Islam's Sunni-Shia Divide Block 6
0 General Document comments
0 Sentence and Paragraph comments
0 Image and Video comments
JUL 31, 2019
Islam's Sunni-Shia Divide BY SARAH PRUITT
Though the two main sects within Islam, Sunni and Shia, agree on most of the fundamental beliefs and practices of Islam, a bitter split between the two goes back some 14 centuries. The divide originated with a dispute over who should succeed the Prophet Muhammad as leader of the Islamic faith he introduced.
|
sect: a group of people with somewhat different religious beliefs from those of a larger group to which they belong |
Today, about 85 percent of the approximately 1.6 billion Muslims around the world are Sunni, while 15 percent are Shia, according to an estimate by the Council on Foreign Relations. While Shia represent the majority of the population in Iran, Iraq, Bahrain and Azerbaijan, and a plurality in Lebanon, Sunnis are the majority in more than 40 other countries, from Morocco to Indonesia.
Despite their differences, Sunni and Shia have lived alongside each other in relative peace for most of history. But starting in the late 20th century, the schism deepened, exploding into violence in many parts of the Middle East as extreme brands of Sunni and Shia Islam battle for both religous and political supremacy.
|
schism: a split or division between strongly opposed sections or parties, caused by differences in opinion or belief. |
The Aftermath of Muhammad’s Death
What is the main idea of this section? The main idea should be a complete sentence.
The main idea is that when he died his family continued his legacy
What are two pieces of textual evidence (COPY and PASTE DIRECTLY FROM THE TEXT) to support the main idea. Why did you choose those 2 pieces?
“While most of Muhammad’s followers thought that the other elite members of the Islamic community should choose his successor, a smaller group believed only someone from Muhammad’s family—namely his cousin and son-in-law, Ali—should succeed him”.“This group became known as the followers of Ali; in Arabic the Shiat Ali, or simply Shia”.
I found this piece of evidence important because they demostrate muhammad’s death and how people started taking over his control.
“The essence of the problem is that Muhammad died without a male heir, and he never clearly stated who he would want to be his successor,”
While most of Muhammad’s followers thought that the other elite members of the Islamic community should choose his successor, a smaller group believed only someone from Muhammad’s family—namely his cousin and son-in-law, Ali—should succeed him. This group became known as the followers of Ali; in Arabic the Shiat Ali, or simply Shia.
“The essence of the problem is that Muhammad died without a male heir, and he never clearly stated who he would want to be his successor,”
While most of Muhammad’s followers thought that the other elite members of the Islamic community should choose his successor, a smaller group believed only someone from Muhammad’s family—namely his cousin and son-in-law, Ali—should succeed him. This group became known as the followers of Ali; in Arabic the Shiat Ali, or simply Shia.
“The essence of the problem is that Muhammad died without a male heir, and he never clearly stated who he would want to be his successor”. “At stake was not only control of Muhammad’s religious and political legacy, but also a great deal of money, in the form of taxes and tributes paid by the various tribes united under the banner of Islam”.
The essence of the problem is that Muhammad died without a male heir, and he never clearly stated who he would want to be his successor"
a smaller group believed only someone from Muhammad’s family—namely his cousin and son-in-law, Ali—should succeed him.But other followers thing that is only right to put as a next successor a family member.
Another piece of evidence to prove the main idea is “A smaller group believed only someone from Muhammad’s family—namely his cousin and son-in-law, Ali—should succeed him. This group became known as the followers of Ali; in Arabic the Shiat Ali, or simply Shia.” This piece of evidence proves that people were unsure if they should of allow people from the Muhammad family be Muhammad successor or even follow them this all happened because Muhammad did not leaving a successor for his people to follow after his death.
I found this piece of evidence important because they demonstrate Muhammad’s death and how people started taking over his control.
“The essence of the problem is that Muhammad died without a male heir, and he never clearly stated who he would want to be his successor,. Within the century after Muhammad’s death, his followers had built an empire that stretched from Central Asia to Spain.
The roots of the Sunni-Shia divide can be traced all the way back to the seventh century, soon after the death of the prophet Muhammad in A.D. 632. While most of Muhammad’s followers thought that the other elite members of the Islamic community should choose his successor, a smaller group believed only someone from Muhammad’s family—namely his cousin and son-in-law, Ali—should succeed him. This group became known as the followers of Ali; in Arabic the Shiat Ali, or simply Shia.
|
successor: the next person to take over a throne, inheritance, office, or other position from the last person |
“The essence of the problem is that Muhammad died without a male heir, and he never clearly stated who he would want to be his successor,” says Lesley Hazleton, author of After the Prophet: The Epic Story of the Sunni-Shia Split in Islam. “This was important, because by the time he died, he had basically brought all the tribes of Arabia together into a kind of confederation that became the ummah—the people or nation of Islam.”
Eventually the Sunni majority (named for sunna, or tradition) won out, and chose Muhammad’s close friend Abu Bakr to become the first caliph, or leader, of the Islamic community. Ali eventually became the fourth caliph (or Imam, as Shiites call their leaders), but only after the two that preceded him had both been assassinated.
Ali, himself, was killed in 661, as the bitter power struggle between Sunni and Shia continued. At stake was not only control of Muhammad’s religious and political legacy, but also a great deal of money, in the form of taxes and tributes paid by the various tribes united under the banner of Islam. This combination of money and power would only grow. Within the century after Muhammad’s death, his followers had built an empire that stretched from Central Asia to Spain.
