NowComment
2-Pane Combined
Comments:
Full Summaries Sorted

Vitamin C lab (results&discussion)


0 General Document comments
0 Sentence and Paragraph comments
0 Image and Video comments


Investigating the Ascorbic Acid Concentration of Various Fruits

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 1 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 1, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Vanessa Braganza

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 2 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 2, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

CHEM 1811 – Section 04

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 3 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 3, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

September 14, 2012

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 4 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 4, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Results and Discussion Section

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 5 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 5, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

In this study, ascorbic acid (1) contained in the juice of lemons, limes, and oranges was titrated with iodine (eqn 1) and the ascorbic acid concentration in each fruit was calculated.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 6 0
profile_photo
Sep 21
Shelby Lipes Shelby Lipes (Sep 21 2012 2:48PM) : Don't forget to make the numbers you use to refer to structures in an equation bold.
profile_photo
Sep 21
Vanessa Braganza Vanessa Braganza (Sep 21 2012 2:53PM) : Thanks, I wasn't sure if they had to or not - I needed that clarification!
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 6, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Standardization of I 2 . Reduced ascorbic acid and iodine were combined in the presence of starch to produce oxidized ascorbic acid and hydroiodic acid.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 7 0
profile_photo
Sep 21
Murali Varadaraj Murali Varadaraj (Sep 21 2012 2:24PM) : Maybe 'combined' could be replaced with 'reacted'? Semantics, but it couldn't hurt.
profile_photo
Sep 21
Shelby Lipes Shelby Lipes (Sep 21 2012 2:49PM) : I agree. Combined sounds more interesting, but reacted is probably preferred in this case.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 7, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 7, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 8 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 8, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

The molarity of iodine was determined to be .019 M.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 9 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 9, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Titration of ascorbic acid . The volumes of titrant and analyte reacted, shown in Table 2, indicate that lime juice required the lowest volume of iodine to reach the endpoint of the titration, while orange juice required the greatest volume.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 10 0
profile_photo
Sep 21
Murali Varadaraj Murali Varadaraj (Sep 21 2012 2:30PM) : For referencing table two i think you just have to put it in parentheses rather than actually stating it.
profile_photo
Sep 21
Shelby Lipes Shelby Lipes (Sep 21 2012 2:49PM) : He's right, I think.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 10, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 10, Sentence 2 0
profile_photo
Sep 21
Murali Varadaraj Murali Varadaraj (Sep 21 2012 2:29PM) : A little grammar issue, but an alternative sentence could be: "The reaction between titrant and analyte indicated that lime juice requires the lowest volume of iodine to reach the endpoint, while orange juice required the greatest volume."

Table 1. Volume of iodine and fruit juice titrated.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 11 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 11, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 11, Sentence 2 0
profile_photo
Sep 21
Murali Varadaraj Murali Varadaraj (Sep 21 2012 2:29PM) : Maybe title 'Iodine and Fruit Juice Titration'?

Fruit

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 12 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 12, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Volume of iodine (mL)

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 13 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 13, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Total volume of fruit juice (mL)

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 14 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 14, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Lime

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 15 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 15, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Lemon

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 16 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 16, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Orange

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 17 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 17, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

2.083 (1.925)*

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 18 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 18, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

2.552

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 19 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 19, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

3.638

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 20 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 20, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

45.10 (50.00)*

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 21 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 21, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

39.43

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 22 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 22, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

60.00

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 23 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 23, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

*Individual data are listed in parentheses.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 24 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 24, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Determination of ascorbic acid in lemons, limes, and oranges. The results of the titration, shown in Table 2, indicate that oranges contain the highest mass of ascorbic acid and limes contain the lowest mass. By contrast, oranges have the lowest mass to volume ratio and limes have the highest ratio. However, some groups used a tape measure to calculate the volume of the fruit, while others determined the volume through water displacement. This disparity in the methods by which each fruit was measured caused experimental error in the calculated average volumes of each fruit.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 25 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 25, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 25, Sentence 2 0
profile_photo
Sep 21
Murali Varadaraj Murali Varadaraj (Sep 21 2012 2:31PM) : Referencing the table can be done in parentheses, rather than direct statement.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 25, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 25, Sentence 4 0
profile_photo
Sep 21
Murali Varadaraj Murali Varadaraj (Sep 21 2012 2:32PM) : Good call, that's a perfect reason why disparities can occur.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 25, Sentence 5 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Table 2. Mass of ascorbic acid and volume of each fruit.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 26 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 26, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 26, Sentence 2 0
profile_photo
Sep 21
Murali Varadaraj Murali Varadaraj (Sep 21 2012 2:33PM) : Maybe an alternative title could be "Fruit ascorbic acid content and volume"

Fruit

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 27 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 27, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Mass ascorbic acid (mg)

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 28 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 28, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Volume of fruit (mL)

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 29 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 29, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Mass to volume ratio

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 30 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 30, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Lime

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 31 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 31, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Lemon

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 32 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 32, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Orange

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 33 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 33, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

7.137 (6.595)*

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 34 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 34, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

8.741

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 35 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 35, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

12.46

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 36 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 36, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

95.00 (105.0)*

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 37 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 37, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

146.7

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 38 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 38, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

254.7

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 39 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 39, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

.0751 (.0628)*

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 40 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 40, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

.0596

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 41 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 41, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

.0489

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 42 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 42, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

*Individual data are listed in parentheses.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 43 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 43, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Determination of fruit to pack. Based on ascorbic acid concentration and volume occupied, shown in Table 3, limes were determined to be the most efficient fruit to pack. With a molarity of 8.984 x 10 -4 M, limes had the lowest ascorbic acid concentration per fruit compared to lemons and oranges. Limes also required 10510 fruits for the journey, higher than lemons and oranges. However, the minimum required number of limes occupies only .998 m 3 , the lowest volume compared to lemons and oranges. This indicates that, while limes contain the lowest ascorbic acid concentration, they are the most effective in terms of spatial conservation. Consequently, they are the most effective fruit to pack on the trip. The volume occupied by the fruits was calculated with the assumption that there is no empty space between any stored fruits. This unduly reduced the predicted volume occupied by the fruits, causing error. The fact that the fruits were not all of uniform ripeness affected the ascorbic acid concentrations, causing error.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 44 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 44, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 44, Sentence 2 0
profile_photo
Sep 21
Murali Varadaraj Murali Varadaraj (Sep 21 2012 2:34PM) : Referencing 'table three' can be done in parentheses, but also saying 'volume occupied' is redundant...I'd say take out the 'occupied'.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 44, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 44, Sentence 4 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 44, Sentence 5 0
profile_photo
Sep 21
Murali Varadaraj Murali Varadaraj (Sep 21 2012 2:36PM) : I'd suggest to remove 'only', and just end the sentence with 'comparatively'.
profile_photo
Sep 21
Shelby Lipes Shelby Lipes (Sep 21 2012 2:53PM) : That does sound a bit better.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 44, Sentence 6 0
profile_photo
Sep 21
Murali Varadaraj Murali Varadaraj (Sep 21 2012 2:37PM) : The first comma is unnecessary, but the second is perfect.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 44, Sentence 7 0
profile_photo
Sep 21
Murali Varadaraj Murali Varadaraj (Sep 21 2012 2:40PM) : Combine this sentence with the previous one? For example: "This indicates that while limes contain the lowest ascorbic acid concentration, they are the most effective in terms of spatial conservation and consequently are the most efficient to pack.
profile_photo
Sep 21
Shelby Lipes Shelby Lipes (Sep 21 2012 2:53PM) : This would be ideal.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 44, Sentence 8 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 44, Sentence 9 0
profile_photo
Sep 21
Murali Varadaraj Murali Varadaraj (Sep 21 2012 2:41PM) : Maybe say, "This reduces the predicted volume of fruits, which is a cause of error."
profile_photo
Sep 21
Shelby Lipes Shelby Lipes (Sep 21 2012 2:54PM) : You ended both of your last two sentences with "causing error," so I would definitely suggest rewording at least one of them.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 44, Sentence 10 0
profile_photo
Sep 21
Murali Varadaraj Murali Varadaraj (Sep 21 2012 2:41PM) : I'd recommend adding 'additionally' before 'causing error'.

Table 3. Total volume, molarity, and number of fruits required.

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 45 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 45, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 45, Sentence 2 0
profile_photo
Sep 21
Murali Varadaraj Murali Varadaraj (Sep 21 2012 2:42PM) : 'Required' can be taken out I'd say.

Fruit

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 46 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 46, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Ascorbic acid molarity

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 47 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 47, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Number required

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 48 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 48, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Volume occupied (m3)

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 49 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 49, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Lime

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 50 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 50, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Lemon

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 51 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 51, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Orange

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 52 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 52, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

8.984 x 10-4

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 53 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 53, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

.0013

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 54 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 54, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

.0012

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 55 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 55, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

10510

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 56 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 56, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

8581

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 57 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 57, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

6019

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 58 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 58, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

.998

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 59 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 59, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

1.259

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 60 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 60, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

1.533

New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 61 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.
New Thinking Partner Conversation New Conversation
Paragraph 61, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

DMU Timestamp: September 14, 2012 19:31

General Document Comments 0
New Thinking Partner Conversation Start a new Document-level conversation

profile_photo
Sep 21
Murali Varadaraj Murali Varadaraj (Sep 21 2012 2:26PM) : The paper looks professional, it's formatted correctly from what I can see, essentially it looks great.
Image
0 comments, 0 areas
add area
add comment
change display
Video
add comment

Quickstart: Commenting and Sharing

How to Comment
  • Click icons on the left to see existing comments.
  • Desktop/Laptop: double-click any text, highlight a section of an image, or add a comment while a video is playing to start a new conversation.
    Tablet/Phone: single click then click on the "Start One" link (look right or below).
  • Click "Reply" on a comment to join the conversation.
How to Share Documents
  1. "Upload" a new document.
  2. "Invite" others to it.

Logging in, please wait... Blue_on_grey_spinner