Chandler's novel is romantic, fog-bound, and depressing.—Bruce Kawin
Complicated, captivating & long
I agree with captivating. The chemistry between the characters is extremely that and of course complicated.
The movie is also confusing, complex and logic-defying in characters. The Big sleep refers to death, so there are many blackmails, murders and committing to ill deeds, such as gambling, pornography, corruptions, deceptions and so forth.
I believe this movie to be Seductive, deep and hazy
As Dude Lebowski once said, “This is a very complicated case, Maude. You know, a lotta ins, lotta outs, lotta what-have-you’s. And, uh, lotta strands to keep in my head, man. Lotta strands in old Duder’s head. Luckily I’m adhering to a pretty strict, uh, drug regimen to keep my mind, you know, limber.”
As for the movie I would have to say that it is convoluted, vague, and appealing.
I agree with Nicholas that it is both convoluted and appealing because sometimes something is so complicated that you can’t look away. You need to know how it ends.
It very much is unusual to watch something that is convoluted and appealing. It happens to work with The Big Sleep because of its genre, film noir, which works with other elements to make the story appealing without having a clear and legible plot.
Mysterious,enchanting, compelling
Complex, charming, & shady
i would describe the film as fast paced, mysterious and dark
Three adjectives I would use to describe the movie are seductive, suspenseful, and complicated
The point is that Hawks had no intention of putting Bogart through the kind of professional crisis an moral self-examination basic to a picture like The Maltese Falcon and to Chandler's novel.—Bruce Kawin
In the big sleep, Bogart’s character is even more playful than the one on to have and have not. He can flirt and drink his way out very charmingly from any situation.
i agree with albi, bogart’s character is very sarcastic in this film, his interaction with other characters is very playful in a sarcastic way.
The two characters are very similar in their personalities. They are both mature, witty and cynical. But compared to the “Steve” Morgan from To have or have not, the deep detective Marlowe seems to have more principals for his behaviors which kept him focusing on his path. This is reflected in many scenes especially the scene he rejected Vivian’s temptation of letting him quit his deeper discovery in the restaurant. Therefore, I think Marlowe is a deeper man with a sophisticated inner mind.
When it comes to film and novel adaptations it is sometimes recognizable to see differences in character interpretations. And how changes can happen. The same can be said for Bogarts character. Bogart brings about an amusing and humorous type of personality as opposed to other adaptions. Even apparent in big Sleep with his interactions with others and using this to handle various situations,.
The Long Goodbye, directed by Altman, is one of my favorite movies. Marlowe, played by Elliott Gould, is just as cynical, cool, and humorous as the one Bogart plays in The Big Sleep. There are some differences; for one Elliott Gould is not as seductive as the version of Marlowe played by Bogart is. Still, the core characteristics of Marlowe are there and they very much are an important part in giving these movies a noir feel. The Long Goodbye isn’t your typical detective film noir, but that’s because Altman has a different palate and vision, especially during the time he made it (the early 70s).
The Big Sleep continued to showcase the how Bogart can get away with dominating his co-stars with his witty phrases. The difference in his two characters is minimal even more his Bogart"s transformation more rough when he interacts with Eddie Mars.
One of the best-known of all Hollywood anecdotes involves the movie's confusing plot, based on the equally confusing novel by Raymond Chandler. Lauren Bacall recalls in her autobiography, "One day Bogie came on the set and said to Howard, 'Who pushed Taylor off the pier?' Everything stopped." As A.M. Sperber and Eric Lax write in "Bogart," "Hawks sent Chandler a telegram asking whether the Sternwood's chauffeur, Owen Taylor, was murdered or a suicide. 'Dammit I didn't know either,' " Chandler recalled. And Chandler later wrote to his publisher, "The girl who played the nymphy sister (Martha Vickers) was so good she shattered Miss Bacall completely. So they cut the picture in such a way that all her best scenes were left out except one. The result made nonsense and Howard Hawks threatened to sue... After long argument, as I hear it, he went back and did a lot of re-shooting."
It is typical of this most puzzling of films that no one agrees even on why it is so puzzling. Yet that has never affected "The Big Sleep's" enduring popularity, because the movie is about the process of a criminal investigation, not its results.
The chemistry in this movie is spot on. I think that has a big part of why its so popular. Bogart and Becall can keep any audience intrigued.
Their relationship is intriguing to me because you can tell Bogart and Bacall’s characters are falling for each other but you’re not sure it it’s going to actually work out for them.
I couldn’t agree with you more, its so intriguing that you’re hanging off your seat. Its really suspenseful that you can’t wait to find out if it works out.
What’s so intriguing about them is that you’re watching these two characters fall for each other and it so sexy. You can’t look away.
The subtlety of The Big Sleep is that it condensed four ambiguous mysteries from its original novel into a two hours film. As an audience, we were always cliff-hanging to find out the real truth, but every time we got a little closer to it, more suspense appeared. So I think this exhausting way of storying-telling exactly provided a sort of fantastic view experience and that is the reason for it to stay classical in the history of film noir. By the way…. I believed that any movie at that time with the name of Bogart and Bacall would have a favorable guarantee on its box office earnings actually…
When we go to the movies we are engaged in the movie going experience. Hanging on to the edge of our seat as we are drawn into the film with the suspense that comes into it as well. The same applies to the big Sleep. Which is where it succeeds. In terms of the mystery it provides through the duration of the film. How it is handled and the suspense that comes along with it which is quite brilliant. Surely elements such as these in the film draw audiences attention.
The suspense in The Big Sleep is built off of the conflict between characters, particularly between Bogart and Bacall. Conflict in this case isn’t necessarily a battle of good vs. evil, but of the two coming together vs. not coming together. Kind of like in The Cherry Orchard by Chekhov, the plot is meaningless and happens off stage most of the time without us paying attention because, quite simply, we are too preoccupied with watching what is presently on screen. It is a mystery in and of itself because we have hints thrown at us all the time, but to only shortly after have our attention is thrown in the other direction (Bogart and Bacall’s direction). We keep trying to figure it out, but we never will.
With big stars of the time of course this would be a popular movie. But I also agree with you that it’s because of its ambiguity and that audiences want to know find out the truth. We want to know what happens at the end. With this movie, everytime you see it you can get a different meaning or catch something you didn’t see before.
The film is very confusing and you do feel you need to watch it again to fully understand it. Not only that but I think once you start discussing it with other people that have seen it you would get a new perspective and would want to see it again.
