The first amendment of the constitution states that: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances". What follows are some questions designed to kick-start our discussion of American Government. Pick one for your comments or better yet come up with your own approach. What does the first ammendment guarantee? There are multiple parts to this amendment; is one part more important that the others? if so why? Can you cite specific examples of theses right in real life?
Logging in, please wait...
Commenting period (January 30, 2017 18:40 – February 14, 2017 00:00) is closed
0 General Document comments
0 Sentence and Paragraph comments
0 Image and Video comments
In my opinion the first amendment assures freedom, privacy, and liberty. One reason that I feel like this is because it allows an individual to express themselves through publication and dissemination. Along with it allowing expression of the nation it also acknowledges the constitutional protection of freedom of expression. In my opinion there numerous parts to the first amendment. One example to support my answer is by considering how society may have different approaches in what way they interpret the meaning of freedom of religion and freedom of press. Which reflect two different aspects of the first amendment.
In my opinion every different aspect of the first amendment all hold the same significates. Which is freedom, solitude and choice. One specific case to support this theory is Texas v. Johnson in 1989, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that flag burning was a form of speech protected by the First Amendment, arguing that “if there is a bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment, it is that the Government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable.” In response, Congress passed the Flag Protection Act of 1989. The following year, in United States v. Eichman, justices again ruled 5-4 that the act was unconstitutional.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
New Conversation
It gives us what it feels are Rights with restrictions. It’s like telling you to do what you want but how and when i want you to and for as long as i say that it’s ok. If at anytime i decide to take away your right to do what you want and you do not comply there shall be consequences to which i or a group of my peers shall deem appropriate. And that’s how courts were developed and JAIL!
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
They state that they shall not make any laws that have to do with our freedom of religion, speech or press but make every way around that to break the agreement in a "lawful " way .. I’m not sure if I’m explaining correctly.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
Yes you are. Our laws which are supposed to be based off of the bible are now being twisted by man. Men can now delegate our freedoms and as long as their peers agree with how they enforce these “laws” it is correct.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
Freedom of speech? When our nation was founded I do not believe that our forefathers were expecting their first ammendment to be drastically taken out of context as it has been in society. Many people take the definition of freedom of speech and use it to promote hate. There is a bill in congress right now called the First Amendment Defense Act, which will make it so the government cannot punish businesses for discrimination of LGBTQ communities, races, and religions. I believe everyone has the right to their own opinion and of course the freedom of speech but when does it go too far? Are we taking advantage of this amendment and using it to harm and hate?
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
New Conversation
The first Amendment addresses several issues; freedom to exercise religion, freedom of speech, of the press, and to peacefully protest or assemble. It seems most people here are focusing on free speech, which is one of the cornerstones of our Republic, but, I want to discuss the first part of the amendment which reads “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof”. Interpreting the words establishment of religion has been a controversial debate in this country, especially since The 1963 Supreme Court ruling Engel Vs. Vitale, which ruled prayer in public school as unconstitutional because it violated the "Separation of Church and state. The Problem with this argument is that the words Separation between church and state do not appear in the Constitution. Yes Thomas Jefferson did use the term ,but he was not even at the constitutional convention in 1787 he was serving as the U.S. Ambassador to France at the time. What needs to be understood about the American colonials is that many of them came to America fleeing religious persecution. In the UK The Church of England was established by King Henry VIII as the official state church. All British Citizens were required to be members of that church which meant Christians of other denominations Such as Puritans and Quakers were beginning to be persecuted. Which is why many of the 13 colonies were founded for religious freedom. Massachusetts was founded in 1620 by Puritans but ended up establishing a state church as well and Puritan minister Roger Williams was expelled from the colony for calling out this injustice. Williams went on to establish Rhode Island and declared a policy of religious freedom for all Christian Denominations. Quaker William Penn did the same thing when he founded Pennsylvania calling it a “holy experiment”. Virginia also had a state church, the Episcopalian Church. In these colonies with state churches Persecution for religious minorities continued, this is what motivated James Madison to include no established religion in the first amendment. Does this mean that recognition of God has no place in Government or that were not a nation founded on the Judeo-Christian faith. Well there are four references to God in our Founding Document, The Deceleration of Independence “The Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God”, “We hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by there Creator with certain unalienable rights”, “We appeal to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intensions”, and finally "With a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor. John Adams Once said “Our Constitution is only for a moral and religious people, it is wholly inadequate to the government of any other”. What, perhaps, reflects the idea of religious freedom in this Nation more that any other is this quote from Patrick Henry “It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that this great nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religions, but on the gospel of Jesus Christ. For this very reason peoples of other faiths have been afforded asylum, prosperity, and freedom of worship here.” So in conclusion we are a nation founded on Christian values, not some kind of medieval theocracy, but rather an enlightened, rational,and civilized nation. A Republic.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
yeah the bill of rights are supposed to give us are rights but the don’t they play like they do and i don’t think that right.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
New Conversation
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
our right , if some are offended don’t precipitate but the ones that want to should have that right.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
america is supposed to be the land of the free and the home of the brave. so there for we should have the right to think and feel exactly how we want to. we are a country of freedom and individuaulism. if we all had to have the same morals and beliefs this would be a boring and even more unhappy place. just like people have the right to burn the american flag not saying that its right but its allowed. its theyer perogative and right as an american and they can do what they want to do
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
Hello all! This is Shawn, a student at Eastern Gateway Commun… (more)
Hello all! This is Shawn, a student at Eastern Gateway Commun… (more)
As a writer, these three words will run my entire second half of my future career, which is being an author. Along with these three words comes also the exceptions to the law. Before anyone can become a published writer, they should learn about their rights about what they are allowed and what they are not allowed to write. Not saying which in a piece of my writing, but I broke one of those rules. I believe every writer does at some point without realizing it. Of course, I fixed my writing to make it acceptable to this right. What people are failing to understand that this right has its restrictions, and they clearly do not know where the line needs to be drawn. The world would definitely be a better place if people knew where the line was for freedom of speech.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
according to Cornell.edu Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.Basically granting Americans the “freedom of expression”. The Amendments are our supposed blueprint for personal freedom, a so-called hallmark of an open society. but if this country is free. Why is it that most that in the fight to get here are so love-struck with the idea that America is the land of freedom and most wonderful things. Yes America is free. Yet everyone is told how to spend money with no real choices. Yes you can say what you want. But only at a given time and only to a specific audience. I wonder if there is fine print on the original document… yes those hopeful reaching souls they try so hard to get here. Unfortunately So quickly they realize that like most things that glitter…. It definitely isn;t gold.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
General Document Comments 0
According to this 1st amendment, we should have the right to all of these things but when you do you are criticized and violently discouraged from doing so. It seems to be wrong to go against the majority. There have been peaceful protests that have erupted with people getting killed and hurt because they disagreed with an unjust or unlawful act. Why is it wrong nowadays to DISAGREE?
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
New Conversation
Hide Thread Detail
New Conversation
New Conversation
New Conversation
For me the first amendment gives me the right to practice whatever religion I want without the government trying to force any one religion on its people. We all have the right to exclaim our opinions or freedom of speech, although just because we may differ in opinions doesn’t mean we should be immature and let things escalate to violence. The first amendment also gives me the right to hold a gathering in opposition to anything the government may do. This only applies if my gathering is peaceful. As soon as it turn violent the local or federal law enforcement can end it. These may be our most important rights because this allows the people’s voices to be heard. Many places in the world oppress the people so much that they have no voice. We need to be thankful for the amazing country we call our home and not be selfish.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment