When | Why |
---|---|
Jun-24-23 | Saturday June 24 |
Jun-24-23 | Looking Deep Into The Unknown |
Jun-25-23 | Sunday June 25 |
Jun-25-23 | Robot Writing Help |
Jun-26-23 | Monday June 26 |
Jun-27-23 | Tuesday June 27 |
Jun-28-23 | Wednesday June 28 |
Jun-29-23 | Thursday June 29 |
Jun-30-23 | Friday June 30 |
Jul-01-23 | Saturday July 1 |
Goals: exploring daily wonderings about the role of Generative AI for writing, making art, teaching and learning
Added June 24, 2023 at 6:29pm
by Kevin Hodgson
Title: Saturday June 24
My students ended their year yesterday and in final reflections, many of my sixth graders noted their appreciation for all the technology that was woven into our ELA lessons. That included some very basic explorations of Generative AI, and even then, I was wary about bringing it to the classroom. Some had heard of ChartGPT but many had not, and I wondered if I was opening a Pandora's Box for young students. In the end, I don't regret it. Bringing those discussions and explorations of ethics and AI advancements -- giving them information and time to process and ask question, and some basic explorations -- is what we teachers need to always be doing.
Added June 24, 2023 at 6:30pm
by Kevin Hodgson
Title: Looking Deep Into The Unknown
Added June 25, 2023 at 5:35am
by Kevin Hodgson
Title: Sunday June 25
I was reading a piece the other day (I can't find the link) about how all of the major Ed Tech companies are now gearing up for integrating AI into its products and marketing them to school districts. I suppose this was inevitable, but I still find it a bit worrisome -- this rush to product development before we've all had a chance to live with AI for a time and play with AI and learn with AI (which is why I appreciate this particular experiment, using the AI Thinking Partner concept). I am most curious about Google and its educational platforms, as we use our Google suite tools all the time. But I also saw that Google is not planning on AI integration into its educational suite of tools ... not yet, anyway. They are rolling it out to regular users first (probably to see how it is used and work out the kinks). It's difficult not think that in a few years, this AI integration will be just normal useage. I wonder how that will impact the art of writing?
Added June 25, 2023 at 5:46am
by Kevin Hodgson
Title: Robot Writing Help
Added June 26, 2023 at 5:44am
by Kevin Hodgson
Title: Monday June 26
There was news last week that Paul McCartney was using an AI tool to complete a Beatles song featuring the mix of real and synthetic voice of John Lennon. The announcement caused a bit of an uproar, to be expected, given the passion of Beatles fans. McCartney defended the work, saying it was a worthy use of AI, to complete a work of art that would remain unfinished, given Lennon's early death. McCartney has long been one to experiment with music, and to use the recording studio as an instrument itself, so I was not surprised, and I will be curious to hear how it comes out. The AI impact on music is pretty fascinating, with the Drake/Weeknd song making headlines and then the Grimes experiment (using her voice AI tool to make tracks, as long as you give her credit and a cut of any sale profits). I've even done some inquiries and experiments with AI Audio platforms (the free ones, anyway) and although the results were mediocre, it is clear there is something there that could transform the music industry (for good? I don't yet know). It does seem to me, however, that AI voice is different than AI text, in that the human element of a person's voice/sound is more personal, and as we move towards AI video and AI audio, there are bound to be more ethical complications (who gives one permission to use someone's voice?).
Added June 27, 2023 at 5:42am
by Kevin Hodgson
Title: Tuesday June 27
I was reading an article in the newspaper about how Newark schools are piloting the use of AI in some classrooms, and how the results are mixed. And as with most things AI, there are voices on both sides of the issue coming through.
"Proponents contend that classroom chatbots could democratize the idea of tutoring by automatically customizing responses to students, allowing them to work on lessons at their own pace. Critics warn that the bots, which are trained on vast databases of texts, can fabricate plausible-sounding misinformation — making them a risky bet for schools." - via New York Times "In Classrooms, Teachers Put Ai Tutoring Bots To The Test"
Although the scale and use is different (run by Khan Academy, which eventually will sell its services), it reminded me of the experiments I am doing here, thanks to Paul, around thinking about Thinking Partners. Paul has offered to help me create a Thinking Partner for this space. I am curious but I feel as I don't know enough about the process to have deep thoughts on the matter.
I would like to figure out a Thinking Partner that has an art-centered approach to questions, so that I might engage it with queries around the art of making music and creativity. Maybe a jazz musician persona of some sort, a mentor with a wealth of knowledge.
(created with Stable Diffusion)
Added June 28, 2023 at 6:12am
by Kevin Hodgson
Title: Wednesday June 28
Here's what I am wondering: Were any of my words and poems and stories and posts and art scraped to become part of the database that fuels sites like ChatGPT and Dall-E and others? I seem to remember coming across a site that would answer that question (although, how it would do it, I don't know) and I know there are some platforms that allow you to either opt out or block the AI Spiders from grabbing your content to feed its engines.
This conundrum of who owns what on the Internet is tangled, complex, fascinating and concerning -- all at the same time. (Are these words now getting fed into the machine?)
I've left a lot of words, in a lot of places, over the years. Sometimes, I wonder how I might gather them back and then think, that's impossible. Let it go (cue song from Frozen). But now I wonder if in some future point, there might be a way to use the AI database to cull back all of those lost poems and lost words. Maybe that's not likely.
Unlike some artists filing lawsuits, and for good reason, I don't feel all that put out if my words were used for Generative AI, and wouldn't it be fascinating to be confronted with some text that you lost but vaguely remember if it the AI output rang familiar when asking a question?
Image via Dall-E AI
Added June 29, 2023 at 5:50am
by Kevin Hodgson
Title: Thursday June 29
The Daily podcast, from the New York Times, had an interesting episode yesterday, in which they explored the imact of ChatGPT on colleges in the Spring 2023 semester.
They interviewed a history professor, who seems rather befuddled about how and why his students would use AI to generate responses to his discussion posts. He noted that he started to see something happening when the "voice" of some of his writers changed. That was his first indication that some students were just posting responses via ChatGPT.
The students interviewed had some interesting insights, too, about the ethical dilemmas they found themselves in, as this new technology appeared that could easily give them access to academic information. Some admitted using it. Others explained how they tapped into it as a sort of Thinking Partner. Most indicated that they knew it was probably wrong, and that they were paying good money to get a good education, so why find an easy path with AI?
The professor admitted that he did not speak to his classes about the role of ChatGPTand other AI in academic settings, even as his concerns mounted, but that he knows he has to. I think this is probably where a lot of educators at all levels are at -- wondering, what is this thing and how will it tranform my teaching and the way my students learn?
AI Art by Craiyon
Added June 30, 2023 at 5:30am
by Kevin Hodgson
Title: Friday June 30
I don't why I keep reading about P(doom) but I do. P(doom) is the odds that someone gives to Artificial Intelligence causing the end of humanity. It's hard to put too much stock in this awful outcome but it's also difficult to just ignore it, too, particularly when it some of the AI scientists have P(doom) numbers hovering over 10 percent likelihood. I guess I remain fairly optmistic that the AI systems will not take that kind of turn for the worst (nuclear war, pandemic disease, etc.) but still, there are plenty of things to worry about in the here and now (misinformation, bias, etc.) when it comes to the Generative AI systems already settling into place.
If I had to settling on a P(doom) number, it might hover around 5 percent. Not likely to happen, but not out of the ballpark, either.
Added July 01, 2023 at 5:54am
by Kevin Hodgson
Title: Saturday July 1
This is my last entry into this AI Dialogue Notebook Journal experiment and it has been helpful to continue my thinking and wondering and inquiry about Generative AI, and to use the AI Thinking Partner tools that are now embedded here in NowComment. With Paul's help and assistance, I have been working on creating my own Thinking Partner personas, and I know I need to spend more time with the Prompt Engineering resources that he and others have gathered.
