NowComment
2-Pane Combined
Comments:
Full Summaries Sorted

An Affinity for Asynchronous Learning

0 General Document comments
0 Sentence and Paragraph comments
0 Image and Video comments


An Affinity for Asynchronous Learning
New Conversation
Paragraph 1 0
profile_photo
Apr 1
Mary Ann Keeler (Apr 01 2015 2:59AM) : I like this picture. It is pleasing.
New Conversation
Paragraph 1, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

New Conversation
Paragraph 2 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 2, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
/ AND / 22 COMMENTS

New Conversation
Paragraph 3 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 3, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

There is something that bothers us about conversations about replacing face-to-face teaching with online learning: they often fall into a trap of assuming that incorporating synchronous interaction is the optimal way to make learning more personable, that it approximates the face-to-face setting closest, and is therefore preferable and better. More often than not, synchronous interaction here implies some form of two-way audiovisual interaction, even though there are text-only forms of synchronous interaction (e.g., Twitter live chat). There are also asynchronous forms of audiovisual interaction (e.g., voicemail, recorded lectures).

New Conversation
Paragraph 4 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 4, Sentence 1 0
profile_photo
Apr 1
Erica Hansen (Apr 01 2015 3:03AM) : I am definitely the teacher that fears a lack of face-to-face interactions for her students. I think people feel loneliness because technology divides us more and more.
New Conversation
Paragraph 4, Sentence 2 0
New Conversation
Paragraph 4, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

But we feel the enthusiasm for audiovisual synchronicity often comes without sufficient discernment, and without deliberative consideration of how asynchronous learning can be not only viable but productive.

New Conversation
Paragraph 5 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 5, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

We’ve had experiences both teaching and learning online in a variety of formats, as well as supporting others who are still learning to teach online, and this article reflects our experiences and how they affect our thinking about digital pedagogy more broadly. We both have a strong preference for asynchronous learning.

New Conversation
Paragraph 6 0
profile_photo
Apr 1
Mabel Rodriguez (Apr 01 2015 2:50AM) : teaching and learning online more

I am not sure if we can safely say that we have had a variety of formats of online learning.

profile_photo
Apr 1
Ms. G Mata (Apr 01 2015 2:57AM) : facts more

facts

New Conversation
Paragraph 6, Sentence 1 0
Comment Deleted more

This comment was deleted by Paul Allison at Jul 09 2015 08:39AM.

profile_photo
Apr 1
Dr. Andrea Smith (Apr 01 2015 2:58AM) : Si! more

Es Verdad! Me gusta el football pero no el baseball.

New Conversation
Paragraph 6, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

In November 2013, we participated in a Coursera MOOC from the University of Edinburgh: E-Learning and Digital Cultures (and #edcmooc on Twitter). We’re from opposite ends of the world (Cairo, Egypt and St. Paul, Minnesota, United States) both geographically and culturally, but not digitally. And through asynchronous communication, we not only came to meet, but also to write this piece, and while writing it, to realize that much of our higher education careers have been quite similar (we both did our master’s degrees online in 2003, using dial-up).

New Conversation
Paragraph 7 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 7, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 7, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 7, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

There are two misconceptions that we think hinder teachers’ creativity when thinking about teaching online. The first is a tendency to think of ways of approximating their face-to-face teaching into an online format as much as possible — instead of considering the possibilities afforded by the new medium, with the diverse opportunities for engagement and communication. The (problematic) assumptions behind this include a belief that text is less personal, that immediacy is inherently more valuable, and that approximating face-to-face is beneficial. The second, which relates to the first, is the belief (as Kolowich suggests) that increasing the “human” element of an online course is best done by either showing the face/voice of the teacher (e.g., as in pre-recorded lectures used in many xMOOCs), approximating a non-interactive lecture-based face-to-face class, or interacting synchronously (as in Google Hangouts), approximating a discussion-based face-to-face class.

New Conversation
Paragraph 8 0
profile_photo
Apr 1
Ms. G Mata (Apr 01 2015 2:56AM) : lies more

i disagree with the two concerns this article is referring to. my only concern is that every kid will get confused and want one on one attention in order to do this.