Battle of Karbala and Its Lasting Significance
In 681, Ali’s son Hussein led a group of 72 followers and family members from Mecca to Karbala (present-day Iraq) to confront the corrupt caliph Yazid of the Ummayad dynasty. A massive Sunni army waited for them, and by the end of a 10-day standoff with various smaller struggles, Hussein was killed and decapitated, and his head brought to Damascus as a tribute to the Sunni caliph.
“It was obviously intended by the Ummayads to put the definitive end to all claims to leadership of the ummah as a matter of direct descendence from Muhammad,” says Hazleton of Hussein’s death, and the death of all the surviving members of Muhammad’s family, at Karbala. “But of course it's not what happened.” Instead, Hussein’s martyrdom at Karbala became the central story of Shia tradition, and is commemorated yearly as Ashoura, the most solemn date on the Shia calendar.
|
Summary of the Battle of Karbala: Ali’s son, Hussein (the rightful heir of the Muhammad throne and a member of the Shia sect) led a group of 72 people to confront the corrupt leader Yazid. Yazid was a member of the Ummayad dynasty and a member of the Sunni sect. Hussein was killed & his death was considered a tribute to the Sunni regime. While members of the Ummayad dynasty would have liked to silence all claims to leadership from Muhammad’s family members, Hussein’s death took on a deeper significance and became the central theme of the Shia tradition. Hussein’s death is honored yearly as Ashoura by Shia Muslims. |
The Sunni-Shia Divide Into the 21st Century
In addition to Karbala, the NPR podcast Throughline identified three key milestones that would sharpen Sunni-Shia divisions by the end of the 20th century. First came the rise of the Safavid dynasty in the 16th century, which transformed Iran (through force) from a Sunni center into the Shia stronghold of the Middle East. In the early 20th century, the victorious Allies divided the territory held by the former Ottoman Empire after World War I, cutting through centuries-old religious and ethnic communities in the process. Finally, in 1979, the Islamic Revolution in Iran produced a radical brand of Shia Islam that would clash violently with Sunni conservatives in Saudi Arabia and elsewhere in the decades to follow.
Amid the increasing politicization of Islam and the rise of fundamentalists on both sides of the divide, sectarian tensions intensified in the early 21st century, especially amid the upheavals caused by two Persian Gulf Wars, the chaos that followed the U.S.-backed ouster of Saddam Hussein’s Sunni regime in Iraq, and the mass uprisings across the region that began with the Arab Spring in 2011.
|
politicization: the action of causing an activity or event to become political in character |
Sunni-Shia divisions would fuel a long-running civil war in Syria, fighting in Lebanon, Iran, Iraq, Yemen and elsewhere, and terrorist violence on both sides. A common thread in most of these conflicts is the ongoing battle between Sunni Saudi Arabia and Shia Iran for influence in the oil-rich Middle East and surrounding regions.
Despite the long-running nature of the Sunni-Shia divide, the fact that the two sects coexisted in relative peace for many centuries suggests their struggles may have less to do with religion than with wealth and power such as with the Taliban in Afghanistan.
Why do you think extremist groups use religion as a front to gain wealth and power?
they got power and wealth from it
The Sunni-Shia Divide In Afghanistan
The Taliban took control of Afghanistan in 1996; The Tailban identify as Sunni, but they imposed very strict rules based on their extreme interpretation of Islam. They also targeted certain ethnic minorities including the Hazara (Shia) people. This led to many Afghans fleeing the country in search of refuge and safety, but often living in desperate conditions, penniless, unable to speak the local language and in search of protection. Oftentimes, people are left as internally displaced persons (IDPs) without much help from their country. This leads to many people leaving Afghanistan because it remains dangerous and unsafe; however, once they reach a new country, they are often discriminated against because of their ethnicity. “People seem to forget that a small section of a population doesn’t equal the whole” says Hazelton
The Taliban have been accused of committing mass killings of the Hazaras particularly in the north. It has been claimed that the Taliban massacred thousands of civilians and prisoners during and after the capture of Mazar-i-Sharif in August 1998; this massacre reportedly was aimed at ethnic Hazaras.
In January 2001, several NGO's reported that the Taliban massacred several hundred Shia civilians in Yakawlang in the center of the country. The massacre reportedly occurred after the Taliban recaptured the area from opposition forces. According to witnesses interviewed by HRW, after the Taliban recaptured the area, they rounded up victims from the surrounding villages, and shot or stabbed them with bayonets in the town center.
Besides claims of genocide, there are claims of forced expulsions of ethnic Hazaras and Tajiks from areas controlled or conquered by the Taliban, as well as harassment of these minorities throughout Taliban-controlled areas.
If Hazaras and Tajiks wanted to flee for their lives, explain their next steps for safety.
What do they need to do in order be safe? (Use this week’s notes to help you answer)
they will have to get along with each other in order to go somewhere else.
While the Taliban is associated with Sunni Islam, it does not follow or represent the religion’s Five Pillars. As stated earlier, while it’s never been confirmed, many believe the conflict between the Taliban and the Hazara has less to do with religion and more to do with control and power.
General Document Comments 0
icons on the left to see existing comments.
0 archived comments