Don’t get me wrong, Hamas murdering Israeli civilians was disgusting, but this is just incorrect and one google search shows you this. The Holocaust was in the 40s, so there has been many genocides with high death counts. For example, in 1979, there was a Cambodian genocide happened, killing at least 1 million and starting in 2003, Darfur, Sudan had a genocide, killing almost 100,000 and counting.

While Israeli citizens and soldiers were killed, the death count being compared to the Holocaust is disingenuous. Especially considering the amount of Palestinians dead due to the conflict being greater in number and followed up to them being trapped and oppressed in the Gaza Strip for likely most of their lives.

But she won’t talk about the worst things her country has done to Palestinians ?? interesting how she seems to isolate what Hamas did as if it was for no other reason than Jewish hatred, yet won’t discuss the plethora of horrific things Israel has done to Palestine, like not letting them have enough water or electricity, or any resource.

Calm down buddy, these aren’t as compatible as you think they are

She is weaponizing the horrific events of the holocaust in an attempt to inflate what happened on October 7th. I find this interesting because she doesn’t mention the terrible things Isreal has been doing to Palestine for 70+ years.

She mentions the violence and compares it to the holocaust, she always only seems to acknowledge the deaths of Israelis and not the blood being shed by Palestinians. Immediately her speech appears bias in favor of Isreal.

I find it ironic that she’s talking about mourning for the people who were killed and labels the Palestinians as evil. Although israeli’s have killed almost 20x the amount that palestinians have killed.

You can tell from this sentence that this article is going to be biased against Palestine because of how they called them evil and made them the villains

She’s using language to push an agenda that’s pro Israel and make Palestine become the villains.

I find it hard to agree with Tishby using a word like evil, I think this may be a personal problem since I don’t like using incriminating words

The tone of her statement is a biased opinion for as both parties have done irreplaceable acts to each other resulting in constant conflict.

She labels people as radical Islamic Nazis but just who are these people she is referring to. She never ends up specifying that she is potentially referring to Hamas when she says that, nor does she clarify. She is very boldly putting out a claim that Islam is behind this. She creates this negative air around the religion of Islam which in it of itself does not promote the murder of innocent people of any religious background. What exactly was the point of her giving a speech? just to insight hate?

She start of saying all Islam is bad and then she calls all Islam radical Nazis witch is of source not true

The words that she uses in her speech such as lurking are extreme. She labels them without know the full situation between Hamas and Isreal and try to make it seem like Isreal is getting attaked.

I’ve mentioned this before in class, but it’s very interesting that Pro-Israeli people like to use Jewish hate to deflect from any critique of the Israeli government. They always talk about Nazis and the Holocaust, as if the Israeli identity and the Jewish identity are completely connected and a issue with Israel is an issue with Jewish people.

I get that you trying to compare this to the Holocaust, which is stupid, but referring to a people as “Islamic Nazism” is wild

The words “Nazism” and “Lurking” gives off the feel as if they have been waiting forever to do this and that they have give hints that it was going to happen even though with the current events, it shows that it was slightly at random. She is generalizing it too because she makes it seem as though it was everyone planning on it when even some of the people of Hamas are confused.

she labels the people of Palestine “Islamic Nazis” which demonstrates how many people see this situation right now. They fail to distinguish the fight between two political powers and citizens of those nations. Nazism is a political ideology, and creating the term “Islamic Nazism” places a whole group of people into one category with a political ideology.

As she labels a group as radical Islamic nazism, she shows her bias of this speech. Her bias of strongly supporting Israel and belittling a whole group of people.

We see her trying to compare this act to that of the holocaust, and she does this by making extreme statements like this, likely to provoke people.

She is reframing the event of October 7th to fit her viewpoint. By saying that the threat is “lurking at Israel’s border” she is omitting the fact that Gaza, where Hamas is based in, is inside of Israel. Also, by referring to Islam as nazis it shifts the reason behind the attack on Israel. She is saying that Hamas attacked Israel because they have something against Jewish people. Hamas is reportedly fighting for the freedom for Palestine from Israel, they view Israel as oppressors. Attributing the reason behind the attack to nazism is very extreme, it also ignores the history that fuels the conflict between Israel and Palestine.

She uses heavy words to bring a black or white type of accusation to the conversation and blamed the Palestinians of major things

This is crazy as there is no way a comparison can be made. Calling a people Nazi’s is a huge claim

I find it interesting how she uses her choice of wording like the naming of “Islamic Nazis” along with the suspenseful music throughout the speech.

The way she words this paragraph shows how articulate she is. She tries her hardest to try and justify Israel’s actions

She made a general claim on “Islamic Nazism” saying every person in Islam is a Nazi and she never mentioned Hamas.

However many of the people who are spreading such "knowledge about this topic has family members in Palestine

She refers to the attacks inflicted by Hamas as nazism and says their behavior is grooming, her use of words are not so much logical more so words of agression.

The use of her words are not the best choice, since it seems she is trying imply that Islam had complete control of all their actions.

That’s obvious, i don’t get her point here because Hamas wont just do a peace march to gain their land back, its common sense theyll use military strength

what warnings is she talking about? she keeps repeating these warnings that they were giving out. What is she implying by these warnings?

A couple times in her speech I see her take peoples words out of context.

I never really understood how this phrase would be seen as supporting violence, until now. To me, this was just a cry for freedom, But since Israel does not intend on giving Palestine independence. Israel knows that the only way Palestine will be free is if they take it for themselves. Hamas is doing this in a violent manner.

This line was taken out of context, i feel like Israel could just be using this saying as a means to attack and have a excuse to attack

She takes things way out of context and says things as in she is sure and positive she is right as if the palestinians themselves have told her yes that is what that means. It is sickining

It’s important to note that this issue has been happening for many years and this one was just one of the more noticeable turns to the public within this issue.

From the river to the sea Palestine will be free very obviously does not mean slaughter the jews. It means that Palestine will be free of the colonizing STATE that is Israel, that does not mean killing the Jewish people. It can be achieved through an agreement by what land is Israel and what land is Palestine without either party trying to later take more land.

I do not see how the attack from Hamas makes the call to freedom a call for genocide against Jewish people, but the bombing of the Gaza Strip for years does not make Israel’s one-state solution a call for genocide against Muslims. It seems like hypocrisy with one side being genocidal and the other simply “retaliating”.

She’s trying to make this a war against Jewish people but in reality it’s a war between Israel and Hamas.

This is an extreme accusation like Hamas wants to call for genocide against the Jews. This is not related.

She is saying that all Palestinians are bad dispute it only being Hamas trying to attack The Israeli Government not the people as she claims.

I don’t think that is what it means. I’m pretty sure that Palstine just doesn’t want to be controlled by a higher power.

shes not sending the right message about who the war is about which isnt towards jewish people

This is extremely one sided towards the side of israel to the point were they accuse them of being nazis essentially

She uses strong language to convey an incorrect and hateful message

This is so tone-deaf to the people who are dying on behalf of Israel. Though Hamas is not the best neither is Isreals military,

This point is incorrect because the American Government supplies Israel with a very large amount of weapons and ships. The US government has been extremely pro-Israel for the entirety of its existence. I do understand she is making the point of the people not in government being Pro Palestine in their protest in colleges, however none of it is anti Jewish.

The use of such harsh language is used to most likely emphasize her opinion that people who don’t agree with Israel in the West are simply brainwashed and foolish. The use of “would be murderers” is very telling. I think she might be talking about Palestinian people in Western countries, because she uses that and “Western idiots” separately. This is very blatantly racist and I’m surprised (but also not really) that they allowed this to air.

There is a lot of bigotry against innocent people who are “Pro-Palestine” and not “Pro-Hamas” or “Pro-Israeli,” The extremity of her deceitfulness is clearly racist and sounds fabricated because the US. paid $3.3 billion in foreign assistance to Israel, 99.7 percent of the aid went to the Israeli military to destroy the Gaza strip and enable chaos in other isolated regions such as the West Bank. The Gaza strip had 6,000 bombs dropped on them since Oct. 7. killing now more than 11,100 people who were barricaded and unable to leave or travel anywhere else other than Gaza.

Through her anger for Hamas she projects it onto those she believes are ignorant and don’t know about the war in America. This is wrong for her to do.

Throughout these last few sentences you can tell that its biased against palestime because of how they victimize israel. They include all the details of everything palestine has done wrong or against them but forget to include the past of how israel has constantly been oppressing palestine and they blame the media for people making isreal the villain

She is talking about how the other side is brainwashed when there is brainwashing on both sides. It all depends on what country they in

this actually does make sense to an extent. There are in fact a lot of people who have just started protesting and choosing sides without knowing the facts or anything in between.

She makes it seem as tho the Israelis are the only people struggling.

Both parties manipulate each other into hating one another to prove that each side is bad, when both sides are just as equally bad.

I feel that the generational trauma that they carry is what incited the violence against Palestine in the first place. If they carry this with them, why push it onto other people?

The Israeli dehumanization of Palestinians is not a sign of social strength in any way. It is calling for a movement of Zionism that will create continue more conflict and add to the IDF’s genocide and “ethnic cleansing” of thousands of innocent Palestine people being massacred. Not only are the Israel blockading and turning the entire Gaza into a concentration camp, they are also trying to repeat the cruel history of Hitler and the Nazis comparing Islam to Nazis when realistically they are known as the Zionists by stealing, taking, controlling the land from Palestinian people and justifying it when it clearly breaks the law and human moral.

She´s using articulate speech to disguise and somewhat have listeners lost in her words in order for her to seem ¨right¨ If you fully interpret the phrases and references shes using to add to her point she uses reverse psychology in this sentence, strategic wording and manipulative tactics to glorify her belief

She accuses the Palestinians of killing while the Israeli’s are killing more people

From what I am reading she is implying because a few words are said about Israel they don’t deserve peace like everyone else. Everyone dose not have to like you.

See this line to me is honestly just funny. She says this, as if the Israeli government hasn’t gone out of their way to kill innocent civilians. What logic is there in saying they want to kill all of you, so you’re allowed to kill all of them? What logic is there behind bombing civilians and putting a place no larger than New Jersey under siege? What logic is there to do any of the things that have happened to quash a group that you outnumber by 20 times? Instead of getting rid of the issue, the people are instead being blamed and are suffering.

This line makes me believe that they are ignorant of what is the truth and what Israel has done and continues to do. She also uses genocide like Hamas(Palestinians) are in any shape or form powerful enough to do such a thing as genocide

“Our borders” is crazy to me. How can you say “our borders” when the land you walk upon was not yours to begin with, when you took that land from the people you now aim to “defeat”.

She is saying that everyone in Palestine wants to have a genocide when in reality, the civilians just want to be free to go where they want. Palestinians are trapped because the government of Israel controls where Palestinians can go and what supplies they can have. So, saying that they are lurking at the borders means that they are waiting to take back their land, but they can’t because they do not have a strong military like Israel.

This is a bit extreme, Nazisim refers to against Jewish. But it’s not.

She said they are lurking on THEIR border when they are controlling the movement of the Palestinians and aren’t letting hem leave the border.

She makes it seam as if the Palestinians liking in Gaza are choosing to stay there by choice and making them all seem bad. But in reality they don’t have the ability to move freely because of the Israeli government.

I think this statement shows how she groups all of these people together and has very negative views.

The speaker uses words like “radical”, “evil”, and “nazism” to describe Muslims. The constant repetition and association of these words to Muslims is meant to generate hate towards them. She generalizes a whole group of people.

I believe her saying Islamic Nazism could be her grouping a religion with people who claim to be in it, causing her to receive backlash. She more than likely knew and meant what she said. Nazism would be to say that they’re antisemitic, when that’s not the case. They are Anti-Zionism and want to put a stop to Palestinians being pushed out of their own country.

She implyies that the Palestinians are lurking on their border, yet Israel has them in an open prison and surrounds Palestine’s borders. The way she says things during her speech is in a manipulative way.

“Islamic Nazism” is an insane term to me because it comes off as if Muslims normally can be be nazis which is an incredibly strong accusation, and “their borders” weren’t even originally theirs