I created three Thinking Partners now in play here:
In a discussion with Paul, I started to realize that creating a Thinking Partner for reading a given text together (AI in conjunctioin with a real person) is different than creating a Thinking Partner to give feedback or do something with something the human has written (as I have been doing here all week). I need to think more on this, and how to fashion Thinking Partners in a way that make sense, but also doesn't just add more noise to a text.
David noted elsewhere, in his observations of what I was doing here, that I was using a sort of "shotgun" effect with the Thinking Partners as I was writing all week -- and that is true. I was not being very systematic with which AI I wanted to add and comment. I was more in exploration -- what will this one do? How is this response going to be different? What words and language were used to create this particular Thinking Partner and how does it impact the response?
Created by Adobe Firefly AI
Logging in, please wait...
0 General Document comments
0 Sentence and Paragraph comments
0 Image and Video comments
As a scholar of constructionism, it is important to understand when and how AI should be used in an educational context. Before introducing AI to a sixth grade classroom, educators should consider the developmental needs of the students. It’s also important to consider if the AI tool will truly benefit the learning process. If so, educators should design learning activities that center learners and their experiences. It will be important to create an approach that taps into learners’ curiosity about the world and encourages them to construct knowledge through exploration. Educators should also consider the ethical implications of using AI and assess potential biases and harm that could arise. Ultimately, the decision to introduce AI to a sixth grade classroom should be grounded in an understanding of the students’ needs and the potential benefits that the AI tool can bring.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
Through active teaching, continuing conversation, and reflective practice, educators can build an ethical approach to using AI and help learners construct knowledge that reflects a world that is rapidly changing.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
No, looking into a cave does not capture the unknown that educators might feel about the emergence of Generative AI. Generative AI is a relatively new technology and as such, there is a great deal of uncertainty and mystery surrounding it. Visualizing this sense of the unknown is best done through abstract illustrations, as opposed to a literal interpretation such as looking into a cave. When educators think of the emergence of Generative AI, they likely think of things like artificial intelligence, machine learning, and automation – all topics that are shrouded in ambiguity and the unknown.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
As we grow more accepting of automation in our lives, I believe it can only be beneficial to incorporate AI technology into educational technology products to make learning easier and faster for students.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
In the text, the writer acknowledges that giving students the choice to opt out of using AI-enhanced technology is an important issue and one that we should explore further. By granting students control over their learning environment, we can give them the freedom to personalize their learning experience. Let’s invite other readers to re-examine the text and identify any other impacts the writer may have experienced as they accepted AI technology into their life.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
Paul McCartney announced last week he is using an AI tool to complete a long-awaited Beatles song featuring the mix of real and synthetic voice of John Lennon. McCartney defends the move, citing it as a way to finish a work of art that was left incomplete due to Lennon’s demise. McCartney is well known for experimenting with music and using the recording studio as an instrument for his own creations. In addition, AI has been making its mark on the music industry with the Drake/Weeknd collaboration and Grimes utilizing a voice AI tool to create her own tracks. However, AI voice is vastly different from AI text, as it is much more personal, and raises ethical issues of permission for someone’s voice to be used in AI. Now reread the text with this summary in mind. Is there anything you would add to this summary? Please let me know what you’re thinking about the text in your reply.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
Quote 1: “McCartney is well known for experimenting with music and using the recording studio as an instrument for his own creations.”
Definition: Experimenting with music – to try out new or unconventional approaches to making or producing music.
Question 1: How has McCartney, as an artist, expressed his creativity through music?
Quote 2: “AI has been making its mark on the music industry with the Drake/Weeknd collaboration and Grimes utilizing a voice AI tool to create her own tracks.”
Definition: AI – Artificial Intelligence; a type of computer technology that is used to mimic and simulate human behavior and thought processes.
Question 2: What are some examples of how AI has been used in music?