New Conversation
Paragraph 8, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 8, Sentence 2 0
profile_photo
Apr 1
M K
(Apr 01 2015 2:47AM) : Teachers see this format as trying to replicate face to face instead of trying to see the other options. more

Students get technology at home but not always face to face connections that they do get at school. Sometimes learning in person is what students need.

profile_photo
Apr 1
C C
(Apr 01 2015 2:58AM) : Asynchronous learning biased? more

I agree. In addition to needing learning in person, many students do not have technology available at home which can cause asynchronous learning to be biased.

profile_photo
Apr 1
Mabel Rodriguez (Apr 01 2015 2:54AM) : Teachers want face to face more

I think I am scared to use technology as the medium because I am always thinking about students going to other sites. However, I find that this is a much more engaging medium which will keep them on task. I need to diversify the opportunities for engagement and learning.

profile_photo
Apr 1
stephanie baker (Apr 01 2015 2:58AM) : on task more

I only only use computers in my government class, I use google docs and use a program that sends a copy to each student and they work in the document. They definitely can get off task, but its not more than when the hand out is paper.

profile_photo
Apr 1
angela arroyo (Apr 01 2015 3:00AM) : lack of engagement... more

great comment!

profile_photo
Apr 1
Mary Ann Keeler (Apr 01 2015 3:03AM) : Angela your comment is great too!
profile_photo
May 30
Lona Jack-Vilmar (May 30 2018 12:55AM) : Teachers mistakenly assume that online learning must replicate certain aspects of face-to-face teaching more

I basically agree with this but in my work with ELLs in the 2017 Summer Academy, I actually felt that it was my duty to provide my students opportunities to engage in face-to-face conversations to build up students oral competence. This would not happen solely from relying on the asynchronous experience so for me the circumstance and the classroom context must factor in.

profile_photo
May 30
Louise Bauso (May 30 2018 1:46AM) : I agree! The social nature of oral language development can't easily be created on the computer... It can, but it's so much easier to do it in a classroom setting.
New Conversation
Paragraph 8, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 8, Sentence 4 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

An automatic preference for synchronous (usually audiovisual) interaction with students is often a “mistake”. It would, teachers imagine, be just like a face-to-face class, only online. Right? Actually, usually not. Maha has had experiences facilitating web-based video dialogue, and even though she sees it could have enormous potential when it works well, very often it does not. When we learn online, we are not together in one room, and we need to recognize not only the limitations of that, but the openness of its possibilities.

New Conversation
Paragraph 9 0
profile_photo
Aug 30
Student Juanita Myers (Aug 30 2020 6:25AM) : There is good and bad in all things. [Edited] more

Many teachers and students are use to the traditional way of teaching and learning. I actually find that it is a lot of teachers, not students, that are not comfortable with moving learning to online. Some feel that online learning takes away the personal interaction one gets from physically being present. There are many advantages to online learning that can be beneficial to both student and teacher.

New Conversation
Paragraph 9, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 9, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 9, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 9, Sentence 4 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 9, Sentence 5 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 9, Sentence 6 0
profile_photo
Apr 1
Moo Lala (Apr 01 2015 2:59AM) : Agreed, but those aren't the only limitations..some of our students are comfortable with technology themselves in an "educational" setting without guidance
profile_photo
Aug 30
Student Juanita Myers (Aug 30 2020 6:28AM) : I agree with you. Many students are better with technology than the teachers are.

The strengths of online learning, especially in massive courses such as MOOCs, and especially for adult learners, might lie in their asynchronous interactive components.

New Conversation
Paragraph 10 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 10, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Synchronous learning is biased

New Conversation
Paragraph 11 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 11, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Here are some of the problems we have with synchronicity, as teachers and as learners. We wanted to include other people’s views on this, so we surveyed other participants in #edcmooc and quote some of their responses.

New Conversation
Paragraph 12 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 12, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 12, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

First, synchronous meetings are biased against certain time zones.

New Conversation
Paragraph 13 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 13, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

If the person leading the meeting is based in Europe/Africa, any time that is convenient for them will either be biased towards US-based time zones, or Australian/East Asian time zones, rarely being convenient for both. An imperfect way around this is to change the time of such interactions each week (as #moocmooc and #futureed chats have been), to accommodate each of the extreme time zones — i.e. you accommodate each timezone half as often.

New Conversation
Paragraph 14 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 14, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 14, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Second, synchronous meetings are culturally unaware.

New Conversation
Paragraph 15 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 15, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

One Friday, Maha discovered that she had missed three separate synchronous meetings (two on Twitter, one Google Hangout) that she was interested in. Why? Friday is a holy day and weekend in much of the Muslim world. In Egypt, this could mean a variety of things: it could mean family time (therefore no time to work online); but it also means a day free of official work and study, which might make it convenient for online meetings; many people stay busy online on Fridays, which slows down everyone’s home internet connection (younger people like to spend lots of time online: fewer family commitments, among other things) and, in recent years, Friday has become a day for political protests and clashes (lots of social networking there, again slowing internet connections, but also keeping one too busy following that news if one is at home rather than on the street, leaving little brain capacity for online professional development).

New Conversation
Paragraph 16 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 16, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 16, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 16, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 16, Sentence 4 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Third, synchronous meetings are biased against families and busy people!

New Conversation
Paragraph 17 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 17, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Maha once participated in a Google Hangout at midnight Egypt time (there’s that time zone bias again) and had to interrupt the interaction in the middle because her toddler woke up. These issues are less problematic with text-based synchronous events with larger groups (e.g. Twitter chats) because a few minutes’ absence would likely go unnoticed, and one can re-cap what was missed quite quickly. As one #edcmooc participant put it:

New Conversation
Paragraph 18 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 18, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 18, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 18, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

“It all comes down to time available to undertake the work required. Working full time with heavy work and family loads. And also when a mooc is managed from the other side of the world, the hangouts etc. are hard to do in real time. (i.e., I have to get up really in the morning UK time to catch.)

New Conversation
Paragraph 19 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 19, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 19, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 19, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 19, Sentence 4 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 19, Sentence 5 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

These are logistical reasons, but important ones, as online learners may not have the luxury of learning online without the convenience of asynchronous communication opportunities.

New Conversation
Paragraph 20 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 20, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Fourth, synchronous meetings that involve audiovisuals are elitist

New Conversation
Paragraph 21 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 21, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Synchronous meetings can be biased against people with choppy internet infrastructure or even occasional electricity cuts (e.g. in developing countries), or whose level of technical skill or access to technical support can prevent them from participating fully (e.g., because of faulty mic setup). One #edcmooc participant said:

New Conversation
Paragraph 22 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 22, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 22, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

“I can’t touch type so I find myself easily lost in synchronous chat. I don’t have a reliable connection so Skype etc. frustrates me as I miss parts of chat and feel like [it would be like] shouting from my window as a means of engagement!”

New Conversation
Paragraph 23 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 23, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 23, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Maha and Bard each completed our master’s degrees online using predominantly asynchronous communication, and we were both on dial-up at the time, which would not have allowed for heavy reliance on synchronous and/or audiovisual interaction.

New Conversation
Paragraph 24 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 24, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Fifth, synchronous meetings rely heavily on linguistic capital

New Conversation
Paragraph 25 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 25, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

(Maha wrote about this recently in Teaching in Higher Education.) In synchronous dialogue, if you are not fluent in the dominant language spoken, you are lost. This is less of a problem if the syncronous communication is one-on-one via text, which might allow participants a bit more time to gather their thoughts before writing them.

New Conversation
Paragraph 26 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 26, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 26, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 26, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

In our survey, nine respondents were neither native nor fluent in English. One such person commented that asynchronous learning “makes the act of communicating with other people less intimidating. I can make sure that I don’t misunderstand what other people are saying.” Another person said, “synchronous thinking and responding could not happen when you should think of the content in another language’s logic and translate your ideas to English.” Note the emphasis on synchronous thinking. The thinking itself can benefit from asynchronicity (coming up later).

New Conversation
Paragraph 27 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 27, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 27, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 27, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 27, Sentence 4 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 27, Sentence 5 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 27, Sentence 6 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Why go for asynchronous learning?

New Conversation
Paragraph 28 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 28, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

There is nothing particularly revolutionary about what we have said above. But for some reason, many of these issues are not put into consideration when planning online learning experiences. People do not always ask themselves if what they are trying to do necessarily requires synchronous interaction (or audio or video, for that matter). And they often forget to consider these access issues (among others that we have not mentioned). Though these are not pedagogical reasons per se, they are in our view important…pre-pedagogical!

New Conversation
Paragraph 29 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 29, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 29, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 29, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 29, Sentence 4 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 29, Sentence 5 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Convenience is not a marginal issue!

New Conversation
Paragraph 30 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 30, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

If learners cannot access the learning experience comfortably in the first place, not much learning is going to happen, is it? Bard’s view is that sometimes asynchronous is the only convenient or possible way to go. One #edcmooc participant said,

New Conversation
Paragraph 31 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 31, Sentence 1 0
profile_photo
Apr 1
M K
(Apr 01 2015 2:55AM) : If students can not access anything they will not learn. more

This is something to think about with students and using technology and making sure all of them have access……….

profile_photo
Aug 30
Student Juanita Myers (Aug 30 2020 6:32AM) : Sometimes as educators we forget the socioeconomic status of our students. In the poorer communities often times children don't have access to a computer or the internet. This can make it difficult for these students to participate in learning.
New Conversation
Paragraph 31, Sentence 2 0
profile_photo
May 30
Lona Jack-Vilmar (May 30 2018 1:11AM) : In order to provide greater access asynchronous learning is only way to go more

This seems like a generalized statement and does not anticipate how different online learning contexts may have different outcomes. For example, working with rising tenth graders ELLs in the summer academy necessitated that students be put in synchronous communication situations in order for them to take the necessary linguistic risks inherent in a language acquisition context. While written exchanges are powerful, it is not equivalent to situations where oral production is emphasized. ELL students need a balance between synchronous and asynchronous communication experiences in order to attain oral proficiency.

New Conversation
Paragraph 31, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

“Async fits in better with the rest of my life. Also, in this MOOC it works as I am on the other side of the world and would never be able to attend sync classes (unless I were awake at 4am). Async allows me to control the pace and timing of my engagement, and therefore increases the likelihood that I will complete the course.”

New Conversation
Paragraph 32 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 32, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 32, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 32, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Another person compared the benefits of synchronous vs. asynchronous learning as follows:

New Conversation
Paragraph 33 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 33, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

“Asynchronous communication links with my local time, my skills, my preferences, my interests, my agenda. So it is focuses on ME. Synchronous communication links with teachers and other learners, it is spontaneous and lets you know how is your GROUP.”

New Conversation
Paragraph 34 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 34, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 34, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 34, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

We are not sure that asynchronous interaction misses out on the group’s thinking, because it still involves social interaction, but the comment above does seem to fit with another person’s comment that asynchronous learning “allows people to participate authentically on their own terms” (emphasis added). Whereas to make synchronous learning work, the needs and convenience of a larger group of people need to intersect.

New Conversation
Paragraph 35 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 35, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 35, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

In our survey, convenience was one of the main reasons people preferred asynchronous learning (21 responses out of 54), often coupled with flexibility (6/54). Some people noted the importance of working at their own pace (15/54) and or the issue of timezones specifically (5/54).

New Conversation
Paragraph 36 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 36, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 36, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Asynchronous learning promotes deeper reflection

New Conversation
Paragraph 37 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 37, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

The most frequently cited pedagogical reason in our survey for preferring asynchronous communication was that it promoted better reflection (15/54), and some also mentioned the ability to research or look things up before responding. Here are some of the comments:

New Conversation
Paragraph 38 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 38, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 38, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  • “async allows me to be more contemplative which can lead to a more considered and articulate dialogue”
  • New Conversation
    Paragraph 39 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 39, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  • “I like not feeling pressured to communicate right away – I like to have processing time and feel as though I can come back to the conversation later and still participate. It helps me to be more thoughtful.”
  • New Conversation
    Paragraph 40 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 40, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 40, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  • “I love the flexibility [of discussion forums] and the time offered to think over one’s response (or ideas). In a perfect world a chance to do some higher order thinking, especially for those who can’t or don’t want to react in the moment with clearly stated points of view. As a teacher, one has the chance to view and reflect on students’ performance, concerns, level of understanding. As a student, one has the chance to do the same – if you don’t intervene at exactly the moment when the other student expresses her ideas, it doesn’t matter.”
  • New Conversation
    Paragraph 41 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 41, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 41, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 41, Sentence 3 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 41, Sentence 4 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  • “In terms of my learning style, I enjoy reading and reflecting; turning things over in my own mind before contributing; being able to stop, walk away, look something up, before responding.”
  • New Conversation
    Paragraph 42 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 42, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Another person compared synchronous and asynchronous learning in terms of reflection:

New Conversation
Paragraph 43 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 43, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

“I personally feel that synchronous, being time bound, may sometimes induce a sense of urgency, due to which important concepts may be overlooked. Asynchronous provides me the opportunity to explore learning at my pace, allowing me more time to experiment and explore. An occasional synchronous interaction helps to clarify concepts and is also a little reassuring in the sense that it helps to affirm the presence of the trainers / lecturers.”

New Conversation
Paragraph 44 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 44, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 44, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 44, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Questions to consider when making decisions about synchronicity

New Conversation
Paragraph 45 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 45, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Pedagogical

New Conversation
Paragraph 46 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 46, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  1. Would the activity benefit from extended reflection?
  2. New Conversation
    Paragraph 47 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 47, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  3. Would the activity benefit from additional research that students bring into the discussion?
  4. New Conversation
    Paragraph 48 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 48, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  5. Does the activity require audio/video that can be recorded separately and uploaded for feedback later? Or is spontaneous audio interaction part of the essential learning outcomes (e.g. language courses)?
  6. New Conversation
    Paragraph 49 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 49, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 49, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  7. Does the activity require synchronicity but not necessarily audiovisuals? Consider text chat (e.g., on Twitter), but note that information overload can occur, especially with larger groups.
  8. New Conversation
    Paragraph 50 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 50, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 50, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  9. Can the interaction benefit from many-to-many interaction? That richness comes mostly from asynchronous text.
  10. New Conversation
    Paragraph 51 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 51, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 51, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Logistical

New Conversation
Paragraph 52 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 52, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  1. Are most of your students full-time and able to commit to synchronous sessions?
  2. New Conversation
    Paragraph 53 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 53, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  3. How large is the class? Large-class interaction is more manageable asynchronously, but also benefits from breaking up into smaller groups.
  4. New Conversation
    Paragraph 54 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 54, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 54, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  5. Are participants in a variety of timezones, or clustered around one side of the world?
  6. New Conversation
    Paragraph 55 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 55, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Ethical

New Conversation
Paragraph 56 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 56, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  1. Do students have equal access to good-enough infrastructure for synchronous (e.g., no electrical cuts), high bandwidth interaction (for synchronous audiovisuals)? If even one student does not have this, you have an equity issue.
  2. New Conversation
    Paragraph 57 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 57, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 57, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  3. Do some students have linguistic difficulties or other learning difficulties that may be helped by working at their own pace? If so, asynchronous is important to consider.
  4. New Conversation
    Paragraph 58 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 58, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 58, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
  5. Do you have minorities or students who are shy, reluctant to speak up, or intimidated by louder or more eloquent others who tend to hog the conversation? Don’t all learning situations have some of these issues? Asynchronous learning creates space for these learners without having to suppress the more eloquent, more dominant participants.
  6. New Conversation
    Paragraph 59 0
    No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 59, Sentence 1 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 59, Sentence 2 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
    New Conversation
    Paragraph 59, Sentence 3 0
    No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Want to think about this further? The pedagogical benefits and challenges of asynchronous learning are documented, and there are a variety of platforms and ways to communicate asynchronously besides traditional discussion forums. Let us know in the comments what you think.

New Conversation
Paragraph 60 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 60, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 60, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 60, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

[Photo from gualtiero on Flickr; licensed under CC BY 2.0]

New Conversation
Paragraph 61 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Conversation
Paragraph 61, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

DMU Timestamp: July 19, 2014 20:48

General Document Comments 0
Start a new Document-level conversation

profile_photo
Mar 31
Teacher Clayton Rocco (Mar 31 2015 7:57PM) : Asynchronous learning creates opportunities for all learners to participate is discussion and learning communities without fear of inadequacies in speech, pronunciation, or intimidation from others. more

Asynchronous learning is a low stakes/ high reward learning environment.

Image
0 comments, 0 areas
add area
add comment
change display
Video
add comment

Quickstart: Commenting and Sharing

How to Comment
  • Click icons on the left to see existing comments.
  • Desktop/Laptop: double-click any text, highlight a section of an image, or add a comment while a video is playing to start a new conversation.
    Tablet/Phone: single click then click on the "Start One" link (look right or below).
  • Click "Reply" on a comment to join the conversation.
How to Share Documents
  1. "Upload" a new document.
  2. "Invite" others to it.

Logging in, please wait... Blue_on_grey_spinner