“Social Media and Youth Mental Health - Current Priorities of the U.S. Surgeon General.” - Current Priorities of the U.S. Surgeon General, www.hhs.gov/surgeongeneral/priorities/youth-mental-health/social-media/index.html. Accessed 30 May 2023.
1
22
A Surgeon General’s Advisory is a public statement that calls the American people’s attention to an urgent public health issue and provides recommendations for how it should be addressed.
Advisories are reserved for significant public health challenges that require the nation’s immediate awareness and action.
This Advisory calls attention to the growing concerns about the effects of social media on youth mental health.
It explores and describes the current evidence on the positive and negative impacts of social media on children and adolescents, some of the primary areas for mental health and well-being concerns, and opportunities for additional research to help understand the full scope and scale of social media’s impact.
This document is not an exhaustive review of the literature.
Rather, it was developed through a substantial review of the available evidence, primarily found via electronic searches of research articles published in English and resources suggested by a wide range of subject matter experts, with priority given to, but not limited to, meta-analyses and systematic literature reviews.
It also offers actionable recommendations for the institutions that can shape online environments – policymakers and technology companies – as well as for what parents and caregivers, young people, and researchers can do.
For additional background and to read other Surgeon General’s Advisories, visit SurgeonGeneral.gov.
24
Social media’ use by youth is nearly universal.
Up to 95% of youth ages 13-17 report using a social media platform, with more than a third saying they use social media “almost constantly.”
2 Although age 13 is commonly the required minimum age used by social media platforms in the U.S., nearly 40% of children ages 8-12 use social media.*
Despite this widespread use among children and adolescents, robust independent safety analyses on the impact of social media on youth have not yet been conducted.
There are increasing concerns among researchers, parents and caregivers, young people, healthcare experts, and others about the impact of social media on youth mental health.5,6
More research is needed to fully understand the impact of social media; however, the current body of evidence indicates that while social media may have benefits for some children and adolescents, there are ample indicators that social media can also have a profound risk of harm to the mental health and well-being of children and adolescents.
At this time, we do not yet have enough evidence to determine if social media is sufficiently safe for children and adolescents.
We must acknowledge the growing body of research about potential harms, increase our collective understanding of the risks associated with social media use, and urgently take action to create safe and healthy digital environments that minimize harm and safeguard children’s and adolescents’ mental health and well-being during critical stages of development.
I’m going to demonstrate a Think Aloud for us to use while chunking the first sentence of this text: “Social media’ use by youth is nearly universal.” To do this, I’m going to break it down into smaller chunks. The first part of the sentence is “Social media’ use” – this shows me the focus of the sentence is on the use of social media. Then comes ”by youth” – this tells us the users of social media are youth. Finally, the last part of the sentence is “is nearly universal” – this indicates that the use of social media by youth is daily or almost total. Now that I have broken down the sentence into chunks it is easier for us to interpret and understand what the text is saying. I invite the other members of our reading group to use this Think Aloud and the same steps when they go back to re-read this paragraph and deepen their comprehension chunk by chunk.
27
The influence of social media on youth mental health is shaped by many complex factors, including, but not limited to, the amount of time children and adolescents spend on platforms, the type of content they consume or are otherwise exposed to, the activities and interactions social media affords, and the degree to which it disrupts activities that are essential for health like sleep and physical activity.
Importantly, different children and adolescents are affected by social media in different ways, based on their individual strengths and vulnerabilities, and based on cultural, historical, and socio-economic factors.7.8 There is broad agreement among the scientific community that social media has the potential to both benefit and harm children and adolescents.6,9
Brain development is a critical factor to consider when assessing the risk for harm.
Adolescents, ages 10 to 19, are undergoing a highly sensitive period of brain development.10, ” This is a period when risk-taking behaviors reach their peak, when well-being experiences the greatest fluctuations, and when mental health challenges such as depression typically emerge.
12, 13, 14 Furthermore, in early adolescence, when identities and sense of self-worth are forming, brain development is especially susceptible to social pressures, peer opinions, and peer comparison.”
, 13 Frequent social media use may be associated with distinct changes in the developing brain in the amygdala (important for emotional learning and behavior) and the prefrontal cortex (important for impulse control, emotional regulation, and moderating social behavior), and could increase sensitivity to social rewards and punishments.
15.16 As such, adolescents may experience heightened emotional sensitivity to the communicative and interactive nature of social media.16 Adolescent social media use is predictive of a subsequent decrease in life satisfaction for certain developmental stages including for girls 11-13 years old and boys 14-15 years old.
Because adolescence is a vulnerable period of brain development, social media exposure during this period warrants additional scrutiny.
29
Social media can provide benefits for some youth by providing positive community and connection with others who share identities, abilities, and interests.
It can provide access to important information and create a space for self-expression.° The ability to form and maintain friendships online and develop social connections are among the positive effects of social media use for youth.
18.
19 These relationships can afford opportunities to have positive interactions with more diverse peer groups than are available to them offline and can provide important social support to youth.18 The buffering effects against stress that online social support from peers may provide can be especially important for youth who are often marginalized, including racial, ethnic, and sexual and gender minorities.
20.
21,22 For example, studies have shown that social media may support the mental health and well-being of lesbian, gay, bisexual, asexual, transgender, queer, intersex and other youths by enabling peer connection, identity development and management, and social support.
23
Seven out of ten adolescent girls of color report encountering positive or identity-affirming content related to race across social media platforms.24 A majority of adolescents report that social media helps them feel more accepted (58%), like they have people who can support them through tough times (67%), like they have a place to show their creative side (71%), and more connected to what’s going on in their friends’ lives (80%).25 In addition, research suggests that social media-based and other digitally-based mental health interventions may also be helpful for some children and adolescents by promoting help-seeking behaviors and serving as a gateway to initiating mental health care.
8, 26,27.28,
31
Over the last decade, evidence has emerged identifying reasons for concern about the potential negative impact of social media on children and adolescents.
A longitudinal cohort study of U.S. adolescents aged 12-15 (n=6,595) that adiusted for baseline mental health status found that adolescents who spent more than 3 hours per day on social media faced double the risk of experiencing poor mental health outcomes including symptoms of depression and anxiety.30
As of 2021, 8th and 10th graders now spend an average of 3.5 hours per day on social media.31 In a unique natural experiment that leveraged the staggered introduction of a social media platform across U.S. colleges, the roll-out of the platform was associated with an increase in depression (9% over baseline) and anxiety (12% over baseline) among college-aged youth (n = 359,827 observations).32 The study’s co-author also noted that when applied across the entirety of the U.S. college population, the introduction of the social media platform may have contributed to more than 300,000 new cases of depression.32, 33 If such sizable effects occurred in college-aged youth, these findings raise serious concerns about the risk of harm from social media exposure for children and adolescents who are at a more vulnerable stage of brain development.
32
Limits on the use of social media have resulted in mental health benefits for young adults and adults.
A small, randomized controlled trial in college-aged youth found that limiting social media use to 30 minutes daily over three weeks led to significant improvements in depression severity.34 This effect was particularly large for those with high baseline levels of depression who saw an improvement in depression scores by more than 35%.35 Another randomized controlled trial among young adults and adults found that deactivation of a social media platform for four weeks improved subjective well-being (ie., self-reported happiness, life satisfaction, depression, and anxiety) by about 25-40% of the effect of psychological interventions like self-help therapy, group training, and individual therapy.36
In addition to these recent studies, correlational research on associations between social media use and mental health has indicated reason for concern and further investigation.
These studies point to a higher relative concern of harm in adolescent girls and those already experiencing poor mental health, 37, 38, 39 as well as for particular health outcomes like cyberbullying-related depression,4 body image and disordered eating behaviors, 4 and poor sleep quality linked to social media use.42 For example, a study conducted among 14-year-olds (n = 10,904) found that greater social media use predicted poor sleep, online harassment, poor body image, low self-esteem, and higher depressive symptom scores with a larger association for girls than boys.43 A majority of parents of adolescents say they are somewhat, very, or extremely worried that their child’s use of social media could lead to problems with anxiety or depression (53%), lower self-esteem (54%), being harassed or bullied by others (54%), feeling pressured to act a certain way (59%), and exposure to explicit content (71%).44
34 Scientific evidence suggests that harmful content exposure as well as excessive and problematic social media use are primary areas for concern.
36
Extreme, inappropriate, and harmful content continues to be easily and widely accessible by children and adolescents.
This can be spread through direct pushes, unwanted content exchanges, and algorithmic designs.
In certain tragic cases, childhood deaths have been linked to suicide- and self-harm-related content and risk-taking challenges on social media platforms.
45, 46 This content may be especially risky for children and adolescents who are already experiencing mental health difficulties.47 Despite social media providing a sense of community for some, a systematic review of more than two dozen studies found that some social media platforms show live depictions of self-harm acts like partial asphyxiation, leading to seizures, and cutting, leading to significant bleeding.48 Further, these studies found that discussing or showing this content can normalize such behaviors, including through the formation of suicide pacts and posting of self-harm models for others to follow.
Social media may also perpetuate body dissatisfaction, disordered eating behaviors, social comparison, and low self-esteem, especially among adolescent girls.
49.50,51.52 A synthesis of 20 studies demonstrated a significant relationship between social media use and body image concerns and eating disorders, with social comparison as a potential contributing factor.41 Social comparison driven by social media is associated with body dissatisfaction, disordered eating, and depressive symptoms.
53, 54, 55.56 When asked about the impact of social media on their body image, nearly half (46%) of adolescents aged 13-17 said social media makes them feel worse, 40% said it makes them feel neither better nor worse, and only 14% said it makes them feel better.57
37 Additionally, roughly two-thirds (64%) of adolescents are “often” or “sometimes” exposed to hate-based content.58 Among adolescent girls of color, one-third or more report exposure to racist content or language on social media platforms at least monthly.24 In a review of 36 studies, a consistent relationship was found between cyberbullying via social media and depression among children and adolescents,40 with adolescent females and sexual minority youth more likely to report experiencing incidents of cyberbullying 59, 6 Nearly 75% of adolescents say social media sites are only doing a fair to poor job of addressing online harassment and cyberbullying.61
38 In addition, social media platforms can be sites for predatory behaviors and interactions with malicious actors who target children and adolescents (e.g., adults seeking to sexually exploit children, to financially extort them through the threat or actual distribution of intimate images, or to sell illicitly manufactured fentanyl). 62.63.64 Adolescent girls and transgender youth are disproportionately impacted by online harassment and abuse, which is associated with negative emotional impacts (e.g., feeling sad, anxious or worried) 65.66 Nearly 6-in-10 adolescent girls say they’ve been contacted by a stranger on certain social media platforms in ways that make them feel uncomfortable. 24
40
Excessive and problematic use of social media can harm children and adolescents by disrupting important healthy behaviors.
Social media platforms are often designed to maximize user engagement, which has the potential to encourage excessive use and behavioral dysregulation.67, 68, 69, 70 Push notifications, autoplay, infinite scroll, quantifying and displaying popularity (i.e., ‘likes’), and algorithms that leverage user data to serve content recommendations are some examples of these features that maximize engagement.
