Please choose from the list of thinking partners to the left
Remember: Everything the GPT Thinking Partners say is made up!
Edit the AI results before you hit Start Conversation. Revise the message to make it
helpful
(to other readers),
honest
(about any facts) and
harmless
(avoiding biases).
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit?
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Resubmission
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit?
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Liz L(Nov 07 2021 11:12AM):
This student does not actually understand the task. He draws his own conclusion, that Jensen is stereotypical and said that the author could make that claim.
more
If the student looked more closely , he would see that Jensen is not in fact stereotyping, but explaining the examples she saw with scientific facts. It would be better to talk about some of the claims that Jensen made and the evidence she gave to support them. This error could be avoided by asking students to highlight claims and evidence (a formative assessment) before writing.
Liz L(Nov 07 2021 11:16AM):
This student actually did a better job of meeting the requirements of the task. He explains that Jensen used examples from her son to explain her claim. This is accurate and fits the task. The highlighted sections show attention to the requirement
Liz L(Nov 07 2021 11:19AM):
I wonder why the student refers to the author's tone and not a claim the author made. The student gets the gist of the text, but does not give evidence to support it.
more
He might benefit from the opportunity to underline statements in the text that show that the teen’s behavior is linked to his brain. Perhaps filling out a chart would help this student to organize his thinking.
Desktop/Laptop: double-click any text, highlight a section of an image, or add a comment while a video is playing to start a new conversation. Tablet/Phone: single click then click on the "Start One" link (look right or below).
Click "Reply" on a comment to join the conversation.
icons on the left to see existing comments.
0 General Document comments
0 Sentence and Paragraph comments
0 Image and Video comments
If the student looked more closely , he would see that Jensen is not in fact stereotyping, but explaining the examples she saw with scientific facts. It would be better to talk about some of the claims that Jensen made and the evidence she gave to support them. This error could be avoided by asking students to highlight claims and evidence (a formative assessment) before writing.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
New Conversation
He might benefit from the opportunity to underline statements in the text that show that the teen’s behavior is linked to his brain. Perhaps filling out a chart would help this student to organize his thinking.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
General Document Comments 0