“every time you see it you can get a different meaning or catch something you didn’t see before”, is a perfect way to describe the effect the movie has on future viewings. The fact is that there is no answer, and so every time you rewatch it, hoping that you will find a new detail that will help you understand what’s going in, you end up coming to a dead end. But reaching that dead end isn’t as bad as it sounds, because you still manage to pick up on subtleties that weren’t noticeable before, but help add a new dimension to the story.
The refined and sophisticated script language also gives the audiences the desire to rewatch it again. As a detective film without suspenses for second time audiences, this film still contains reasons for them to review it and that is sufficient to prove how great it is.
It’s interesting to consider whether not having a romance would make a noir film fail. David Fincher’s Se7en, Coen brothers’s Fargo, and Refn’s Drive are all arguably film noir without a femme fatale. All the the other standards apply (for instance a cool and cynical protagonist, beside Fargo at least). It is also interesting to consider other film noir that does have a love interest. Take Le Samourai with Alain Delon in role of the cool detective. The love interest is a girl working at a club where Alain assassinated the owner of the club. She was called as a witness to the crime, and spares Alain of being guilty. This all happens in the first 30 minutes. We don’t hear or see her again after this until the very end. The entire second act happens with eyes all on Alain. And in the second act all we do is watch how Alain goes about his life. Yet, the second act is extremely entertaining and interesting to watch, regardless of the little plot that is developed.
In fact, in the novel, there is no obvious romance existed between Marlowe and Vivian but few crippling chemistry. This is allowed for a detective novel in which a tough guy was set as the main character, but not rich enough for a classical Hollywood narrative. Marlowe’s romance with the Femme Fatale Vivian makes this film full of spectacles and ease the sense of depression created by the suspense.
The audience gets attached to the characters and the story because of the combination of duration and suspense. It is so strong with the story telling that when cliff hangers happen, we react and want to know whats going to happen next. Even if its confusing for some or not, having something unsolved makes us interested to figure out what it is and what will happen next.
Bogart’s character portray his as a lady’s man. Even in the Big Sleep him and Macall creates an attraction. Even though, this is a good reason to watch, I believe it’s more about the suspense that drew the audience in. Bogart character is use to being the hero but in the Big Sleep it took a long, strategic path to get there.
The film is popular because it has star power, Bogart and Bacall are very famous actors, also Humphrey Bogart is very humorous and charismatic in the film. Bacall is also mysterious and seductive.
The film is so popular because it finds a way around the rules. Typically in stories that involve mysteries there is an unsaid rule that the mystery must be solved. Also the new rules and regulations on films Hollywood produced sex could not be outright spoken about on screen and other things had regulation placed upon them. Therefore the film broke two rules, one unspoken and the other which was directly given.
There is never a result from the investigation the audience is drawn to the story because until the end they do not know that there will be no result. Ontop of that Geiger as a book store clerk that locks the door and drinks with Marlowe, and later talks with double meaning about horse racing/sex at a restaurant is daring and defiantly draws the audience in.
I would believe that no one agrees that the film was puzzling because they like how the film was made. With the actors being romantic and Bogart breaks his image of being of detective because its something new that people usually don’t see in the film. People enjoy the film so the film stays popular.
The process follows private eye Philip Marlowe (Humphrey Bogart) as he finds his way through the jungle of gamblers, pornographers, killers and blackmailers who have attached themselves to the rich old general (Charles Waldron) and his two randy daughters (Bacall and Vickers). Some bad guys get killed and others get arrested, and we don't much care--because the real result is that Bogart and Lauren Bacall end up in each other's arms. "The Big Sleep" is a lust story with a plot about a lot of other things.
That can be seen more clearly now that an earlier version of the film has surfaced. "The Big Sleep" was finished by Warner Brothers in 1945, but held out of release while the studio rushed to play off its backlog of World War II movies. Meanwhile, ongoing events greatly affected its future. Hawks' "To Have and Have Not" (1944), Bacall's screen debut, was an enormous hit, and the onscreen chemistry between her and Bogart was sizzling ("You know how to whistle, don't you, Steve? You just put your lips together and blow.") Bacall then starred opposite Charles Boyer in "Confidential Agent" (1945) and got withering reviews. And she and Bogart were married (she was 20, he was 44).
This was a famous scene in the movie, when she told him to put his lips together. Here you can see that there is a romance between two of them. She is flirting with him while making it not to easy for him to get her. This clip attracts the viewers attention if Bogart gets her or not.
Bacall's powerful agent, Charles Feldman, who disliked the version he saw, wrote studio head Jack Warner in desperation, asking that scenes be eliminated, added and reshot. Otherwise, he warned, Bacall was likely to get more bad reviews, damaging the career of a promising star who was married to the studio's biggest money-maker.
The final cut of the film is based on Bacall’s reviews, which is significant. On one hand, it is perfectly understandable that a bad review for Bacall is a bad review for the film. On the other hand, though, reshooting the film based on “damaging the career of a promising star who was married to the studio’s biggest money-maker” somewhat questions the integrity of the filmmaking process. This is a good reminder of the values and priorities of the Hollywood star system.
This not to say, though, that these reshoots were not successful in maintaining the integrity of the novel. It is still important, I think, to question and scrutinize the motives behind decisions made about the film’s structure and the moments it chooses to highlight from the original work.
Warner agreed, and Hawks returned to the sound stages with his actors for reshoots. Bacall's book minimizes this process: "Howard ... did need one more scene between Bogie and me." Actually, he needed a lot more than that. The 1945 release, now restored by archivists at UCLA, is accompanied by a detailed documentary showing what was left out and what was brand new when the movie was finally released in 1946.
What Feldman missed, he said, was the "insolence" that Bacall showed in "To Have and Have Not." In the original version of "The Big Sleep," the relationship between Bogart and Bacall is problematical: Marlowe isn't sure whether he trusts this cool, elegant charmer. The 1946 version commits to their romance, and adds among other scenes one of the most daring examples of double entendre in any movie up until that time. The new scene puts Bacall and Bogart in a nightclub, where they are only ostensibly talking about horse racing:
Bacall:"...speaking of horses, I like to play them myself. But I like to see them work out a little first. See if they're front-runners or come from behind... I'd say you don't like to be rated. You like to get out in front, open up a lead, take a little breather in the back stretch, and then come home free...."Bogart:"You've got a touch of class, but I don't know how far you can go." Bacall:"A lot depends on who's in the saddle."
What you sense here is the enjoyable sight of two people who are in love and enjoy toying with one another. The new scenes add a charge to the film that was missing in the 1945 version; this is a case where "studio interference" was exactly the right thing. The only reason to see the earlier version is to go behind the scenes, to learn how the tone and impact of a movie can be altered with just a few scenes. (The accompanying documentary even shows how dialog was redubbed to get a slightly different spin.)
