NowComment
2-Pane Combined
Comments:
Full Summaries Sorted

Managing Disagreements: Texts from the Talmud


0 General Document comments
0 Sentence and Paragraph comments
0 Image and Video comments


Below are two texts from different parts of the Talmud, the major corpus of Rabbinic law and culture in the Jewish tradition, edited around 500 C.E. (the first text) and 200 C.E. (the second text), respectively.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 1 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 1, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

They tell the story of the academies of Hillel and Shammai, two different schools and ideological camps that thrived in the first century of the Common Era. Though they disagreed, at times profoundly, about how Jewish law should be decided, they managed those disagreements in fruitful ways.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 2 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 2, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 2, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Rabbi Abba said in the name of Shmuel:

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 3 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 3, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

For three years the academy of Shammai and the academy of Hillel argued. One group asserted, “The law follows our views,” and the other asserted, “The law follows our views.”

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 4 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 4, Sentence 1 0
profile_photo

I’m the Tech Liaison for the New York City Writing Project. I… (more)

Mar 3
Paul Allison

I’m the Tech Liaison for the New York City Writing Project. I… (more)

Paul Allison (Mar 03 2015 11:38AM) : Two schools had a 3-year dispute. more

That’s a long time to be disagreeing! There aren’t many details here. I wonder what it was really about, how it mattered materially or emotionally to the people in each of these schools.

profile_photo
Mar 5
Mrs. Dawn Reed Mrs. Dawn Reed (Mar 05 2015 4:04PM) : Long-lasting feuds [Edited] more

I have never been in a feud with someone for years, but I often wonder what leads people to this point. We see it in various literature (we’re reading Romeo and Juliet right now and the two lover’s families hate one another and no one even knows why). Why do people feud for years? Is this just about being upset or real issues?

I do realize that this is more than a feud for this text. It makes me wonder, what topics need to be hashed out with disagreement over years. Here I wonder if it is religious law? I also recognize this as part of knowledge advancement such as in the TED talk referenced here: http://youthvoices.net/howdowedisagree

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 4, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

A Heavenly voice came down and announced, “They are both the words of the living God, but the law follows the academy of Hillel.”

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 5 0
profile_photo

I’m the Tech Liaison for the New York City Writing Project. I… (more)

Mar 3
Paul Allison

I’m the Tech Liaison for the New York City Writing Project. I… (more)

Paul Allison (Mar 03 2015 11:58AM) : So, God says, you're both right, but one is more right than the other. more

This reminds me of how I used to try to settle disputes between my two sons. I’m not sure either of them were happy when I would say something like this. But I like that it is settled. Maybe that’s the message: it’s not worth arguing about.

profile_photo
Mar 6
Karen Fasimpaur Karen Fasimpaur (Mar 06 2015 1:09PM) : a matter of personal style? more

I agree that many things are not worth arguing about, but I think it’s a matter of personal style whether one can set aside the issue and emotion involved. I have been involved in disputes where one side or the other has suggested a “settlement” or even given in completely, only to have the other refuse to accept that. I think that is sometimes how arguments turn into long-lasting feuds.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 5, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Since both were the words of the living God, what entitled the academy of Hillel to have the law agree with them?

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 6 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 6, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Because they were kind and modest, they studied their own rulings and those of the academy of Shammai, and not only that, they mentioned the rulings of the academy of Shammai before their own.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 7 0
profile_photo
Mar 5
Mrs. Dawn Reed Mrs. Dawn Reed (Mar 05 2015 4:09PM) : Recognizing the start of the conversation more

To me this also speaks of the importance of recognizing that conversations and arguments are sometimes ongoing and we need to have background information and respect to enter them.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 7, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Talmud Eiruvin 13b | Also see: The Open Canon: On the Meaning of Halakhic Discourse

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 8 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 8, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Even though the academy of Shammai declares one thing kosher while the academy of Hillel declares the same thing not kosher, even though one forbids while the other permits, the academy of Shammai did not refrain from marrying the women of the academy of Hillel, nor did the academy of Hillel refrain from marrying the women of the academy of Shammai.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 9 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 9, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Even though one side declares things to be pure while the other side declares the same thing to be impure, nonetheless they did not refrain from preparing things requiring a state of purity by using things from the other side.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 10 0
profile_photo

I’m the Tech Liaison for the New York City Writing Project. I… (more)

Mar 3
Paul Allison

I’m the Tech Liaison for the New York City Writing Project. I… (more)

Paul Allison (Mar 03 2015 1:51PM) : Each side sets up rules about what foods and preparations are considered pure, but their rules are different. Still, they use food prepared by the other side, even when if it had been prepared that way by them, it would have been considered impure. more

This takes a lot of, oh what’s the word… maturity? experience… trust? It would be easy to consider both sides hypocritical, but this arrangement preserves the local beliefs without imposing them on other people. How to have your own clear beliefs without asking others to share them is not easy — least not easy for me, having been raised an evangelical Christian.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 10, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Mishnah Yevamot 1:4

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 11 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 11, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

DMU Timestamp: January 07, 2015 02:48

General Document Comments 0
New Thinking Partner Conversation Start a new Document-level conversation

profile_photo
Mar 5
Mrs. Dawn Reed Mrs. Dawn Reed (Mar 05 2015 4:06PM) : Two different perspectives more

I find a lot of value when disagreeing. In this case, I recognize that the two groups had different opinions. When can we agree to disagree and when is compromise the right choice? I do think there are times when dispute and a resolution need to happen. I see that happening in this conversation.

Image
0 comments, 0 areas
add area
add comment
change display
Video
add comment

Quickstart: Commenting and Sharing

How to Comment
  • Click icons on the left to see existing comments.
  • Desktop/Laptop: double-click any text, highlight a section of an image, or add a comment while a video is playing to start a new conversation.
    Tablet/Phone: single click then click on the "Start One" link (look right or below).
  • Click "Reply" on a comment to join the conversation.
How to Share Documents
  1. "Upload" a new document.
  2. "Invite" others to it.

Logging in, please wait... Blue_on_grey_spinner