A review by Carl Rollyson
Like other works of art, biographies have provenance. Each comes with a history that has to be understood in order to judge the authenticity of its account. How did this book originate? What is its chain of evidence? In the case of unauthorized biographies -- which appear without the blessing and, perhaps, with the curse of their subjects -- the author must be upfront about his sources and the potential limitations of his working methods.
Howard Sounes's subtitle, "An Intimate Life of Paul McCartney," implies some kind of extraordinary access to the subject, and Mr. Sounes touts more than 200 interviews, including some with family members who preferred to remain anonymous. But he says nothing about Mr. McCartney's reaction to being written about in this way. So what to make of the biographer's claim that he has studied his subject "closely, as an entomologist might put another kind of beetle under the microscope"? Isn't something missing from Mr. Sounes's laboratory slide?
Mr. Sounes does provide sound background on Mr. McCartney's working-class roots, the environs of Liverpool, and the bonding of two song-writing youths (Mr. McCartney and John Lennon) who both lost their mothers while still in their teens. The author turns up new details on these early topics -- although some of what he has gleaned (about a family scandal involving larcenous "Uncle Will," for example) does not really add to an understanding of Mr. McCartney or his music.
Yet if Mr. Sounes's book fails to impress, it is in part because in his source notes he resorts to headings such as "Relations with brother: author's interviews." Well, yes, but tell us with whom. No one expects an unauthorized biography to boast the parade of big-name sources that adorn the pages of the approved accounts. In the end, though, an unauthorized biographer's credibility will actually benefit from a candid discussion of any piece of evidence that does not come directly from the subject. Otherwise the biography does not even meet the People magazine standard.
Speaking of which, former People senior writer Peter Ames Carlin has written a book that treats the evidence in an even dodgier fashion. But where Fab is rather ponderous -- "A large part of the Beatles' success, and thereby Paul McCartney's, can be put down to the fact that the boys worked with first-rate people from the start" -- Mr. Carlin's Paul McCartney: A Life at least has the virtues of readability and style. In his acknowledgments, Mr. Carlin includes a doughty paragraph saluting a list of names for "interviews, insights, and fact-checking." Who did the interviewing and how extensive it actually was remain a little murky -- but a notes section does nail down the identities of key informants.
Mr. Carlin's most disturbing tic is a faux-intimate style. Describing Mr. McCartney's appearance at the celebration of his 66th birthday in his old working-class Liverpool neighborhood, the biographer notes that his subject has his "Hofner bass strapped around his neck, and this makes him look -- and almost certainly feel -- ageless." But couldn't it just as easily make him feel aged? After all, this bass is the instrument of his youth, one of his iconic symbols, as Mr. Carlin affirms on the way to this muddle-up of the moment: "It is his Rosebud, his Excalibur. It's not the key to his past, exactly. But that he still has it, and wields it so frequently in public, tells you something." Tells us what? You can turn the page, but it does not get much better.
Still, Mr. Carlin has a knack for setting a scene. Crisp reporting makes his version of the Beatles' encounter with Elvis a fascinating cultural and political misadventure: John Lennon twits Elvis for his support of LBJ and the Vietnam War, but Mr. McCartney saves the day and dispels the stilted atmosphere by saying: "Can we play some music?" This episode emphasizes the generational differences between the King of Rock 'n' Roll and his British acolytes turned rivals. Indeed, Mr. Carlin might have developed this moment further, since it is rich with irony -- the subversive, hip-swinging Elvis of the 1950s having become the stodgy supporter of the 1960s establishment. Even so, Mr. Carlin's scene adds a few sharp details to the account found in Peter Guralnick's biography of Elvis, a work that sets the gold standard for biographies of rock musicians.
The Elvis scene works so well for Mr. Carlin because he's not afraid to acknowledge the limited perspective of his source -- in this case, journalist Chris Hutchins, barely mentioned in Mr. Sounes's account but right at the crux of the action in Mr. Carlin's riveting re-creation of a pivotal time in rock-music history. This single source gives Mr. Carlin what he needs to capture a moment, when, as Paul McCartney put it, the "styles were changing in favour of us."
I found myself constantly shifting between these two books, hoping to find that one remedied the other yet never finding the sustained balance between fact and interpretation that is crucial to the integrity of unauthorized biography.
Mr. Rollyson is the author of seven biographies and of Biography: A User's Guide.
Logging in, please wait...
0 General Document comments
0 Sentence and Paragraph comments
0 Image and Video comments
Why does McCartney keep biographers at bay/at a distant? Now I need to dive in and see if the reviewer answers my question. The title doesn’t lag and it propels me to keep on reading.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
Bay is such an interesting word to use in the title.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
Should have explained in my original comment. I find Bay to be a good active and lively word. It sort of paints a picture, because when I think of Bay I think of big and open. Makes me read on, why does McCarthy put biographers in this big open bay?