Quote 3: “However, AI voice is vastly different from AI text, as it is much more personal, and raises ethical issues of permission for someone’s voice to be used in AI.”
Definition: Ethical Issues – moral or moral-related principles or standards of behavior that guide or evaluate a person’s actions.
Question 3: What ethical issues are associated with AI voice being used in music?
Now take time to go back to the text and re-read it to find the answers to my three questions before moving on to the next paragraph. Paraphrase the quotes I provided in your answers to help you to explore the main ideas better.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
Keywords:
AI Tool: A computer program or piece of hardware which uses artificial intelligence, usually to help automate tasks like creating music or processing text.
John Lennon: A late singer-songwriter and lead singer of the Beatles who passed away in 1980
Voice AI: A type of artificial intelligence which can generate a human-like voice for music or other audio effects, also known as audio AI.
Ethical Issues: A discussion of moral principles which can guide decision-making, such as what should be done when using AI to generate someone’s voice for a recording.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
Yes, I would definitely listen to AI music if it featured a favorite singer of mine. It’s amazing how technology continues to push the boundaries of art and creativity, and I’m excited to hear what kind of musical creations can come from AI. I think it’s important to consider the ethical implications of using someone’s voice in AI music and that artists should be granted permission before this type of technology is used. It’s also important to note that even though AI voice is similar to AI text, there are still major differences that make it a more personal and unique experience.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
The 45-second viral TikTok video opens with a fascinating juxtaposition between the two very different versions of the same song—The Beatles classic “Let it Be” featuring both a real and synthetic voice of John Lennon. This then transitions into visuals of iconic Beatles moments, archival footage of Paul McCartney creating music in the recording studio, and clips of AI-generated music. The visuals will be accompanied by an electronic music track, trendy filters, and vibrant stickers. The video ends with a thought-provoking question—Would you rather use a music track for a video from a real person or from an AI Music Generator?—that invites viewers to engage in a conversation about the ethical considerations raised by AI-generated music.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
, AI artwork. That’s interesting. This artwork combines the familiar and iconic image of a Beatle bug with something completely new, Artificial Intelligence. We can think of it as an unexpected twist of a classic theme. Even better, the artwork cleverly plays with the double entendre of “Beetle Beatle” – a pun for seeing how AI blurs the line between natural evolution and mechanization. It evokes the mystery of what happens when technology is applied to the natural world, leading us to consider what might be the consequences of artificial intelligence for the future of human civilization.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
Someone who can offer me advice in guiding me through creative blocks and obstacles, understanding the creative process while also being supportive and encouraging.
Counter-argument: Expression in art is often intensely personal and subjective; it can be difficult to find a reliable source of guidance and advice when engaging with creative projects. Even if one were to find an AI Thinking Partner with an arts focus, they may not provide an authoritatively accurate answer, and thus may not always be reliable.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
In my teaching practice, I am clearly already introducing the idea of a Social Exchange as I’m exploring the concept of incorporating AI Thinking Partners to provide guidance and support with creative projects. However, to further enhance this Social Exchange, I would encourage discussions among my students about the pros and cons of using an AI Thinking Partner for art projects. This could involve talking through questions such as “Should AI Thinking Partners be given human names or does that cause confusion about the use of the AI?” and “What are the benefits and drawbacks of using an AI Thinking Partner for something as personal and subjective as creative expression?”. By discussing such questions, my students would be engaging in a Social Exchange Dialogue About Text, learning from one another’s thoughts and experiences, and exploring how the use of AI Thinking Partners can be both beneficial and detrimental to the creative process.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
The text is suggesting that it’s important to be aware of the ways that AI systems are collecting information about us, and controlling what we see, including our own work. It’s also urging people to take the steps to opt out of those systems if they’re uncomfortable with the terms of use. This is an important lesson for everyone to remember, which can help protect our online privacy and control our exposure to biased information. Let’s re-read the text and see if we can uncover any other universal lessons or insights the writer is trying to convey.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