It is so interesting to consider the ways that small details can impact a film. The ways that the “tone and impact can be altered with just a few scenes” is especially crucial when thinking about the adaptation of novel to film. The message or impact of the original work can be altered tremendously with seemingly small changes to the film. The two works are then able to exist outside of one another, while still giving the audience a chance to critically consider the film with the novel in mind.
As for the 1946 version that we have been watching all of these years, it is one of the great film noirs, a black-and-white symphony that exactly reproduces Chandler's ability, on the page, to find a tone of voice that keeps its distance, and yet is wry and humorous and cares. Working from Chandler's original words and adding spins of their own, the writers (William Faulkner, Jules Furthman and Leigh Brackett) wrote one of the most quotable of screenplays: It's unusual to find yourself laughing in a movie not because something is funny but because it's so wickedly clever. (Marlowe on the "nymphy" kid sister: "She tried to sit in my lap while I was standing up.") Unlike modern crime movies which are loaded with action, "The Big Sleep" is heavy with dialogue--the characters talk and talk, just like in the Chandler novels; it's as if there's a competition to see who has the most verbal style.
I believe this happens due to the complexity of the movie genre, and specifically to this as it gets quite confusing at certain parts.
Faulkner knows it and what he did was just carrying them out and applying in the film. And in some cases, linguistic wisdom is even more important than understanding the blur plots. For example,the discussions full of linguistic flirting and metaphor on sex between Marlowe and Vivian on “horse racing” is a classical example showing how impressive and subtle the dialogues are.
Yes. I completely agree. Dialogue when usd properly can evoke emotions, desires and motivations among characters within the film. The same applies to th big sleep. As you mentioned regarding the flirting between Marlowe and Vivian is a brilliant use in the film
I couldn’t agree with you more. Dialogue creates emotions. The audience gets a sense of what the character is looking for based on what is said and how it is said.
Linguistic wisdom in the context of GuanXing’s comment is essentially synonymous to wit. However, there also another point to the wit, and that it is subtle. There are no explicit moments where you can imagine a laugh track being put in. It is all very much in how invested the viewer is in the character. This is why the things they say come off as wise; they fit perfectly to the characters personalities and sense of humor, and because of this it is not phony dialogue, but instead something along the lines of subtle wise wit (not in a philosophical or moral sense).
In screenplays the narrator usually tells what is going on but in the Big Sleep we get to hear the back and forth banter of characters and go into the mind of the detective.
Talk is not minimized in this screen play because maybe Hawks wanted to take the film in a different direction. Hawks could have included witty dialogue to differentiate his film noir from other film noirs. Hawks succeed in this task because the film is noted for it’s witty lines
Perhaps the use of increased dialogue is meant to shift the audiences attention to the physical and visual hints at the detail of the film. Almost as the other senses pick up the slack for lack of one, with minimal dialogue the focus is to pay attention to whatever is said, however when dialogue is increased physical and social cues become less used and must be paid attention to with more importance.
Verbal dialogue between the characters adds another layer of personality the roles that they are trying to portray. Although body language and facial expressions can convey many things, by adding a lot of verbal dialogue, you get a sense of their personality and wit.
It is different in this film because you need dialogue for these characters. How can their relationship development without talk. They have to flirt with each other somehow.
I am interested to see the original version, because I did find that the film remained quite true to Chandler’s novel. It seems that the few changes made in tone and dialogue really made this film a version of the novel that can both stand on its own, and work seamlessly with the original text.
Martha Vickers was indeed electric as the kid sister, and Dorothy Malone all but steals her scene as a book clerk who finds Marlowe intriguing. But the 1945 version makes it clear Bacall was by no means as bad as Feldman feared she was: She is adequate in most scenes, and splendid in others--but the scenes themselves didn't give her the opportunities that the reshoot did. In scenes like the "racing" conversation she has the dry reserve, the private amusement, the way of sizing up a man and enjoying the competition, that became her trademark. It's astonishing to realize she was 20, untrained as an actor, and by her own report scared to death.
It is surprising to learn that Bacall was untrained as an actor and also apparently very scared when shooting this film. She has such a command in her scenes, and I found her to be very confident and controlled.
I found this very interesting too. I felt that Bacall fit into role really well. Her expressions and her demeanor did not show that she was actually untrained as an actor.
Bogart himself made personal style into an art form. What else did he have? He wasn't particularly handsome, he wore a rug, he wasn't tall ("I try to be," he tells Vickers), and he always seemed to act within a certain range. Yet no other movie actor is more likely to be remembered a century from now. And the fascinating subtext in "The Big Sleep" is that in Bacall he found his match.
They both look cynical, stubborn but self-disciplined and extremely insisted on their decisions. Even if they do not have a superior appearance, these qualities of a hardcore gentleman will remain them mysterious and provide a fatal attraction to women.
I couldn’t agree with you more. Both of these characters are so intriguing, you love to look at them. Bogarts character was so mysterious that any women would fall for him.
Bogart as Marlowe is super charismatic character that has a way with his words. You immediately like Marlowe. He’s very witty and funny with lines like how he became a detective from the book ‘how to be a detective in ten easy lessons.’ He can take a joke but knows when to get serious. Guys want to be him and girls want to be with him.
Bogart is a great actor, the timing of his lines, and his body language are all very charismatic. He also develops great chemistry with the lead female and looks very comfortable on screen
Bogart’s appeal is due to his cynicism as well as his ability to reject a women that clearly wants him. Unfortunate but true women tend to be more attracted to men that do not want them, so for women in the audience to see Bogart engaging conversations layered in subtext and still wanting to walk away makes him all the more appealing.
I believe his quick wit and the way he wore his clothes accounts for his appeal.
You can see it in his eyes: Sure, he's in love, but there's something else, too. He was going through a messy breakup with his wife, Mayo, when they shot the picture. He was drinking so heavily he didn't turn up some days, and Hawks had to shoot around him. He saw this coltish 20-year-old not only as his love but perhaps as his salvation. That's the undercurrent. It may not have been fun to live through, but it creates a kind of joyous, desperate tension on the screen. And since the whole idea of film noir was to live through unspeakable experiences and keep your cool, this was the right screenplay for this time in his life.
