Megan's Math
0 General Document comments
0 Sentence and Paragraph comments
0 Image and Video comments
Respond to the Now Comment Discussion Week 2: Megan’s Math.
Megan’s word problem using real objects she can relate to in her everyday life.
Sample C was given a 1. It was thrown together. She had a lot of typo errors as well.
Criteria for the discussion post are listed below and in the Now Comment discussion thread.
Explain what score you would give each sample response from Task 2.
- Use the rubric and your notes to support your reasoning.
- Write at least one paragraph of 5-7 sentences in length.
- Use complete sentences and conventions of standard written English.
Attach your notes from Task 1 and Task 2 to your response.
General Document Comments 0
After reading Task Two, I would use the Analytic Scoring. The score that I would give the test- taker would be a 3 (Sample A and B). The test-taker did identify the different strategies and explain each one like a task analysis. The test-taker also answered each part of the question.
Shenell Taylor
For Sample C, I would give the test-taker a score of a 2. The Test-taker didn’t separate the strategies from the explanation. The test-taker terms or vocabulary was very simple. They could have used more Special Education terms like Sample A and B. Knowing the terms allows the scorer to know that you have the knowledge about Special Education.
In my opinion, I would rate samples A and B with a score of 3 on the rubric. Both seemed to cover all aspects of a score of 3. I decided to give sample C a score of 2. My decision behind that was the fact that in the first paragraph, I thought that all three strategies had been addressed. However, as I got to the second paragraph, there seemed to be another strategy being addressed while also discussing a couple of the previous strategies. Also, all of the strategies were explaining how it would help Megan but not how it should be used.
It was a pleasure reading the samples in task two. After thoroughly reviewing the rubric I would rate samples A and B with a score of 3.Both A and B Samples were very detailed and demonstrates a thorough understanding of the aspects of special education relevant to the question. However, I felt that Sample C should receive a score of a 1.The response demonstrates little or no understanding of the aspects of special education relevant to the questions. When reading Sample C, I felt like it started off providing me with the strategies and then became vague in the second paragraph.
icons on the left to see existing comments.
0 archived comments