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
To “keep someone at bay” means to keep them at a distance, so that word suggests that McCartney did not allow biographers to get close to him, and like Jason said, it’s probably because he didn’t trust them. It really does make me want to find out why…one would think all celebrities want their life story told.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
A review title seems like a sarcastic question mark above the book title. An author claims to know exceptional details about intimate life of someone who has always refrained from providing any.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
Maybe it was just my initial reaction to the contrast between book and review titles. Especially after reading the review, the book reputation becomes blurry,as it is an authorized biography with omitted sources and names. But the book title is very confident and loud, even with the word ‘fab’ in it.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
Establishing provenance allows you to completely examine the biography. It provides the chronological background needed to fully evaluate.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
Provenance serves as a fact checking device that distinguishes a biography from a written fantasy. And makes a work look reliable, especially when it comes to unauthorized biographies.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
This is highly important to establish authority so the reader can trust the author. Also, it builds historical context of the person/subject, which makes the work authentic and legit. The reader wants the truth, and a chronological story, especially of a well known person, where many rumors might have been roaming around.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
It’s important to know the root of the existence to better understand the events that follow. You can’t truly understand who a person is now without understand how they were as a child, the environment they grew up in and what contributed to the person they are today. In McCartney’s case, he lost his mother at a young age, that’s something that was probably hard for him to talk about and inviting a biographer into his life will stir up feelings he’d probably want to keep intimate. He has probably found a way to deal with it and letting other people, especially the public, into that part of his life may just disturb the wound. Not only will others be a part of an intimate event in his life, he may be required to talk about his biography in interviews and will therefore be questioned about his mother’s death and his past.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
Because it is about him after all. And in reviews you should try in part to at least give both sides of the story.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
It’s usually something readers want to know. Also it offers an opportunity for McCartney to express his thoughts and maybe even divulge something that wasn’t written in the biography or falsified.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
Getting the subject’s reaction helps gauge the accuracy of the biography. Though their view is clearly biased, it still is a viewpoint that should be listened to.
On another note, this paragraph does a good job at getting right to the main discussion surrounding the biography.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
Not necessarily. But that’s why it should only “help” in gauging the accuracy. People’s perception of themselves is often warped.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
The biographer has an advantage to hear his subject’s opinion,since McCartney is still alive. Especially on a pretty scandalous topic as intimate life, McCartney comments could serve as part of the provenance. By omitting it Mr.Sounes makes the reliability of his work questionable for once again.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
They are pretty different words in their meaning. Private is more of a category. There is private, public and maybe secret life. It is when events leak from one category to another, it can become scandalous, as a result of public reaction.
Here the book author teases in his title with fabulous private details of the rock legend. The wider the gap between secret and public, the stronger public reaction can be if these details emerge.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
It’s always great to know the reaction of who is being talked about. This also establishes the authenticity of the work, and the star of the work can comment his own feelings about – if it’s truthful or not.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
Sounes’s subtitle IS “An Intimate Life of Paul McCartney,” and although he conducted over 200 interviews, ignoring McCartney’s reaction in regards to being closely scrutinized makes me question Sounes’s credibility and if he actually knows McCartney well enough to write about his life so intimately.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
This paragraph shows the importance of some information, but validates that new information isn’t always a good thing.
The job of the biography is to shed light on the subject not necessarily uncover new information.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
It’s difficult to say. On the one hand, you want to give enough background information so that people who aren’t familiar with the subject have a good foundation for what they are about to read but on the other, you don’t want to be repetitive with whatever information you’re giving. I guess if the background material is going to be something that people may already know, then it should be absolutely essential and the author should be make sure to present it as different and fresh as they possibly can.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
It creates a feeling of intimacy for the viewer, especially fans.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
A reviewer suggests more about the way the background information could be used. In this case it was ‘gleaned’ with such an effort by the biographer, but produces no value in understanding McCartney’s life or work. It could be easily omitted then, and leave space for a more unique information, like McCartney’s opinion on this biography.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
It’s hard to find a good balance of truth and not crossing the line of the subjects’ intimacy. We do want to know some exquisite details, but it could be an extent of bad taste and going through someones’ laundry, if not knowing how to see the difference between story and something that is wished to not be remembered.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
When it comes to a well-known celebrity like Paul McCartney, it’s tiring to hear repeated facts and old information. It’s redundant and a waste of space. It’s a challenge but I think the best work focuses on finding new material, taking on different perspectives and gaining a new understanding of the subject.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
Based on what is said in the paragraph I think that the credibility of the unauthorized biographer, and then the evidence that the biographer gives is what makes the biography convincing.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
The fact that the subject wasn’t able to give the biographer talking points or place restrictions on what was being written. Essentially it’s because the person being written about had no hand in its construction.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
Definitely not with the vagueness of sources. Since a biography is already unauthorized, it is important to back up its reliability with facts like names of the interviewees at least. Or develop an argument that there might have been truth to the biography the subject wanted to hide and denied an authorization.