Howard Hawks (1896-1977) is one of the great American directors of pure movies ("His Girl Friday," "Bringing Up Baby," "Red River," "Rio Bravo"), and a hero of auteur critics because he found his own laconic values in many different kinds of genre material. He once defined a good movie as "three great scenes and no bad scenes." Comparing the two versions of "The Big Sleep" reveals that the reshoots inserted one of the great scenes, and removed some of the bad ones, neatly proving his point.—Roger Ebert
AMC Filmsite, Tim Dirks
The Big Sleep (1946) is one of Raymond Chandler's best hard-boiled detective mysteries transformed into a film noir, private detective film classic. This successful adaptation of Chandler's 1939 novel was from his first Philip Marlowe novel. [Chandler took segments of two of his own, previously-published stories that appeared in Black Mask magazine: "Killer in the Rain," and "The Curtain."] It was directed by the legendary Howard Hawks, scripted by Nobel laureate William Faulkner (with additional assistance from Leigh Brackett and Jules Furthman), and scored by composer Max Steiner.
The Big Sleep is the best example of a classic Warner Bros. mystery. It is a very complex, confusing, logic-defying whodunit with a quintessential private detective (Marlowe), false leads, unforgettable dialogue and wisecracks, raw-edged characters, sexy women (including the two daughters of a dying millionaire, a bookseller, and others), tough action, gunplay, a series of electrifying scenes, and screen violence. Although a classic film noir, it has no flashbacks, no voice-over narration, and little evidence of expressionistic images. The film was not recognized by the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences in any of its award categories.
Although Faulkner was experienced in script writing, Hawks did not take risk making film with flashbacks, but he instructed Faulkner to be ease in the process of making film. Also, he focused on character development and keep the story in right flow. Besides, there could be time or film budget concerns too.
I agree with what you’re saying about the character development. I believe Hawks did not want flashbacks in this film because it would lose its mystery and the overall film couldn’t develop.
Perhaps in this case Hawks was worried the flashbacks would be seen as an answer to the mysteries. Although this would clear up the story line, flashbacks would provide insight into the character’s personality that the audience is to figure out for themselves via the timeline of the film without flashbacks.
I couldn’t agree with you more. Flashbacks are a guide to a character. Flashbacks leave no mystery. They create answers and perhaps that’s why he didn’t use the,
I agree I think the Faulkner was told not to do flashbacks in order to give the characters more time to develop. This relies heavily on mystery so if Faulkner just outright explained each character using flashbacks it would take away from the ambiguous feeling surrounding the characters in the story.
The reason for The big sleep without flashback as well as Today As We are different. In The big sleep, Hawks preferred the story without flashback because he wanted it to be more straight forward like what it is in the novel. It is the easiest way of storytelling but created most suspense.
As far as flashbacks go it depends on the direction and vision originally intended for it’s adaptation. I know initially it was to slowly ease into the film making process. Not using flashabacks would of allowed a more direct form of storytelling . Flashbacks might have deteriorated certain elements of the film such as the mystery it provides to it’s audience.
At time, it was Faulkner’s first film. Hawk wanted him to stay focus and concentrate on the basics. Since he was in experienced in films flashbacks may have complicated things
There are a lot of reasons for no flashbacks like others have mentioned. Character development, time, budget, etc but I think the biggest one for the Big Sleep is it would make the film that much more confusing. Already hard to follow (I had to rewind quite a few times) why would add the flashbacks to this complex mystery story.
This may be to keep the narrative moving forward. Although a successful flashback would not necessarily keep the story from flowing, it takes away from the immediacy of the story. For the action to keep moving forward, the story must remain in the moment. this might help build excitement and keep an audience engaged in the immediate aspects of the film, like fast-paced dialogue that is crucial to the story.
The main protagonists in the convoluted film appear equally as confused about the plot (the who did what to whom, what, when, and why questions) during clue-chasing as audiences on first viewing. [The seven killings are marked below by numbers - one of the seven occurred before the film's action.] What makes things especially perplexing is that important characters involved in the plot never appear alive on screen (e.g. Owen Taylor and Sean Regan), several other characters appear only momentarily or are rapidly dispatched, and important information is deliberately missing.
That we don’t see certain characters alive on screen contributes to the immediacy of the narrative. These characters are arguably more important to the story dead than they are alive. We are not meant to see the events that transpired before Marlowe came into the picture. The story is more about Marlowe solving this mystery, than the mystery itself.
The Production Code of the time wouldn't have condoned the exposition of explicit details of portions of the depraved plot anyway (the references to drug use, Carmen's nymphomania, the pornography racket, and the homosexual relationship between Lundgren and Geiger). Without a voice-over narrative, the audience is allowed to follow the point-of-view experiences of the detective and conclude what they want about his search for solutions to the confused puzzle. What is much more important than the basic blackmail-murder plot is the stylish method and process of the private detective's quest, that the viewer identifies with and shares, as he makes his way through the murky world of nasty crime from one oppressive setting to the next, or from one wicked character, fallen woman, or femme fatale to another, until eventually discovering love with his female protagonist.
Although the film was released in mid-1946, it was actually filmed mostly in the fall of 1944 (about six months before Bacall and Bogart were married). [Pictures of President Franklin D. Roosevelt on walls, in the Acme Book store, and in the detective's office hint that the film was shot mainly in late 1944, and finished in early 1945. By mid-1946 when the film was released, after awaiting the release of other war-themed films, FDR had been dead for a year.]
In 1997, the original 1945 pre-release version of the film was discovered - it was the film originally intended for release by Warner Bros, but shelved (except for a few showings overseas to US troops in August 1945). The dialogue in the recently-restored first version, with a total of eighteen never-before-seen minutes, rendered the incomprehensible, labryinthine plot more clearly by revealing plot points. But the pre-release version did not include two of Lauren Bacall's re-shot scenes found only in the second version - their second bedroom scene at the Sternwoods and the notorious nightclub scene with racy dialogue about horse-racing and saddles.
The commonly-seen version of this big-budgeted film included some of the toughest, most sexually-electric, innuendo-filled dialogue in film history between its two main leads, Bogart and Bacall (an off-screen romantic couple fulfilling their romance on-screen). Their sexy pairing in Hawks' earlier To Have and Have Not (1944) was one of the main reasons why new scenes were shot (e.g., the famous 'horse-race' dialogue) and the film was re-worked - to emphasis the stars' earlier 'chemistry,' romance, and insolent interplay. This follow-up film was the second of five films that brought Bogart and Bacall together:
To Have and Have Not (1944), d.
Howard Hawks
The Big Sleep (1946), d.
Howard Hawks
Two Guys From Milwaukee (1946), d.
David Butler; Bogart and Bacall appear in cameos
Dark Passage (1947), d.
Delmer Daves
Key Largo (1948), d.
John Huston
The atmosphere of the film is dark and paranoic - full of suspicion, dread, and intrigue.
The film's title, The Big Sleep, refers to death.
Blackmailers and murderers commit their ill deeds (gambling, pornography, vice, perversion) while the world continues on its course, almost asleep.
Marlowe's single-handed pursuit and investigation of pervasive corruption and treachery is met with deception, threats of extermination, and violence (although most of the killings are discreetly committed off-screen).
Robert Mitchum reprised the role of Marlowe in the remade UK classic mystery The Big Sleep (1978), with the setting transferred from a 1940s Los Angeles to an updated 1970s London.
The Story
Behind the credits, a silhouetted couple light cigarettes, and then leave them burning in an ashtray.
In the opening sequence, an unidentified hand and finger press in the doorbell buzzer of a mansion doorway.
A hard-boiled, laconic, intelligent, and cynical private detective Philip Marlowe (Humphrey Bogart) arrives at a lavish mansion.
[Bogart played the part of Marlowe only once.]
The Los Angeles gumshoe is there to consult with wealthy, aging and dying, dessicated, wheelchair-bound "General" Sternwood (Charles Waldron), a rich widower:
My name's Marlowe. General Sternwood wanted to see me.
On the way in, he meets one of the General's two alluring and sexy daughters, the younger, troubled, errant, thumb-biting, frequently doped-up nymphomaniacal heiress Carmen (Martha Vickers), wearing a white polka-dot miniskirt. He notices her legs after she descends the stairs. Capriciously, she tells him:
Carmen: You're not very tall, are you?
Marlowe: Well, I, uh, I try to be.
Carmen: Not bad looking.
Oh you probably know it. (while twirling and biting a lock of her hair)
Marlowe: Thank you.
Carmen: What's your name?
Marlowe: Reilly.
Doghouse Reilly.
Carmen: That's a funny kind of name.
Marlowe: You think so.
Carmen: Uh, uh.
What are you?
A prizefighter?
Marlowe: No, I'm a shamus.
Carmen: What's a shamus?
Marlowe: It's a private detective.
Carmen: You're making fun of me.
Marlowe: Uh, uh.
Carmen (she leans back and falls into his arms, throwing herself at him): You're cute.
The Big Sleep is a thrilling novel and the writer wrote about crime and investigating the crime by Shamus which refers private detective in the novel.
I think the use of this word here highlights the one of the unique characteristics of Marlowe and his overall level of knowledge.
A shamus is a private detective. Also spelled Seamus, it was a word used to describe an Irish police detective.
Shamus can be interpreted as a private investigator. Here it can be used in order to identity and provide better insight into characters in the film such as Marlowe and investigations occurring in the film.
Shamus is much less common word for private detective. The word itself is a mystery to most people so for Marlowe to use it shows just how smart he is.
The word Shamus, which sounds similar to the Irish name Seamus, is a slang term for detective. Traditionally Irish Americans served in the police force
Marlowe tells the butler, Norris (Charles Brown): "You ought to wean her, she's old enough." In the humid, hot greenhouse filled with orchids, Sternwood is introduced to Marlowe. [Carmen could accurately be described as a 'hothouse orchid' herself.] He permits Marlowe to drink and smoke:
Sternwood: How do you like your brandy, sir? Marlowe: In a glass. Sternwood: I used to like mine with champagne. Champagne cold as Valley Forge and with about three ponies of brandy under it...I like to see people drink...You may take off your coat, sir...Too hot in here for any man who has any blood in his veins. You may smoke, too. I can still enjoy the smell of it. Nice state of affairs when a man has to indulge his vices by proxy.
The emaciated Sternwood describes the dreariness of his existence. The humid hothouse is necessary for his survival and he is waiting for death - the "big sleep" of the title - in the temperature-controlled greenhouse:
Sternwood: You are looking, sir, at a very dull survival of a very gaudy life - crippled, paralyzed in both legs, very little I can eat, and my sleep is so near waking that it's hardly worth the name. I seem to exist largely on heat, like a newborn spider. The orchids are an excuse for the heat. Do you like orchids? Marlowe: Not particularly. Sternwood: Nasty things! Their flesh is too much like the flesh of men, and their perfume has the rotten sweetness of corruption.
Marlowe, who used to work for the district attorney's office "was fired for insubordination - I seem to rate pretty high on that," knows about Sternwood's two daughters: "Both pretty, and both pretty wild." The detective is told that Sternwood is being blackmailed again by gambler and petty blackmailer Joe Brody (Louis Jean Heydt), who was earlier paid $5,000 "to let my younger daughter alone." Sternwood questions his reaction to his words:
Marlowe: Hmm. Sternwood: What does that mean? Marlowe: It means - hmm.
Marlowe is called in to break up the troublesome blackmail ring that threatens to apply further pressure, ostensibly forcing Sternwood to pay legally-uncollectible gambling debts. A secondary aim is to have Marlowe find his missing friend and confidant, Sean Regan, who suddenly disappeared a month earlier under mysterious circumstances. [In Chandler's novel, Sean Regan was son-in-law "Rusty" Regan, who was married to Sternwood's oldest daughter Vivian.] Regan was Sternwood's bodyguard and close companion, an Irish Republican Army adventurer who acted as the General's surrogate son-substitute. Sean Regan had handled the first case of blackmail, but now that he is missing "without a word," Marlowe must be employed [as a substitute for Regan - one surrogate son hired to ascertain the whereabouts of another]:
Sternwood: You knew him too? Marlowe: Yes, in the old days, when he used to run rum out of Mexico and I was on the other side. We used to swap shots between drinks, or drinks between shots, whichever you like. Sternwood: My respects to you, sir. Few men ever swapped more than one shot with Sean Regan. He commanded a brigade in the Irish-Republican Army - you knew that. Marlowe: No I didn't...I know he was a good man at whatever he did. No one was more pleased than I when I heard you had taken him on as your...whatever he was. Sternwood: My friend, my son almost.
Marlowe is asked to investigate Carmen's ostensible blackmailer - a suspicious porno "rare book" dealer Arthur Gwynn Geiger (Theodore von Eltz) on North Sunset, who is blackmailing Sternwood over "gambling debts" incurred by his youngest daughter. There are numerous $1,000 IOU's signed by Carmen, one being dated September 11th, 1945. [The exact nature of the blackmail is not clear, though it may be that Geiger has illicit, nude, incriminating or obscene photographs of Carmen and threatens to circulate them. Or perhaps the IOU's are for gambling debts or drugs. Whatever is going on, Carmen cannot pay the blackmail and signs IOU's that Geiger tries to cash with General Sternwood.] Sternwood doesn't intend to discuss these things with Carmen: "If I did, she'd just suck her thumb and look coy." Marlowe describes how Carmen had met him in a similar fashion:
I met her in the hall and she did that to me. Then she tried to sit in my lap while I was standing up.
The General compares the morality of his two daughters. The older daughter, Vivian, is fiesty and strong. The spoiled, sexually-perverse, younger daughter is named Carmen:
They're alike only in having the same corrupt blood. Vivian is spoilt, exacting, smart and ruthless. Carmen is still a little child who likes to pull the wings off flies. I assume they have all the usual vices, besides those they've invented for themselves. If I seem a bit sinister as a parent, Mr. Marlowe, it's because my hold on life is too slight to include any Victorian hypocrisy. I need hardly add that any man who has lived as I have and who indulges for the first time in parenthood at my age deserves all he gets.
Public buildings and factories in cities of the Victorian era contributed to images full of dark, gloomy and sin in people’s minds. Although the industrial revolution laid the modern social corner of towering as well as the rise of the bourgeoisie to enjoy more and more abundant goods, instead people’s spiritual world is volatile unrest. To some extent, Hollywood production code has its similar characteristics with the “mask” of Victoria era and the existence of black film is to take off this mask made of pretenses and expose the real faces of “city”.
The production code and film noir are often at odds with one another. The code seeks to censor subversive thoughts and behaviors, while film noir often seeks to expose them. The dynamic between the two creates a sort of sneaky way that film noir inserts subversive ideas into films in order to make it past the production code. Similarly, Victorian morality involved strict social codes and restrictions that had to be subverted in indirect and creative ways.
The well-paying job offer is specifically to end Geiger's blackmail permanently and just get rid of him: "I guess you want me to take this Geiger off your back." Marlowe thanks the General for the drink and promises to be back in touch:
Marlowe: Thanks for the drink, General. Sternwood: I enjoyed your drink as much as you did, sir.
On his way out, he tells the butler Norris that his normal fees are $25 dollars a day plus expenses. Marlowe is not pleased that Norris has informed Vivian Sternwood Rutledge (Lauren Bacall), the General's other daughter, about his identity:
Norris: Are you attempting to tell me my duties, sir? Marlowe: No, just having fun trying to guess what they are.
Before he leaves, Marlowe (now sweating profusely with a soaked shirt) is introduced to the ice-cool, elder daughter Vivian who was once married and then divorced to an anonymous man named Rutledge - never seen in the film [In the Chandler novel, Vivian had been married and divorced three times]. There are memorable lines of clever dialogue in his provocative, yet inauspicious, competitive and bickering first encounter with her in her bedroom as she seductively cross-examines him and probes into the reason why he is being hired as a "private detective" by her father:
Because even though he kills people and doesn’t do his job as instructed, he still has to be the good guy and the film has to develop around him,
Also, Marlow is like the hero in the film as he depicts characteristics of one lacking mostly the Chivalry aspects
The film develops around Marlowe because it is often hard to understand why someone that kills people can be sweet. It makes his character feel hypocritical or maybe even insane like the Joker. Therefore to avoid having Marlowe feel contradicting and develop the mystery further the film develops around Marlowe and explains through his actions how he can be sweet but also murderous.
To show that he is still a gentlemen even though he works as a private detective.
Perhaps to show more of the humane side to him despite his field of work. Providing a likability for him and the audience to engage in his journeys.
Making Marlow likable makes the audience want to follow the story.Having a character like Marlow interested. It makes the audience care enough to keep watching.
As a stubborn, rational and cynical detective, it is difficult for him to get the favorite of most audiences, especially the group of female. But the situation will be completely different, if our hero is a stubborn, rational, cynical, but gentle and sweet. And this may also be the reason for the filmmaker to create romance for.
No better way to make someone seem inferior or less powerful – even if only for a moment – than to show them sweating. Sweating symbolizes nervousness, anxiety, uncertainty, and inferiority. Not saying that that is how Marlow is perceive in that scene, but I am saying that it helped Vivian look the cooler and calmer of the two in that moment.
Vivian (taunting): So you're a private detective.
I didn't know they existed, except in books.
Or else they were greasy little men snooping around hotel corridors.
My, you're a mess, aren't you?
Marlowe: I'm not very tall either.
Next time, I'll come on stilts, wear a white tie and carry a tennis racket.
Vivian: I doubt if even that would help.
Now this business of Dad's.
You think you can handle it for him?
Marlowe: It shouldn't be too tough.
Vivian: Really?
I would have thought a case like that took a little effort.
Marlowe: Not too much.
Vivian: What will your first step be?
Marlowe: The usual one.
Vivian: I didn't know there was a usual one.
Marlowe: (with a lisp) Oh sure there is.
It comes complete with diagrams on page forty-seven of 'How to Be a Detective in Ten Easy Lessons' correspondence school textbook.
And, uh, your father offered me a drink.
Vivian: You must have read another one on how to be a comedian.
Marlowe: Did you hear what I said about the drink?
Vivian: I'm quite serious, Mr. Marlowe, my father...
Marlowe: I said your father...
Vivian: (She doesn't get him a drink.)
Help yourself!
Now look, Mr. Marlowe.
My father's not well, and I want this case handled with the least possible worry to him.
Marlowe: That's just the way I was going to handle it.
Vivian: I see.
No professional secrets?
Marlowe: Nope.
Vivian: I thought you wanted a drink.
Marlowe: I've changed my mind.
Vivian: Then what - ?
(She turns away and walks toward the window to open it.)
How did you like Dad?
Marlowe: I liked him.
Vivian: He liked Sean, Sean Regan.
I suppose you know who he is.
Marlowe: Uh, huh.
Vivian: You don't have to play poker with me, Mr. Marlowe.
Dad wants to find him, doesn't he?
Marlowe: Do you?
Vivian: Of course I do.
It wasn't right for him to go off like that.
He broke Dad's heart, although he won't say much about it.
Or did he?
This line shows Marlow as an upfront character that is not afraid t to intimidate his bosses daughter, but also that he has a sense of humor
Right before his line, vivian basically insults him by saying he doesn’t look like much of a detective. So his come back line shows that he is sarcastic and can make fun of himself.
It shows that he is very sarcastic and quick witted
These lines provide better insight into Marlows character and overall mindset. Showing his sense of humor that he portrays within the film
What Bogard might be getting at is that he’s not one of those typical white collar guys, he’s outside of this culture, and in a sense also outside of society. Moreover, this is clearly sarcasm, and his sarcasm is hinting at that he isn’t the type to get fazed by people’s comments or disrespect.
These lines show how quick and witty Marlowe is. There’s never an awkward moment for Marlowe. He seems to have a comeback for everything and doesn’t mind making fun of himself.
She is spoiled, aloof, smart, and playful, and very protective of her younger sister and aging father. [Vivian visually dominates the film's frames in these early scenes.] Mutually attracted to each other, they trade loaded lines with each other. She is suspicious of him and wants to know what her father has asked him to do - she is fearful that he has been hired to find Regan, who has disappeared:
Marlowe: Why don't you ask him? Vivian: You know, I don't see what there is to be cagey about, Mr. Marlowe. And I don't like your manners. Marlowe: I'm not crazy about yours. I didn't ask to see you. I don't mind if you don't like my manners. I don't like them myself. They're pretty bad. I grieve over them long winter evenings. And I don't mind your ritzing me, or drinking your lunch out of a bottle, but don't waste your time trying to cross-examine me. Vivian: People don't talk to me like that. Marlowe: Ohhh. Vivian: Do you always think you can handle people like, uh, trained seals? Marlowe: Uh, huh. I usually get away with it, too. Vivian: How nice for you. Marlowe: Just what is it you're afraid of? Vivian: Dad didn't want you about Sean at all, did he? Marlowe: Didn't he? Vivian: Would you find him if Dad wanted you to? Marlowe: Maybe. When did he go?
He learns that a month earlier, Regan just drove off one afternoon without saying a word and has disappeared. Authorities found his car parked in a private garage. Marlowe is amused but perplexed to learn that she assumes he has been hired to find Regan rather than end Geiger's blackmailing threats. He admits that although he knows about Regan, he hasn't been hired to find him:
I'm wasting your time. Goodbye, Mrs. Rutledge.
Marlowe begins his investigation in the Hollywood Public Library, researching titles of collector's edition books. The blonde, bespectacled librarian (Carole Douglas) slyly and appreciatively observes that he doesn't look like the typical collector:
Librarian: You know, you don't look like a man who'd be interested in first editions. Marlowe: (retorting) I collect blondes and bottles too.
He searches for Geiger - the blackmailer, by going to A. G. Geiger's rare books and deluxe editions Hollywood bookstore. Playfully disguised as an effeminate bookworm (or homosexual) with sunglasses and an upturned hat, he talks to Geiger's salesclerk, Agnes Lozelle (Sonia Darrin). Asking for a rare third edition of Ben Hur - a book that doesn't really exist - he realizes she knows little about rare books:
Yeah exactly. Through his private investigation work he develops certain styles that provide a strong identity to his character . His knowledge provides him advantages in order to overcome certain obstacles and situations. All of which though his own understanding .
Yes his book knowledge allows him to take advantage of certain situations just as in this scene. His book knowledge also allows him to be quick witted and helps him to read people
Marlowe’s book knowledge gives him an understanding of the world and how things work. This knowledge keeps him a step in front of the next person which helps him in many situations throughout this story. He seems to already know what to do before anything happens.
It shows that he has a wide range of knowledge on various fields and subjects. Especially with rare books, it means the knowledge in those books are not common to everyone. It means only an exclusive handful of people know what secrets may lie in those books.
Marlowe: Would you happen to have a Ben-Hur, 1860? Agnes: A what? Marlowe: I said, 'Would you happen to have a Ben-Hur, 1860'? Agnes: Oh, a first edition? Marlowe: No, no, no, no, no. The third. The third. The one with the erratum on page one-sixteen. Agnes: I'm afraid not. Marlowe: Uh, how about a Chevalier Audubon 1840 - a full set, of course? Agnes: Not at the moment. Marlowe: You do sell books? Hmm? Agnes: What do those look like, grapefruit? Marlowe: Well, from here, they look like books. Maybe I'd better see Mr. Geiger?
And when a respectable looking businessman, a client, is buzzed into the back room, this confirms Marlowe's feelings about Geiger's disreputable business (a front for a blackmail racket or for a high-class lending library of pornographic, dirty books for subscribers only). Across the street from the bookstore, Marlowe waits for Geiger to materialize, viewing the store from the front window of the Acme Book Store with a spectacled, antiquarian bookseller clerk (Dorothy Malone) who is quickly charmed:
Clerk: Is there something I can do for you?
Marlowe: Would you do me a very small favor?
Clerk: I don't know.
It depends on the favor.
Marlowe: Do you know Geiger's bookstore across the street?
Clerk: I think I may have passed it.
Marlowe: Do you know Geiger by sight?
Clerk: Well, I ...
Marlowe: What does he look like?
Clerk: Wouldn't it be easy enough to go across the street and ask to see him?
Marlowe: I've already done that...Do you know anything about rare books?
Clerk: You could try me.
Marlowe: Would you happen to have a Ben-Hur 1860, Third Edition with a duplicated line on page one-sixteen?
Or a Chevalier Audubon 1840?
(She searches her listings and bibliographies)
Clerk: Nobody would.
There isn't one.
Marlowe: The girl in Geiger's bookstore didn't know that.
Clerk: Oh, I see.
You begin to interest me - vaguely.
Marlowe: I'm a private dick on a case.
Perhaps I'm asking too much, although it doesn't seem too much to me somehow.
Clerk: Well, Geiger's in his early forties, medium height, fattish, soft all over, Charlie Chan mustache, well-dressed, wears a black hat, affects a knowledge of antiques and hasn't any, and, oh yes, I think his left eye is glass.
[While describing Geiger, the Clerk openly ogles Marlowe as if to compare his body (favorably) with Geiger's.]
Marlowe: You'd make a good cop.
As a heavy rain begins to fall, he proposes that they have a drink of rye (from a bottle in his pocket) while he waits for Geiger to come out - with a suggestive line: "I'd rather get wet in here." The independent bookseller pulls the shade and closes an hour early, removes her eyeglasses and lets her hair down coyly: "It looks like we're closed for the rest of the afternoon." She also offers two cups for their drinking. Marlowe can't believe the quick transformation, and greets her with an exaggerated "Hello," before they enjoy an afternoon dalliance together - suggested by the film's fadeout. Later, (after the rain has stopped), as Marlowe leaves the bookstore, he non-chalantly says goodbye to the character who has given him an observant, professional description of Geiger:
Marlowe: Well, thanks. Clerk: If you ever want to buy a book...? Marlowe: Ben-Hur, 1860? Clerk: With duplications? So long. Marlowe: So long, pal.
Humphrey Bogart's Philip Marlowe is tough without a gun and lethal with a wisecrack in this irresistible rerelease
The Big Sleep
Humphrey Bogart and Lauren Bacall in The Big Sleep (1946).
Raymond Chandler reckoned Bogart's Philip Marlowe the best interpretation of his wisecracking detective.
Philip French
Saturday 1 January 2011 19.05 EST Last modified on Friday 29 November 2013 09.14 ES
First released in 1946 and now being revived for selected screenings around the country and an extended run at the National Film Theatre, The Big Sleep is a film of infinite interest.
In its famously knowing trailer, Humphrey Bogart walks into the Hollywood Public Library and asks for "a good mystery like The Maltese Falcon".
A librarian gives him a copy of what is misleadingly described as "Raymond Chandler's latest", adding: "What a picture that'll make!"
Well, it did, and the result can be approached from a number of distinct and complementary directions.
First, it's a Warner Brothers production, made at the height of Hollywood's big studio era and announced by Warner's logo, which looks like a federal badge of social responsibility. Jack L Warner, who'd headed the studio since the early 1920s, determined what films were made, how and by whom, their cost and which contract performers appeared in them; their smart, stocky, wisecracking heroes looked a lot like Warner himself.
Second, The Big Sleep is a tough, sophisticated crime picture built around Bogart as LA private eye Philip Marlowe. All but two of his best films were made at Warners. After some years as a secondary figure on different sides of the law, he'd become a true star in The Maltese Falcon (1941) and an enduringly major one in Casablanca (1943). To Have and Have Not teamed him with his future wife, the newcomer Lauren Bacall, 25 years his junior, in a second world war drama that set out to imitate Casablanca. When in late 1944 early screenings for American forces found its successor, The Big Sleep, too dark, the opening of the film was delayed as lighter, sexier sequences were shot.
Just a combination of certain personal characteristics tend to be intriguing as they normally aren’t seen together in personalities. One that comes to mind is actually a recent crime noir film called The Nice Guys in which the main character is as you described a sort of weak and stupid lead role who continuously succeeds in his tasks.
His own personality and traits led to his dedication to get close to what he really wants. People know if they could not quit one thing at the right exit, then it will be more difficult to stay out of it. However, it seems not suitable for Marlowe and after this stupid protagonists refused the advice of others, trying to step closer to the truth, this series of events is doomed to be tough and sophisticated.
Tough and sophistication bring an air of mysteriousness for a role such as a private detective. Someone that is a difficult to figure out is more interesting. It makes them captivating and alluring; you can’t help but want to get to know more about them.
Together, Bogart and Bacall became iconic figures, sharing cigarettes and exchanging wisecracks on and off screen. An excellent, handsomely illustrated study of Bogart has just been published in paperback, Bogie (Palazzo £14.99), with essays by Stephen Bogart, Richard Schickel, George Perry and Alistair Cooke.
Third, The Big Sleep is being shown at the NFT in a two-part season of films directed by Howard Hawks (1896-1977), a spiky figure who could turn his talent to every genre while imposing himself stylistically and thematically on whatever he made. Camera movements were functional; his rapid dialogue challenged industry practice; a casually understated professional respect existed between his heroes; his confident heroines demanded and were accorded equality.
The Cahiers du cinéma critic- film-makers proclaimed him an auteur. But he was a hard-headed film-maker and, deep in debt as a result of his grand lifestyle and gambling, he had to make concessions in production costs on The Big Sleep. He engaged major writing talents such as his old friend William Faulkner and his personal discovery, Leigh Brackett, a Hawksian woman with a great ear for dialogue who went on to write Rio Bravo and The Empire Strikes Back.
Fourth, The Big Sleep is based on Chandler's first novel. Educated, like PG Wodehouse, at Dulwich College in London, he'd settled in Los Angeles before Cecil B DeMille arrived there to shoot The Squaw Man in 1914, and he became a defining chronicler of the city. He coined the term "the big sleep" to describe death: two years later it was quoted as the last words of a notorious gangster.
A dozen actors have impersonated Marlowe on film, radio and TV, and Chandler, whose ideal exponent would have been Cary Grant, thought Bogart the best. In a 1946 letter to his British publisher, he said: "Bogart is so much better than any other tough-guy actor. As we say here, Bogart can be tough without a gun. Also he has a sense of humour that contains that grating undertone of contempt."
Finally, The Big Sleep is invariably described as a film noir, a term coined by French critic Nino Frank in 1945 when a flood of dark Hollywood thrillers made during the war eventually arrived on Parisian screens after the four years of German occupation. Nearly 40 years passed before the term became current in the English-speaking world. The time of day in The Big Sleep is appropriately night, with rain and fog the dominant climatic conditions. But the influence of German expressionism is absent, there's no hard-boiled narration, no angst-ridden hero, no distorted camera angles, no nightmares, no ominous shadows, no flashbacks. Bogart and Bacall's exchanges are wittily playful, and the only femme fatale is a minor though crucial figure who destroys that perennial noir fall-guy, Elisha Cook Jr. But it's unmissable, irresistible.
Although it has no voice-over narration, no flashbacks, there was little Proof of expressionistic images. Besides, the film was not recognized by the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences in award categories.
I don’t believe The Big SLeep is a film noir. It lacks more than just the narration and flashbacks. Yes, there is crime and a femme fatale but that’s it.
Differ from The Double indemnity the other work scripted by Chandler , the story-telling mode of The big sleep are more straight forward just like what it is in the novel and does not contain any voice over narration and flashback. However, it does not deny its success as a classical film noir, after all, I don’t think film noir is all about its way of telling a story instead of the nature of the story itself: the sin, rot and dark atmosphere in the cities. The big sleep is no doubt an excellent film noir which meets some most significant elements to be a film noir like: series of crimes, a femme fatal character as Vivian and darkness side of people.
I honestly believe the Big Sleep is a film noir. Although it lacks certain elements such as voice over and use of flashbacks .Providing a more direct approach to its form of storytelling. But still personifies elements such as femme fatale
Yeah the voice over and use of flashbacks aren’t there but there are other elements that come together to make The Big Sleep essentially a film noir. Femme fatale as you pointed out is one. Another is a complicated and far fetched plot. A couple of others are an urban setting, a cynical detective, poetic dialogue, and my favorite, lots of drinking and smoking. Roger Ebert once very comedically wrote that "everybody in film noir is always smoking, as if to say, “On top of everything else, I’ve been assigned to get through three packs today.” The best smoking movie of all time is “Out of the Past,” in which Robert Mitchum and Kirk Douglas smoke furiously at each other. At one point, Mitchum enters a room, Douglas extends a pack and says, “Cigarette?” and Mitchum, holding up his hand, says, “Smoking.”"
Yes the Big Sleep is a film noir. Its a detective film shot in Black in White a lot of filtered lights, its ambiguous and has a femme fatale.
Logging in, please wait...
0 archived comments