Nelson Mandela Speech
0 General Document comments
0 Sentence and Paragraph comments
0 Image and Video comments
In 1964, Nelson Mandela was convicted of sabotage because he was fighting against Apartheid in South Africa. (He encouraged native South Africans to strike to protest the violation of their human rights.) Prior to being sentenced, he made the following speech. (This is actually only an excerpt of the speech.) Following this speech, Mandela was sentenced to life in prison. He served nearly thirty years and was released in 1990. Four short years later, Nelson Mandela was elected the first black President of South Africa.
Read the prompt below and annotate it. Look for patterns and deviations in syntax. Examine diction and how it contributes to tone. Look at pronoun usage, verb choice, and adjectives. Look for tools of persuasion (logos, ethos, pathos). What is the author's purpose? Who is his intended audience? What techniques does he use to achieve his purpose? And how do each of your annotations contribute to achieving this purpose?
_______________________________
The African National Congress was formed in 1912 to defend the rights of the African people which had been seriously curtailed by the South Africa Act, and which were then being threatened by the Native Land Act. For thirty-seven years—that is until 1949—it adhered strictly to a constitutional struggle. It put forward demands and resolutions; it sent delegations to the Government in the belief that African grievances could be settled through peaceful discussion and that Africans could advance gradually to full political rights. But White Governments remained unmoved, and the rights of Africans became less instead of becoming greater…
This sentence is also very important because because it uses pathos, along with ellipses, to show sincere emotion. I think it might also be to make the reader stop and think about what Mandela was actually saying and process it to what happens today
South Africa is the richest country in Africa, and could be one of the richest countries in the world. But it is a land of extremes and remarkable contrasts. The whites enjoy what may well be the highest standard of living in the world, whilst Africans live in poverty and misery. Forty percent of the Africans live in hopelessly overcrowded and, in some cases, drought-stricken Reserves, where soil erosion and the overworking of the soil makes it impossible for them to live properly off the land. Thirty percent are labourers, labour tenants, and squatters on white farms and work and live under conditions similar to those of the serfs of the Middle Ages. The other 30 percent live in towns where they have developed economic and social habits, which bring them closer in many respects to white standards. Yet most Africans, even in this group, are impoverished by low incomes and high cost of living…
Does he use logos to show that what he’s stating is actually built off of facts and not opinions, so it gives him more reliability and really helps make his points? For example he uses it to show how bad it was for the Africans.
White people have very high expectations but they only hold these standards for themselves. They know about the African squatters yet they do not do anything to help them or fix their lifestyles. The whites are able to profit off of the country while the country’s natural inhabitants fall behind.
Poverty goes hand in hand with malnutrition and disease. The incidence of malnutrition and deficiency diseases is very high amongst Africans. Tuberculosis, pellagra, kwashiorkor, gastro-enteritis, and scurvy bring death and destruction of health. The incidence of infant mortality is one of the highest in the world. According to the Medical Officer of Health for Pretoria, tuberculosis kills forty people a day (almost all Africans), and in 1961 there were 58,491 new cases reported. These diseases not only destroy the vital organs of the body, but they result in retarded mental conditions and lack of initiative, and reduce powers of concentration. The secondary results of such conditions affect the whole community and the standard of work performed by African labourers.
The fact that Mandela did his research about the specific diseases and is African gives him credibility. It also shows that he is well educated (no hyphen ;) and therefore affirms that this whole speech is well written. The purpose of this paragraph is to show cold, hard facts that also tug at heartstrings, and that’s highly persuasive.
The complaint of Africans, however, is not only that they are poor and the whites are rich, but that the laws which are made by the whites are designed to preserve this situation. There are two ways to break out of poverty. The first is by formal education, and the second is by the worker acquiring a greater skill at his work and thus higher wages. As far as Africans are concerned, both these avenues of advancement are deliberately curtailed by legislation…
The lack of human dignity experienced by Africans is the direct result of the policy of white supremacy. White supremacy implies black inferiority. Legislation designed to preserve white supremacy entrenches this notion. Menial tasks in South Africa are invariably performed by Africans. When anything has to be carried or cleaned the white man will look around for an African to do it for him, whether the African is employed by him or not. Because of this sort of attitude, whites tend to regard Africans as a separate breed. They do not look upon them as people with families of their own; they do not realize that they have emotions - that they fall in love like white people do; that they want to be with their wives and children like white people want to be with theirs; that they want to earn enough money to support their families properly, to feed and clothe them and send them to school. And what `house-boy` or `garden-boy` or labourer can ever hope to do this?
