Zero tolerance refers to school discipline policies and practices that mandate predetermined consequences, typically severe, punitive and exclusionary (e.g., out of school suspension and expulsion), in response to specific types of student misbehavior—regardless of the context or rationale for the behavior. The term originated during the Reagan era during which the federal Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 was signed into law as a response to the War on Drugs. The law imposed new mandatory minimum sentences for drug offenders changing a rehabilitative system into a punitive system. Congress passed the Gun-Free Schools Act of 1994, requiring states to expel students who bring firearms to school. Although originally intended as a response to serious offenses (e.g., selling drugs or engaging in gang-related fights on school grounds) to ensure safe and healthy schools, in recent years zero tolerance policies have been applied broadly to include minor offenses (e.g., talking back to school personnel, bringing over the counter or prescription drugs on school grounds without a doctor’s note, and coming to school out of uniform) (NEA, 2008). Like the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, school zero tolerance policies typically do not specify rehabilitative or supportive services to help students change their behavior in positive ways. Research has demonstrated that zero tolerance policies can lead to harmful effects of individuals, lead to higher rates of exclusionary disciplinary action and are not associated with improved school safety and academics (APA, 2008).
Are Zero Tolerance Policies Effective in the Schools? An Evidentiary Review and Recommendations
This report highlights research identifying that zero-tolerance policies may negatively affect the relationships between education and juvenile justice as well as hinder adolescent development. The report concludes that data raises questions about the effectiveness of zero tolerance policies.
This report draws from research and student’s own stories, to demonstrate that zero tolerance does not lead to safer schools or improved academic outcomes and damages student-teacher relations. Zero tolerance policies have major financial costs to taxpayers.
This paper explores the history, philosophy, and effectiveness of zero tolerance policies in schools. Few studies report that zero tolerance policies improve student behavior or school safety and instead finds that research on suspension and expulsion—essential parts of zero tolerance policies—raises serious concerns about the consistency, fairness, and effectiveness of such discipline.
This article shares the high national rates of suspension and expulsion, especially for students of color. It cites National Center on Education Statistics (NCES) data that show the great majority of suspensions and expulsions were for non-criminal offenses such as coming late to class, talking back to a teacher, or violating dress codes. It also mentions an essential movement against unproven, expensive, harmful zero tolerance policies to end of the school-to-prison pipeline.
This is a video of Judith Browne Dianis, Co Director of the Advancement Project who testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee on the School-to-Prison Pipeline.
This report presents findings of a project that identified and examined three communities where schools have successfully reduced discipline problems and improved learning and behavior of all students, including those with disabilities.
This presentation explains the similar origins and mutual reinforcement between (the pressures of) high-stakes testing and (the over-reliance on) zero tolerance policies through which schools suspend or expel students who are less engaged, disruptive, and/or expected to score below proficiency levels on academic assessments. The presentation also provides potential solutions (e.g., people who push for positive school discipline reform should push for high-stakes testing reform, and vice versa).
This report aims to help stakeholders move beyond zero tolerance policies and high-stakes testing, explaining their mutual reinforcement contributes to hostile school environments and pushes students into the school-to-prison pipeline. It cites evidence that zero tolerance policies have not improved school safety or student behavior and provides examples in which alternative prevention and intervention strategies have been successful.
This report aims to inspire people to discuss the negative impact of zero tolerance policies and bring about alternative methods that have decreased school violence and improved learning environments. It reviews the disparate impact on students of color; the expanding role of law enforcement in schools; provides examples of the school-to-prison pipeline in Denver, Chicago, and Palm Beach; and presents initial solutions.
This brief reviews existing research on the implementation and effects of zero tolerance in the school setting; and it highlights rigorously evaluated, nonpunitive alternatives to zero tolerance that have shown greater promise in improving school safety and student outcomes.
This report highlights research findings and recommendations made by the New York City School-Justice Partnership Task Force. The report describes relevant data about school-justice indicators in New York City, emerging trends in policy and practice around the country, and provides recommendations and strategies for implementation.
Logging in, please wait...
0 General Document comments
0 Sentence and Paragraph comments
0 Image and Video comments
New Conversation
New Conversation
General Document Comments 0