changing the animals genetics, but then injecting them with other damaging tests.

New Conversation
Paragraph 27, Sentence 7 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

I’d love to hear a proposal for methods
to realistically replace these animal models that ‘eliminate the risk of species differences’, but currently none exist, and developing
these methods is still well within the realm
of science ction. To suggest otherwise is highly misleading. One can claim that medical discoveries can be made using exclusively non- animal methods, but unless one can suggest realistic replacements, these claims are hollow.

New Conversation
Paragraph 28 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 28, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 28, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 28, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 28, Sentence 4 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 28, Sentence 5 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 28, Sentence 6 0
profile_photo
Jan 15
Megan McCoy (Jan 15 2020 11:02AM) : solutions more

There is no solution that allows medical testing to ethically persist, and abolishing it completely also seems not to be an option, for the bettering of medical advancements.

The thalidomide tragedy in fact resulted from

New Conversation
Paragraph 29 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 29, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Argument

New Conversation
Paragraph 30 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 30, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

page3image984

New Conversation
Paragraph 31 (Image 1) 0
No whole image conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Whole Image 0
No whole image conversations. Start one.

page3image1144

New Conversation
Paragraph 32 (Image 2) 0
No whole image conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Whole Image 0
No whole image conversations. Start one.

insufcient animal testing. At the time it was not standard procedure to give pregnant animals drugs before clinical use. Once investigators became aware of thalidomide’s mutating effects, experiments using pregnant animals con rmed the results, leading to these tests becoming standard for pre-clinical drug testing.

New Conversation
Paragraph 33 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 33, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 33, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 33, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Helen

New Conversation
Paragraph 34 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 34, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Even when genetically modi ed, there is no single animal model that can accurately mimic the complex human situation. There are far too many unknown variables that cannot all be accounted for. Instead, we now have scienti c (not ction) technologies such as micro uidic chips and microdosing. Not only do these techniques analyse the effects of drugs on an entire living system, they analyze a human living system, eliminating error caused by species differences and resulting in data that is relevant to humans.

New Conversation
Paragraph 35 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 35, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 35, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 35, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 35, Sentence 4 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Systematic reviews conducted in the areas of toxicity testing and biomedical research have shown that alternatives are far more predictive of human outcomes than data obtained from animals.

New Conversation
Paragraph 36 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 36, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

The results obtained from testing thalidomide (post-disaster) on pregnant animals only resulted in defects when given to white New Zealand rabbits – at doses between 25 to 300 times that given to humans, and certain species of monkeys – at ten times the dose. Even if the drug had been tested on those speci c species (by chance) thalidomide would still have gone to market since the vast majority of species showed no defects, and of those that did, only at much higher doses than given to humans.

New Conversation
Paragraph 37 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 37, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 37, Sentence 2 0
profile_photo
Jan 15
Megan McCoy (Jan 15 2020 11:03AM) : dangers more

There have been near misses where these medicines would have turned out deathly for humans.

Laurie

New Conversation
Paragraph 38 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 38, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Claiming that micro uidics and microdosing

New Conversation
Paragraph 39 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 39, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

can analyze drug effects on a full living system is absurd. How can a uid-based chip replicate the most basic heart, let alone a human one? Microdosing can be useful for studying uptake mechanisms of a drug, but gives extremely limited information on its ef cacy at treating

New Conversation
Paragraph 40 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 40, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 40, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 40, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

a condition. ‘Alternatives’ are already widely used in research, but expecting them to replace animal tests in the near future is hugely naïve. It’s true that thalidomide doesn’t affect all species, which is part of the basis for drugs being tested on a variety of carefully selected species. These models will never be perfect but, as any scientist will tell you, no test is. We must use the best available model, and some of the time this means using animals.

New Conversation
Paragraph 41 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 41, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 41, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 41, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 41, Sentence 4 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 41, Sentence 5 0
profile_photo
Jan 15
Megan McCoy (Jan 15 2020 11:03AM) : counter argument more

Testing on animals isn’t great, but it seems to be the only option that we have.

More importantly, you continue to ignore the most important use of animals in science – basic research. Without access to live organisms, we would know far less about the function of the cardiovascular system, how digestion works, hormonal interactions, and a vast array of other data which none of your proposed ‘alternatives’ could even hope to elucidate. Thus, if we value progression of medical knowledge, animal research is a necessity.

New Conversation
Paragraph 42 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 42, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 42, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 42, Sentence 3 0
profile_photo
Jan 15
Megan McCoy (Jan 15 2020 11:04AM) : counterargument more

It always comes back to humans.

Helen

New Conversation
Paragraph 43 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 43, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Without emotion, we can say that no model
is perfect, but a battery of human-speci c methodologies in pre-clinical testing is far more predictive than depending on data from another species. Even the US Federal Drug Administration con rms that nine out of ten drugs ‘proven’ successful in animal tests fail
in human trials. This not only questions the ef cacy and the fundamental argument for using animals, but critically raises the question about all the drugs that failed in animals which might have worked in humans. How many discarded cures for cancer?

New Conversation
Paragraph 44 0
profile_photo
Jan 15
Megan McCoy (Jan 15 2020 11:04AM) : Ethicallity and animals more

We have to look at it form the animals perspective, and truly question the ethicality of the testing, whether or not it is beneficial to advancing humans knowledge.

New Conversation
Paragraph 44, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 44, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 44, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 44, Sentence 4 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 44, Sentence 5 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 44, Sentence 6 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

In the past, much research has been based on animals because we didn’t know any better. Today we are far more aware of the dangers
of extrapolating from one species to another and we have scienti c research methods – mass spectrometry, genome mapping, innovative imaging techniques and highly developed computer models capable of simulating parts
of the human body as mathematical equations and three-dimensional graphical models, just to name a few more.

New Conversation
Paragraph 45 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 45, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 45, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 45, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 45, Sentence 4 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Terminally ill patients don’t care whether
a cancer drug works on a mouse, or that
some disease can be cured in another species. Such claims only taunt them with false hope. These people need real cures based on real science – not misleading and antiquated animal experiments.

New Conversation
Paragraph 46 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 46, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 46, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 46, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 46, Sentence 4 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 46, Sentence 5 0
profile_photo
Jan 15
Megan McCoy (Jan 15 2020 11:05AM) : argument more

Medicine is not only unethical, but can also be misleading in the medical field.

DMU Timestamp: November 27, 2019 01:26

General Document Comments 0
Start a new Document-level conversation

Image
0 comments, 0 areas
add area
add comment
change display
Video
add comment

Quickstart: Commenting and Sharing

How to Comment
  • Click icons on the left to see existing comments.
  • Desktop/Laptop: double-click any text, highlight a section of an image, or add a comment while a video is playing to start a new conversation.
    Tablet/Phone: single click then click on the "Start One" link (look right or below).
  • Click "Reply" on a comment to join the conversation.
How to Share Documents
  1. "Upload" a new document.
  2. "Invite" others to it.

Logging in, please wait... Blue_on_grey_spinner