Whites look at blacks as another species and black men look at white men as the enemy. This leads to a corrupt society. If white men would view everyone as equals most problems would be solved. Instead they hand every little problem on to the black men and expect them to fix it or get it done with almost nothing in return. This is why the society is corrupt and failing.
convinced themselves and others that black citizens were incapable of surviving on their own. But deep down, they must have known they were only lying to themselves. Otherwise, why was it necessary to pass laws to restrict them? Why keep them illiterate? Why forbid them education? Why strip them of their own voices to tell their own stories?
Pass laws, which to the Africans are among the most hated bits of legislation in South Africa, render any African liable to police surveillance at any time. I doubt whether there is a single African male in South Africa who has not at some stage had a brush with the police over his pass. Hundreds and thousands of Africans are thrown into jail each year under pass laws. Even worse than this is the fact that pass laws keep husband and wife apart and lead to the breakdown of family life.
feel defeated by the enormity of the overwhelming prospect of reforming a system (tradition) that has been in play since long before our country was founded.
Poverty and the breakdown of family life have secondary effects. Children wander about the streets of the townships because they have no schools to go to, or no money to enable them to go to school, or no parents at home to see that they go to school, because both parents (if there be two) have to work to keep the family alive. This leads to a breakdown in moral standards, to an alarming rise in illegitimacy, and to growing violence, which erupts not only politically, but everywhere. Life in the townships is dangerous. There is not a day that goes by without somebody being stabbed or assaulted. And violence is carried out of the townships in the white living areas. People are afraid to walk alone in the streets after dark. Housebreakings and robberies are increasing, despite the fact that the death sentence can now be imposed for such offences. Death sentences cannot cure the festering sore.
Families can try to do better for themselves but because of poverty and the laws made, it makes it hard. In this paragraph it talks about how parents have no money and then because of that, the kids can’t go to school. Then the parents or even the kids turn to crime to support each other. As the kids grow up (and find out this is what they “need” to do to survive) they might have families but the same thing might happen all over again because nothing has changed. It’s just a big circle.
Africans want to be paid a living wage. Africans want to perform work which they are capable of doing, and not work which the Government declares them to be capable of. Africans want to be allowed to live where they obtain work, and not be endorsed out of an area because they were not born there. Africans want to be allowed to own land in places where they work, and not to be obliged to live in rented houses, which they can never call their own. Africans want to be part of the general population, and not confined to living in their own ghettoes. African men want to have their wives and children to live with them where they work, and not be forced into an unnatural existence in men`s hostels. African women want to be with their menfolk and not be left permanently widowed in the Reserves. Africans want to be allowed out after eleven o`clock at night and not to be confined to their rooms like little children. Africans want to be allowed to travel in their own country and to seek work where they want to and not where the Labour Bureau tells them to. Africans want a just share in the whole of South Africa; they want security and a stake in society.
Uses pathos for people to realize that “black” people don’t have basic or the same things that most others have
Mandela repeats “Africans want…” throughout this whole entire paragraph to show that they don’t have equality. Each sentence is telling readers that the Africans just want their lives to be normal, like how the whites live.
Above all, we want equal political rights, because without them our disabilities will be permanent. I know this sounds revolutionary to the whites in this country, because the majority of voters will be Africans. This makes the white man fear democracy.
But this fear cannot be allowed to stand in the way of the only solution which will guarantee racial harmony and freedom for all. It is not true that the enfranchisement of all will result in racial domination. Political division, based on colour, is entirely artificial and, when it disappears, so will the domination of one colour group by another. The ANC has spent half a century fighting against racialism. When it triumphs it will not change that policy.
This then is what the ANC is fighting. Their struggle is a truly national one. It is a struggle of the African people, inspired by their own suffering and their own experience. It is a struggle for the right to live.
During my lifetime I have dedicated myself to this struggle of the African people. I have fought against white domination, and I have fought against black domination. I have cherished the ideal of a democratic and free society in which all persons live together in harmony and with equal opportunities. It is an ideal, which I hope to live for and to achieve. But if needs be, it is an ideal for which I am prepared to die.
General Document Comments 0
icons on the left to see existing comments.
0 archived comments