According to one recent model, nearly a third (31%) of social media use may be attributable to self-control challenges magnified by habit formation.?
Further, some researchers believe that social media exposure can overstimulate the reward center in the brain and, when the stimulation becomes excessive, can trigger pathways comparable to addiction 68, 72 Small studies have shown that people with frequent and problematic social media use can experience changes in brain structure similar to changes seen in individuals with substance use or gambling addictions.73.74 In a nationally representative survey of girls aged 11-15, one-third or more say they feel “addicted” to a social media platform.24 Over half of teenagers report that it would be hard to give up social media.?
Nearly 3-in-4 teenagers believe that technology companies manipulate users to spend more time on their devices.68 In addition, according to a survey of 8th and 10th graders, the average time spent on social media is 3.5 hours per day, 1-in-4 spend 5+ hours per day and 1-in-7 spend 7+ hours per day on social media.
31
Excessive and problematic social media use, such as compulsive or uncontrollable use, has been linked to sleep problems, attention problems, and feelings of exclusion among adolescents.
43, 75.76.
77 Sleep is essential for the healthy development of adolescents.
A systematic review of 42 studies on the effects of excessive social media use found a consistent relationship between social media use and poor sleep quality, reduced sleep duration, sleep difficulties, and depression among youth.
42 Poor sleep has been linked to altered neurological development in adolescent brains, depressive symptoms, and suicidal thoughts and behaviors.
8, 79,80 On a typical weekday, nearly 1-in-3 adolescents report using screen media until midnight or later.58 While screen media use encompasses various digital activities, social media applications are the most commonly used applications by adolescents.58
In a recent narrative review of multiple studies, problematic social media use has also been linked to both self-reported and diagnosed attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adolescents, although more research is necessary to understand whether one causes the other.81 A longitudinal prospective study of adolescents without ADHD symptoms at the beginning of the study found that, over a 2-year follow-up, high-frequency use of digital media, with social media as one of the most common activities, was associated with a modest yet statistically significant increased odds of developing ADHD symptoms (OR 1.10; 95% CI, 1.05-1.15).82 Additionally, social media-induced fear of missing out, or “the pervasive apprehension that others might be having rewarding experiences from which one is absent,”83 has been associated with depression, anxiety, and neuroticism.84
42 Nearly every teenager in America uses social media, and yet we do not have enough evidence to conclude that it is sufficiently safe for them. Our children have become unknowing participants in a decades-long experiment. It is critical that independent researchers and technology companies work together to rapidly advance our understanding of the impact of social media on children and adolescents. This section describes the known gaps and proposes additional areas for research that warrant urgent consideration.
44 The relationship between social media and youth mental health is complex and potentially bidirectional. 19 There is broad concern among the scientific community that a lack of access to data and lack of transparency from technology companies have been barriers to understanding the full scope and scale of the impact of social media on mental health and well-being. Most prior research to date has been correlational, focused on young adults or adults, and generated a range of results.85 Critical areas of research have been proposed to fill knowledge gaps and create evidence-based interventions, resources, and tools to support youth mental health.86 Thus, there is an urgent need for additional research including on, but not limited to, the following questions:
56
Our children and adolescents don’t have the luxury of waiting years until we know the full extent of social media’s impact.
Their childhoods and development are happening now.
While social media use can have positive impacts for some children, the evidence noted throughout this Surgeon General’s Advisory necessitates significant concern with the way it is currently designed, deployed, and utilized.
Child and adolescent use of platforms designed for adults places them at high risk of “unsupervised, developmentally inappropriate, and potentially harmful” use according to the National Scientific Council on Adolescence.87 At a moment when we are experiencing a national youth mental health crisis, now is the time to act swiftly and decisively to protect children and adolescents from risk of harm.
To date, the burden of protecting youth has fallen predominantly on children, adolescents, and their families.
Parents face significant challenges in managing children and adolescents’ use of social media applications, and youth are using social media at increasingly earlier ages.4,88 Nearly 70% of parents say parenting is now more difficult than it was 20 years ago, with technology and social media as the top two cited reasons.89 While nearly all parents believe they have a responsibility to protect their children from inappropriate content online,89 the entire burden of mitigating the risk of harm of social media cannot be placed on the shoulders of children and parents.
Nearly 80% of parents believe technology companies have a responsibility to protect children from inappropriate content as well.
89
We must provide children and their families with the information and tools to navigate the changing digital environment, but this burden to support our children must be further shared.
There are actions technology companies can take to make their platforms safer for children and adolescents.
There are actions researchers can take to develop the necessary research base to support further safeguards.
And there is a role for local, state, and federal policy to implement protections for our children and adolescents.
57
The U.S. has a strong history of taking action in such circumstances.
In the case of toys, transportation, and medications – among other sectors that have widespread adoption and impact on children -the U.S. has often adopted a safety-first approach to mitigate the risk of harm to consumers.
According to this principle, a basic threshold for safety must be met, and until safety is demonstrated with rigorous evidence and independent evaluation, protections are put in place to minimize the risk of harm from products, services, or goods.
For example, the Consumer Product Safety Commission requires toy manufacturers to undergo third-party testing and be certified through a Children’s Product Certificate as compliant with the federal toy safety standard for toys intended for use by children.° To reduce the risk of injury from motor vehicle accidents, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration requires manufacturers to fit new motor vehicles with standard airbags and seat belts, among other safety features, and conduct crash tests to be compliant with the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards.91 Medications must demonstrate safety to the Food and Drug Administration before being made available and marketed for use.92 Given the mounting evidence for the risk of harm to some children and adolescents from social media use, a safety-first approach should be applied in the context of social media products.
To better safeguard the mental health and well-being of children and adolescents, policymakers, technology companies, researchers, families, and young people must all engage in a proactive and multifaceted approach.
Through the recommendations below, we can provide more resources and tools to children and families, we can gain a better understanding of the full impact of social media, and we can maximize the benefits and minimize the harms of social media platforms to create safer, healthier online environments for children.
60 Policymakers play an important role in addressing the complex and multifaceted issues related to social media use and in protecting youth from harm.
70 Technology companies play a central role and have a fundamental responsibility in designing safe online environments and in preventing, minimizing, and addressing the risks associated with social media.
82 The onus of mitigating the potential harms of social media should not be placed solely on the shoulders of parents and caregivers, but there are steps they can take to help protect and support children and adolescents against the risk of harm.
90 The burden of mitigating the potential harms of social media does not rest solely on the shoulders of children and adolescents, but there are measures they can take to navigate social media in a safe and healthy way.
99 Researchers play a critical role in helping to gain a better understanding of the full impact of social media on mental health and well-being and informing policy, best practices, and effective interventions.
109 We are grateful to all of the experts, academic researchers, associations, and community-based organizations across the country who shared their insights.
110 The U.S. Surgeon General’s Advisory on Social Media and Youth Mental Health was prepared by the Office of the Surgeon General with valuable contributions from partners across the U.S. Government, including but not limited to:
111 Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health (OASH)
112 Office of the General Counsel (OGC)
113 Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE)
114 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
118 Health Resources and Services Administration (HRS)
119 National Institutes of Health (NIH)
120 Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
121 National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
122 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA)
124 (Copied from the report and links checked and corrected on May 30. 2023)
125 1. The definition of social media has been highly debated over the past few decades. As a result, there isn’t a single, wIdely-accepted scholarly definition of social media. Aichnei et al., 2021) The definition may vary from the cited research in this document based on the methods used in each study. In making conclusions and recommendations, this document regards social media as “internet-based channels that allow users to opportunistically interact and selectively self-present either in real-time or asynchronously, with both broad and narrow audiences who derive value from user-generated content and the perception of interaction with others.” (Carr & Hayes, 2015) For the purposes of this product, we did not include studies specific to online gaming or e-sports. Source: Aichner, T., Grünfelder, M., Maurer, O., & Jegeni, D. (2021). Twenty-Five Years of Social Media: A Review of Social Media Applications and Definitions from 1994 to 2019. Cyberpsychology, Behavior And Social Networking, 24(4), 215-222. https://doi.org/10.1089/ cyber.2020.0134 Source: Carr, C. T., & Hayes, R. A. (2015). Social Media: Defining, Developing, and Divining. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 23:1, 46-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2015.972282
126 2. Vogels, E., Gelles-Watnick, R. & Massarat, N. (2022). Teens, Social Media and Technology 2022. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. United States of America. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2022/08/10/teens-social-media-and-technology-2022/
127 3. The minimum required age set by social media platforms is informed by the Children’s Online Protection and Privacy Act that requires social media platforms to collect verifiable parental consent before collecting, storing, and sharing data from children under age 13. Source: Federal Trade Commission. (2023, February 3). Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule (“COPPA”). Federal Trade Commission. Retrieved from https:// www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/rules/childrens-online-privacy-protection-rule-coppa
128 4. Rideout, V., Peebles, A., Mann, S., & Robb, M. B. (2022). Common Sense Census: Media use by tweens and teens, 2021. San Francisco, CA: Common Sense. Retrieved from https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/research/report/8-18-census-integrated-report-final-web_0.pdf
129 5. It is important to note that many factors can shape mental health, and a comprehensive approach, including prevention strategies, will be needed to support and protect the mental health of children and adolescents. Source: Office of the Surgeon General (OSG). (2021). Protecting Youth Mental Health: The U.S. Surgeon General’s Advisory. US Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/surgeon-general-youth-mental-health-advisory.pdf
130 6. American Psychological Association. (2023). Health Advisory on Social Media Use in Adolescence. American Psychological Association. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/topics/social-media-internet/health-advisory-adolescent-social-media-use.pdf
131 7. Beyens, I., Pouwels, J. L., van Driel, I. I., Keijsers, L., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2020). The effect of social media on wellbeing differs from adolescent to adolescent. Scientific reports, 10(1), 10763. https://doi.org/10.1038/41598-020-67727-7
132 8. Hollis, C., Livingstone, S., & Sonuga-Barke, E. (2020). Editorial: The role of digital technology in children and young people’s mental health-a triple-edged sword?. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 61(8), 837-841. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13302
133 9. Uhls, Y. T., Ellison, N. B., & Subrahmanyam, K. (2017). Benefits and Costs of Social Media in Adolescence. Pediatrics, 140 (Suppl2), S67-S70. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1758E
134 10. Fuhrmann, D., Knoll, L. J., & Blakemore, S. J. (2015). Adolescence as a Sensitive Period of Brain Development. Trends in cognitive sciences, 19(10), 558-566. https://doi.org/10.1016/jtics.2015.07.008
135 11. Blakemore, S. J., & Mills, K. L. (2014). Is adolescence a sensitive period for sociocultural processing?. Annual review of psychology, 65, 187-207. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115202
136 12. Romer D. (2010). Adolescent risk taking, impulsivity, and brain development: implications for prevention. Developmental psychobiology, 52(3), 263-276. https://doi.org/10.1002/ dev.20442
137 13. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). (2019). The Promise of Adolescence: Realizing Opportunity for All Youth. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25388
138 14. Kessler, R. C., Amminger, G. P., Aguilar-Gaxiola, S., Alonso, J., Lee, S., & Ustün, T. B. (2007). Age of onset of mental disorders: a review of recent literature. Current opinion in psychiatry, 20(4), 359-364. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0b013e32816ebc8c
139 15. Maza, M. T., Fox, K. A., Kwon, S. J., Flannery, J. E., Lindquist, K. A., Prinstein, M. J., & Telzer, E. H. (2023). Association of Habitual Checking Behaviors on Social Media With Longitudinal Functional Brain Development. JAMA pediatrics, 177(2), 160-167. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.4924
140 16. Crone, E. A., & Konijn, E. A. (2018). Media use and brain development during adolescence. Nature communications, 9(1), 588. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03126-x
141 17. Orben, A., Przybylski, A. K., Blakemore, S. J., & Kievit, R. A (2022). Windows of developmental sensitivity to social media. Nature communications, 13(1), 1649. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-022-29296-3
142 18. Anderson, M. & Jiang, J. (2018). Teens’ Social Media Habits and Experiences. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. United States of America. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/11/28/teens-social-media-habits-and-experiences/
143 19. Seabrook, E. M., Kern, M. L., & Rickard, N. S. (2016). Social Networking Sites, Depression, and Anxiety: A Systematic Review. JMIR mental health, 3(4), e50. https://doi.org/10.2196/ mental.5842
144 20. According to the National Institutes of Health, sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations include, but are not limited to, individuals who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, asexual, transgender, Two-Spirit, queer, and/or intersex. Individuals with same-sex or -gender attractions or behaviors and those with a difference in sex development are also included. These populations also encompass those who do not self-identify with one of these terms but whose sexual orientation, gender identity or expression. or reproductive development is characterized by non-binary constructs of sexual orientation, gender, and/or sex. Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes of Health. (2022, December 8). Sex, gender, and Sexuality. National Institutes of Health. https://www.nih.gov/nih-style-guide/sex-gender-sexuality
145 21. Charmaraman, L., Hernandez, J., & Hodes, R. (2022). Marginalized and Understudied Populations Using Digital Media. In J. Nesi, E. Telzer, & M. Prinstein (Eds.), Handbook of Adolescent Digital Media Use and Mental Health (pp. 188-214). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/handbook-of-adolescent-digital-media-use-and-mental-health/marginalized-and-understudied-populations-using-digital-media/11A8E212846491FFEA02A32EAFDC401E
146 22. Ybarra, M. L., Mitchell, K. J., Palmer, N. A., & Reisner, S. L. (2015). Online social support as a butter against online anc offline peer and sexual victimization among U.S. LGBI and non-LGBT youth. Child abuse & neglect, 39, 123-136. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.08.006
147 23. Berger, M. N., Taba, M., Marino, J. L., Lim, M. S. C., & Skinner, S. R. (2022). Social Media Use and Health and Well-being of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Youth: Systematic Review. Journal of medical Internet research, 24(9), e38449. https://doi.org/10.2196/38449
148 24. Nesi, J., Mann, S. and Robb, M. B. (2023). Teens and mental health: How girls really feel about social media. San Francisco, CA: Common Sense. Retrieved from https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/research/report/how-girls-really-feel-about-social-media-researchreport_final_1.pdf
149 25. Vogels, E., & Gelles-Watnick, R. (2023). Teens and social media: Key findings from Pew Research Center surveys. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. United States of America. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/short. reads/2023/04/24/teens-and-social-media-key-findings-from-pew-research-center-surveys/
150 26. Kauer, S. D., Mangan, C., & Sanci, L. (2014). Do online mental health services improve help-seeking for young people? A systematic review. Journal of medical Internet research, 16(3).e66. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3103
151 27. Rice, S. M., Goodall, J., Hetrick, S. E., Parker, A. G., Gilbertson, T., Amminger, G. P., Davey, C. G., McGorry, P. D., Gleeson, J., & Alvarez-Jimenez, M. (2014). Online and social networking interventions for the treatment of depression in young people: a systematic review. Journal of medical Internet research, 16(9), e206. https://doi.org/10.2196/mir.3304
152 28. Ridout, B., & Campbell, A. (2018). The Use of Social Networking Sites in Mental Health Interventions for Young People: Systematic Review. Journal of medical Internet research, 20(12), e12244. https://doi.org/10.2196/12244
153 29. Kruzan, K. P., Williams, K. D. A., Meyerhoff, J., Yoo, D. W., O’Dwyer, L. C., De Choudhury, M., & Mohr, D. C. (2022). Social media-based interventions for adolescent and young adult mental health: A scoping review. Internet interventions, 30, 100578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2022.100578
154 30. Riehm, K. E., Feder, K. A., Tormohlen, K. N., Crum, R. M., Young, A. S., Green, K. M., Pacek, L. R., La Flair, L. N., & Moitabai, R. (2019). Associations Between Time Spent Using Social Media and Internalizing and Externalizing Problems Among US Youth JAMA psychiatry, 76(12), 1266-1273. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/2749480
155 31. Miech, R. A., Johnston, L. D., Bachman, J. G., O’Malley, P. M., Schulenberg, J. E., and Patrick, M. E. (2022). Monitoring the Future: A Continuing Study of American Youth (8th-and 10th. Grade Surveys), 2021. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]. https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/NAHDAP/studies/38502/versions/V1
156 32. Braghieri, L., Levy, R., & Makarin, A. (2022). Social Media and Mental Health. American Economic Review, 112(11), 3660-3693. https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/abs/10.1257/aer.20211218
157 33. Doucleff, M. (2023, April 25). The Truth About Teens, Social Media and the Mental Health Crisis. NPR. Retrieved May 2, 2023, from https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2023/04/25/1171773181/social-media-teens-mental-health
158 34. Hunt, M. G., Marx, R., Lipson, C., & Young, J. (2018). No more FOMO: Limiting social media decreases loneliness and depression. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 37(10), 751-768. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2018.37.10.751
159 35. From a mean Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) of 23 at baseline to a mean BDI of 14.5 at Week 4.
160 36. Allcott, H., Braghieri, L., Eichmeyer, S., & Gentzkow, M. (2020). The Welfare Effects of Social Media. American Economic Review, 110(3), 629-76. DOl: 10.1257/aer.20190658
161 37. Abi-Jaoude, E., Naylor, K. T., & Pignatiello, A. (2020). Smartphones, social media use and youth mental health. Canadian Medical Association journal, 192(6), E136-E141. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.190434
162 38. Orben, A., & Przybylski, A. K. (2020). Reply to: Underestimating digital media harm. Nature human behaviour, 4(4), 349-351. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0840-y
163 39. Twenge, J. M., Haidt, J., Lozano, J., & Cummins, K. M. (2022). Specification curve analysis shows that social media use is linked to poor mental health, especially among girls. Acta psychologica, 224, 103512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. actpsy.2022.103512
164 40. Hamm, M. P., Newton, A. S., Chisholm, A., Shulhan, J., Milne, A., Sundar, P., Ennis, H., Scott, S. D., & Hartling, L. (2015). Prevalence and Effect of Cyberbullying on Children and Young People: A Scoping Review of Social Media Studies. JAMA pediatrics, 169(8), 770-777. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0944
165 41. Holland, G., & Tiggemann, M. (2016). A systematic review of the impact of the use of social networking sites on body image and disordered eating outcomes. Body image, 17, 100-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.02.008
166 42. Alonzo, R., Hussain, J., Stranges, S., & Anderson, K. K. (2021). Interplay between social media use, sleep quality, and mental health in youth: A systematic review. Sleep medicine reviews, 56, 101414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2020.101414
167 43. Kelly, Y., Zilanawala, A., Booker, C., & Sacker, A. (2019). Social Media Use and Adolescent Mental Health: Findings From the UK Millennium Cohort Study. EClinicalMedicine, 6, 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2018.12.005
168 44. Gelles-Watnick, R. (2022). Explicit Content, Time-wasting Are Key Social Media Worries For Parents Of U.S. Teens. Pew Research Center. United States of America. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/12/15/explicit-content-time-wasting-are-key-social-media-worries-for-parents-of-u-s-teens/
169 45. Dyer C. (2022). Social media content contributed to teenager’s death “in more than a minimal way,” says coroner. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 379, 02374. https://www.bmj.com/content/379/bmj.o2374
170 46. Carville, O. (2022, November 30). TikTok’s Viral Challenges Keep Luring Young Kids to Their Deaths. Bloomberg. Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2022-11-30/is-tiktok-responsible-if-kids-die-doing-dangerous-viral-challenges
171 47. Sumner, S. A., Ferguson, B., Bason, B., Dink, J., Yard, E. Hertz, M., Hilkert, B., Holland, K., Mercado-Crespo, M., Tang, S.. & Jones. C. M. (2021). Association of Online Risk Factors With Subsequent Youth Suicide-Related Behaviors in the US. JAMA network open, 4(9), e2125860. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.25860
172 48. Dyson, M. P., Hartling, L., Shulhan, J., Chisholm, A., Milne, A., Sundar, P., Scott, S. D., & Newton, A. S. (2016). A Systematic Review of Social Media Use to Discuss and View Deliberate Self-Harm Acts. PloS one, 11(5), e0155813. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0155813
173 49. Lonergan, A. R., Bussey, K., Fardouly, J., Griffiths, S., Murray, S. B., Hay, P., Mond, J., Trompeter, N., & Mitchison, D. (2020). Protect me from my selfie: Examining the association between photo-based social media behaviors and self-reported eating disorders in adolescence. The International journal of eating disorders, 53(5), 485-496. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23256
174 50. Meier, E. P., & Gray, J. (2014). Facebook photo activity associated with body image disturbance in adolescent girls. Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking, 17 (4), 199-206. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2013.0305
175 51. Thai, H., Davis, C. G., Mahboob, W., Perry, S., Adams, A., & Goldfield, G. S. (2023). Reducing Social Media Use Improves Appearance and Weight Esteem in Youth With Emotional Distress. Psychology of Popular Media. https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/ppm-ppm0000460.pdf
176 52. Vogel, E. A., Rose, J. P., Roberts, L. R., & Eckles, K. (2014). Social comparison, social media, and self-esteem. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 3(4), 206-222. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000047
177 53. Nesi, J., & Prinstein, M. J. (2015). Using Social Media for Social Comparison and Feedback-Seeking: Gender and Popularity Moderate Associations with Depressive Symptoms. Journal of abnormal child psychology, 43(8), 1427-1438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-015-0020-0
178 54. Appel, H., Gerlach, A. L., & Crusius, J. (2016). The Interplay Between Facebook Use, Social Comparison, Envy, And Depression. Current Opinion in Psychology, 9, 44-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.10.006
179 55. Kleemans, M., Daalmans, S., Carbaat, I., & Anschütz, D. (2018). Picture Perfect: The Direct Effect Of Manipulated Instagram Photos On Body Image In Adolescent Girls. Media Psychology, 21(1), 93-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2016.1257392
180 56. Mabe, A. G., Forney, K. J., & Keel, P. K. (2014). Do You “Like” My Photo? Facebook Use Maintains Eating Disorder Risk. The International journal of eating disorders, 47(5), 516-523. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22254
181 57. Bickham, D.S., Hunt, E., Bediou, B., & Rich, M. (2022).Adolescent Media Use: Attitudes, Effects, and Online Experiences. Boston, MA: Boston Children’s Hospital Digital Wellness Lab. Retrieved from https://digitalwellnesslab.org/wp-content/uploads/Pulse-Survey_Adolescent-Attitudes-Effects-and-Experiences.pdf
182 58. Rideout, V., & Robb, M. B. (2018). Social media, social life: Teens reveal their experiences. san Francisco, CA: common Sense Media. Retrieved from https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/research/report/2018-social-media-social-life-executive-summary-web.pdf
183 59. Alhaji, M., Bass, S., & Dai, T. (2019). Cyberbullying, Mental Health, and Violence in Adolescents and Associations With Sex and Race: Data From the 2015 Youth Risk Behavior Survey. Global pediatric health, 6, 2333794X19868887. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333794X19868887
184 60. Rice, E., Petering, R., Rhoades, H., Winetrobe, H., Goldbach, J., Plant, A., Montoya, J., & Kordic, T. (2015). Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among middle-school students. American journal of public health, 105(3), e66-e72. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302393
185 61. Vogels, E. (2022). Teens and Cyberbullying 2022. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. United States of America. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2022/12/15/teens-and-cyberbullying-2022/
186 62. Wolak, J., Finkelhor, D., Walsh, W., & Treitman, L. (2018). Sextortion of Minors: Characteristics and Dynamics. The Journal of adolescent health, 62(1), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.08.014
187 63. Federal Bureau of Investigations. (2022, December 19). FBI and Partners Issue National Public Safety Alert on Financial Sextortion Schemes. FBI. Retrieved from https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases/fbi-and-partners-issue-national-public-safety-alert-on-financial-sextortion-schemes
188 64. U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration. (2021, July 23). DEA Washington warns of deadly counterfeit drugs on social media. DEA. Retrieved from https://www.dea.gov/stories/2021/2021-07/2021-07-23/counterfeit-drugs-social-media
189 65. Finkelhor, D., Turner, H.A., & Colburn, D. (2023). Which dynamics make online child sexual abuse and cyberstalking more emotionally impactful: Perpetrator identity and images? Child Abuse & Neglect, 137, 106020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106020
190 66. Finkelhor, D., Turner, H., & Colburn, D. (2022). Prevalence of Online Sexual Offenses Against Children in the US. JAMA network open, 5(10), e2234471. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.34471
191 67. 5Rights Foundation. (2021). Pathways: How Digital Design Puts Children At Risk. Retrieved from https://5rightsfoundation.com/uploads/Pathways-how-digital-design-puts-children-at-risk.pdf
192 68. Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2011). Online social networking and addiction–a review of the psychological literature. International journal of environmental research and public health, 8(9), 3528-3552. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8093528
193 69. Griffiths, M.D. (2018). Adolescent social networking: How do social media operators facilitate habitual use? Education and Health, 36(3), 66-69. Retrieved from https://sheu.org.uk/sheux/EH/eh363mdg.pdf
194 70. Marino, C., Gini, G., Vieno, A., & Spada, M. M. (2018). The associations between problematic Facebook use, psychological distress and well-being among adolescents and young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of affective disorders, 226, 274-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106270
195 71. Allcott, H., Gentzkow, M., & Song, L. (2022). Digital Addiction. American Economic Review, 112 (7): 2424-63. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20210867
196 72. Andreassen, C. S. (2015). Online Social Network Site Addiction: A Comprehensive Review. Current Addiction Reports, 2, 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-015-0056-9
197 73. He, Q., Turel, O., & Bechara, A. (2017). Brain anatomy alterations associated with Social Networking Site (SNS) addiction. Scientific reports, 7, 45064. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45064
198 74. Montag, C., Markowetz, A., Blaszkiewicz, K., Andone, I., Lachmann, B., Sariyska, R., Trendafilov, B., Eibes, M., Kolb, J., Reuter, M., Weber, B., & Markett, S. (2017). Facebook Usage On Smartphones And Gray Matter Volume Of The Nucleus Accumbens. Behavioural Brain Research, 329, 221-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2017.04.035
199 75. Shannon, H., Bush, K., Villeneuve, P. J., Hellemans, K. G., & Guimond, S. (2022). Problematic Social Media Use In Adolescents and Young Adults: systematic RevIew and Meta-analysis. JMIR mental health, 9(4), e33450. https://doi. org/10.2196/33450
200 76. Boer, M., Stevens, G., Finkenauer, C., & van den Eijnden, R. (2020). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder-symptoms, social media use intensity, and social media use problems in adolescents: Investigating directionality. Child Development, 91(4), e853-e865. https://doi.% 20org/10.1111/cdev.13334
201 77. Franchina, V., Vanden Abeele, M., van Rooij, A. J., Lo Coco, G., & De Marez, L. (2018). Fear of Missing Out as a Predictor of Problematic Social Media Use and Phubbing Behavior among Flemish Adolescents. International Journal Of Environmental Research And Public Health, 15(10), 2319. https://srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/cdev.13334
202 78. Telzer, E. H., Goldenberg, D., Fuligni, A. J., Lieberman, M.D., & Gálvan, A. (2015). Sleep variability in adolescence is associated with altered brain development. Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 14, 16-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.05.007
203 79. Liu, R. T., Steele, S. J., Hamilton, J. L., Do, Q. B. P., Furbish, K., Burke, T. A., Martinez, A. P., & Gerlus, N. (2020). Sleep and suIcide: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Clinical psychology review, 81, 101895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101895
204 80. Shochat, T., Cohen-Zion, M., & Tzischinsky, O. (2014). Functional consequences of inadequate sleep in adolescents: a systematic review. Sleep medicine reviews, 18(1), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2013.03.005
205 81. Dekkers, T. J., & van Hoorn, J. (2022). Understanding Problematic Social Media Use in Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): A Narrative Review and Clinical Recommendations. Brain Sciences, 12(12), 1625. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12121625
206 82. Ra, C. K., Cho, J., Stone, M. D., De La Cerda, J., Goldenson, N. I., Moroney, E., Tung, I., Lee, S. S., & Leventhal, A. M. (2018). Association of Digital Media Use With Subsequent Symptoms of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Among Adolescents JAMA, 320(3), 255-263. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.8931
207 83. Przybylski A. K., Murayama K., DeHaan C.R., & Gladwell V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior; 29:1841-1848 https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2013-14654-070
208 84. Fioravanti, G., Casale, S., Benucci, S.B., Prostamo, A., Falone, A., Ricca, V., & Rotella, F. (2021). Fear of missing out and social networking sites use and abuse: A meta-analysIs. Computers in Human Behavior, 122, 106839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106839
209 85. Odgers, C. L., & Jensen, M. R. (2020). Annual Research Review: Adolescent mental health in the digital age: facts, fears, and future directions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 61(3), 336-348. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13190
210 86. Office of the Surgeon General (OSG). (2021). Protecting Youth Mental Health: The U.S. Surgeon General’s Advisory. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/surgeon-general-youth-mental-health-advisory.pdf
211 87. Odgers, C.L., Allen, N.B., Pfeifer, J.H., Dahl, R.E., Nesi, J., Schueller, S.M., Williams, J. L., & the National Scientific Council on Adolescence (2022). Engaging, safe, and evidence-based: What science tells us about how to promote positive development and decrease risk in online spaces, Council Report No 2. doi: 10.31234/osf.io/rvn8g https://psyarxiv.com/rvn8q/
212 88. Clark, S. J., Schultz, S. L., Gebremariam, A., Singer, D. C., & Freed, G. L. (2021). Sharing too soon? Children and social media apps. C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital National Poll on Children’s Health, University of Michigan, 39(4). Retrieved from https://mottpoll.org/sites/default/files/documents/101821_SocialMedia.pdf
213 89. Auxier, B., Anderson, M., Perrin, A., & Turner, E. (2020). Parenting Children in the Age of Screens. Pew Research center: Internet, science & lech. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2020/07/28/parenting-children-in-the-age-of-screens/
214 90. U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. (n.d.) . Toy Safety Business Guidance & Small Entity Compliance Guide. U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. Retrieved from https://www.cpsc.gov/Business–Manufacturing/Business-Education/Toy-Safety-Business-Guidance-and-Small-Entity-Compliance-Guide
215 91. United States Department of Transportation. (n.d.) . National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Retrieved from https://www.nhtsa.gov/
216 92. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.) . Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/drugs
217 93. Australian Government, Safety Commissioner. (nd). Safety by Design. Retrieved from https://www.esafety.gov.au/industry/safety-by-design
218 94. Information Commissioner’s Office. (nd). Introduction To The Age Appropriate Design Code. Retrieved from https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/childrens-code-hub/
219 95. Perrino, J. (2022, July 27). Using “Safety By Design” To Address Online Harms. Brookings Institute. https://www.brookings.edu/techstream/using-safety-by-design-to-address-online-harms/
220 96. Lenhart, A., & Owens, K. (2021). The Unseen Teen: The Challenges of Building Healthy Tech for Young People. Data & Society. Retrieved from https://datasociety.net/library/the-unseen-teen/
221 97. Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). (2018, October 8). Kids & Tech: Tips for parents in the Digital age. HealthyChildren. org. Retrieved from https://www.healthychildren.org/English/family-life/Media/Pages/Tips-for-Parents-Digital-Age.aspx
222 98. Morgan Stanley Alliance For Children’s Mental Health & Child Mind Institute. (2022, May). How to set limits on screen time and internet use. Retrieved from https://www.morganstanley.com/assets/pdfs/setting-limits-on-screen-time-tip-sheet.pdf
223 99. Ehmke, R. (2023, March 13). How using social media affects teenagers. Child Mind Institute. Retrieved from https://childmind.org/article/how-using-social-media-affects-teenagers/
224 100. American Psychological Association. (2019, December 12). Digital Guidelines: Promoting healthy technology use for children. American Psychological Association. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/topics/social-media-internet/technology-use-children
225 101. US Department of Health and Human Services, Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs (ASPA). (2021, November 10). Prevent cyberbullying. StopBullying.gov. Retrieved from https://www.stopbullying.gov/cyberbullying/prevention
226 102. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). (n.d.) . Assessment of the Impact of Social Media on the Health and Wellbeing of Adolescents and Children. Retrieved from https://www.nationalacademies.org/our-work/assessment-of-the-impact-of-social-media-on-the-health-and-wellbeing-of-adolescents-and-children
227 103. American Academy of Pediatrics. (2023, February 7). Center of Excellence on Social Media and Youth Mental Health. Retrieved from https://www.aap.org/en/patient-care/media-and-children/center-of-excellence-on-social-media-and-youth-mental-health/#:~:text=What%20We%20Do,protect%20youth%20mental%20health%20online
228 104. American Academy of Pediatrics. (2017). Bright Futures Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents (4th ed., pp. 229-234). American Academy of Pediatrics. https://downloads.aap.org/AAP/PDF/Bright%20Futures/BF4_HealthySocialMedia.pdf
0 archived comments