But avoiding sources makes a biographer here looks like he is trying to cover up himself. This approach develops mistrust and can distance a reader.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
I felt like I learned more about her and therefore I was able to relate more to her. When you follow an artist enough you can sort of fish out the bogus information.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
It is crucial that there would be credible sources, that can establish authority. This could be a bias, paced from one persons’ opinion. But reliable sources can show different aspects of the subjects life, proving that it is a liable biography.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
Unauthorized work does spark an interest especially if you want to get candid, unfiltered information but what makes this new information stick are the sources. It’s extremely important to make sure that the claims made are backed up by sound evidence, or else it won’t stand up to scrutiny. By listing the sources, this shows that proper research was done.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
The sentence is a bit confusing to me. It seems like a bit of a run-on sentence. Also, I just feel like the quote included in the sentence could have been replaced with one that makes more sense to the point he is making, which is, Mr. Carlin’s book is easily readable and has style.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
Information within the sentence is not accurate. “Thereby Paul McCartneys” meaning his success has flown from the band’s glory. But he stood at the very origin of the band and was a big part of this success. Neither “first-rate” people could take a credit for the massive explosion The Beatles created on the rock scene.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
I didn’t use the entire quote, but just quoted a few words. Carlin suggests that ‘first-rate’ people who worked with The Beatles escalated the band success. And he also uses ‘thereby Paul McCartney,’ like he was not part of the success, but just became the result of it. I thought that what was wrong with the sentence, its message.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
New Conversation
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
Excalibur, a sword The Legend of King Arthur, and Rosebud, a snow sled in Orson Welles’s Citizen Kane, are objects that signify the main character’s childhood. Carlin states that McCartney’s bass guitar is his “Rosebud” and “Excalibur” because like in Citizen Kane and The Legend of King Arthur, McCartney’s bass travelled with him from childhood (technically his teen years) into adulthood. It’s a sentimental item that stands for his past.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
Carlin says that the bass guitar doesn’t serve as a “key” to McCartney’s past but the fact that he still has it and uses “tells you something.” Though Carlin doesn’t say what it tells you and the reviewer is frustrated that he doesn’t elaborate on it, one can say that it gives a positive attitude of the past. It shows that McCartney is proud of how far he has come and the bass guitar reminds him of that. But I wouldn’t know for sure, i’m not McCartney.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
“Tells you something” is a cop-out. It teases and fails to inform. If Carlin didn’t know what that “something” was he should have omitted this part.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
He hasn’t developed an argument to make his point about McCartney’s guitar as his Rosebud or Excalibur credible. Carlin left off the argument unfinished, though there was a good potential.
Maybe it is not the McCartney, but his image with this guitar became ageless.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
You know your stuff. That is some deep background information you give there.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
Paul McCartney with bass guitar is a classic iconic image. So is the reference to Rosebud and Excalibur. These objects are a powerful trigger to imagination, this guitar has been his legendary magical sword, and he is greatly attached to it since early years.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
The meeting of two cultural giants had the world watching. You’d expect admiration and respect between the two. Lennon, being who he was, refused to bite his lip and politicized the encounter.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
Two rock titans meet, but behave as ordinary people by engaging into quarrels over politics on stage. It is pretty amusing and ironic.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
It’s ironic because they were two huge cultural icons, which were completely different and instead of working side by side and learning maybe something from each other there was rivalry tension between the two, although, at the end of the day, McCartney pulls through to cooperate with Elvis.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
For one, this scene is already accounted for in Guralnick’s biography so there is a certain credibility to the account, even if people don’t trust Carlin’s reporting.
The single source, though usually a negative, allows the biographer to give the scene rich detail and the perspective of someone who knows what they are talking about.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
New Conversation
It is not that it is praised, but forgives Carlin for using only one source, as he used it well at least to capture the moment.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
Because this is a very valuable source, who was there side-by-side, experiencing the cultural changes with the artist, who can speak from that time.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
In interpreting something you have to prove it with a fact, it cant be just a wild claim. I see this in the 11th Paragraph where the writer makes the claim that Mr. Carlin has a knack for setting a scene. The claim is made then the fact, about the reporting on the encounter with the Beatles is given to prove it.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
Seems like in this case it is more of an observation based on a general statment.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
Every paragraph is structured this way, the reviewer states what he finds wrong or unfinished in both biographies and then interprets why.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
A University of Toronto Ph.D, Rollyson has published more … (more)
New Conversation
General Document Comments 0