The words we write and post on the internet are incredibly important. It is all too easy to take away someone’s ideas or opinions by using those words without permission or credit. This could be used to mislead people or to create a distorted impression of the writer. Additionally, you never know where your words might end up, so it is essential to back up anything you plan to keep. It is also extremely important to take notice of any legal or ethical perspective of words or phrases before sharing, tagging, or even posting. It is worth keeping the words we share on the internet if they have significance to us, even if it is something as simple as a memory.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
But it is also important to recognize that making everything private is not the answer either. Privacy settings help give us a level of control over our words, but if we completely hide away, we are not contributing to the conversation and growth of communities either.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
Having an authentic voice matters in writing because it is a reflection of your individual style and perspective. It’s one of the distinguishing features that makes your writing unique and meaningful. AI cannot create an authentic voice because it is not able to understand human feelings and experiences, which are necessary for creating an individual’s writing. AI also lacks the capacity to interpret and convey the nuances and subtleties required to create a true sense of voice. AI-generated writing will always be fundamentally different from human-authored writing, because it lacks the elements that come from life experience and emotion.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
In order to identify inauthentic voice, a teacher needs to be on the lookout for several key characteristics: robotic and formulaic sentence structure, the absence of different forms of language such as colloquialisms, metaphors, and other figures of speech, and a lack of emotional investment in the ideas being presented. Furthermore, AI-generated writing often features vocabulary choices that are either too complex or too simplistic, and it may also lack the subtle variations in tone that come from a genuine human voice. Finally, AI-generated writing is often repetitive, overly general, and fact-focused, rather than providing insight into the writer’s perspective and opinions. If a teacher can recognize these signs of inauthentic voice, they can better guide students in the development of their unique writing style.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
What do you think about this idea and arrangement: Could we help students further by presenting them with AI generated pieces that have been crafted to resemble authentic human writing?
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
Thanks for turning the question around on me, but yes, I do think that helping students notice the robotic, inauthentic voice of AI (as it now exists) would help make visible what makes human writing and creativity different than the text-prediction of ChatGPT and other Generative AI tools out there right now.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
A constructionist educator would likely focus on providing students with the opportunity to grapple with the ethics of using AI by hands-on exploration and experimental learning. This could include encouraging students to discuss their experiences of using AI with each other and to create a safe space for those conversations. The educator could also set up learning activities that provide students with opportunities to consider how the use of AI impacts the value of education, the accuracy of the results, and the effect of AI on their writing. These activities could range from debates to small group discussions to research projects, in which students explore the ethical ramifications of using AI for writing first hand. In this way, the educator is providing the students with the opportunity to develop their own ethical reasoning around the situation so that they can create thoughtful positions on how they will handle such questions in the future.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
Yes, the image does represent that concept. The students are shown struggling to come to an ethical decision, which is likely related to some form of artificial intelligence or creative industry. The painting expresses a sense of confusion, uncertainty, and complexity that comes with balancing moral or ethical dilemmas.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
This sentence is important because it describes the current opinion of Artificial Intelligence (AI) among data scientists, which is the fact that it is uncertain and carries a moderate risk. It highlights the concerns associated with AI and why it is important to understand the implications of its use.
Background Information: AI is a form of technology based on computer systems that are able to perform tasks commonly associated with human intelligence, such as facial recognition, language translation, and decision-making. AI-driven automation is transforming many aspects of our lives, but there are still many concerns about its implications. Data scientists have been researching the potential risks of AI, with some estimating that there is a moderate risk of catastrophe.
I invite you to re-read the text and explore AI’s implications further. Think about the risks of AI, the data scientists’ warnings, and the implications of its use. What do you think? Is there something else that you can add to the conversation?
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
Metaphor:
“AI is a deep chasm of unknowns”
Explanation 1: The metaphor describes the multitudes of uncertainties associated with AI, suggesting a deep well of unknowns that is impossible for us to comprehend, making many worry about the implications of its growing use.
Explanation 2: AI is changing the world and impacting many aspects of our lives, but the full scope of its implications is still unknown, and the unpredictability of the unknown is immensely deep and difficult to grasp.
Explanation 3: The utilization of AI carries a variety of unknown consequences, as well as the potential to cause an irreversible catastrophe, making the deep chasm of unknowns an infinitely alarming truth.
Found Poem:
Deep chasm of unknowns
Multitudes of uncertainties
Impossible to comprehend
Unfathomable implications
Full scope remains unknown
Irreversible catastrophe
Alarming truth of AI.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
- realizes that making art is a chance to express and share something unique about your experience and opinion of the world with others. Art can offer a respite from negativity, stimulate curiosity, and free the mind from everyday monotony. In the creation of art, an artist is also providing a gift to their audience, which can be transformative. To make music, poetry or visual works of art is to share an intimate experience with others and to create something beautiful that will move on through time, leaving perhaps a lasting impact.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
– National Parks are an important part of the American landscape. They provide a safe haven for wildlife and plant life, offer great spaces for physical activity, recreation and exploration, celebrate our cultural history, and provide educational and career opportunities in park management and related fields. They serve as a special escape from routine life, offering an opportunity to unplug and reconnect with nature and with each other. National Parks are a place to relax, learn, play and appreciate our country’s rare and beautiful places.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
Five syllables,
Melody and thought combined,
Unite us in song.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
General Document Comments 0
Yes, I definitely think that the use of AI in writing platforms will have a significant impact on the way we work on our writing. AI technology can help with the process of generating writing ideas, creating content, and providing editing support. For instance, AI can help identify patterns, keywords, and content that need refinement in writing projects. AI can also be used to provide feedback on the writing process, track progress, and suggest areas of improvement or further development. AI tools can help provide structure to writing, suggesting potential topics and ideas, and even offer automated grammar and spelling check. This type of technology can give students, writers, and professionals access to comprehensive writing resources and help them produce polished, well-written material quickly and efficiently.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
However, introducing AI into the classroom can also raise several concerns. A major concern is privacy. AI technology can often access and retain large amounts of data on students’ classwork and activities. If mishandled, this data can easily be used for unethical purposes or collection of personal data. Additionally, there is also the potential for AI to be biased and introduce inaccuracy and false information into the classroom. AI can also reduce the amount of critical thinking and creativity because much of the writing and production process is automated. As such, it is important to ensure that students are still able to show their creative thinking and understanding of the material. Finally, AI requires significant technical resources to implement, so it may not be financially feasible for all classrooms.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
Furthermore, AI in the classroom can be a great benefit to students with special needs. AI technology can be used to break down complex tasks into smaller, more engaging activities that can be more easily accessible, and break down language barriers. AI can also be used to provide personalized learning and feedback that can be tailored to the specific student’s needs, allowing them to work at their own pace and still be able to reach the same level of understanding and success as their non-disabled peers.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
/ gibberish, Writing Descriptions, and Creative Writing. AI could help with these genres by providing word suggestions and creating random sentences for the writer to build upon. AI could also give feedback about the accuracy of grammar and sentence structure. With these writing genres, AI can also help generate story ideas, allowing the writer to focus more on the creative aspects and less time on researching and organizing facts.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
By using AI to assist in writing, the writer can benefit from its ability to provide intelligent and creative solutions that may not have been available before. Finally, AI will help the writer to stay focused and organized, reducing the time spent on research and brainstorming.
The author in this text is making intentional choices with their language to create a certain atmosphere and effect. For example, they use words such as “gibberish” and “creative” to emphasize the idea of using AI to help with creative writing. They also point out the practical advantages and focus AI can provide when writing. This hints at the writer’s opinion that AI can be a useful tool for writers. By highlighting the potential benefits, the author is suggesting that AI can be a valuable asset in the writing process.
Let’s discuss more about the author’s writing choices and the impact they have on the text. What other choices do you think the author is making, and how do you think this text could be interpreted differently?
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment