Nature: Introduction & Chapter One
Ralph Waldo Emerson
Originally published as part of Nature; Addresses and Lectures
Courtesy of Project Gutenburg
Annenberg/CPB • www.learner.org
Corporation for Public Broadcasting Copyright Ó 2003
Nature: Introduction & Chapter One
Ralph Waldo Emerson
Introduction
Our age is retrospective. It builds the sepulchres of the fathers. It writes biographies, histories, and criticism. The foregoing generations beheld God and nature face to face; we, through their eyes. Why should not we also enjoy an original relation to the universe? Why should not we have a poetry and philosophy of insight and not of tradition, and a religion by revelation to us, and not the history of theirs? Embosomed for a season in nature, whose floods of life stream around and through us, and invite us by the powers they supply, to action proportioned to nature, why should we grope among the dry bones of the past, or put the living generation into masquerade out of its faded wardrobe? The sun shines to-day also. There is more wool and flax in the fields. There are new lands, new men, new thoughts. Let us demand our own works and laws and worship.
Undoubtedly we have no questions to ask which are unanswerable. We must trust the perfection of the creation so far, as to believe that whatever curiosity the order of things has awakened in our minds, the order of things can satisfy. Every man's condition is a solution in hieroglyphic to those inquiries he would put. He acts it as life, before he apprehends it as truth. In like manner, nature is already, in its forms and tendencies, describing its own design. Let us interrogate the great apparition, that shines so peacefully around us. Let us inquire, to what end is nature?
All science has one aim, namely, to find a theory of nature. We have theories of races and of functions, but scarcely yet a remote approach to an idea of creation. We are now so far from the road to truth, that religious teachers dispute and hate each other, and speculative men are esteemed unsound and frivolous. But to a sound judgment, the most abstract truth is the most practical. Whenever a true theory appears, it will be its own evidence. Its test is, that it will explain all phenomena. Now many are thought not only unexplained but inexplicable; as language, sleep, madness, dreams, beasts, sex.
Philosophically considered, the universe is composed of Nature and the Soul. Strictly speaking, therefore, all that is separate from us, all which Philosophy distinguishes as the NOT ME, that is, both nature and art, all other men and my own body, must be ranked under this name, NATURE. In enumerating the values of nature and casting up their sum, I shall use the word in both senses; — in its common and in its philosophical import. In inquiries so general as our present one, the inaccuracy is not material; no confusion of thought will occur. Nature, in the common sense, refers to essences unchanged by man; space, the air, the river, the leaf. Art is applied to the mixture of his will with the same things, as in a house, a canal, a statue, a picture. But his operations taken together are so insignificant, a little chipping, baking, patching, and
American Passages e-text / www.learner.org2
washing, that in an impression so grand as that of the world on the human mind, they do not vary the result.
Chapter One
To go into solitude, a man needs to retire as much from his chamber as from society. I am not solitary whilst I read and write, though nobody is with me. But if a man would be alone, let him look at the stars. The rays that come from those heavenly worlds, will separate between him and what he touches. One might think the atmosphere was made transparent with this design, to give man, in the heavenly bodies, the perpetual presence of the sublime. Seen in the streets of cities, how great they are! If the stars should appear one night in a thousand years, how would men believe and adore; and preserve for many generations the remembrance of the city of God which had been shown! But every night come out these envoys of beauty, and light the universe with their admonishing smile.
The stars awaken a certain reverence, because though always present, they are inaccessible; but all natural objects make a kindred impression, when the mind is open to their influence. Nature never wears a mean appearance. Neither does the wisest man extort her secret, and lose his curiosity by finding out all her perfection. Nature never became a toy to a wise spirit. The flowers, the animals, the mountains, reflected the wisdom of his best hour, as much as they had delighted the simplicity of his childhood. When we speak of nature in this manner, we have a distinct but most poetical sense in the mind. We mean the integrity of impression made by manifold natural objects. It is this which distinguishes the stick of timber of the wood-cutter, from the tree of the poet. The charming landscape which I saw this morning, is indubitably made up of some twenty or thirty farms. Miller owns this field, Locke that, and Manning the woodland beyond. But none of them owns the landscape. There is a property in the horizon which no man has but he whose eye can integrate all the parts, that is, the poet. This is the best part of these men's farms, yet to this their warranty-deeds give no title. To speak truly, few adult persons can see nature. Most persons do not see the sun. At least they have a very superficial seeing. The sun illuminates only the eye of the man, but shines into the eye and the heart of the child. The lover of nature is he whose inward and outward senses are still truly adjusted to each other; who has retained the spirit of infancy even into the era of manhood. His intercourse with heaven and earth, becomes part of his daily food. In the presence of nature, a wild delight runs through the man, in spite of real sorrows. Nature says, — he is my creature, and maugre all his impertinent griefs, he shall be glad with me. Not the sun or the summer alone, but every hour and season yields its tribute of delight; for every hour and change corresponds to and authorizes a different state of the mind, from breathless noon to grimmest midnight. Nature is a setting that fits equally well a comic or a mourning piece. In good health, the air is a cordial of incredible virtue. Crossing a bare common, in snow puddles, at twilight, under a clouded sky, without having in my thoughts any occurrence of special good fortune, I have enjoyed a perfect exhilaration. I am glad to the brink of fear. In the woods too, a man casts off his years, as the snake his slough, and at what period soever of life, is always a child. In the woods, is perpetual youth. Within these
American Passages e-text / www.learner.org3
plantations of God, a decorum and sanctity reign, a perennial festival is dressed, and the guest sees not how he should tire of them in a thousand years. In the woods, we return to reason and faith. There I feel that nothing can befall me in life, — no disgrace, no calamity, (leaving me my eyes,) which nature cannot repair. Standing on the bare ground, — my head bathed by the blithe air, and uplifted into infinite space, — all mean egotism vanishes. I become a transparent eye-ball; I am nothing; I see all; the currents of the Universal Being circulate through me; I am part or particle of God. The name of the nearest friend sounds then foreign and accidental: to be brothers, to be acquaintances, — master or servant, is then a trifle and a disturbance. I am the lover of uncontained and immortal beauty. In the wilderness, I find something more dear and connate than in streets or villages. In the tranquil landscape, and especially in the distant line of the horizon, man beholds somewhat as beautiful as his own nature.
The greatest delight which the fields and woods minister, is the suggestion of an occult relation between man and the vegetable. I am not alone and unacknowledged. They nod to me, and I to them. The waving of the boughs in the storm, is new to me and old. It takes me by surprise, and yet is not unknown. Its effect is like that of a higher thought or a better emotion coming over me, when I deemed I was thinking justly or doing right.
Yet it is certain that the power to produce this delight, does not reside in nature, but in man, or in a harmony of both. It is necessary to use these pleasures with great temperance. For, nature is not always tricked in holiday attire, but the same scene which yesterday breathed perfume and glittered as for the frolic of the nymphs, is overspread with melancholy today. Nature always wears the colors of the spirit. To a man laboring under calamity, the heat of his own fire hath sadness in it. Then, there is a kind of contempt of the landscape felt by him who has just lost by death a dear friend. The sky is less grand as it shuts down over less worth in the population.
American Passages e-text / www.learner.org4
Logging in, please wait...
0 General Document comments
0 Sentence and Paragraph comments
0 Image and Video comments
My interpretation of this sentence is that Emerson’s progressive standpoint towards the beginning of this piece illustrates that humans are multi-faceted creatures who are always evolving. While yes, it is important to understand history so we do not make the same mistakes of the past, it is also necessary to be able not to be stuck in only reliving history and the good parts of it, but being able to make our own and diverge new roads. This is said simply by the repetition of the word “new.” “new lands, new men, new thoughts.”
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
Your view emphasizes Emerson’s focus on progress and personal development. By repeating the word “new,” he emphasizes the idea that humans are not designed to be constrained by history, but rather always seek innovation and self-discovery. While history gives essential lessons, Emerson encourages us to stop rehashing the past and instead forge our own paths. His statements imply that personal and societal change are fundamental to human nature. This perspective is consistent with his transcendentalist concept in self-reliance, which encourages us to welcome change, think independently, and make the future rather than simply inheriting the past.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
Right away, this sentence stopped me in my tracks. I have never thought of our age as being retrospective until now. But it is. As humans, we refer to the past experiences and wisdom of others and even ourselves. More often than not, we are stuck viewing the world through the lens of the past instead of blocking that lens and embracing the here and now. For me, personally, this is something that I struggle with. A lot of times, my brain thinks about the “should have, could have, would have” instead of simply reflecting on something and how I can make it count moving forward.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
I think in this rhetorical question Emerson is asking why can we not have poetry that has someone’s point of view on the new topics. He is wondering why we have to stick with traditional poetry instead of having poetry that has someone’s insight in it. Like someone’s life or story interrogated in it.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
One word, in particular, that caught my eye from this excerpt is the word, “an.” The phrase “an idea of creation” is interesting to me vast majority of religions that we know today share a different creation story. To note that we have theories of race and functions, i.e how the world works and the relationship that humans have with one another, but not on how we came to be, at least, in a widely agreed upon way shows the divide that humanity has with its place in history, and the actual reason why we are here. Emerson touches on this topic nicely, along with the rest of paragraph 13.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
The word “an” in “an idea of creation” implies that Emerson accepts multiple viewpoints on how the world and humanity came to be. This openness contrasts with the certainty common in religious or cultural creation stories, highlighting the philosophical gap in how humans perceive reality. The absence of a universally acknowledged genesis tale reflects humanity’s effort to find its position in history and the universe. Emerson’s work encourages us to evaluate how our perspective of creation is formed not only by facts but also by perception, supporting his overarching subject of the individual’s relationship with nature and truth.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
My interpretation of this is the arthur point towards the many branches of religion that has causes too many church leaders to disrespect each other as well as belittle. I personally wish they would all sit down together around one big table and hash out their differences instead of using their congregations to fight among one another to see who is true and who is false.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
New Conversation
The passage challenges the self/other divide, asserting that everything external, nature, art, others, and even one’s body, belongs to a unified “Nature.” It critiques dualism by blurring subjective and objective distinctions, echoing monistic views where all existence is interconnected and not fundamentally separate from the self. This redefinition invites reflection on universal unity.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
The sentence “The rays that come from those heavenly worlds will separate between him and what he touches” means that some higher power or truth can change how we see and feel about our everyday lives. It shows that there’s more than just the material things around us, and we can feel connected to something bigger.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
The author suggests that humans take the majestic light of the stars for granted. If they appeared only once in a thousand years, people would see them differently. We should always appreciate nature as God’s creation and recognize the significance of its beauty.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
Amy, I agree with what he says here. People take things for granted because we see it everyday but if we saw it every thousands of year we would be more appreciated. The stars show every night but what if they didn’t?
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
New Conversation
What I get from this sentence is that he is trying to say if we have a open mind then we can be impressed by the natural objects of this world. We can visually see what they mean and stand for. He wants us to open our minds so that we can see what is meant to be seen by nature and look at it’s beauty.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
Personally, I often feel inspired by nature, whether I’m hiking in the woods or just sitting by a river. Those experiences bring peaceful feelings and spark my imagination, which connects to what this sentence is saying about having a “poetical sense.”
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
New Conversation
New Conversation
I interpret this sentence as nature provides the perfect backdrop for all emotional experiences, whether it be something happy or sad. Nature is so big that it can accommodate both happiness and grief together and separately. Like a stage can be used for both comedy and tragedy nature can also host these same emotions, equally without changing itself.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
I think what Emerson is trying to convey here is that there is something about the raw beauty of nature that is exhilarating and leaves us with a sense of youthfulness. Not everyone sees the true beauty in nature and the wonders that it holds. Taking a walk in nature, alone and without distractions is one of my favorite ways to calm my mind and reset. Hearing the sounds, smelling the fresh rain or the scents of the untouched flowers, and taking the time to stop and really admire everything in nature is rejuvenating. Even though Emerson is trying to convey the beauty and divinity of nature throughout the entire text, I think that this one sentence sums it up pretty well.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
My interpretation of this is that the man feels like he has nothing in life but he has God. He needs to give everything to God.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
This sentence was so powerful to me! Wilderness and nature are so unique and powerful. Streets and villages can be rummaged through by people, trashed by the citizens around and vandalized. These are just a few simple reasons why nature could be so much nicer and therapeutic than the streets. The beauty and insight from all of the vast trees, bodies of water, flowers, etc.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
New Conversation
This quote celebrates nature’s hidden power to evoke a sense of mystery and connection. It suggests that the true pleasure of experiencing the natural world, its fields and woods, lies in revealing a secret, almost mystical, bond between humans and plants, hinting that we are inherently intertwined with nature.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
Emerson wants us to believe that the beauty and delight we experience in nature stem from the outside world and the relationship between nature and our perspective. He encourages us to recognize that our inner ideas and emotions impact how we perceive the natural world, resulting in a very personal and introspective experience.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
I feel as if this sentence convinces readers how great nature and the environment around us can be. The way the nature around us at the time looks, can speak so many different things to us.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
New Conversation
General Document Comments 0
I Interpret this sentence as Emerson suggesting that the stars leave him in a sense of awe because, even though they are always in the sky, they remain so far away. This symbolizes something beyond human grasp. He extends this feeling of awe and respect to all natural objects, implying that when one is open-minded to nature, everything holds a deeper, almost sacred significance.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment